2:43 pm By Maegan La Mala · DREAM Act|Immigration|Justice|Obama|Politics|Secure Communities · 9 Comments
21 Apr 2011Publisher’s Note : There have been many posts here and in other spaces regarding President Obama’s failure to push immigration reform effectively at the legislative level and more recently, his continued dismissal of executive actions he can take. With the 2012 presidential campaign season officially kicking off, the question that is often presented to those of us offering the critiques is : who to vote for then? a Republican? No one at all? The always provocative Roberto Lovato offers the following commentary and options for what the Latino community can and should be doing. And for the record, I agree.
- Mala
Local media is abuzz with news of President Obama’s visit to San Francisco. Unfortunately for immigration policy and for the noble cause of immigrant rights, the media coverage reflects the editorial filters built up by the multimillion-dollar media apparatus set up by Obama’s immigrant rights allies in Washington, D.C., who are still seen by the press as the official voice of immigrants in the United States.
Consciously or not, these D.C. groups, their leaders, and their – until very recently – ominous silence about Obama’s radical immigration policies have so conditioned the ears of journalists and editors to the faux-applause and the JumboTron sound of support, to the sickly “Sí Se Puede” legalization of it all, that anyone talking about Obama’s repressive and devastating immigration policies sounds and looks like what SF Weekly wrote about activist Prerna Lal, who is currently in deportation proceedings: marginal and out of the mainstream.
Dangerous stuff. I’ve been traveling around the country a lot lately and am sickened of stories like what’s happening to Prerna, countless cases of immigrant children forced to watch in terror as their parents are treated like criminals and taken away forever by ICE – the agency Obama has the power to tell, “Stop it, stop it immediately.”
Failure to bring the Obama administration to some reasonable, concrete relief for DREAMers, or around cooperation agreements between local police and federal immigration authorities, like 287(g) and Secure Communities, will bring the bar of immigrant and Latino respect to even more dangerous lows. Democratic and Republican politicians and their allies will see that they can get away with continued repression without paying a political price. Such perception will, I fear, result in even more unprecedented terror and devastation of a community perceived to know no lower limits to its self-disrespect when its says “Sí Se Puede” in support of the administration that is breaking records as the most violent and repressive in the history of the immigrant United States.
Fortunately, we – not they – are the ones we have been waiting for.
I know many of you who will not allow Obama to glide through Latino communities as if he has not been the commander in chief of the war on immigrants. If things don’t change soon, any and all Obama Latino events should be subject to non-violent actions that defend both immigrants and our self-respect and dignity. Even his closest allies have communicated the need to take action on urgent matters like the deportation of DREAMers and the 287(g) and Secure Communities programs. If he doesn’t heed them, then he is clearly committed to moving beyond being a “frenemy” of immigrants, one deserving of having his electoral campaign aspirations dropped and devastated in Latino communities with the same zeal with which he and his administration prosecute the war on immigrants in Latino communities.
We cannot allow people to humiliate, attack and terrorize Latinos and still have Latinos singing their praises. Without relief for immigrants, we should make support for Obama’s re-election – and for the election of violent Republicans – synonymous with being what we used to call “vendidos” or “sellouts” in a previous political era. The moral reality is there to do so as is the urgent necessity.
Thankfully, I think the will and courage are there too. I am very proud of those who are teaching Obama and his allies what living hope and heart-driven change look like. Please enlist me in your heroic effort as I find great edification and inspiration in your actions.
For his own dignity and for ours, I hope President Obama does the right thing and stops the terror and devastation against immigrants.
Respectfully,
R
Roberto Lovato is co-founder of Presente.org.
5:48 pm By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|Obama|Politics · 8 Comments
19 Apr 2011Today the White House held yet another one of it’s meetings on immigration, where lots of press attention is garnered but little movement forward actually happens. According to a background press release, at the meeting were “Administration Officials and Stakeholders” including DHS Secretary Napolitano, Cecilia Munoz, Deputy Assistant to the President & Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, the mayors of NYC & San Antonio, law enforcement officials like the heads of the NYC and Philly police departments, business leaders such as the COO of Facebook, and organizational leaders such as John Podesta, CEO, Center for American Progress, Al Sharpton of the the National Action Network, and Richard Trumka of the AFL-CIO.
It has been confirmed by VivirLatino that there were Latino and immigration advocates at the meeting whose names were not on the official press list, perhaps on purpose to avoid the White House being criticized in the media for their inactions and actions that have led to increased enforcement and deportations. Those people were Eliseo Medina of SEIU, Janet Murguia of the NCLR, Ali Noorani of RI4A, Frank Sharry of America’s Voice, and Karen Narasaki of the Asian American Justice Center.
Pablo Alvarado, Director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network said of the meeting :
“While we appreciate the President’s effort to keep immigration reform on the national agenda, his actions belie his intent. We’re greatly disappointed that the meeting didn’t include more voices of immigrants at the table, including representatives of directly affected communities especially the people in the state of Arizona and Georgia where there is a modern day human rights crisis. If the President genuinely wanted to fix the broken immigration system, he would respond to the growing chorus of voices calling for the suspension of the secure communities program and move to legalize instead of further criminalize our immigrant communities.”
12:32 pm By Maegan La Mala · DREAM Act|Immigration · 8 Comments
12 Apr 2011The numerous posts I have written throughout the years pushing for calls, petitions and support for people who would have/could have been eligible to live in the U.S. without fear, namely the DREAMers, is proof of the deception of the Obama administration.
On April 1st, it was reported that Department of Homeland Security head, Janet Napolitano said that DREAMers were not targets for immigration. Whoever believed this was fool. Recently, activist and friend, Prerna Lal received notice that she was being placed in removal proceedings.
From her website :
The Notice to Appear for a Master Hearing is for November 10, 2011, just four days short of my 12 year anniversary in this country.
(So much for Barack Obama not deporting DREAM-eligible youth or am I just too old and educated to qualify now?)
I’m the grandchild of a U.S. citizen and the daughter of legal permanent residents of the United States. The fact that I’m in removal proceedings is incomprehensible as a matter of fact and law…
… I’ll take the Notice to Appear as a compliment. It looks like I’m an important enough threat to be the target of ICE enforcement efforts. I thought DHS Secretary Napolitano was prioritizing removing so-called “criminal aliens” from the country and students like me were not the target of ICE enforcement efforts. I was wrong. Funnily, I’ve never received a speeding ticket or citation, let alone seen the inside of a police station. My only “crime” is that I turned 21 before my mother became a legal permanent resident of the United States. Unfortunately, I can’t stop aging. I’d love to know how to reverse the process. I’m sure everyone would.
But you know what’s a bigger crime? Separating a mother from her child. Separating a child from her mother based on an arbitrary age. I don’t know how my parents are supposed to survive this, considering all their hopes and dreams for the future are pinned on me, considering they came to this country only to give me a better life.
It’s also unfortunate that no court of law would hear my claim of the years of pain, anguish and trauma that I’ve faced by the simple fact that according to immigration law, my only parents are not my immediate relatives.
They are legal permanent residents now. They will be U.S. citizens soon. And they still won’t have the right to keep their youngest daughter in this country.
God Bless America.
If you can help Prerna out by donating some funds to pay for her trips to court, etc, please do so here.
9:21 am By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Immigration|Politics · 1 Comment
12 Apr 2011Yesterday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to lift an injunction on the most controversial aspects of SB 1070, including the provision that required police to verify the immigration status of anyone they suspected of being undocumented, the show me your papers portion of the notorious law. The injunction is expected to stay in place until the Department of Justice lawsuit against SB-1070 is decided.
Salvador Reza of the Puente Movement responded, “SB 1070 and the on-going court battles could be avoided if the Obama administration simply ended its ICE Access contracts with Arizona. A simple stroke of the President’s pen could resolve much of the human rights crisis in Arizona. ”
And may I add, across the country. It’s important to remember that the federal lawsuit against SB1070 is based more on the idea that it is the job of the federal government to enforce immigration laws, than on the idea of racial profiling being a disgusting way to feed the prison system. And enforce the federal government has done (i.e Secure Communities).
The continuance of the injunction hopefully will also serve as a warning to states, like Georgia, that are pushing laws like SB1070, that these laws will be challenged by the legal system, but perhaps more importantly and less talked about, by our communities.
10:12 am By Maegan La Mala · Activism|DREAM Act|Education|Georgia|Immigration · 2 Comments
6 Apr 2011Yesterday, undocumented youth in Georgia amped up the action by committing an act of civil disobedience, risking deportation. The arrests of Georgina Perez, Viridiana Martinez, Jose Rico, Dayanna Rebolledo, Andrea Rosales, David Ramirez and Maria Marroquin near Georgia State University, were preceded by the state’s first “coming out” event, where the young people first publicly declared their undocumented status. The young people also delivered
a letter to the Georgia State University President asking him to not comply with the recent Georgia Board of Regents ban of undocumented youth from the top 5 public universities.
With no DREAM Act currently in play in the U.S. Congress (although that may change soon), DREAMers across the country have been working locally to make sure that all young people have access to education regardless of their immigration status.
CNN has the following video of the protest and arrests.
Read more…
8:00 am By Maegan La Mala · Activism|chicago|DREAM Act|Education|Immigration|Justice|Media|Politics|Videos|youth · Comments Off
4 Apr 2011This past, March 10th, young people, many whom would be eligible for the DREAM Act (if politicians would just get it passed already), came out of the shadows and declared their immigration status, without fear and without apologies.
The following is a video from the “Coming Out of the Shadows” rally in Chicago, organized by the Youth Justice League.
The film moved me to tears, and I was really appreciative of how it showed the diversity of the young people involved in the struggle for the DREAM Act.
If you want to support these youth or want to learn how to get involved. Visit the Youth Justice League online or email them at info@iyjl.org.
12:15 pm By Maegan La Mala · DREAM Act|GLBT|Immigration|Obama|Politics|Secure Communities · 7 Comments
31 Mar 2011Earlier this week, President Obama appeared on an Univision hosted television forum on Latinos and Education. While education is an important key in the future of the growing Latino population in the US, now estimated at 50 million, immigration is tied into this future as well. During the forum, Obama said that he still had hope for comprehensive immigration reform including the DREAM Act. All the hope in the world however, cannot obscure the ugly reality of current policy and this week has proven chock full of examples of the double speak the administration is engaging in, especially to the Latino community in all it’s intersections.
False Hope for Immigrant LGB Couples
For 24 hours, immigrant gay and lesbian married couples believed that their struggle to have their marriages recognized and having that recognition work in their favor to access the same right to permanent residency green cards as straight married couples was over.
For 24 hours U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services initiated a temporary hold on on green card applications from married same-sex couples based on President Obama’s declaration that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional. This meant a hold on deportations of foreign nationals in legally recognized same-sex marriages. Quickly though, USCIS declared it’s intention to return to business as usual as per Obama’s deportation first immigration policy.
Christopher Bentley, a spokesperson for U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, confirmed on Wednesday that the temporary hold on green card applications from married same-sex couples has been lifted after the agency received the anticipated legal instructions on issues that emerged after President Obama declared the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional.
“USCIS has not implemented any change in policy and intends to follow the president’s directive to continue enforcing the law,” Bentley said.
Steve Ralls, spokesperson for Immigration Equality, expressed disappointment that the Obama administration resumed its authority to deport foreign nationals in legally recognized same-sex marriages.
“Our government should be in the business of keeping families together, not tearing them apart,” Ralls said. “The Department of Justice has said it believes DOMA is unconstitutional. Immigration Equality agrees, and we believe it is inappropriate to use that unconstitutional law to separate American citizens from their loved ones.”
US citizenship does not equal safety from being separated from your loved ones, even if you are a U.S. citizen child. Just ask four year old Emily Ruiz.
Read more…
8:19 am By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|Massachusetts|Secure Communities · 1 Comment
21 Mar 2011Basing their assertion on the results of a Freedom of Information Act request which yielded thousands of internal documents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), legal advocates from the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, the Center for Constitutional Rights and the Cardozo Immigrant Justice Clinic, delivered a letter to Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, advising that he has the power to prevent statewide participation in the controversial “Secure Communities” program (S-Comm).
The 21 page letter points to Washington State and Washington D.C. as examples of areas that effectively opt-ed out of the program which mandates the sending of fingerprints of those in police custody to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. From the letter:
Washington State and the District of Columbia Have Effectively Opted Out of S-Comm and ICE has Provided No Reason Why Massachusetts Cannot Do the Same
In May 2010, after a series of communications with ICE, Washington State informed ICE that it would not sign an S-Comm Memorandum of Agreement. Rather, Washington informed ICE that it would leave the decision whether or not to participate in S-Comm to local jurisdictions. To our knowledge, Washington’s refusal to sign an MOA has meant that no localities in Washington have been “activated” in S-Comm without their consent. ICE’s own documents show that, to date, no jurisdictions in Washington are participating in S-Comm.
Similarly, in July 2010, following a unanimous vote by the DC Council opposing S-Comm, the District of Columbia informed ICE that it would not participate in the program.3 As with Washington State, the District’s opt-out has, according to our knowledge and ICE’s own representations, The District has not been activated in S-Comm, and it maintains a firm separation between local police and federal immigration functions.
If Massachusetts declines to sign an S-Comm MOA, there is no reason to believe that its decisionwould be any less effective than those of Washington State or the District of Columbia in preventing additional localities within Massachusetts from being activated in S-Comm absent an independent agreement between the locality and ICE. If ICE claims otherwise, the burden is on it to explain the justification for applying one standard to Washington State and the District of Columbia, and another standard to Massachusetts.
8:32 am By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|mexico|Politics|Uncategorized · 21 Comments
14 Mar 2011While states across the country continue to push anti-immigrant legislation which seeks to criminalize the most basic rights of people, the Department of Homeland Security under Secretary Janet Napolitano is being very clear about it’s policy of deportation and death on the Southern Border.
In hearings last week before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Napolitano bragged about the fact that the Obama administration granted deferred action in less than 900 cases last year. That was fewer than the Bush administration.
According to Immigration Equality‘s useful definition Deferred Action is:
a minimal humanitarian status which The Department of Homeland Security can grant in cases of extremely compelling humanitarian facts (such as a life-threatening illness). The status permits an individual to remain in the United States for a limited period of time (generally two years) after which point he or she must re-apply.
So essentially Napolitano is bragging about immigration policy becoming less humane under the Obama administration than under the last Bush administration.
Read more…
8:21 am By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|Mississippi · 16 Comments
24 Feb 2011There has been much talk of the Obama administration moving towards more “silent” immigration raids, that is targeting workplaces. The perception and narrative is that targeting immigrants and their employers in this way is kinder and gentler. But the reality looks more like what went down in the Jackson, Mississippi metro area this past weekend.
ICE agents were “knocking on doors, saying they were selling Avon or with Domino’s,” said Glenda Arevalo, who lives in the complex. “They said, ‘Come out, come out, y’all are going back to your country.’”
When some responded they were in the country legally, she said ICE agents replied, “We don’t care. You’re going with us.”
Angella Rector said she saw an ICE agent put a gun against the head of one Hispanic and say, “If you move motherf—er, we’re going to kill you.”
The father of her three young children was among those arrested by agents, she said. “He was in his boxers. They told him, ‘You’re f—ing illegal.’”
Her husband is being taken back to Mexico, she said. “Now I have to raise the kids by myself.”
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter