11:04 am By la Macha · Media|media justice · 1 Comment
10 Jul 2009So now we all have a big debate on our hands! Is U.S. president Barack Obama a totally slimy pig checking out a 17-year-old’s ass? Well, the media has *proof* that he indeed, might be!
Or…wait a minute…
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
I think it’s awesome that the results of some camera man fucking around with freeze frame controls can make news. My respect for mainstream media has just increased exponentially.
I wonder if anybody else besides me just realized that video about a non story about piggy world leaders is more important to mainstream news than pretty much every story VL has ever covered about coups, military interventions, immigration, violence against women….
6:34 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · honduras · 2 Comments
7 Jul 2009In parts of Latin America, calling someone negrito(a) can be a term of endearment however, I doubt that was the intention of Chancellor of Honduras, Enrique Ortez, in this interview. Although, I don’t know if the subtitled translation is exactly accurate either. Given how Ortez is playing up President Obama’s ignorance on Latin America in general, and specifically his knowledge of Honduras, I would be more likely to translate the use of “negrito” as the N word.
Via / Inca Kola News
9:52 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Chile|history|honduras|Latin America|Obama|Politics · 5 Comments
1 Jul 2009
This story is from a few days ago, but given the current situation in Honduras, I thought it was relevant.
U.S. President Obama met with Chilean President Michelle Bachelet and was asked about the U.S.’s role in the 1973 coup that ousted democratically elected Salvador Allende and led to 17 years of military dictatorship.
Obama was asked about CIA involvement in Latin America such as the coup that brought Augusto Pinochet into power. Despite admitting that errors have been made in the past, Obama emphasized the need to move ahead in U.S.-Latin America relations:“I’m interested in going forward, not looking backward,” said Obama, who has pledged to reinvigorate ties with Latin America, after what his advisors believe was neglect during the previous Bush administration.
“I think that the United States has been an enormous force for good in the world. I think there have been times where we’ve made mistakes,” Obama said in the Oval Office.
“But I think that what is important is looking at what our policies are today, and what my administration intends to do in cooperating with the region.
5:58 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · GLBT|history|Obama|Politics · 2 Comments
29 Jun 2009
In a pretty weak gesture toward the gay community, President Barack Obama — rather than extending a firm handshake of collaboration in policy — has instead decided to throw yet another tiny bone. A fishbone, almost. It appears he’s holding some kind of improvised event in the East Room of the White House to commemorate Pride.
Obama invited hundreds of members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community to a first-of-its-kind East Room reception marking the 40th anniversary of the start of the gay rights movement.“To me, today’s event is more than just a reception honoring LGBT Pride Month,” said Brian Bond, the openly gay deputy director of the White House Office of Public Engagement in a message posted on the White House blog. “It is an opportunity for the Administration to provide the world with a snapshot of the real heroes across the country that do the day-to-day work fighting for equality,” Bond added.
But the gathering also comes as many in the gay community are angered over seeing little movement toward doing away with the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, or the Defense Of Marriage Act which says states don’t have to recognize same-sex marriages consummated in other states.
Obama plans to tell the group his administration is currently working on an effort to repeal DOMA.
But there is still much anger among many in the gay and lesbian community over the language Obama’s Justice Department used in a legal brief filed this month in support of the act.
I’m afraid that Obama’s LGBT supporters — some of whom worked his campaign with the sweat of their brow and/or their pocketbooks — aren’t going to just sit down and take the fishbone of saying he’s “working on” repealing DOMA. Fulfilling campaign promises to his LGBT supporters would be, at the very least, a presidential push for the establishment of civil unions at the Federal level, if the term “marriage” is too racy for the president. Why is the *Federal* nuance so important? Because it’s the only way that same sex couples will ever really be able to have (almost) equal rights under the law, including the right to immigration and family reunification.
Pero Obama no se moja.
This month marks Pride, celebrated far and wide, in small and large events in the U.S. and worldwide. And while prominent members of the LGBT community are invited to an event at the White House, in the words of NYT columnist Frank Rich, 40 years later, still second-class Americans.
Via / LA Times
Image via SFGate.com
7:37 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration|Media|Obama|Politics · Comments Off
24 Jun 2009New America Media, who gave some of the pro-migrant blogging work I’m aligned with some props, is calling on “Ethnic Media” to run an editorial pushing immigration reform.
Some of us don’t need to be pushed, as it’s part of our everyday operating standards but what I found most interesting about the push is how it’s being labeled specifically as:
NOT a direct reflection of some advocates’ disatisfaction with President Barack Obama’s deliberate approach to immigration reform. [Emphasis mine]
Except for some of us it is. For example, yesterday President Obama has a press conference where he discussed Iran, health care reform, the economy, and even his smoking but couldn’t be bothered to even breath a word on immigration.
You can read NAM’s suggested text after the jump.
6:47 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Controversia|GLBT|Obama|Politics|society · 1 Comment
17 Jun 2009Come on, Barack. You can do so much better than this:
It’s for federal workers only. So it applies to about 0.00001% of the LGBT population in the U.S. And it’s a memorandum. What does that even mean? And since it applies to federal employees, does that mean that federal privileges such as allowing a person to petition a visa for a foreign partner would be honored? I would guess not.
While HRC commended the move before it was even officially announced, I say that this is crumbs; a token move to quiet the millions of LGBT Obama supporters who feel let down betrayed by what hasn’t been happening with this administration. It’s time for Obama to get his gall up and tackle the two issues we all know he’s afraid of: gay marriage and immigration.
Via / Queerty
5:33 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Obama|Politics|race|society · 2 Comments
15 Jun 2009
Mainstream media really knows how to blow up a relatively insignificant piece of data. Case in point: the newswires are all a-flutter with “news” that Obama is the U.S. president that has appointed the most Latinos ever to his administration. How many? A whopping 11% for posts requiring Senate confirmation:
The Houston Chronicle reported Sunday that Obama has tapped significant numbers of Latinos from California and Texas to serve in his administration.Brent Wilkes, national executive director of the League of United Latin American Citizens, said he credits California’s large Latino population, its quality educational system and its concentration of “more progressive Latinos” for its high number of Obama administration picks.
While this is nothing to wince at, it’s not anything to marvel over either. Obama is being compared to former President George W. Bush with 5.5% and former President Bill Clinton with a paltry 4.5%.
These appointments are welcomed, but let us not forget that Latinos now account for 17% of the U.S. population, and that is only counting those residents recognized by the U.S. Census.
Don’t be fooled. This type of “news” is helping along the Right’s suggestions that Obama is, to use their term, a “reverse racist” gone wild, when in reality all he is doing is making meager attempts to diversify his administration.
Via / UPI
12:34 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Controversia|Cuba|Egypt|Obama|Politics|World · Comments Off
9 Jun 2009
Cuban leader Fidel Castro doesn’t have all that much to say these days about the U.S., but he did have some reflections to make on Obama’s now famous speech in Cairo. On the one hand, he admits that Obama isn’t the babbling idiot that former president George W. Bush was with regard to speechmaking, but when it comes to the content of said speech, he differs in opinion. In his weekly column “Reflexiones”, Castro says:
“If you take into account how long the speech was, without even using notes, the number of pauses isn’t important if compared to his predecessor (George Bush), who made mistakes at every paragraph. He has a great ability to communicate. However, the policies that the U.S. has followed for the past 7 decades is “in contradiction” with his words, since it was a history of “interventions” and “wars”, said Castro.He expressed that although Obama started his speech saying that no nation has the right to impose its system or its form of governance on any other, he quickly contradicted himself “with a declaration of faith that makes the United States the supreme judge of democratic values and human rights.”
This doesn’t sound familiar to me. Does anyone know statement Castro is referring to here?
The fact is Castro does have a point. America has a way of wandering into countries or regions and telling people how to run their societies when the U.S. has a history of not following its own rhetoric…to say the very least.
Via / La Voz de Houston
As most of you probably know, Obama spoke in Cario today in an effort to reach out to Muslims and Arabs in a post 9-11 world. Haven’t watched the entire speech yet, but so far it’s a good one. Entire text of speech is at this link.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
5:36 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Controversia|economy|Money|Obama|Politics|Venezuela · Comments Off
3 Jun 2009After all that hate, then some awkward moments, Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez appears to be warming up to Barack Obama…if you consider calling Obama more leftist than he and Fidel Castro showing love (and I do). Reuters reports:
Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez said on Tuesday that he and Cuban ally Fidel Castro risk being more conservative than U.S. President Barack Obama as Washington prepares to take control of General Motors Corp.During one of Chavez’s customary lectures on the “curse” of capitalism and the bonanzas of socialism, the Venezuelan leader made reference to GM’s bankruptcy filing, which is expected to give the U.S. government a 60 percent stake in the 100-year-old former symbol of American might.
“Hey, Obama has just nationalized nothing more and nothing less than General Motors. Comrade Obama! Fidel, careful or we are going to end up to his right,” Chavez joked on a live television broadcast.
Chavez’s message is not lost on Republicans, who were quick to jump on Obama’s bones for the move. Check out the RNC’s video attacking Obama after the jump. Read more…
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter