11:48 am By Maegan La Mala · Casa Blanca Camino 2012|Con la Vista al Voto|DREAM Act|Florida|Immigration|Politics|Puerto Rico · 3 Comments
27 Jan 2012I’m feeling a little dazed from the seemingly endless stream of GOP debates and the incumbent President’s non-statement statement on immigration policy during the SOTU. With the Florida primary just days away, both political parties are targeting the Latino vote that the state allegedly represents. Both parties are playing a spin game, ready to crown an opponent as the most anti-immigrant on one hand, while claiming that the Latino electorate in Florida doesn’t really care about immigration.
In last night’s GOP debate, on again off again front runner Newt Gingrich took a page from the Democratic National Committee, targeting Mitt Romney as the most anti-immigrant. Certainly this attack is related to Romney’s statements earlier this week touting “self-deportation” as a good solution to current problems. Romney, offended by Gingrich’s characterization, demanded an apology. As I pointed out in a piece I wrote for El Diario La Prensa last month, we are heading into dangerous territory when we try to find the “worst” among bad choices. Gingrich’s allegedly kinder, softer approach to immigration amounts to what the current Obama policy is on paper, allowing “non-threatening” immigrants with family ties and a long history in the U.S. to stay in a permanent limbo status.
A new/old Latino target is being pushed by one organization. Today, Presente.org launched a campaign targeting potential GOP Vice Presidential pick, Senator Marco Rubio. The campaign wittingly named “No Somos Rubios” (We are not Rubios/We are not Blondes), hones in on Republicans using a brown face with a brown name to earn Latino votes. This right wing strategy is being called into question not just based on Rubio’s anti-immigrant positions but also because Rubio represent such a specific facet of the Latino electorate. Rubio appeals to Cuban-American anti-Castro demographic. Rubio probably will not appeal to other Latinos, especially in the South West, who according to polls, played a critical role in Obama’s getting elected in 2008.
12:20 pm By Maegan La Mala · Con la Vista al Voto|Immigration|Midterm Elections 2010 · 18 Comments
3 Nov 2010Yesterday’s midterm elections saw the addition of some Latino surnames to the political rosters including Tea Party Latino poster bebe Marco Rubio who won the Senate race in Florida.
But is having more Latinos in elected positions more important than having the right Latinos in office? Have some Latino voters gotten caught up in representational fever based on ethnicity and not on who will best represents our interests?
MicEvHill.Com points out some of the Latino losses and gains and what they mean specifically for the issues around immigration:
Congressional Hispanic Caucus Losses in the House. Two members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) lost their bids for reelection to Republican challengers: Representative Ciro Rodriguez (D-TX) and Representative John Salazar (D-CO). Three other CHC Members were locked in tight races at the time of this writing and could well lose their seats: Representative Jim Costa (D-CA), Representatiive Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) and Representative Solomon Ortiz (D-TX). This is an important development, not just because of the symoloss of these staunchly pro-immigrant Members. But it also is important because it may well have provided immigration restrictionists with a model for winning seats in CHC districts in the furture: recruit conservative Hispanic Republicans to run against CHC Members and then flood the district with massive amounts of television ads and money that CHC Members cannot compete with.
Election of Immigration Restrictionist-Oriented Hispanic Republicans. Six Hispanic Republicans were elected to either the House or the Senate on anti-immigrant platforms. This includes Senator-Elect Marco Rubio (R-FL) who was elected to the Senate. It also includes Representatives-Elect Quico Canseco (R-TX), Bill Flores (R-TX), Jaime Herrera (R-WA), Raul Labrador (R-ID), and David Rivera (R-FL). This is an important devlopment, in that it could enable immigration restricionists in Congress to make some of these new anti-immigrant Republican Hispanics the face of some of their restrictionist legislative efforts, thereby dulling any charges that pro-immigrant Hispanics might make that their immigration restrictionist legislation is anti-Latino or anti-Hispanic. Additionally, two Hispanic Republicans who ran largely on immigration restrictionisit platforms were elected governors of New Mexico and Nevada. There already is talk in Washington of Senator-Elect Marco Rubio or Governor-Elect Susana Martinez (R-NM) being possible Vice Presidential running mates for whoever winds up winning the 2012 Republican Presidential nomination, an eventuality that could have a profound impact on that election.
Immigration certainly isn’t the only issue of interest to the Latino community but it is tied into to ALL other issues from the economy and unemployment to national security and education. Many if not all of the candidates above may be more likely to play divide and conquer good immigrant Latino vs bad immigrant Latino as they move their careers forward.
1:34 pm By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration|Politics · Comments Off
24 Feb 2010Suddenly, Latinos are expected to believe that Republicans love us. There has been an increase in efforts to go after our votes and support. Is this for real as in Republicans love Latins or is it just the latest attempt to take advantage of the current political landscape with Democratic policy promises that helped win the Latino vote at a standstill?
As the electoral eye shifts to mid-term elections, I am overwhelmed with the amount of media coverage the idea of “Republicans Loving Latinos” has received. Republican Loving Latinos sounds like some bad ethnic porn film and in many ways the script is as predictable as a skin flick. Latinos are either raised up as the hard working wannabe good U.S. citizens or demonized an invading, ever pregnant, and populating the country with criminals and “anchor babies”. The truth is though that Republicans can’t win seats in office without us. Note that this is different than saying that they can’t push dangerous policy without us. They have the Democrats to help them with that.
Read more…
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter