6:50 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Activism| Labor| New York City| Puerto Rico · No Comments
15 Oct 2009NYC LCLAA
JOIN!
UNITY LABOR RALLY!
&
PRESS EVENT!STAND UP IN SOLIDARITY!
TO STOP THE MASSIVE LAYOFFS
OF OUR UNION BROTHERS & SISTERS
IN PUERTO RICO!DEFEND PUERTO RICAN WORKERS RIGHTS!
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2009
12 NOON
CITY HALL STEPSFor more information – NYC LCLAA – 212-701-9400
NCPRR NYC CHAPTER SPONSORED EVENT
Thursday October 15, 2009
TIME
5:00 PM
LOCATION
Puerto Rican Federal Affairs Administration
135 W 50Th St.
New York City
I was told that the indigenous people had “tortured, gutted, and violently killed the police men they had captured the day before, slicing their necks and in at least one case cutting their eyeballs out.” You can also read about this in some of the Peruvian papers, such as El Comercio.
These accounts were not mentioned neither in the NY Times article, nor the BBC one, and so its validity is in question. (Of course the framing for both articles is centered on the police and not on the protestors themselves, also victims of violence) It seems that this piece of the story is either made up or being exagerrated to readers into a general sentiment heading in the direction of “Those Savages Must Be Stopped!” In other words, the “savagery” is described as being perpetrated by the indigenous people, when in actuality, it is the Peruvian military that is committing the “savagery,”, with their guns, tear gas, and tanks; backed by big oil and logging companies, and by the “free-trade-loving” president Alan Garcia himself. Not to mention how “savagely” the Amazon land is being destroyed day by day by the oil profiteers, nor how these companies are destroying the bio diversity of one of the most important regions for planet earth.
This type of fear mongering is to be expected when you are the president of a country that just signed Free Trade Agreements with China and Canada. He even went as far to call the resisters “terrorits.” Ben Powless, a Mohawk from Six Nations in Ontario and blogger with Rabble.ca, writes:
“Garcia declared the Indigenous elements to be standing in the way of progress, in the path of national development, wrenches in the gears of modernity, and part of an international conspiracy to keep Peru down. In a troubling statement on the resemblance of the Indigenous protestors to the infamous Sendero Luminoso (Shining Path) armed insurrection, Garcia seemed to imply the Natives were a band of terrorists as he stood in front of hundreds of military officers in a nationally televised speech. He continued to decry the Indian barbarity and savagery, and called for all police and military to stand against savagery.”
1:11 pm By la Macha · Peru| Violence| military| military interventions · 1 Comment
6 Jun 2009From Reuters comes the news of violence against indigenous populations in Peru that are protesting against the commercialization of their native lands.
The death toll rose on Saturday after Peruvian security forces battled native Indians in clashes that highlighted opposition to exploration in the Amazon and could threaten Peru’s investor-friendly government.
Up to 42 people have been killed in the escalating protests over mining and oil development in the region, which have interrupted food and fuel supplies and represent the worst violence of President Alan Garcia’s current government.
Thousands of Indians with wooden spears continued to block remote Amazon highways, vowing to keep protesting if police did not halt efforts to break up their demonstrations.
Makes me wonder where all the do-gooder Westerners are that buy acres of land to stop *indigenous* peoples from developing the land? Do those same people not care when it’s corporations looking to develop that land?
Background
Early this morning (June 5th), Peruvian police launched a violent attack on a nonviolent road blockade held by Amazonian indigenous protesters opposing 10 laws that would open up their territory to increased mineral, oil, gas and timber exploitation. Police opened fire with live ammunition, killing at least 28 people.
Why Take Action?The first reason to take action, of course, is simply out of solidarity with our fellow warriors in the struggle for a just and sustainable world. But why are we sending out this action alert as Root Force?
For nearly two months, thousands indigenous protesters have nearly paralyzed Peru’s Amazon region with blockades of critical transportation and mining infrastructure. They have sparked a national discourse over the limits to development and who owns nature, and have made it clear that they will not surrender any of their ancestral homelands.
At the heart of the issue are 10 laws passed by presidential decree that would greatly facilitate industrial exploitation of the Amazon. This is critical infrastructure, intended to supply new raw materials for the global market. This is one of those weak points of the system that we are always talking about.
The indigenous warriors fighting for their lives have pushed this issue into the global eye, and the Peruvian government has placed itself in a position of weakness by murdering unarmed protesters. Even before the recent killings, a congressional panel had already declared 2 of the laws unconstitutional, and only through procedural tricks has the president’s party been able to stall debate on repealing one of those laws.
This is one of those rare cases where sustained international pressure could tip the scales. If these laws are repealed, it will be a major setback for infrastructure expansion plans in a truly critical region of the hemisphere.
How to Take ActionYou can email critical people in the Peruvian government through this page, provided by Amazon Watch.
You can also organize protests at Peruvian embassies or consulates, or take other actions that you think stand a good chance of making it back to the decision makers in Lima.
Make sure to express your outrage at the government’s strong arm tactics — even before the murders, the government had suspended civil liberties in 5 provinces and was calling indigenous people “terrorists” — and demand the repeal of the Free Trade laws and any law further opening the Amazon to mineral, oil, gas, timber, hydroelectric or agricultural exploitation.
In Solidarity,
Root Forcewww.rootforce.org
12:14 pm By la Macha · Women| children| sex| society · 2 Comments
18 May 2009
President Obama spent Sunday giving the commencement address at Notre Dame. A little context: Arizona State University recently refused to give Obama an honorary doctorate when they asked him to give the commencement at their school. There seemed to be no reason or rhym behind the decision–which lead to this excellent report by the team at the John Stewart show.
Notre Dame students (who actually have a legitimate beef with Obama) saw this and wondered why on earth their school, which is Catholic and thus as an institution, anti-abortion, would 1. invite an openly pro-choice supporter to speak in the first place, and 2. reward that pro-choice speaker with an honorary doctorate. Students have protested regularly leading up to the speech, and got in some moments of protest at the actual event.
Obama seemed to hold his own, however, earning a standing ovation and reluctant respect from news outlets. The following is from Fox News:
He said the views of the two sides of the debate are “irreconcilable” but can be honored.
“I do not suggest that the debate surrounding abortion can or should go away. Because no matter how much we may want to fudge it — indeed, while we know that the views of most Americans on the subject are complex and even contradictory — the fact is that at some level, the views of the two camps are irreconcilable,” Obama said.
“Each side will continue to make its case to the public with passion and conviction. But surely we can do so without reducing those with differing views to caricature,” he said.
…
On the specific issue of abortion, Obama urged the public to at least agree that it is a “heart-wrenching” decision for any woman, and that the country should work to reduce the number of women seeking abortions by reducing unwanted pregnancies and making adoption more available.
So, looking past the obvious irony that a man is deciding how a conversation about women should be discussed (and many of the protesters were men), I think it was a good speech in so much that for once, when there were protests going on, a public figure actually talked about those protests instead of barreling through some bullshit speech as if half the audience wasn’t standing with it’s back to the person.
But I do have one nitpicky issue: why does choosing an abortion always have to be a gut wrenching heartbreaking horrible decision? Why is it that the only way pro-choicers can frame the debate in a way that isn’t offensive is if they frame it around a woman who is inherently tragic rather than assertive and active?
It’s simply yet another version of the virgin/whore dichotomy (good tragic wonderful woman sacrificing her desired child just to survive in evil world versus evil whore that uses abortions as birth control)–and it’s frustrating. Why are women so easily reduced to simple caricatures ? (Oooh, the irony)
As May Day activities heat up here in the U.S., Europe is already in the thick of things. France, of course, is in the workers rights lead–managing to bring out tens of thousands (as compared to–um, NONE where I live).
From the BBC News:
Some 300 rallies are taking place across France, which has already seen strikes by hospital staff, fishermen and university staff, among others.
Across the country, tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets in cities such as Marseille, Bordeaux and Grenoble, ahead of a major demonstration in Paris.
This year’s traditional Labour Day in France comes against a backdrop of mounting social tension, reports the BBC’s Paris correspondent Emma Jane Kirby.
There is a growing perception that little has been done to protect the ordinary person’s job and wages, while executives from banks bailed out by the government have enjoyed generous pay-offs and bonuses, she says.
The country’s eight main unions have urged people to come out and protest in their third such day of action this year.
Violence erupted in Istanbul as hundreds of left-wing and trade union groups tried to pass through police checkpoints into the city’s main Taksim square.
The protesters had been refused permission to hold rallies in the square but, as in previous years, they chose to ignore the ban, reports the BBC’s David O’Byrne in Istanbul.
The marchers took to the back streets after they were met with police water cannon, and hurled stones and other missiles at police who responded by firing tear gas.
When capitalism exists as a world wide economic structure, it doesn’t make much sense to me to have an ununionized work force. Make no mistake, unions have their problems–they aren’t the perfect solution to all the problems works face. But they’re the best thing the worker has right now–and workers are *entitled* to the protection (however limited) unions can bring them.
Solidarity forever!
9:01 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · media justice · 1 Comment
19 Sep 2008
Remember how I told you yesterday that Charlize Theron was out promoting her new film, Battle in Seattle? Well, I just got word in my email inbox that actual protesters that were at Seattle during the World Trade Protests have something really major to say about that movie:
It’s time that we in the social movements tell our own stories, reclaim our own histories, and publicly fight damaging myths of our movements past and present. We must intervene in the public understanding of what happened, what is happening, and what it all means. Stories are how we understand the world and thus shape the future—they are part of our fight against corporate power, empire, war, and social and environmental injustice and for the alternatives that will make a better world.
The real story of Seattle 1999 is of tens of thousands of people rising up, taking direct action, and changing history; standing up to corporations and governments and winning; joining with movements around the world in our common struggle against the WTO.
Here is the really interesting website that this statement came from–it is run by the activists themselves, and I found all sorts of amazing information and commentary there. I highly recommend you check it out!
1:40 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Activism| crime| mexico · Comments Off
2 Sep 2008It wasn’t just RNC protesters out marching this weekend. Mexicans sick of the constant violence in their country were out en masse as well. Among the protesters were parents and family members of murdered and kidnapped relatives.
Drug cartels are being blamed for the violence, and yet for some reason, 25,000 military and federal officers dispatched throughout the country since Mexican president Calderon took office don’t seem to be helping at all.
I wonder why that is?
Could it have something to do with the fact that many of those military seem more intent on preventing indigenous nations from organizing than they do stopping drug trafficking? Or maybe it’s just that old culture of violence thing–you know, the argument that basically states that you can’t end violence with violence?
Whatever the reason is, Mexican citizens seem to be doing more about the violence than the government is. And there’s sadly, nothing new about that.
9:10 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Activism| Media| Politics| RNC08| Women| radio · 5 Comments
2 Sep 2008Last night was a pretty intense night at the Republican National Convention. Protesters at the RNC were pepper sprayed, beaten with clubs, indiscriminately arrested and otherwise harassed nonstop. Among the arrested was noted indy media journalist and Democracy Now! broadcaster, Amy Goodman.
7:22 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · DNC| US Presidential Race 2008 · 2 Comments
26 Aug 2008Just saw this video of a cop in Denver slamming a woman to the ground with his police baton. Then, after the woman starts talking to the press, the police come over and arrest her. In light of all the analysis about how horrible China was in regards to human rights, I have to wonder where all the analysis is about this incident?
6:45 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Activism| Chile| Education| Politics · 1 Comment
5 Jun 2006
Unrest in Chile’s schools rages on after weeks of sit-ins and protests. The Latin Americanist rounds up a few stories about this ongoing saga on their site today. QuePasa reports on recent incidents which they say mark the “first crisis” of Bachelet’s presidency:
Faced with the first major crisis of her three-month old term, President Michelle Bachelet proposed amending Chile’s constitution to guarantee quality education.But as her proposal was made, police fired water cannons and tear gas on about 1,000 high school students and some adults at a barricade blocking public transport in downtown Santiago.
Leaders of the protests said more than one million students and their supporters would take part in the latest nationwide strike. They are demanding efforts by the government to close the gap between public
Bachelet is calling the protests
“…’unnecessary’ but said that by Tuesday “I will send to Congress a bill to reform the constitution, to confirm the right of all citizens to a quality education.”She added: “The students have made felt their demands, which I have described as just and legitimate, for a better quality education, and they did it peacefully.”
See some amazing photos about all of this on Flickr.
Via / Que Pasa and The Latin Americanist
Photo via JP’s Flickr page
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by 2 Mujeres Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse and influential Latino and Latina community in the U.S.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter