Advertisement

Posts Tagged ‘utah

The Utah anti-immigrant law passed in March that some praised for presenting a more middle of the road approach is facing it’s first legal challenge. Yesterday, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Utah, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) and the law firm of Munger, Tolles & Olsen filed a class action lawsuit charging that HB 497 authorizes police to demand “papers” demonstrating citizenship or immigration status during traffic stops, invites racial profiling of Latinos and others who appear “foreign” to an officer and interferes with federal law.

The lawsuit charges that the Utah law is unconstitutional in that it unlawfully interferes with federal power and authority over immigration matters in violation of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution; authorizes and requires unreasonable seizures and arrests in violation of the Fourth Amendment; restricts the constitutional right to travel freely throughout the United States; violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution by unlawfully discriminating against certain lawful immigrants as well as people in Utah without approved identify documents; and violates the Utah state constitutional guarantee of uniform operation of the laws.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah on behalf of civil rights, labor, social justice and business organizations, including Utah Coalition of La Raza, Service Employees International Union, Latin American Chamber of Commerce, Workers’ United Rocky Mountain Joint Board, Centro Civico Mexicano, Coalition of Utah Progressives, individually named plaintiffs who would be subject to harassment or arrest under the law and a class of similarly situated people.

“This law has been wildly misrepresented as a kinder, gentler version of Arizona’s discriminating law,” said Karen McCreary, Executive Director of the ACLU of Utah. “But the truth is, this ill-conceived law is just as harsh, turning Utah into a police state where everyone is required to carry their ‘papers’ to prove they are lawfully present.”

Read more…

Post to Twitter

The “anonymous” group behind the list of over 1,000 suspected undocumented immigrants released in Utah last week isn’t so anonymous anymore.
At least two Utah state employees have been identified as being behind “the list” that included the names, addresses, birth dates, due dates, social security numbers, and places of employment of 1,300 “suspected” undocumented immigrants including about 200 children.

The workers, whose ironically have not have their names released, were employed by the Department of Workforce Services. There also may be 3 to 10 other state employees involved.

Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said that in addition to the state charges the two would be facing, there is the possibility of Federal felony level charges as well.

Gov. Gary Herbert also said that the state of Utah would not investigate any of the names of the people on “the list” but did not dismiss the possibility that the Federal government could and at publication date I.C.E. has not said that they will not use the list.

For those who say that anti-immigrant sentiment isn’t racialized as “brown”, the majority of the names on “the list”, some belonging to people who have since come forward and are not undocumented, are Latino.

Via / The Salt Lake Tribune

Post to Twitter

I just…can’t even think of anything to say. My mouth is on the floor and I can’t pick it up.

Via Gawker

An anonymous group in Utah calling itself “Concerned Citizens of the United States” has compiled a list of 1,300 alleged illegal immigrants—including their birth dates, workplaces, and social security numbers. “Begin deportation now,” the accompanying letter instructs.

On Tuesday, government agencies like Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, along with Utah news media like the Mormon mouthpiece Deseret News, received a list of 1,300 names, mostly Hispanic in origin, and identifying information: Not just birthdays and phone numbers, but social security numbers, names of children, and, in a particularly sinister touch, due dates for some pregnant women on the list.

“Our group observes these people in our neighborhoods, driving on our streets, working in our stores, attending our schools and entering our public welfare buildings,” the letter reads. “We then spend the time and effort needed to gather information along with legal Mexican nationals who infiltrate their social networks and help us obtain the necessary information we need.”

“We plan to provide your office with new lists on a continual basis and request—no insist—that your agency take immediate and forceful action to the individuals on this list and begin deportation now.”

The private information contained on the list indicates that one of its compilers could be a government employee, with access to Utah Department of Health or other state databases that would have information like due dates. Governor Gary Herbert has said the state is doing an internal investigation.

They even included *due dates* of pregnant women. Due dates.

I feel safe, how about you?

Post to Twitter

Miscarriage: The New Crime

4:02 pm By la Macha · Health|Women · 2 Comments

24 Feb 2010

Utah is working to implement a cleaver new law that will make it a criminal offense for women to miscarry a pregnancy.

The bill responds to a case in which a Vernal woman allegedly paid a man $150 to beat her and cause miscarriage but could not be charged. The Senate on Thursday approved HB12 on a vote of 24-4, criminalizing a woman’s “intentional, knowing, or reckless act” leading to a pregnancy’s illegal termination. It specifies that a woman cannot be prosecuted for arranging a legal abortion.

The measure now goes to Gov. Gary Herbert for final action.

Some Senate Democrats attempted a last-minute amendment to remove the word “reckless” from the list of criminal acts leading to miscarriage. They argued that criminalizing reckless acts leaves open the possibility of prosecutions against domestic violence victims who return to their abusers only to be beaten and lose the child.

“It’s part of the cycle of domestic violence,” said Sen. Luz Robles, D-Salt Lake City.

“I hope none of you ever have to face that situation,” she said after realizing the majority would pass the bill as is, “or have a daughter facing that situation, or a granddaughter.”

But the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Margaret Dayton, R-Orem, said the bill doesn’t target victims at all — only those who arrange to terminate their pregnancies illegally.

Now, let’s be clear here, of course this legislation is about ending or severely restricting a woman’s right to abortion. Of course this legislation is about controlling and even hating women (rather than opening up more choices for women’s reproductive health, let’s just make it illegal for them to be desperate!). And of course, the life of a fetus is far more important to many people making laws than the woman’s life is.

But along with the women hating anti-choice violence this law is enacting on women in Utah, this law (which looks as if it is going to pass) *also* has the (perhaps) unintended consequence of particularly targeting poor women of color–and even more pointedly, undocumented women.

Remember that undocumented women are not allowed medicaid or medicare–and even if they were, most states prevent women from using state funds to get abortions. Under the new health legislation being proposed, it would be illegal for undocumented immigrants to even *buy* their own health insurance (much less get it for free or at a reduced cost from the government), and again, even if they did, abortion coverage (even if women want to buy their own) is being written out of the legislation.

So, after making it near impossible and mostly illegal for undocumented (and even documented) women to buy their own health insurance that covers abortions, after making it impossible to get free or reduced cost health insurance that covers abortions–the state of Utah feels it’s important to then criminalize women who don’t have “legal” abortions.

But…what is a “legal” abortion? Is getting advice on what herbs to take from a midwife “legal?” Is taking various medications that many Latinas can get from Mexico and other Latin American countries “legal?” Is a coat hanger “legal?”

Because there seems to be no definition of what equates “legal” written into this legislation, that means any woman anywhere who for whatever reason miscarries–will be subject to criminal charges. And lest you think that prosecutors have ever shown restraint when it comes to pressing criminal charges against women who are making their own *often times very LEGAL* choices about their bodies, please, surf around the National Advocates for Pregnant Women website for a while. This organization of lawyers that defend pregnant women from criminal prosecution, has worked to defend women who have done such things as being pregnant and addicted to various drugs to refusing c-sections to being “uppity” in the birthing room.

It is not a “safe” thing to be a woman who is pregnant. And unfortunately, rather than feeling compassion for a woman who would willingly be beaten so that she doesn’t have a child (and maybe increasing funding for free reproductive health care options), we hate that woman, and do what we can to punish all women who would dare to be as desperate as she was.

via Jezebel

Post to Twitter

Utah to Revoke Driving Privileges of Undocumented

12:27 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Controversia|utah · Comments Off

12 Feb 2008

UTAH.JPGThe State House of Representatives in Utah voted yesterday to revoke the driving privileges of undocumented people.

Rep. Glenn Donnelson, R-North Ogden, said the cards are a threat to national security because anyone, including terrorists, can get a federal individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN), which is needed to get a driving privilege cards.
“Utah driver privilege cards are making it possible for illegal aliens to operate in our society,” he said.

Last year alone, about 41,000 driver privilege cards were granted. The bill now goes to the state senate.

Via / Salt Lake Tribune

Image Via / News for Mormons

Post to Twitter

Prisoners: You ain’t takin’ away my novelas

4:09 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Controversia|States|TV · Comments Off

13 Jul 2006

120967600_2d97db03b5.jpgSpanish-speaking prisoners in Utah are up in arms because they’ve been robbed of something vital to their peace of mind: Univision telenovelas.

An outburst among inmates over a decision to pull the plug on steamy Spanish-language soaps and talk shows resulted in a lockdown at Logan’s Cache County Jail.

After getting numerous complaints about the raunchy shows and inmates hogging the television, jail commanders decided Tuesday to pull the Spanish-language TV channel Univision from the cable line-up pumped into the jail’s 15 common area TVs.

“It was dividing the inmates,” said Cache County Sheriff’s Lt. Brian Locke. “Some wanted to watch it, some didn’t want to watch it and it just got worse and worse and it all came back to that channel.”

Read more…

Post to Twitter

WAMU says no to driving cards as I.D.

12:00 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Immigration|Marketing|Money · 2 Comments

18 Oct 2005

wamu-Monu-280.jpgIf a report read on a local Utah television station’s web site is to be believed, it seems that bank Washington Mutual is not accepting government-issued “driving privilage cards” as identification for immigrants interested in banking at their establishment:

Latinos that have driving privilege cards are finding that Washington Mutual Bank location won’t recognize their cards as a legitimate form of identification.

Community Activist Tony Yapias says he’s heard about the problem in Ogden and Salt Lake City branches. “I think it’s unfortunate for Washington Mutual Bank to not accept it.”

I think it’s unfortunate, too. WAMU is one of the banks that I do my banking at, and I have been a rabid consumer evangelist for them for years, talking them up to my friends on their excellent customer service, low fees and all-around no-hassle way of doing business.

On a less personal level, we are talking about a business that spends hundreds of millions of dollars on advertising campaigns targeting not only the Latino market, but the monolingual Spanish-speaking market (read: immigrants), and that is competing in that arena with every other major bank in the U.S.

Bad move, I say. People need to feel safe when dealing with their money, not judged. Not accepting a card that has been accepted by the government as a legitimate form of identification seems to me to be not only as bad business, but bad community ambassadorship. A standard rule of business: don’t piss off a community to whom you are spending millions to market, and don’t burn the bridges you’ve worked so hard to build.

Via / Hispanic Tips and KSL.com

Post to Twitter


Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you
  • Maegan La Mala: Thank you Julio! To be honest I was a little nervous. [...]
  • Ana L. Flores: I was very excited when you decided to join us. I really wanted your voice there as it would add dep [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: Hola Juliana and thanks for commenting. There is a dearth in activist/critical thinking Latino blogg [...]
  • Julio Ricardo Varela: Good for you for asking. I got goose bumps just reading this and yes, yes, yes, to it all. Thank you [...]
  • julianabritto: The sense that I get is that you might feel a little frustrated at the dearth in activist bloggers? [...]

Get our RSS Feed!