6:14 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Health| Immigration| Justice| Politics| Violence| Women| arizona · No Comments
27 Oct 2009
Yesterday, la Macha told us how today is the National Call in Day for Women of Color to Demand Health Care Reform (have you called yet?). And while immigrants have been used as scapegoats, not much attention has been paid to the access for immigrants, especially immigrant women who find themselves detained while pregnant, women like Juana Villegas DeLaPaz who we wrote about last year.
Seems like Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who revels in terrorizing Latino communities, wants to make sure that even infants entering into this world know their place in his eyes. From Latino Politico:
During her second night behind bars, the bleeding started. On the morning of October 14, she felt contractions. Her hands and feet shackled, she was in labor and ushered into a paramedic’s van by a detention officer who restrained her to the stretcher.
“That’s not necessary,” the paramedic told the officer.
“It’s my job,” the officer responded. The guard was a Latina.
She thought she would be released from the shackles once she arrived at the hospital, but she wasn’t.
The officer chained her ankle to one leg of the hospital bed.
A nurse requested that she be freed to get a urine sample. But the officer suggested instead that her bed be dragged over to the bathroom.
Later she was changed from her jail uniform into a hospital gown.
“The officer chained me by the feet and the hands to the bed,” she said. “And that’s how my daughter was born.”
It is the lives of women above that make me keep repeating why the issues of immigration reform, health care reform, and prison reform all work together. It is why I am not a reformer because the reform movements tends to separate the issues into neat little blocks. I think of those who cried victory when Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s 287(g) contract was modified to only include checking the status of those in jail, those in jail like the woman forced to give birth in chains.
7:52 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration| Obama| Politics · 1 Comment
25 Jun 2009Today is the day many have been waiting for: the sign that the Obama administration and members of Congress care about immigration reform.
So who is going to be at the White House meeting, that had already been postponed twice?
According to La Opinión:
Senadores:
Robert Menéndez (D)
Patrick Leahy (R)
Charles Schumer (D)
John McCain (R)
Mel Martínez (R)
John Cornyn (R)
Jeff Sessions (R)
Congresistas:
Lamar Smith (R)
Zoe Lofgren (D)
Xavier Becerra (D)
Howard Berman (D)
Lincoln Díaz-Balart (R)
Luis Gutiérrez (D)
Nydia Velázquez (D)
Adam Putnam (R)
Anthony Weiner (D)
But color me unimpressed and not very hopeful given some of the language that lawmakers and so-called progressive groups are using to discuss immigration reform, language that promotes the “good immigrant/bad immigrant” dichotomy.
Read more…
7:37 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration| Media| Obama| Politics · Comments Off
24 Jun 2009New America Media, who gave some of the pro-migrant blogging work I’m aligned with some props, is calling on “Ethnic Media” to run an editorial pushing immigration reform.
Some of us don’t need to be pushed, as it’s part of our everyday operating standards but what I found most interesting about the push is how it’s being labeled specifically as:
NOT a direct reflection of some advocates’ disatisfaction with President Barack Obama’s deliberate approach to immigration reform. [Emphasis mine]
Except for some of us it is. For example, yesterday President Obama has a press conference where he discussed Iran, health care reform, the economy, and even his smoking but couldn’t be bothered to even breath a word on immigration.
You can read NAM’s suggested text after the jump.
1:42 pm By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Events| Immigration| Los Angeles| Washington DC · 1 Comment
3 Jun 2009I am writing to you from Washington DC and am in the company of about 700 other people with one thing on their mind, Reform Immigration for America. What that means for each individual differs pero the energy is high and all the people here are here to work. So far I have met people from so many different states, from so many different backgrounds. Some are policy makers, some are activists, some are importantly, immigrants themselves.
I need to sit down with my notes from the Welcome Luncheon which included a keynote speech from Representative Luis Gutierrez and breakdown a little, the tone that was set for this summit.
Pero in the meantime, I think it speaks to the some of the strategic organizing when you think how this summit is part of a national effort across the country that includes local actions which jumped off yesterday. Here’s a video from the Los Angeles jump off.
9:45 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Activism| Controversia| Immigration| Politics| Religion| society · 1 Comment
23 Apr 2009
A group of Latino pastors is asking immigrants to “boycott” the U.S. Census unless Congress passes comprehensive immigration reform:
The National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders says illegal immigrants should not agree to be counted unless Congress first passes immigration reform. The group is planning a rally this week in Newark, N.J.It says census numbers have been used to target and repress the undocumented. They say the nation’s estimated 12 million illegal immigrants need a path to legalization before they agree to have their numbers count toward state funding and congressional seats.
The organization, CONLAMIC, says that data on Latinos is being used to build up police forces and fund programs which will ultimately lead to arrests, raids and deportations.
Latino organization NALEO (The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials) is criticizing CONLAMIC’s efforts, stating:
“To do this boycott to pressure comprehensive immigration reform is like cutting off your nose to spite your face,” Vargas said. “There is no connection between the census and immigration reform; it’s undermining the community by encouraging an undercount; and it’s misguided and irresponsible.
What do you think about CONLAMIC’s campaign? Will this ultimately help the immigrant community or will it not make a difference?
9:36 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration| Labor| Politics · 1 Comment
15 Apr 2009
Understanding that what benefits some workers in the US should benefit all workers has been a struggle in the pro-migrant community. Finally it seems that there us some movement towards recognizing that scapegoating undocumented workers as the cause for labor and economic woes isn’t helping anyone.
The nation’s two major labor federations have agreed for the first time to join forces to support an overhaul of the immigration system, leaders of both organizations said on Monday. The accord could give President Obama significant support among unions as he revisits the stormy issue in the midst of the recession.
What does pro-labor/pro-migrant immigration reform look like?
The accord endorses legalizing the status of illegal immigrants already in the United States and opposes any large new program for employers to bring in temporary immigrant workers, officials of both federations said.
The guest worker program has been a huge sticking point since the business sector loves guest worker programs and sees them as a “trade-off” for legalizing millions of undocumented.
8:19 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration| Politics · 1 Comment
9 Apr 2009
One of the reasons that the Obama administration and its supporters have given for not working on immigration reform sooner is the economy, as if the lives of undocumented immigrants and indeed the lives of all of us have nothing to do with the millions who work in the U.S. without papers. However now, as we approach the worker’s day of May Day, a day that has also more recently been used to highlight the lives of the undocumented, the Obama administration is saying that this year it is going to address immigration
Mr. Obama plans to speak publicly about the issue in May, administration officials said, and over the summer he will convene working groups, including lawmakers from both parties and a range of immigration groups, to begin discussing possible legislation for as early as this fall.
5:29 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · California| Immigration · 20 Comments
19 Mar 2009President Obama was in Costa Mesa, California, yesterday to hold a “town hall” meeting and he finally brought up the hot-button topic of immigration, and more specifically, immigration reform. The speech was vague and lacking content, as was to be expected, but here’s the most salient part:
“You’ve got to say to the undocumented workers… ‘Look, you’ve broken the law. You didn’t come here the way you were supposed to. So this is not going to be a free ride … What’s going to happen is you’re going to pay a significant fine.’
“‘You are going to learn english. You are going to… go to the back of the line so you don’t get ahead of somebody who was in Mexico City applying legally.’”
“‘But after you’ve done these things over a certain period of time, you can earn your citizenship. So that it’s not — it’s not something that is guaranteed or automatic. You’ve got to earn it.’ But over time, you get people an opportunity.”
How do you interpret this? How will this rhetoric translate into real policy?
Via / SGGP
9:00 am By Maegan La Mala · Immigration| Politics · 5 Comments
23 Oct 2008
Still think that electoral politics is going to solve the immigration issue? Or that being a Democrat means a magic answer to save Latinos once we, as a sleeping giant that everyone keeps talking about, vote? Gracias to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who is keeping it real by stepping away from offering a path to citizenship to immigrants.
…Pelosi also said Congress would have to tackle the politically sticky job of overhauling immigration laws in the new Congress, after a bipartisan measure collapsed last year.The estimated 12 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally “are part of the U.S. economy. We cannot send them all home, and we cannot send them all to jail, so we have to address it,” Pelosi said.
Any solution would have to be bipartisan, she said, so it may require sacrificing some of Democrats’ past priorities, such as giving illegal immigrants a path to citizenship.
“Maybe there never is a path to citizenship if you came here illegally,” Pelosi said. “I would hope that there could be, but maybe there isn’t.”
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by 2 Mujeres Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse and influential Latino and Latina community in the U.S.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter