Advertisement

Posts Tagged ‘Environment

This article from the BBC about farmers in Bolivia who are using farming methods of their ancestors to create sustainable farming techniques was very interesting. It made me think about how people in the U.S. have absolutely no similar history to draw on for our own farming methods–mostly because we’ve never done anything sustainable or environmentally friendly–ever. And we’ve done all that we can to destroy sustainable methods of surviving in indigenous communities in the U.S. for centuries.

The system is based on building “camellones” – raised earth platforms of anything up to 2m high, surrounded by canals.

Constructed above the height of flood waters, the camellones can protect seeds and crops from being washed away.

The water in the canals provide irrigation and nutrients during the dry season.

Pre-Columbian cultures in Beni from about 1000BC to AD1400 used a similar system.

So while other countries are talking about canals and irrigation and camellones–the U.S. is talking about militarization and destruction. When the hell are we in the U.S. ever going to wake up?

Post to Twitter

375618973_65246f6df5

Contrary to what the writers of South Park would have you think, Costa Rica is a paradise on earth. At least that’s that’s what a new poll by a UK environmental institute has shown: Costa Rica ranks as not only one of the most environmentally friendly countries, but also as the world’s happiest:

The New Economics Foundation looked at 143 countries that are home to 99 percent of the world’s population and devised an equation that weighed life expectancy and people’s happiness against their environmental impact.

By that formula, Costa Rica is the happiest, greenest country in the world, just ahead of the Dominican Republic.

85% of Costa Ricans say they are happy with their lives.

In contrast, the United States came in at 114, and Britain at 74. Speaking of the UK, the BBC’s Mark Easton says he has an idea as to why the richest countries come out last. Quite interesting.

What is it about Latin America and happiness anyway?

Via / AFP

Image via mikebaird on Flickr

Post to Twitter

A great interview from Democracy Now! about the incidents in Peru and the U.S. role in shaping the violence:

AMY GOODMAN: On Sunday, Peruvian President Alan Garcia defended the police actions and lashed out against the deaths of the policemen. He blamed, quote, “foreign forces” for the violence and spoke of a, quote, “conspiracy” to stop his government from exploiting natural resources.

PRESIDENT ALAN GARCIA: [translated] These death mongers would like the world to denounce hundreds of natives being killed. But what has been found are dozens of police with their throats slit. That’s the truth when one talks of the facts of these deaths. And you might ask why they are our police deaths, if they are the one who are armed. The explanation for all of this, you come to understand, is a will for dialogue on the part of these humble policemen, who had no desire to fire their weapons.

AMY GOODMAN: Peruvian President Alan Garcia defending the police actions against indigenous protesters last week. Over the weekend, Garcia, a free trade advocate, said 40,000 natives did not have the right to tell 28 million Peruvians not to come to their lands. Anyone who did so, he warned, would lead Peru into, quote, “irrationality and a backwards primitive state.”

Since April, indigenous groups have opposed new laws that would allow an unprecedented wave of logging, oil drilling, mining and agriculture in the Amazon rainforest by blocking roads, waterways and oil pipelines. President Garcia’s government passed these laws under “fast track” authority he had received from the Peruvian congress to facilitate implementation of the US-Peru Free Trade Agreement.

Friday’s clashes followed a governmental decision to reject congressional attempts to overturn some of the laws.

Post to Twitter

peruindigenousBeing in the U.S. affords me certain privileges, namely allowing me to be unaware of how laws of the U.S. affect citizens in other countries. I knew on some level what the fighting in Peru was about (corporate versus indigenous nations versus Peruvian government), but of course, the role of the U.S. is so hidden from people in the U.S., we don’t see it until we are told.

From msnbc.com:

The strikers’ demands are the same as those of the protesting Indians: that Congress revoke laws to promote oil and natural gas extraction, logging and large-scale agriculture on traditional Indian lands. Garcia decreed the laws to comply with a new U.S.-Peru free trade agreement.

“We don’t get anything from this huge exploitation, which also poisons us. We’ve never seen any development and my community lives in poverty,” local Aguaruna leader Mateo Inti told The Associated Press in Bagua, the scene of Friday’s violence.

They also want Garcia and his Cabinet prosecuted for the bloodshed, which they say also killed 30 Indians. The government puts the civilian death toll at nine — outraging the Indian leaders who accuse police of burning and hiding more bodies.

“We’re not taking even one step back. We haven’t lost this fight,” protest leader Daysi Zapata said.

In a two page article, there is one sentence that details what all this has to do with the U.S.–or in other words, how U.S. style capitalism is killing people a world away from the U.S.–or, in other words, how people in other countries learn to “hate” the U.S.

Or, more bluntly, people don’t hate the U.S. because we’re ‘free’ and because of our ‘rights,’ they hate us because we create economic structures that destroy and violate their land, communities and peoples–all in the name of protecting and defending our ‘rights.’

On a tangent, this is what makes me think that maybe “ethnic media” has some legitimacy. I cringe at the name “ethnic media,” but if it is the only media that is attempting to do something as simple as explain what U.S. trade agreements are doing to the world–then maybe I can get over the name a lot faster than I thought I could.

Corporate media should be ashamed of itself.

Post to Twitter

Updates on Protests in Peru

11:29 am By la Macha · Environment|Peru · Comments Off

8 Jun 2009

As I watch this unfold, I have to ask again, where are all the environmentalist do-gooders that buy amazon rainforest up so that native peoples can’t “destroy” it?

via the BBC News

“The police were shooting to kill, but that’s not all, because they hid the dead,” one man told the BBC.

“They took them to the ravine and threw them from the helicopter in plastic bags. There are also dead on the river banks. Up there beyond the hill, there are more, as if it were a common grave.”

President Garcia has roundly rejected the allegations. He accused the protesters of disarming, tying up and slitting the throats of the officers taken hostage.

President Garcia has blamed foreign forces – widely understood to mean Bolivia and Venezuela – for inciting the unrest, saying on Sunday they did not want Peru to use its “natural resources for the good, growth and quality of life of our people”.

Does fighting against corporate environmental destruction not feel as good as fighting against native peoples making a living?

Post to Twitter

Speaking of Littering

3:28 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Environment · Comments Off

15 Dec 2008

antartica.jpg
Anybody who is acquainted in even the smallest part with anti-immigration rhetoric, knows that littering and pollution are actually both reasons that we are supposed to be anti-immigration. That is, when immigrants ‘sneak’ over the boarder, they leave trash in the desert, thus increasing pollution, garbage that needs to be cleaned up, etc.

So it was interesting to me to see this series about the South Pole over at Dark Roasted Blend, in which ghost towns and other abandoned ‘trash’ are documented and discussed. Some of the ‘trash’ includes massive rotting whaling ships, entire towns including churches and cemeteries, airplanes and abandoned (or lost) base camps of travelers.

Some of the towns/base camps are actually considered tourist attractions now and accept money to help with preservation costs. It really made me consider–why is the ‘trash’ of a certain group of people (who happen to be colonizers looking to basically harness the land for money or ‘quick gold’) considered tourist attractions worthy of preserving–and the ‘trash’ of others (namely brown and poor) considered a good enough reason to use militaristic means to prevent those people from traveling?

Is there a reason for this discrepancy that makes sense?

Post to Twitter

Connecting Social Justice Movements

3:25 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Environment|Immigration · Comments Off

17 Nov 2008

endiceraids.jpgI’ve been wanting to post about this for a while, but kept forgetting to. In light of the total screw up of the gay community on how to organize with and across different community boundaries, I remembered and now I am posting!

From RAN comes the really important story about how two groups that seemingly have little in common, anti-ICE Latino organizations and a pro-environment organization, managed to come together and stand in alliance with each other:

But before describing the day, one may ask, what does this have to do with the climate?
(aside from bad puns about melting the ICE…)

Yesterday I felt the power of youth, and the moral legitimacy of young people speaking truth to power – of being bold and not letting injustices stand; of offering leadership; of youth organizing for a better world. A Youth Climate Movement holds this same power, and as young climate activists strive to integrate a deep understanding of power, race, class, and gender into our movement, we would do well to explore the links between our work and the struggles of immigrant youth and their families across the country.

Far too often, mainstream organizations will throw their hands up in frustration and whine about, “We’re not supposed to save everybody, we’re an organization that focuses on X!”

What alliances like the anti-ICE and pro-environment alliance does is show that you don’t have to give up your organization’s center in order to connect your fight to the fight of other social justice centered organizations. But you do need to be willing to extend yourself to people you don’t normally talk to and extend yourself to people you normally may not feel inclined to hook up with.

Post to Twitter

Mexico City Limits Car Use on Weekends

12:08 pm By Maegan La Mala · Environment|Latin America|mexico · Comments Off

20 Jun 2008

Programa_hoy_no_circula.jpgBack when I lived in Mexico City, my friends who had cars had to structure their lives around the “Hoy No Circula” program, which dictates one weekday in which your car cannot be driven. The program has been very successful both in its ability to get people to comply (huge fines will do that) and how it’s improved the quality of the air in the Mexican capital. But according to VivirMexico (no relation to VL, but great blog), local government is taking the program a step further, imposing restrictions on Saturdays as well, though only one Saturday per month per car.

According to VivirMexico, critics say the new restriction will negatively impact tourism to the city.

Via / VivirMexico

Post to Twitter

When Latino Corporate Fighters Win Awards, The Corporates Get Mad

10:07 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Ecuador|Environment · Comments Off

18 Apr 2008

goldman_winners.jpgWhat does a multi-national company do when two Ecuadorians fighting against them win an award? They launch a PR battle attack. Pablo Fajardo and Luis Yanza were named the 2008 Goldman Environmental Prize recipients for their 14 year grassroots struggle against Chevron and the contamination that oil company has done against the country and people of Ecuador, specifically in the Amazon region.

In response, Chevron issued a press release and hold a press briefing saying that the company objects:

to the Goldman Foundation over its selection of personal injury lawyer Pablo Fajardo and his associate, Luis Yanza, who were revealed today as 2008 Goldman prize recipients. Chevron regrets that the organizers of the Goldman Environmental Prize were skillfully misled into naming Mr. Fajardo and Mr. Yanza as prize winners.

Read more…

Post to Twitter

Mexico Proposes a Global Climate Change Initiative

3:26 pm By Maegan La Mala · Environment|mexico|World · Comments Off

13 Dec 2007

370x270raf2.jpgThe Kyoto Protocol isn’t doing enough was the opinion of Mexico’s Environment Secretary Juan Rafael Elvira Quesada the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Bali today. Quesada is proposing on behalf of Mexico a global fund which would help developing countries take steps to help avoid global warming:

Facing up to global climate change is a shared responsibility that demands immediate action. The lack of action on the part of some cannot be an excuse for letting them impede our own efforts.

I mentioning those “some”, Quesada was clearly referring to the Bush administration, which has never accepted the terms of the Kyoto Protocol, leaving this country as non-compliant with its principles.

Quesada stressed that developing countries such as Mexico are extremely vulnerable to climate change, citing the example of the recent floods in Tabasco which were some of the worst in the country’s history.

Via / Milenio

Post to Twitter


Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Get our RSS Feed!