12:39 pm By Maegan La Mala · Health|Immigration|Latina Week of Action for Reproductive Justice|Women · 6 Comments
5 Aug 2011As part of the Latina Week of Action for Reproductive Justice, the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health asks participants in it’s blog carnival : What’s the REAL problem with scapegoating immigrant women?
I wrote a very brief intro yesterday, questioning how we frame the question even and who gets to speak for themselves vs. who is spoken for.
My family is an immigrant family. I have taken heat from other Latinas for claiming this, for claiming being the first generation in my Puerto Rican family to be born in the United States. It is often raised that Puerto Rico is part of the United States, so that the migration patterns of the women who came before me, my tias and later my abuela, who came to New York looking for work in the garment industries, mujeres who came before their husbands to work in sweatshops run buy famous fashion designers, mujeres who now can barely see – and not just because of age, don’t matter or worse, don’t exist. As amiga Bianca Laureano wrote in her submission to the blog carnival :
Many folks think those narratives are not worthy or important, when really they have impacted me! And don’t I matter? Don’t the women with similar testimonios and experiences matter?
Bringing this back to the issue of immigrant women and reproductive justice, the buzzwords, according to mainstream (read white led) feminism and non-profits, is choice and access. The choice of how to prevent and plan pregnancies, allegedly revolutionized by the birth control pill, used Puerto Rican women of my grandmothers’ generation as the perfect test subjects. When our uteri weren’t being experimented on, they were being forcibly sterilized. My tias and my grandmothers weren’t accused of harboring anchor babies in their wombs, turning the possibility of “poor brown babies” being born as U.S. citizens as threats because of the colonial occupation of Puerto Rico sure sounds pretty damn close.
8:50 am By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|New York City|sexuality|Women · 7 Comments
2 Jul 2011If we were to follow the logic of the NYC District Attorney’s office, if you have ever told a lie, even if it is in the face of a system set up to fail you and your family, like say the U.S. immigration system, then your accused rapist deserves to go free. This is the lesson of the recent news surrounding the rape case against former International Monetary Fund head Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
Yesterday, Strauss-Kahn was released from house arrest following an announcement by the prosecutor that called into question the “credibility” of the hotel housekeeper who has said that Strauss-Kahn sexually assaulted her in May. What has made the parties responsible for going after Strauss-Kahn throw the Guinean woman under the bus?
The immigrant mother allegedly knows people who are criminals and details regarding her application for immigration asylum are being called into question, specifically details regarding past sexual assault and genital mutilation.
The take-aways from this are pretty clear and serve as reminders to women and people of color who dare to come forward expecting the criminal justice system to protect/serve them.
1: If you are going to call anyone after you are sexually assaulted because you need support, make sure that person has never done anything remotely criminal or been accused of doing anything remotely criminal. Forget that fact that within the United States, people of color communities are policed hard and prosecuted hard over minor violations and that racial profiling means that walking down your street means handing over your papers at a moment’s notice.
2: Don’t be an immigrant, especially an immigrant woman of color. The fact that the accuser has an immigration record has served to hurt her more than help her. It has created an area of access to further violate her life. The questions that are reopened include why did she come here and does she deserve to be here. She is the one that must prove her worthiness to first even exist in the United States before it’s criminal justice system will grant her the honor of considering her valuable enough to defend.
What if she were a citizen? What if she were a White French tourist? Certainly women in general do not fare well under the current criminal justice system, but to be an immigrant woman of color – well she might as well deserved it.
At a time when one of the main arguments being used by “advocates” against immigration enforcement programs like Secure Communities is the fact that it threatens the safety of immigrant women in terms of how they relate to the police aka community policing (ha) – the treatment of the accuser/survivor is an example that the entire criminal justice system places no value in the reality/lives of working, immigrant, women of color and has no respect for their sexual dignity.
What would justice look like here?
11:27 am By Maegan La Mala · Food|Immigration|Violence|Women · 2 Comments
24 Nov 2010I don’t really celebrate Thanksgiving but many families across the United States will take advantage of deserved days off from work and gather together around tables to give thanks and to break bread. But that turkey (or pernil), how did it get to your kitchen and your table?
A report released by the Southern Poverty Law Center attempts to answer that question.
Farmworkers
* There are an estimated 3 million migrant and seasonal farmworkers employed in the United States.4 The federal government estimates that 60 percent of farmworkers are undocumented immigrants; farmworker advocates say the percentage is far higher.
* The National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) published by the Department of Labor reports that about 22% of the farmworker population is female. Thus, there are an estimated 630,000 women engaged in farm work in the United States.5
* The average personal income of female crop workers is $11,250, compared to $16,250 for male crop workers.6
* A mere 8 percent of farmworkers report being covered by employer-provided health insurance, a rate that dropped to 5 percent for farmworkers who are employed seasonally and not year-round.7
* According to the U.S. Department of Labor, farmworkers suffer from higher rates of toxic chemical injuries and skin disorders than any other workers in the country.8 The children of migrant farmworkers, also, have higher rates of pesticide exposure than the general public.9
* Each year, there are an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 cases of physician-diagnosed pesticide poisoning among U.S. farmworkers, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.10
* Farmworkers are not covered by workers’ compensation laws in many states. They are not entitled to overtime pay under federal law. On smaller farms and in short harvest seasons, they are not entitled to the federal minimum wage.11 They are excluded from many state health and safety laws.12
* Because of special exemptions for agriculture, children as young as 10 may work in the fields. Also, many states exempt farmworker children from compulsory education laws.Poultry Workers
* Almost a quarter of the workers who butcher and process meat, poultry and fish are undocumented.13
* At least half of the 250,00014 laborers in 174 of the major U.S. chicken factories are Latino and more than half are women.15
* Working in a chicken factory is one of the most dangerous occupations in America. Line workers endure a frigid and wet work environment, without adequate bathroom breaks, while being exposed to numerous hazards handling chicken on hangers that whiz by a rate of hundreds per minute. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has not enacted any regulation to limit the speed at which poultry and meat processing lines operate — despite the appallingly high rates of injury directly attributable to the line speed. In the decade ending in 2008, 100 poultry workers died in the U.S., and 300,000 were injured, many suffering the loss of a limb or debilitating repetitive motion injuries.16
* The U.S. Department of Labor surveyed 51 poultry processing plants and found 100% had violated labor laws by not paying employees for all hours worked. Also, one-third took impermissible deductions from workers’ pay.17
8:53 am By Maegan La Mala · children|Family|Immigration|Justice|Mississippi|Women · 53 Comments
19 Aug 2010
Cirila Baltazar Cruz may have returned to Mexico with her beloved daughter Ruby, but that does not mean that the state of Mississippi should not be held responsible for the ordeal that the Oaxacan mother and her child went through because of hate filled policy.
VivirLatino first wrote about Cirila over a year ago, when there was still hope of comprehensive immigration reform being passed this year and yet the narrative was framed in term of who deserved that reform? Certainly not women like Cirila Baltazar Cruz, an Indigenous woman from Oaxaca, a single mami, who dared to work and live in the United States not speaking English or Spanish. A fellow Latina, identified as Puerto Rican in original reports, took away Cirila’s newborn daughter, Ruby, after deciding that speaking Chatino, an Indigenous language, made her an unfit mother. Not only was Ruby taken away and placed with a prominent white family and fast-tracked for adoption, Cirila was criminalized in a way the happens all too often to immigrant mujeres and mamis. She was accused of being a sex worker.
11:14 am By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|Women · 11 Comments
5 Aug 2010I touched upon some of my own personal issues with birthright citizenship, and how from a colonial perspective it’s complicated but today I wanted to post this clip and look at how so many white men are discussing the GOP calls to take back the 14th amendment and how women of color, women like me and so many of my hermanas and vecinas, are being talked about instead of talked with or listened to. How our wombs are worded as weapons of mass destruction and our beautiful babies as objects stuck into the earth to keep us here. This dehumanization of some Latina mujeres cuerpos (because let’s keep it real, not all mujer Latina cuerpos can/will have babies pero they still are mujer Latina bodies) and the life that comes from those bodies is what allows hate crimes to go unpunished, what allows the separation of mother from child to be ok, and what allows violence against immigrant mujeres to be ignored.
Even in this space, haters have come and sought information about my and my children, calling them anchor babies. And the point is not what their status is or what my status is (although I have been clear about that) but that this comes down to where ethnicity and gender meet. That now Latina mujer = anchor baby factory.
What I worry about, as this rhetoric keeps building, is what about the babies, the children. How can we guarantee their safety? We have already seen that they don’t care about our hijos.
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Born in the U.S.A. | ||||
|
||||
12:25 pm By la Macha · arizona|children|Immigration|Women · 8 Comments
25 May 2010Via Racewire comes the disgusting, but sadly not shocking, news that the 14th Amendment will be the next target in Russel Pearce’s (the author of SB 1070) campaign against immigrants.
Pearce writes in one e-mail: “I also intend to push for an Arizona bill that would refuse to accept or issue a birth certificate that recognizes citizenship to those born to illegal aliens, unless one parent is a citizen.”
One of the more remarkable e-mails sent to a list of supporters detailed his next steps: The e-mail, several pages long, includes articles critical of the 14th Amendment, which gives babies born on U.S. soil automatic citizenship.
One of the e-mails written by someone else but forwarded by Pearce reads: “If we are going to have an effect on the anchor baby racket, we need to target the mother. Call it sexist, but that’s the way nature made it. Men don’t drop anchor babies, illegal alien mothers do.”
If we take just a minute here to do a little supposing, we can really see how preposterous and dangerous it is to assume that women are the sole instigators in “dropping anchors.”
Let’s pretend a Mexican man gets together with a white female citizen. The white woman gets pregnant. The man leaves–leaving the citizen baby with her citizen mother.
Did the man just drop an anchor here? Is that baby a citizen or an anchor? Does the white mother bear sole legal responsibility for bearing an anchor baby? How do we punish that mother for bearing an anchor baby? And if we don’t assume this baby is an anchor baby, why do we assume *women* get pregnant with the exclusive desire to get citizenship, and men don’t? Can’t men use their citizen child just as vindictively as women can?
And are we to assume that citizen women who get pregnant with “illegal sperm” are really so innocent? That they aren’t hopeful, didn’t specifically *suggest*–let’s get pregnant so you can stay here!
There are simply too many holes in any scenario (another example: parents come here legally [as most do] and their papers expire. Kids are born when papers are legal. Are they anchor babies?]) based in reality to find a credible reason to target mothers/women specifically–but that really doesn’t seem to matter much.
As most of us involved in pro-immigration work know, the decision to target mothers/women has been gaining steam and support for years, decades, really. There is no logic behind any of the arguments–except that mothers/women are easiest to target.
Which brings up the difficult question: when you know that a group is being targeted exclusively because of hate–how do you *logically* fight that? How do “5 Myths about Immigrants” posts (which I do find very helpful, by the way) stand up against an emotion–an intense passionate emotion that most people can’t even really explain coherently?
7:02 pm By la Macha · U.S.-Mexico Border|Violence · 1 Comment
15 Mar 2010For the latest Remembering Women’s History month post, I wanted to focus on this article I found about the health of Latina women in Arizona. As most of us know, Arizona is a notoriously unfriendly state for immigrants in general and immigrant women specifically. It is the state that has enacted some of the harshest anti-immigrant laws and, of course, has Sheriff Joe as well.
But all the anti-immigrant hysteria has led to some terrifying consequences for immigrant women. Namely in the form of their health. When a woman who is in the country without documentation gets cancer, what does she do?
In Arizona, the answer is rarely “she gets treatment.”
Undocumented women are more likely to forego treatment because of the costs involved with their care, said Mollie Williams, director of community health programs for Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a foundation that provides grants for services and education on cancer. “It is likely for these women to fall through the cracks.”
Williams said in some cases service providers who receive grants from the foundation have reported that women were able to cover the cost of their mastectomy and initial care using their state Medicaid emergency insurance. This type of coverage is available to anyone, regardless of immigration status.
But breast cancer is a complex disease that requires an assortment of specialists, expensive medicines and follow-up care. Treatment could extend for up to five years and cost between $20,000 to $60,000.
In some areas community clinics can only diagnose the cancer, but there is no follow up.
“We are able to screen them, but there’s not much we can do after that,” said Lucy Murrieta, an outreach community relations manager for the Sunset Community Health Center in Yuma County.
So–a few women can get a diagnosis–and even fewer women can actually get treated. And as usual, there seems to be little difference between “legal” and “illegal” woman.
In some cases the women have migrated legally, said Murrieta, but since they have been in the country for less than five years they’re ineligible for Medicaid coverage, available to low income people. When these women lose work after the farming season, they also lose their health insurance, making it difficult to obtain breast cancer treatment.
Similarly, there seems to be little difference between immigrants and citizens either. For example, what effect is this diagnosis and lack of treatment having on the generation of children who are US citizens and are watching their parents die from treatable and sometimes even preventable diseases? If we look toward the black community, we see that there is often a strong suspicion of doctors and the medical community–largely due to how the black community has historically been treated by the medical establishment (see: Mississippi Appendectomies and Tuskeegee Experiments among others).
What are we telling US citizens about their health when we’ll diagnose a disease but not treat it? What relationship with their health are we creating? And how does this unequal, terrifying and inhumane relationship with the medical establishment intersect with cultural based issues like: a Catholicism that often encourages a virgin/whore dichotomy that makes many Latinas think of their private areas as dirty and untouchable–something to be ignored until marriage or babies? Old school religious mothers that are the primary source of sexual knowledge for their daughters? “Good Girl” mentalities that teach girls (especially the oldest daughter) to be the caretakers of everybody else (the little mama) at the expense of themselves?
The consequences of all these factors mixing together cannot be understated. And if we look towards other Latina populations (the report is largely about Mexican women)–for example, Puerto Ricans–you can see how mother’s who were sterilized in the 70′s have raised daughters that often have not just a healthy suspicion of the medical establishment, but an outright fear of it. I know several Puerto Rican women–in their 30′s and 40′s–who have never once gone to see a gynecologist.
But how many studies are ever done on good methods to get Latinas back into the doctor’s office?
There is a desperate need for Latinas to begin our own studies, our own research and our own grassroots organizing to create our own clinics. The great news is that there are plenty of existing models on how to do this, including one that was started by Latinas.
If you know of other health clinics that cater to Latin@ populations specifically or women generally–please leave them in comments!
11:34 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · mexico|Music|Women · Comments Off
8 Mar 2010Lila Downs is one of my favorite mujer artistas. The video here features some of the mujeres that have been killed and disappeared in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. i would like to extend the dedication to todas las mujeres that have been disappeared by I.C.E. and the U.S Department of Homeland Security.
8:20 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · children|Immigration|Justice|language|Mississippi|Women · 4 Comments
25 Feb 2010I love good news, especially when I hear about it from our amazing readers/amig@s. Last night Katie let us know that Cirila Baltazar Cruz, the Indigenous Mexican mujer who had her child taken away from her because of a mix of racist and sexist anti-immigrant actions in the name of the state of Mississippi, has been reunited with her hijita, Ruby.
There has been a cloak of secrecy surrounding this case which has made it nearly impossible to get any information or perspective directly from the people involved but according to an article I found on The Native American Times, Cirila and Ruby are headed back to Oaxaca.
9:52 am By la Macha · Health|Immigration · 2 Comments
13 Nov 2009
I was reading this article about douching and how it’s not good for you (probably not safe for work–multiple uses of p* word, no pictures.), and I started wondering. I’ve always thought of douching as a white girl thing. All the commercials (mom and daughter on a beach, etc) highlight white women–and all the articles that talk about why douching is bad for you are written by white women and highlight the experience of douching white women.
Do Latinas douche? And if they do, why are they doing it? And why do only white girls get access to the knowledge that douching is actually quite horrible for you?
Turns out, I’m not the only one who had these questions. Researchers conducted studies and found that douching is a regular part of a big population of Latina’s lives. Specifically, immigrant Latinas.
Of course, I can’t read the results of the entire essay without paying for it (damn you academic websites!), so some of my questions are going unanswered. Like: How did the researchers define “Latina” (were blatinas a part of the make up?)? And is there a certain era that saw an increasing in douching Latinas? What was it? And what mitigated the increase? And how many generations does the practice linger once women have immigrated? Does the move to the U.S. increase usage or does the practice gradually die away?
But for now, it’s just good to know that a harmful practice that Latinas participate in can be confronted. Latinas, if you’re douching, please be aware that douching can often cause problems with your system (yeast infections, etc). It also *does not* stop pregnancy. You’ll need a condoms or birth control for that. And finally, douching actually increases your chances of catching an STD.
Remember: The truth, simply, is that the vagina is the original self-cleaning oven. It needs no help. Then get yourself some condoms and/or birth control. Love your body before all else.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter