Advertisement

Posts Tagged ‘Mitt Romney

There seems to be much confusion out there about who Puerto Ricans are politically speaking, what their immigration status is in the United States, and what language they speak. It’s very easy to blame Republican hate speech and ignorance and fail to look at the bigger picture of the big c word most people don’t want to mention when talking about la isla del encanto : colonialism.

So as a Rican, not claiming to speak for all of Ricankind, I wanted to clarify a few points.

Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens

Members of the Southern Mississippi University band chanted, “Where’s your green card?” at a Puerto Rican Kansas State player during their NCAA Tournament game against Kansas State University (source)

Puerto Ricans are citizens of the United States no matter if they are born within the 50 states or on the island of Puerto Rico. In 1917 the Jones–Shafroth Act collectively made Puerto Ricans citizens as well as giving us a very useful (sarcasm) Resident Commissioner who is a non-voting member of the U.S. House of Representatives. We do not need green cards. We have social security numbers and US passports. If we live within the 50 states we can vote for president. If we live in Puerto Rico we cannot. This make our immigrant experience unique in a number if ways, but it clearly does not protect us from racism or xenophobia. My own grandparents’ apartment in New York was raided by la migra in search of papers and our community has been impacted by the criminalization of Latino immigrants as demonstrated by the deportation of a Puerto Rican in 2008.

(Most) Puerto Ricans Speak English
As the GOP presidential candidates campaign in Puerto Rico, where residents can vote in primaries but not in the general election, recently Rick Santorum made a statement regarding the island’s political future.

Now put aside for a moment the English only nativist subtext and acknowledge that Puerto Ricans on the island are taught English. Do most Puerto Ricans on the island speak Spanish? Yes and they are well within their right to do so. As of 2007, the American Community Survey states that 95.1% of island residents speak Spanish and 81.5% of Puerto Ricans speak English less than “very well”. 4.7% of people on the island speak English only. It should be noted that there has been previous backlash in Puerto Rico against the idea of an English language requirement for statehood or an English language requirement in general. Puerto Ricans are extremely proud of their culture including their unique version of Spanish just as a NYRican I am very proud of my official language of Spanglish.

While it has been wonderful to see people in the media correcting the misconceptions about Puerto Ricans. I have yet to see anyone put these misconceptions within a colonial context. It needs to be acknowledged that the reason so many candidates stump on the island is not out of interest in changing the political status of the island, a commonwealth aka colony and recognized as such globally including by the United Nations, but rather as a way to earn Puerto Rican voters inside of the United States. Many are pointing to the upcoming plebiscite or non-binding vote on the island’s status that will occur while the U.S. presidential elections are happening. It’s hard not to choke on the irony of the exercise of democracy, however flawed, inside the 50 states while a farcical glorified opinion poll happens inside a country occupied by the U.S. for over 100 years.

I understand the confusion. When Puerto Rico is taught about in U.S. schools, it is not called a colony and it is not explained how the relationship between the U.S. and the island actually works in terms of political representation, voting rights, taxes, language, and culture. It isn’t explained how Puerto Rican migration happens nor how Rican bodies served as guinea pigs for the birth control so many women in the US are fighting to maintain access to.

One cannot look at the high unemployment numbers inside Puerto Rico, the poverty, the drug trade, police brutality and corruption without looking at how the local economy was decimated during Operation Bootstrap to give U.S. companies tax breaks on the backs of Rican men and woman, many who were forced to migrate to the United States. That is how my family arrived in NY.

But let’s keep ignoring the fact that the US has a colony and let’s engage in the joke of the GOP campaign, egged on by Tea Party island Governor Luis Fortuño. That’s a punchline that requires no papers and no translation.

Post to Twitter

Originally I had no intention of watching the alleged last of the GOP debates . It was held in Mesa, Arizona which meant the anti-immigrant rhetoric would be amped up to pander to the local audience which included Sheriff Joe Arpaio. I ended up watching the debate because my partner said we should watch it together (how romantic).Also, Arizona is where the next big primary will happen this coming Tuesday.
I was right about the hateful narrative used against immigrants but I also watched and listened to a group of white men who seemed to be against everything, including each other.

The whole debate, poorly moderated by CNN’s John King, had a strange air about it. The Republican hopefuls appeared on stage and introduced themselves in a manner that would have been appropriate in a bad comic book. For example, Ron Paul knighted himself the “defender of the Constitution.” Someone get that man a cape.

The rest of the very long evening consisted of the candidates talking about everything they hate like spending money. Rick Santorum responded to the first question asked, regarding the national debt, saying that the only thing he wanted to spend money on was the defense department, everything else should be cut : medicaid, medicare, food stamps, and of course Obama Care, I mean healthcare, and education.

Applause followed by Mitt Romney and Santorum going back and forth at each other for a while about who was more fiscally conservative.
Ron Paul gets in on the Santorum bashing (the candidate, not the sexual liquid) by calling him a fake and especially targeting how Santorum was once a backer of No Child Left Behind and now was against it.

Mitt Romney mentioned his experience as head of the Salt Lake Olympic Organizing Committee so many times that I proposed a bobsled race instead of primary to determine the GOP candidate for president.

The most unsurprising portions of the night involved birth control and immigration, and within those topics, race.

All of the candidates made the issue of contraceptives one of choice, access, and liberties but for religious fundamentalists, not for people with a uterus. Access to contraception was blamed for the amount of children born out of wedlock, especially among “some people”. I wonder who those people could be?

:: looks around at her two kids with no daddy in sight::.

Oh wait. They mean me.

Those same some people,like me, are really poor, usually criminals,uneducated and a burden because of all the babies they had while not being married. Therefore the answer to poverty is marriage and no birth control. Sign me and my out of wedlock daughters up! Married people who use birth control are mythical creatures who must exist only in the realm of the liberal elites.
This discussion of the evils of birth control had one brief ray of light when Ron Paul clarified that the morning after pill is not the same as the abortion pill. I said that moment was brief right because then he entered into the bash Planned Parenthood portion of the evening.

Arizona, the home of SB 1070 and banned books, seemed to waiting for the four white men to unleash the anti-immigration vitriol. Governer Jan Brewer and Sherrif Joe Arpaio sat in the audience, almost as GOP guests of honor. All of the candidates spoke in favor of fences and more boots on the ground. All of the candidates lambasted Obama and his administration for suing Arizona and not doing enough to stop immigrants who were of accused draining the economy and coming for the welfare ride. Mitt Romney especially came down hard on the administration, which makes sense campaign wise, since the Democratic Party has been putting all of it’s eggs in the Latino vote basket hoping that they can keep or win support by making Romney the most anti-immigrant of all. Alternately, Florida GOP Senator Marco Rubio’s name was mentioned, as if to prove to any Latinos who were watching, that they were capable of acknowledging a Latino who they weren’t going to paint as the scapegoat for the U.S.’s ills.

Of course none of the arguments the GOP presidential wannabes presented are based in reality. No one mentioned how Obama has actually expanded Bush immigration enforcement policies and how thanks to those expansions there were more Border Patrol boots on the ground and record breaking deportation numbers. Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio’s name was mentioned, as if to prove that they were capable of mentioning a Latino and had some credibility. Newt Gingrich, who at one point was being praised for his “common sense” approach to immigration policy, which boiled down to saying that family unification was important for “good” undocumented people and proposing a limbo status of undocumented but not deportable, reverted back to the standard nativist arguments and when asked to discribe himself in one word, Newt Gingrich cockily answered, “cheerful”.

Post to Twitter

I’m feeling a little dazed from the seemingly endless stream of GOP debates and the incumbent President’s non-statement statement on immigration policy during the SOTU. With the Florida primary just days away, both political parties are targeting the Latino vote that the state allegedly represents. Both parties are playing a spin game, ready to crown an opponent as the most anti-immigrant on one hand, while claiming that the Latino electorate in Florida doesn’t really care about immigration.

In last night’s GOP debate, on again off again front runner Newt Gingrich took a page from the Democratic National Committee, targeting Mitt Romney as the most anti-immigrant. Certainly this attack is related to Romney’s statements earlier this week touting “self-deportation” as a good solution to current problems. Romney, offended by Gingrich’s characterization, demanded an apology. As I pointed out in a piece I wrote for El Diario La Prensa last month, we are heading into dangerous territory when we try to find the “worst” among bad choices. Gingrich’s allegedly kinder, softer approach to immigration amounts to what the current Obama policy is on paper, allowing “non-threatening” immigrants with family ties and a long history in the U.S. to stay in a permanent limbo status.

A new/old Latino target is being pushed by one organization. Today, Presente.org launched a campaign targeting potential GOP Vice Presidential pick, Senator Marco Rubio. The campaign wittingly named “No Somos Rubios” (We are not Rubios/We are not Blondes), hones in on Republicans using a brown face with a brown name to earn Latino votes. This right wing strategy is being called into question not just based on Rubio’s anti-immigrant positions but also because Rubio represent such a specific facet of the Latino electorate. Rubio appeals to Cuban-American anti-Castro demographic. Rubio probably will not appeal to other Latinos, especially in the South West, who according to polls, played a critical role in Obama’s getting elected in 2008.

Read more…

Post to Twitter

Many eyes are focused towards the Iowa Caucuses are today, highlighting the Republican U.S. Presidential Nominees and the state of presidential campaigning. High on show. Low on substance.

For many paying attention to the way immigration policy is playing out in this election, recent focus has been on Mitt Romney, a GOP front runner in Iowa and nationally, and recent statements he made. He said that if he were president and the DREAM Act were to pass in Congress, he would veto it.

Enter the Democrat/Progressive words of shock and finger pointing. This is additional proof of how much the Republicans hate immigrants, especially non-criminal college students or potential soldiers for whatever invented global conflict comes next. This is additional proof as to why everyone who loves immigrants, especially Latinos who are the perpetual faces of immigration policy, need to support the Democratic Party and vote for Barack Obama. This is what the Democrats use the Iowa Caucuses for, to knock down potential GOP nominees. Mitt Romney has been especially targeted by the Democratic National Committee who have a website and numerous videos focusing on Romney’s flip-flopping in a number of policy areas.

But hold on and wait a minute. Is it just me or does it seem like the Democrats (as a party, not individually) only really started talking about the DREAM Act after it failed a procedural vote last year? If I remember correctly, there were only a handful of Democrats who were really pushing the DREAM Act, especially as a standalone measure. If I remember correctly, for a long time, the party line was Comprehensive Immigration Reform until New York Democrat Charles Schumer beat that biometric horse into the ground, allowing the DREAM Act to be presented as the “oh well” option. And if I remember correctly weren’t there some Democrats who voted against the DREAM Act in that procedural vote last year?

Read more…

Post to Twitter

t1home.romneyad.ap.jpgRomney’s out and I’m sad. Not because I don’t despise him (because I do) or because I was excited about some religious diversity in the White House (I was, but not at the expense of having him as our President…shudder to think). It’s because McCain is apparently so “liberal” (read not doesn’t come off as a right-wing nutbar like Huckabee) that he can actually prove to be a threat to the Democrats in the race for the White House. “On the fencers” and other moderates might oscillate between McCain and the Democratic candidate based on issues. Independents might gravitate towards him because he hasn’t walked the Republican party line (and indeed, is hated by most in his party). And (is it possible?) could Democrats — particularly former supporters of John Edwards — be swayed into voting off-ticket because they don’t feel any affinity towards Obama or Clinton? Will Latinos turn to him because of his immigration bill stance?

I think it’s possible and we should be very afraid. What do you think? Let us know in the comments.

Via / NPR

Post to Twitter

McCain Takes Florida. Giuliani to Take a Bow.

8:11 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Florida|US Presidential Race 2008 · Comments Off

30 Jan 2008

30florida04_600.jpgWith 99% of the vote counted, John McCain led Mitt Romney by 36% to 31% in the Florida priamaries held yesterday, meaning all 57 Republican delegates go to him. All the results are as follows:

Republicans
John McCain: 36%
Mitt Romney: 31%
Rudy Giuliani: 15%
Mike Huckabee: 13%
Ron Paul: 3%
Democrats
Hillary Clinton: 50%
Barack Obama: 33%
John Edwards: 14%

Former NYC Mayor, Rudolph Giulini, who had placed all his campaigning eggs in the Florida basket, is expected to withdraw from from the race and support John McCain.

For Giuliani…..

Read more…

Post to Twitter

Romney Takes Michigan and Clinton too, well not really

8:39 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Michigan|Politics · Comments Off

16 Jan 2008

michigan.jpgYesterday Mitt Romney won the Republican party primary in Michigan proving two things: 1- It’s easy to win in a state where your daddy was once governor and 2 – the Republicans across the country aren’t all behind the same person. Senator John McCain won in New Hampshire and Mike Huckabee won Iowa.

With 97 percent of the electoral precincts reporting, Mr. Romney had 39 percent of the vote, compared with 30 percent for Mr. McCain and 16 percent for Mr. Huckabee. Ron Paul, the antiwar congressman from Texas, came in fourth with 6 percent of the vote.

Read more…

Post to Twitter

I admit that I’m late to the party on reporting about Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney You Tube/CNN debate spar over which one was nicer to those damn illegal aliens. Personally I think they are both racist a-holes and could give a crap. I would never vote Republican anyway. But listen closely to what both of them said then read my analysis after the jump.

Read more…

Post to Twitter


Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you
  • Maegan La Mala: Thank you Ana. You have always had a kind word and great example. As I tweeted yesterday the biggest [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: Thank you Julio! To be honest I was a little nervous. [...]
  • Ana L. Flores: I was very excited when you decided to join us. I really wanted your voice there as it would add dep [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: Hola Juliana and thanks for commenting. There is a dearth in activist/critical thinking Latino blogg [...]
  • Julio Ricardo Varela: Good for you for asking. I got goose bumps just reading this and yes, yes, yes, to it all. Thank you [...]

Get our RSS Feed!