Advertisement

Posts Tagged ‘Capitalism

There are currently a whole slew of comments in trash right now that are really dependent on the “yeah, you complain about the US, but look at what Mexico is/does!” thought process. In other words, people in the US have no right to complain about immigration policy because if they lived in Mexico, things would be way worse.

We at VL get these comments all the time. Usually in relation to the border (i.e. I vote America starts treating illegals like Mexico does, shoot them!) but lately we’ve been getting them in relation to the border shooting of Sergio Adrian Hernandez-Huereca.

This is a meme used by everybody from the liberals to the far right conservatives. But the thing is, as a meme, this logic simply doesn’t cut it.

First of all, there is no pro-immigration advocate of any sort (that I’ve heard of) who has ever said that their problem with immigration in the US is that we are “not like other countries.” That we want to be like other countries. That we should model ourselves on other countries immigration policies. The reason? 99% of other countries’ immigration policies suck just as bad or worse than the US’s–and that includes more “civilized” European countries. I’ve posted how in Canada, women living at shelters have been hunted down by immigration police, for example.

If you are a part of the immigration debate for any amount of time, you know that “looking towards other countries” for indication on how to create understandable and human immigration policy simply isn’t a viable method for creating policy here in the US. As such, only very very rarely will you find a legitimate pro-immigration advocate/organization calling for the implementation of another countries’ policies. Thus, if it isn’t an argument, it can’t be used as a *counter* argument. Simple rules of debate. If somebody doesn’t bring it up in the original argument, you can’t make a counter argument introducting new idea.

Also, 99% of of the “But Mexico sux worse!” arguments center *Mexico* as a site of “bad immigration policy.” As if 99% of immigrants in the US come from Mexico. But what does Mexico’s horrible immigration policy mean for the Irish immigrant in the US illegally? Or the Britians or the Indians etc? In other words, all immigrants in the US are from pretty much every country in the world, and it solves next to nothing to assume that if we just close the border, immigration problems will end. Immigration is a global problem that every country in the world is struggling to deal with–to be so US centric in the face of a global international problem is to be narrow minded at best and self-defeating at worst.

Which brings us to another point: many many many times, other countries have horrible immigration policies *specifically* because of US interference/interventions. For example–look at the Phillipines. It is a country similar to Mexico, in that vast money comes into the country from immigrants living outside of it. It has a colonial history, like Mexico and until recently, was living under a dictator, like far too many countries in South America.

And yet, by virtue of land/water geographies, most who come *into* the US are documented (but they may not stay that way–most undocumented workers become undocumented *after* they get here). So we have us a good legal population of workers that we all love because they are like, totes legal, right?

Only…what is the US government doing to help reduce the level of immigration–of *necessary* economic immigration–from the Philippines? Except, oh, congratulating the Philippines for being the “first democractic nation” in Asia as the regime controlling the country murders labor unionizers and thinks 1 out of every 4 workers being unemployed is not so bad?

In other words, the tired “But X country sucks worse than the US” does next to nothing to address the actual reasons why people are forced to immigrate, and erases US culpability in creating the *need* to immigrate to begin with. That is, the problem with immigration is NOT enforcement or “protection” or “defense” etc. The problem is vastly horrifically bigger. It is a problem that exists on a world-wide scale and has everything to do with the World Bank, capitalism, free trade agreements and corporate power. And just because we are able to document some immigrants living under horrific circumstances we created does not erase the fact that those immigrants, like immigrants from countries that we *aren’t* able to majority document–don’t want to immigrate. Who in the hell wants to leave home?

Fighting for hours and hours in blogland about who is worse, Mexico or the US, does next to nothing to interrogate the real issues wrapped around immigration: Who is entitled to a homeland? Who is entitled to protections by a nation/state from corporations? Are corporations human beings? Why is immigration/migration so necessary under current global economic structures? How do The People hold corporations accountable and responsible across borders when The People are not allowed to migrate those same borders? When are we going to make the lives of human beings more important than the life of a Corporation? Which laws are we going to listen to, community laws made by the community for the community, nation/state laws that are increasingly privileging corporations, or corporate laws? And why are the immigration problems in almost every single first world country almost exactly like they are here in the US (i.e. unfixable and unending)? Are Mexicans really the problem? Or is it a system that depends on the movement of labor and capital to exist?

I am the first to say that Mexico as a nation/state sucks. I have no loyalty to Mexico and have many problems with Chicano nationalism/organizing because Chicanos base so much of their organizing on the 1848 Treaty of Hildago thereby assuming that *Mexico* had a legitimate right to contested borderland (I would argue that no nation/state has the right to indigenous land.).

But there is a reason that this is the first time I have ever posted this critique of Chicano Mexico centered organizing at VL in the three plus years I’ve been writing here. Who is better or worse is not the problem for me, and it has almost never been the problem for any immigrant or immigrant rights advocate that I’ve ever known. And I promise you, it is absolutely NOT what any nation/state or corporation is worried about either.

If all of us who are interested in immigration–and yes, that includes you, hateful right wingers–could start talking about the problems that those in government and corporations are talking about, I think we’d actually find some answers worth implementing.

Until then, however, please be forwarned–there’s a reason 99% of the “Mexico Sux Worse Than US” comments are deleted.

Thanks.

Post to Twitter

I already wrote that I can’t wait to see the new Michael Moore movie–the following clips show why. Especially pay attention to the Colbert video: if we had universal health insurance, we wouldn’t be in the middle of this economic crisis right now.

So I made this movie to do a number of things. One, to just go head on at this system. I’m not a reformer. I’m not looking for Congress to pass a few new regulations, which, by the way, it’s been a year since the crash, and they haven’t passed one of these things, which is what they said they were going to do right away, right? “All we need is a few rules. Don’t get rid of capitalism, just a few rules, and we’ll get everything back in shape.” Of course, they have no intention of doing that, and the banking industry has lobbied them successfully over the last year to leave them alone so that they can keep doing their crazy schemes. That’s one reason.

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Capitalism’s Enemy – Michael Moore
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor Health Care Protests

I wonder what the politicians (and my Libertarian friends) response to that assertion is.

Post to Twitter

Breaking news right now is that Bernard Madoff, the same guy who started the current economic downturn the U.S. is in by creating all sorts of economic schemes, was just sentenced to 150 years on prison.

From Huffington Post:

When asked by the judge whether he had anything to say, Madoff slowly stood, leaned forward on the defense table and spoke in a monotone for about 10 minutes. At various times, he referred to his historic fraud as a “problem,” “an error of judgment” and “a tragic mistake.”

He claimed he and his wife were tormented, saying she “cries herself to sleep every night, knowing all the pain and suffering I have caused,” he said. “That’s something I live with, as well.”

He then finally looked at the victims lining the first row of the gallery.

“I will turn and face you,” he said. “I’m sorry. I know that doesn’t help you.”

Afterward, Ruth Madoff _ often a target of victims’ scorn since her husband’s arrest _ broke her silence by issuing a statement through her lawyer. She said she, too, had been misled.

“I am embarrassed and ashamed,” she said. “Like everyone else, I feel betrayed and confused. The man who committed this horrible fraud is not the man whom I have known for all these years.”

At first, I was really happy to read the sentence–but then I read about all these different interactions–and now I’m just sad. We’ve all been screwed so badly. And for some reason that I can’t really explain, it seems wrong that one man is taking responsibility for how fucked the economic system we all live under has screwed us all.

Post to Twitter

Obama’s New Ad Explains Keating Economics

1:20 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · US Presidential Race 2008 · Comments Off

7 Oct 2008

I like this latest video put out by Obama not so much because it is anti-McCain, but because I think it explains a lot of what the heck is going on with the latest economic crisis that seems darn near impossible to unravel. I don’t think the U.S.’s current economic problems started recently with predatory lending (although that’s obviously a huge deal), I think it started before that–when John McCain’s hero, Ronald Reagan, began deregulating anything he could get his hands on.

I don’t know though, as I said before, it’s not like I’m some sorta economics wizard. So maybe I’m too easily persuaded by partisan politics.

What do you think? Do you buy the video’s argument?

Post to Twitter

Evo Morales : Enemy of Capitalism

1:19 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Bolivia|Politics · Comments Off

25 May 2007

evo2.jpgBolivia’s President Evo Morales may be pals with Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro but he’s no friend of the U.S.’s best friend, capitalism. At a conference this past Tuesday Morales said:

The transnational corporations always provoke conflicts to accumulate capital, and the accumulation of capital in a few hands is no solution for humanity,And so I have arrived at the conclusion that capitalism is the worst enemy of humanity. Instead of making more weapons and bullets to kill humankind, we must concentrate on producing more food,”

Via / CBS News

Post to Twitter


Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you
  • Maegan La Mala: Thank you Julio! To be honest I was a little nervous. [...]
  • Ana L. Flores: I was very excited when you decided to join us. I really wanted your voice there as it would add dep [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: Hola Juliana and thanks for commenting. There is a dearth in activist/critical thinking Latino blogg [...]
  • Julio Ricardo Varela: Good for you for asking. I got goose bumps just reading this and yes, yes, yes, to it all. Thank you [...]
  • julianabritto: The sense that I get is that you might feel a little frustrated at the dearth in activist bloggers? [...]

Get our RSS Feed!