VivirLatino

Living & Luchando la Vida Latin@

Executive Power to Kill but Not to Stop the Separation of Families?

May 31st, 2012

The Obama administration has said, directly or though its mouthpieces like Cecilia Munoz, that it’s hands are tied when it comes to providing some sort of administrative relief to certain classes of undocumented immigrants, namely DREAMers. Advocates, activists, and community members at large have been told that the president has to follow the laws, even if they are broken, and that the real power is in Congress.

And yet, just this week the world is learning about the type of executive power that President Obama can execute – and yes I chose that word intentionally. Earlier this week the New York Times reported on what is being called the president’s Secret Kill List, an internal executive branch process that allegedly satisfies due process standards. This allows Obama to personally sign off on targets of drone attacks in Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. You can check it Democracy Now’s excellent coverage here ( link opens to a YouTube video).

It appears that in this election season, Obama is more interested in appeasing the right than doing what is right. An even more scary possibility is that Obama, a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, actually thinks this is an appropriate course of action. His administration has no problem wielding executive power to decide if someone labeled a “militant” should die, but throws his hands up in the air when it comes to separating families and destroying lives on two sides of a border via deportation.

What is spectacular, but not surprising is how many alleged liberals take this information, like Obama’s inaction on immigration reform, as an opportunity to press play on the canned responses that work well for both instances of the use (or lack) of executive power :

He inherited this from Bush

It would have been worse under a Republican President

It will be worse under Romney

This is why electoral politics will not save anyone’s life.

Post to Twitter

The Devil is in the Details, Not the Party

May 27th, 2012

Last week there were a lot of gasps from people who couldn’t believe that President Obama was being compared to Maricopa County’s Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Not only was Obama compared to the Sheriff who is facing a federal lawsuit for refusing to allow oversight of his department over accusations of racial profiling against Latinos and general poor management, Obama was called worse when it came to immigration.

Democrats and Obama supporters are quick to point out that the accusation is coming from a conservative strategist, Alfonso Aguilar, in an effort to gain votes for Republicans in key swing states like Nevada, especially since assumed GOP presidential candidate Romney is trailing in polls among Latino voters.

But is the accusation so off base? Obama’s detention and deportation policies have been built on the legacies of presidents before him. Secure Communities has been expanded and made mandatory under Obama’swatch and responsible in large part to record deportation numbers topping over a million. Comprehensive immigration reform, a promise made to Latino voters during Obama’s 2008 campaign, has failed to make an appearance. Weak willed face saving actions like pushing the DREAM Act and announcing prosecutorial discretion haven’t lived up to expectations nor the demands of immigration advocates and the Latino electorate.

Maricopa Country Cheriff Joe Arpaio’s power has been bolstered by federal immigration policies that lack real oversight on the state level. The soon to be faded out 287(g), allowed Arpaio to turn his police force into defacto immigration enforcement agents. Secure Communities bolsters this. So it’s not a matter of if Obama is worse than Sheriff Joe, it’s a matter of what polices allowed Sheriff Joe to become who he is. The role of state laws like SB1070 cannot be ignored, which is why the Feds are trying to shut parts of that law down, not on the basis of how they violate the rights of immigrants, especially immigrant Latinos (and non-immigrant Latinos as well) but on the basis of how those laws step on federal immigration enforcement toes.

Obama is in a bad position. He has an immigration record that can be scrutinized while Romney is all talk. And while Romney’s talk sure ain’t pretty, it’s not surprising. It follows the same hard-line anti-immigrant, enforcement first agenda that was set back during McCain’s presidential run. If Romney really wants to win the Latino vote in Nevada or any other state he’s gonna need to do better and chances are he won’t and no brown face, not Marco Rubio’s or Alfonso Aguilar’s, is going to help just by pointing out what Latinos already know. Yes, the Obama administration has failed massively and miserably when it comes to immigration reform. What is the GOP offering that is any better?

Let’s see some real policy proposals and less party pointing.

Post to Twitter

Youth Perspectives on NCLR Conference & POTUS Obama

July 27th, 2011

Maegan is working on a longer post specifically about President Obama’s speech at the NCLR Conference this past Monday (of which I don’t think either of us desire to hear, I know I don’t!). In the meantime, I wanted to share some information that I have been reading from youth perspectives regarding youth being welcomed into the ballroom for the luncheon where President Obama gave his speech.

In short, youth participants in the Lideres Summit were originally invited to be in the room during the luncheon for the President’s speech. As reported by Ernesto Dominguez on Amplify Your Voice, on Sunday evening

“at the ‘Noche De Premios,’ Lideres participants were asked to give up their tickets to enter the Monday Luncheon event and hence give up the chance to be in the same room that President Obama would be giving his remarks from.

Participants were told that ‘seats have sold out to the lunch event, and to make sure youth get to see the President (over view screens), they were told to go to the overflow room only and give up their seats to ‘others.’”

Needless to say Lideres participants were upset and questioned if NCLR is committed to included youth in all aspects of the work they do. NCLR President Janet Murguía asked Lideres participants to “withhold criticism until after the lunch on Monday. We ask everyone to make sacrifices at this summit…’Judge me when this is all over.’ I believe we can deliver the President, and we will see what happens.”

The activism of the youth present resulted in this video where Murguía was questioned and offered clarification on the decision to replace youth participants in an “overflow” room. Below is the interview in English (sorry no transcript at this time):

One thing I noticed about this video is that it is youth created and I think it is great that Murguía made/found time (even if 5 minutes) to talk with you. I also noticed that towards the end of the video where Murguía indicates her plan to urge President Obama to go to the “overflow” room how she spoke to the youth about their activism. The reporter shares that the youth are also using their new media skills to reach out to President Obama regarding this situation and prior to the youth reporter finishing her statement Murguía speaks over her and states “I think any time you can use your new media strategies is great, but I’m telling you I have some really powerful advocacy skills and I believe I can deliver the President.”

Reminding myself to take deep breaths, that not everyone embraces a positive youth development approach, that this is probably a very challenging and stressful time for Murguía, I must state that I was so disappointed in this response it is sickening! First of all, this is NOT about what advocacy skills Murguía has, it is about the initial decision to remove youth participants so that more adult/traditional conference participants can join the luncheon replacing the space set aside for the youth. This is about recognizing that the work we need to do as a community requires just that a communal effort. It requires us to recognize that young people are powerful contributing members of this society. That they can and will (even if we don’t like it) mentor and teach us how to do things differently and effectively! It is not always the “adults” that have all the knowledge and wisdom to share. We need to understand our roles are not always to teach the youth, but to also learn in the process!

The image of a “kiddie table” came into my mind when I read this story. The youth participants being sent to another room called “overflow” (when they weren’t even overflow to begin with!) reeks so much of not making room for youth anywhere, even at the table. Which to me, ultimately means you are not welcome, old enough, privileged, or have not earned a space here. There is so much wrong in this approach!

I know conferences are stressful, I’ve organized national ones before and I know folks are asked to do all sorts of things not in their job description to make the event run smoothly. Yet, I’ve also been that conference participant who was asked to move somewhere else because of whatever the issue was (height, my hair blocking the person behind me, misspelling of my name, given the wrong credentials for entry, challenging the “expert on the panel, etc.).

Finally, if you are wondering if President Obama was recruited by those “powerful advocacy skills” to visit the “overflow room” where youth participants were, he was. He entered and from tweets regarding the interaction (you can read up on this by searching by hashtags #NCLRConf and #Lideres11) by youth participants present, he shook a few hands and took a few fotos then was off. NCLR senior staff are of course seeing this as a victory and that the youth were appeased. Some response to this was that Lideres participants deserve “more” and “substance.” It seems youth do not just want a foto op or a handshake, they want to be treated with respect! Shocking, I know….


Post to Twitter

What to Expect and Not Out of Obama’s Immigration Speech

May 10th, 2011

Today in El Paso, President Obama is scheduled to make a speech on immigration. According to background information from the White House, the focus will be immigration in the context of security and the economy – in other words how can this exploitative system of getting U.S. capitalist desires met keep working on the backs of immigrant communities. There will be the call for a need to a bipartisan legislative solution that not one person in Congress has taken seriously. There will be talk about how in a post-Osama world the U.S. is safer but not safe enough which is why we need a militarized border. There may even be a head nod acknowledgement to the DREAM Act the DREAMers.

What there will not be: a moratorium on deportations of anyone – not even the DREAMers and others that fall within the so-called “good immigrant” pool. Obama will reaffirm how the U.S. is a nation of laws and lie about how he has no power to take executive action.

Obama will not acknowledge the DREAMers that were arrested yesterday outside Gov. Mitch Daniels’ office in Indiana protesting both a mandatory E-verify bill and a bill that denies the right of undocumented students to be acknowledged as state residents for tuition purposes.

There will be no talk about the real consequences of all this security on the border and how safety, a mind trick more than anything tangible, is reserved for certain people, people not including those killed by border patrol because they are near their homes on either side of the frontera.

There will be no acknowledgement beyond imperialist pride of the increased deportations under Obama. The higher numbers, like the assassination of Bin Laden, will be used as macho political cred even as who comprises those numbers is questioned in states like Illinois y nationally.

Clearly my expectations for today’s immigration speech are low. Maybe I will be surprised and be forced to take back my criticism of the administration. However, given the number of speeches and meetings while immigration policy gets continuously more abusive, there where probably plenty more room for criticism and calls for action.

Post to Twitter

From New America Media : Immigrant Rights Supporters Refocus Struggle on Obama

May 4th, 2011

Note from Mala : I wanted to share this piece for a few reasons. I find it interesting that the article makes it seem as if Obama has never had pressure put on him or been the target of campaigns and criticisms over White House Immigration policy. I will also admit to being amused at the continued posturing of Congressman Gutierrez and threats to pull support from the President. It is a promise he has made often and has yet to make good on in any real meaningful way.

Immigrant Rights Supporters Refocus Struggle on Obama
New America Media, News Report, Liz Gonzalez, Posted: Apr 29, 2011

SAN JOSE, Calif. — More than 300 people packed the Sacred Heart church in San Jose last Tuesday to hear Congressman Luis Gutierrez speak about immigration reform at a town hall meeting. The event was part of a 20-city tour being organized by the congressman from Illinois to energize and refocus immigrant rights supporters ahead of a national day of protests scheduled for Sunday, May 1.

Five years after immigrant rights advocates staged their first large-scale May Day protests, and with little indication that Congress will be making any moves on immigration legislation in the near future, immigrant communities and their supporters are switching tactics, using their voting power as leverage to lobby President Obama to use his executive power to halt deportations.

“I have not come to talk to you about comprehensive immigration reform; to speak to you about a legislative process that will bring about change. It isn’t possible,” Gutierrez told the crowd.

“We are not losing hope, just refocusing our struggle on President Obama. We responded [to his Presidential campaign] with our vote and our confidence and we need him to be the champion that he promised he would be for our community,” he said.

Since Obama took office, said Gutierrez, his administration has overseen a record number – 400,000 – of deportations.

The town hall meetings are part of a larger campaign, “Change Takes Courage,” which is demanding that the U.S. government cease all deportations of parents whose children are citizens, of DREAM Act-eligible youth and military veterans. The campaign is also calling for the discontinuation of joint federal and local law enforcement programs such as Secure Communities and 287G, which immigrant rights advocates say are making their communities unsafe.

“Immigration reform has been dead the last couple of months and this looks like there will be another spark (by offering) some form of relief. It may not affect all the community, but it will affect a portion of the community – the DREAM students – and give (legal) status to families,” said Jesse Castaneda, chair of the Silicon Valley Alliance for Immigration Reform, a coalition of diverse religious, labor and non-profit community groups that helped organize the forum in San Jose.

Many people arrived early just to hear Gutierrez speak.

“Congressman Gutierrez is on the vanguard of immigration reform and he lifts up the spirit of our families. That’s important with the May 1 march coming up this week,” said Jose Sandoval, the founder of Voluntarios de la Comunidad, a group that has been “urging people …[to] become citizens to vote because their vote is their power.”

San Jose resident Katya Ceballos, who spoke on a panel during the forum, told the crowd that her husband was facing a deportation order and eventually beat it, although the ordeal was a nightmare for her family. Ceballos is a member of Silicon Valley De-Bug, a community group that supports individuals who face deportation orders due to contact with the criminal justice system.

“I have a daughter who is an American citizen, who deserves and has the right to have her father by her side like any other child,” she said. Ceballos urged the crowd to become citizens and vote for immigration reform, so that families would not separated.

The meeting attracted city and county officials who reaffirmed the commitment of local governments in Santa Clara and San Jose to do whatever possible to not put their immigrant communities at further risk. Speakers included San Jose’s new Chief of Police Chris Moore, Supervisor Dave Cortese, Congressman Mike Honda, and testimonials from youth impacted by the immigration system.

Moore, who spoke on a panel, emphasized the importance of separating local and federal law enforcement duties.

“In my own department, we have made it very clear that we should not be engaged in civil immigration (enforcement),” he said. “It has become very important to add our voices to the need for immigration reform.”

Counties like Santa Clara have tried to opt out of Secure Communities — a program that requires local police to submit fingerprints of arrestees to federal immigration officials – but don’t yet have a clear legal roadmap to do so effectively.

Student Raul Martinez described his frustration and disappointment in getting turned down for jobs, because he doesn’t have a Social Security Number. Martinez called for passage of the DREAM Act, legislation that would give eligible high school graduates a path to citizenship. The legislation was defeated in Congress last year.

“I am undocumented and unafraid,” Martinez said.

A petition for immigration reform, signed by those who have been attending the town hall meetings, will be hand delivered to President Obama next Wednesday when Gutierrez meets with him personally.

.

Post to Twitter

From New America Media : Obama Is Our “Frenemy”—An Open Letter to Latinos

April 21st, 2011

Publisher’s Note : There have been many posts here and in other spaces regarding President Obama’s failure to push immigration reform effectively at the legislative level and more recently, his continued dismissal of executive actions he can take. With the 2012 presidential campaign season officially kicking off, the question that is often presented to those of us offering the critiques is : who to vote for then? a Republican? No one at all? The always provocative Roberto Lovato offers the following commentary and options for what the Latino community can and should be doing. And for the record, I agree.

- Mala

Obama Is Our “Frenemy”—An Open Letter to Latinos
New America Media, Commentary,
Roberto Lovato, Posted: Apr 21, 2011

Local media is abuzz with news of President Obama’s visit to San Francisco. Unfortunately for immigration policy and for the noble cause of immigrant rights, the media coverage reflects the editorial filters built up by the multimillion-dollar media apparatus set up by Obama’s immigrant rights allies in Washington, D.C., who are still seen by the press as the official voice of immigrants in the United States.

Consciously or not, these D.C. groups, their leaders, and their – until very recently – ominous silence about Obama’s radical immigration policies have so conditioned the ears of journalists and editors to the faux-applause and the JumboTron sound of support, to the sickly “Sí Se Puede” legalization of it all, that anyone talking about Obama’s repressive and devastating immigration policies sounds and looks like what SF Weekly wrote about activist Prerna Lal, who is currently in deportation proceedings: marginal and out of the mainstream.

Dangerous stuff. I’ve been traveling around the country a lot lately and am sickened of stories like what’s happening to Prerna, countless cases of immigrant children forced to watch in terror as their parents are treated like criminals and taken away forever by ICE – the agency Obama has the power to tell, “Stop it, stop it immediately.”

Failure to bring the Obama administration to some reasonable, concrete relief for DREAMers, or around cooperation agreements between local police and federal immigration authorities, like 287(g) and Secure Communities, will bring the bar of immigrant and Latino respect to even more dangerous lows. Democratic and Republican politicians and their allies will see that they can get away with continued repression without paying a political price. Such perception will, I fear, result in even more unprecedented terror and devastation of a community perceived to know no lower limits to its self-disrespect when its says “Sí Se Puede” in support of the administration that is breaking records as the most violent and repressive in the history of the immigrant United States.

Fortunately, we – not they – are the ones we have been waiting for.

I know many of you who will not allow Obama to glide through Latino communities as if he has not been the commander in chief of the war on immigrants. If things don’t change soon, any and all Obama Latino events should be subject to non-violent actions that defend both immigrants and our self-respect and dignity. Even his closest allies have communicated the need to take action on urgent matters like the deportation of DREAMers and the 287(g) and Secure Communities programs. If he doesn’t heed them, then he is clearly committed to moving beyond being a “frenemy” of immigrants, one deserving of having his electoral campaign aspirations dropped and devastated in Latino communities with the same zeal with which he and his administration prosecute the war on immigrants in Latino communities.

We cannot allow people to humiliate, attack and terrorize Latinos and still have Latinos singing their praises. Without relief for immigrants, we should make support for Obama’s re-election – and for the election of violent Republicans – synonymous with being what we used to call “vendidos” or “sellouts” in a previous political era. The moral reality is there to do so as is the urgent necessity.

Thankfully, I think the will and courage are there too. I am very proud of those who are teaching Obama and his allies what living hope and heart-driven change look like. Please enlist me in your heroic effort as I find great edification and inspiration in your actions.

For his own dignity and for ours, I hope President Obama does the right thing and stops the terror and devastation against immigrants.

Respectfully,

R
Roberto Lovato is co-founder of Presente.org.

Post to Twitter

Democratic Promises, Insecure Lies

October 6th, 2010

Let’s get this out of the way.

Yes, the Republicans as a party have shown nothing but contempt for Latinos, especially immigrant Latinos, LGBT Latinos, poor Latinos and all the intersections and iterations of the aforementioned.

Is that enough for Latinos to run to the polls and vote Democrat in less than a month? All signs point to no. Polls abound pointing that the mythical Latino voter supports the Democratic party in theory but aren’t convinced enough to keep the Dems in office.

And why would that be?

It’s a little too easy to merely point out the fact that the Obama administration has failed to cumplir it’s promesa to the Latino community on comprehensive immigration reform. To rely on that as the reason to not vote/not vote Dem, makes the Latino electorate look irresponsible and passes blame onto the voter. Rather, perhaps the media who is sounding alarm bells about the lack of Latino loyalty and will should look at what the Democrats have done against immigrant communities.

Post to Twitter

Happy (?) Latino Heritage Month

September 16th, 2010

Sigh inside Papa John's Advertsing a Fiesta PizzaYesterday marked the official start of Latino (of Hispanic) Heritage Month, 30 days or so of corporate cafeterias serving tacos. Ok so I’m being cynical. The marketing is so over the top some time (see picture). The political pandering so offensive, especially at a time like this with the mid-term elections, it feels like all fluff and no substance.

It’s not that I don’t love being a Latina, it’s my primary identity above all others. I think in large part because of my political awaking when I was a teenager, whenever someone asks that tired old question and I am forced to limit myself to one answer, I’ll go with Latina over mujer. It’s just it is who I am, how I live. I don’t wake up in the morning thinking about how can I be more Latino and don’t try extra hard to be extra Latina during this month. But that, that not trying so hard to prove myself, is a shift for myself so maybe in that there is value in this month as a kind of “new year” of sorts for our multiple communities.

Post to Twitter

Senate Border Security Bill Passes and Obama Signs On

August 12th, 2010

The Democratic led Senate interrupted their summer recess in order to interrupt the lives of countless undocumented immigrants, those suspected of being undocumented immigrants, and those living on either side of the U.S. Mexico frontera.

The Senate approved a $600-million border security bill Thursday morning, sending President Obama his request for 1,500 more troops and immigration officials to beef up security along the border with Mexico…The bill passed without dissent

The National Guard troops that will be deployed to the border have received their orders.And President Obama happily put more boots on the ground and boots on the backs of immigrant communities by signing the bill into law.

Post to Twitter