VivirLatino

Living & Luchando la Vida Latin@

Broken Promises and Lowered Expectations : Immigration Reform in the Time of Elections

April 24th, 2012

It’s time to woo the Latinos! It’s time to woo the Latinos!

According to Michael Scherer in TIME:

 “When we consider the impact of Latinos in 2012, we are looking at a swing between about a 20% vote share for Republicans and a 45% vote share. The question that follows is how much of an impact this swing will have on the final electoral college results. The polls that really matter are state-by-state surveys, not national ones. Latinos are expected to make up about one in ten voters this year, but many of those votes, in big states like Texas, California and New York, will have no impact on the electoral college, since those states are not in play for Romney. But Latinos can have a big impact on the outcomes in Colorado, Arizona, Nevada and Florida, and a marginal impact in states like North Carolina and Ohio, all of which both parties will contest.”.

In other words game on. While the immigration issue may not be the most important to all Latinos, it is one that many care about for ourselves, our families, and our loved ones. It’s a political litmus test of racial politics beyond black and white. The call has gone out and both parties are upping their game by reviving dead immigration horses and even hitching their hopes to new ones.

Republicans love to remind Latinos that we’re just like them, based on stereotypical assumptions on issues like LGBTQ rights and abortion. Moving away from morality a bit this election season, the GOP is sing the promise of a potential brown vice-president, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who made the rounds on the Sunday morning political pundit television shows and the novel approach of challenging Democratic inaction on immigration reform by pushing various pared down versions of the DREAM Act.

The Democrats are approaching the Latino vote in three ways. One, by pouring money and energy into massive voter registration and get out the vote campaigns. Two, by repeating the promise of immigration reform and three, by pointing out how bad Republicans have been and will continue to be for the Latino community.

Last week Latinos for Obama officially relaunched, complete with a newish tag line : Estamos Unidos. There is nothing novel in the outreach which focuses on Latinos as the backbone of the alleged economic recovery. Of course there is mention of fixing the broken immigration system and taking a swipe at GOP versions of the DREAM Act, a mention of offering a pathway to citizenship to those who came into the U.S. as children.

Recently in an interview with Univision (of course- this a promise not to be made in English), President Obama promised, again, that if he were reelected he really would push for comprehensive immigration reform in the first year of his second term. Problem with the promise, besides that he made the same exact promise back in 2008 and didn’t keep it, is that Obama has already excused eventual failure. In that same Univision interview, Obama said that while he would push for comprehensive immigration reform in his second term, the Republicans (cue evil music) would kill it, especially Republicans like his likely opponent, Mitt Romney.

With Mitt Romney emerging as the likely GOP presidential nominee, liberal think tanks, non-profits, and advocacy orgs have joined with the Democratic Party in attacking what the Republican ticket would look like with junior Florida Senator Marco Rubio as it’s Vice-presidential pick. The Center for American Progress Action Fund recently released an issue brief ominously titled, “Nightmare Ahead: What a Romney-Rubio Presidency Would Mean for Immigration.”. One thing that immigration advocates and activists should be concerned about, according to CAP, is that both Romney and Rubio seem to love E-Verify, a flawed internet-based work-authorization system and that both would push for mandatory nation-wide use. While CAP accurately points out the problems with E-Verify, including error rates that misidentify workers authorized to work as not and vice versa, what isn’t mentioned is how the current Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano voted to make E-Verify mandatory in Arizona. 

Also under attack from the Democrats and their supporters is the GOP DREAM Act. While no actual piece of legislation has been drafted, what Senator Rubio has proposed in statements is a DREAM Act like bill that would allow young undocumented people brought into the United States by their parents some sort of legal status but no path to citizenship. This proposal has rankled many within the immigration advocacy world who took up the DREAM Act as their pet cause after it became clear that President Obama was not going to keep his campaign promise of comprehensive immigration reform. Democrats and allied orgs are quick to point out that Republican senators overwhelmingly voted against the DREAM Act coming to the floor back in 2010. What many undocumented young people have countered with is how some Democrats also voted against the DREAM Act in that procedural vote and that since then the Obama administration has offered nothing save an increase in detentions and deportations. In other words, something is better than nothing and it certainly is better than living in fear of being arrested and deported. Likely GOP presidential candidate Romney has cubically spoken out against the original DREAM Act but He did say that he would support a military only version, like Republican David Rivera’s ARMS Act and has indicated that he is not opposed to a something like what Rubio is suggesting. Not all immigrants wants to be citizens and certainly that’s not a path that anyone should be forced to go on, but critics worry about the creation of second class non-citizens who are able to live and work in the United States but not vote. And because it is election time, it’s all about the vote, voters, and would be voters.

The proof however goes beyond words. We need to see what an actual GOP DREAM Act would contain and see if the Obama administration makes any real attempts at slowing down the detentions and deportations. 


Post to Twitter

In Mississippi, Promise of Immigration Changes Does not Equal Lessening of Immigrant Fears

September 21st, 2011

While reports are written urging an end to Secure Communities and while the Obama administration and the Department of Homeland Security make announcements promising change to the “good & hardworking” undocumented immigrants, a months ago ICE audit in Ecru and Ripley (Northeast Mississippi) casts a long shadow over a community. This so-called kinder, gentler “raid lite” which took place in April at Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. resulted in the firing of hundreds because of “irregularities with I-9 forms.”

IC from the Mississippi Immigrants’ Rights Alliance (MIRA) in Jackson, MS shared with me that many of the undocumented immigrants who lost their jobs after this event found other jobs in other factories, a few decided to leave the country, and a few decided to start small businesses, but none of them have filed suits with the EEOC or Department of Labor regarding back pay for wage theft they endured over the years because they are afraid.

What happened at Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. is a prime example of some of the problems that mandatory E-Verify cause and how widespread the impact can be. Inside the company supervisors, employees, managers and HR personnel encouraged identity theft. From the MIRA Newsletter:

One supervisor, Ricardo* and one HR Supervisor Jeff* collaborated in selling identities for anywhere from $400-600, and in selling jobs for anywhere from $300-1200, depending on the wages of the job involved. Ricardo went to jail for six months for his crime, but when he was released, the company gave him his old job back. During that time, various female employees accused him, of sexual harassment, while male employees often complained that he forced them to pay weekly quotas.

Certainly none of the displaced workers have been able to get their jobs back and workers that remain employed at Ashley have complained of lowered starting wages.

Today, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) is pushing a bill in the House Judiciary Committee to make E-Verify mandatory nationwide. Given the current economic crisis and unemployment numbers, the focus on how E-Verify drives down wages and actually increases job instability for U.S. workers is understandable. However, the immediate impact on the lives of the undocumented workers shouldn’t be swept under the rug in the name of political expediency.

Post to Twitter

E-Verify Returns to Congress

June 15th, 2011

Yesterday, Congressman Lamar Smith (R-TX) introduced H.R. 2164, the Legal Workforce Act of 2011, that would dramatically expand and make E-Verify,a government internet-based work authorization system, mandatory for all employers within two years (three for agriculture). It is expected that today, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement will hold a hearing on the Act.

E-Verify is a web-based technology that allows employers to check federal databases to determine whether their employees—U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and other foreign-born workers—are authorized to work in the U.S.

The problem is that the system has proven itself to be less than accurate; it raises issues of privacy and due process, and would be extremely costly to implement and run.

Post to Twitter

Attacks on Immigrant Workers Cross Party Lines

February 9th, 2011

Just last month, I wrote about how I.C.E., a division of the Department of Homeland Security announced that it was stepping up so called “silent raids” or audits of companies suspected of hiring undocumented workers. This announcement, which really was just an official announcement of what I.C.E. has already been doing (besides “loud” raids in communities), certainly can be related to the mass firings and investigations into the employees of faux Mexican chain Chipotle.

Fact : Department of Homeland Security is run by Janet Napolitano, Democrat, appointed by Democrat President Obama. In fact here is what Napolitano had to say about E-Verify on C-Span.

Post to Twitter

Workplace Raids Targeting Employers or Employed?

January 20th, 2011

This morning U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (I.C.E) is set to announce the creation of a new office with the express job of auditing companies suspected of hiring undocumented workers. While the alleged purpose of these efforts to is to insure that companies use workers eligible to the work in the U.S. and to find those that don’t, the effects increase the number of unemployed overall.

From the Wall Street Journal:

Mr. Morton [head of I.C.E] said the new center would have the “express purpose” of providing support to regional immigration offices conducting large audits. “We wouldn’t be limited by the size of a company,” he said.

The audits, which have affected garment makers, fruit growers and meat packers, result in the firing of everyundocumented immigrant on a company’s payroll. Companies say this has hurt them, especially as they can’t attract American workers even during an economic downturn.

Last year, for example, Gebbers Farm, an agricultural concern in Brewster, Wash., dismissed an estimated 550 workers—about a quarter of the local population—after ICE told the company a number of its employees’ hiring documents were suspect.

Post to Twitter

Immigration Reform Trade Offs or Sell Outs?

July 10th, 2009

A conversation I had recently with some amigos reaffirmed the fact that pushing legislation is not a game I want to get into. Legislation within the corrupt U.S. political system requires not compromises, but selling people out. I don’t mean to use the word selling figuratively. Within the chambers of Congress and the White House walls the highest bidder wins and moves legislation. And yet many liberals and progressives call these sell outs trade-offs, part of the game in which the people lose.

Take the moves on immigration reform that have gone down this week, approval from the Senate of a Bush started fence on the U.S. Mexico border and E-verify, a system that requires any federal contractor to use this particular system to ensure that employees have legal immigration status to work in the United States, a system that is hugely flawed and inaccurate. The people are being told to calm down, take these moves with a grain of salt. The problem is that while these amendments are being pushed by Republicans, what Democratic senators, hailed as leaders in the push for immigration reform, are pushing doesn’t look much better.

Post to Twitter

E-Verify to be Extended Until End of September

March 11th, 2009

everifypstr-engYesterday, after my post on the latest scapegoating efforts of anti-immigrant forces, Mario asked a good question about E-Verify, a voluntary internet-based program intended to allow employers to electronically verify the information that workers present to prove their employment eligibility by accessing information in databases maintained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA).


As we told you earlier this year,
E-Verify is expensive and not accurate. One test of the program by Intel Corporation in 2008 had 13% of the employees unverifiable by the system even though all the employees were legally eligible to work. Despite the problems, a spending bill approved yesterday would extend it’s use through September 30th.

What a waste of much needed money.

Via / Feet in 2 Worlds

Post to Twitter