7:50 am By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Immigration|Justice|Politics · 4 Comments
23 Apr 2012
Arizona’s S.B. 1070 has been pushed back against since it’s creation. There have been marches, rallies, acts of civil disobedience, boycotts, petitions, and lawsuits. This week attention turns to the Supreme Court who on Wednesday will hear if parts of the law, in effect since April of 2010, can be enforced by the state or if the law infringes upon a federal power, immigration enforcement. So far, four parts of the law have been blocked from being enforced because they, according to courts, clearly tread on what the federal government should be doing. These are the four parts that will be considered by the court. The court can strike down all four provisions, some, or none. The parts being considered are:
1. The requirement that all residents of the state, regardless of immigration status, be able to show proof of their legal status if a law enforcement agent stops them with a “reasonable suspicion” to
believe that they are undocumented.
2. The provision making it a state crime if a person cannot produce the proof of their immigration status.
3. The provision making it a state crime for a person to be looking for work or be working if they don’t have legal papers.
4. The provision authorizing law enforcement to arrest an individual without a warrant if the officer believes they have committed any offense that would make them deportable.
This is not a case about if the anti-immigrant law denies equal protection under the law for immigrants. This is not a case about the civil or human rights of immigrants. People should be clear that while yes, if the Supreme Court decides that S.B. 1070 indeed goes above and beyond what a state should be doing, it has the potential of stopping other copycat laws from moving forward in other states like in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina and Utah. But that same court decision against S.B. 1070 will affirm the existence and enforcement of federal policies and practices that predated S.B. 1070, namely programs like Secure Communities. It is the federal government who will be arguing against S.B. 1070. So while a Supreme Court decision against S.B. 1070 could have a domino effect in terms of other state anti-immigrant legislation, it will not erase the climate of fear for the undocumented in the United States. That would take a real effort by the federal government to actually practice discretion when it comes to immigration enforcement priorities, something that honestly cannot happen while policies like S-Comm are pushed as part of immigration policy.
On Wednesday, there are events scheduled in Arizona and all over the country against S.B. 1070 and similar laws.
For a great resource on the Supreme Court S.B. 1070 case, visit the Immigration Policy Center.
10:32 am By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Immigration · Comments Off
1 Mar 2012Yesterday, a federal district court issued a ruling blocking Arizona from enforcing another portion of it’s anti-immigrant law, SB 1070. Specifically, the court found that parts of the law violated the first amendment rights of day laborers soliciting work on public streets.
In defending this portion of the law, the state of Arizona claimed that the purpose of the provision was to ensure traffic safety.
From the National Day Laborer Organizing Network’s Press Release on the decision:
“Not only is the exercise of free speech a crucial civil right,” declared the court, “Plaintiffs have shown that they and their members are being chilled from soliciting employment by the threat of enforcement” of the anti-day labor provisions.
This is the second recent victory for day laborers:
Last week, the Supreme Court declined to review a Ninth Circuit decision striking down on First Amendment grounds a Redondo Beach ordinance that criminalized day labor solicitation (Comité de Jornaleros de Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach). The court’s ruling in Redondo Beach struck down the City of Redondo Beach’s anti-solicitation ordinance as a “facially unconstitutional restriction on speech.”
12:53 pm By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Immigration · 10 Comments
13 Sep 2011This past weekend, when I received an email announcing that the National Council of la Raza (NCLR) was declaring the economic boycott of Arizona over, I admit that my first reaction was confusion.
I was confused because I didn’t remember the boycott solely being “owned” by any one organization. I was confused because I thought that the boycott (which I have been following and respecting as have my children) was supposed to remain in effect until the anti-immigrant law SB1070 was repealed. Did I misunderstand?
So I went back.
Various organizations and localities called for boycotts. No one can own an act of resistance.
The demand of the boycott was that SB1070 be repealed.
That hasn’t happened.
According to reports in the media, NCLR is cancelling the boycott because they feel that they have successfully discouraged other states from enacting similar laws (never mind not so successfully discouraging the president from his enforcement/deportation party). NCLR and other orgs are pointing the millions of dollars lost because of the boycott including the cancellation of conferences and conventions in the state. Additionally, The Arizona Republic says Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon’s office sent NCLR letters last month asking it to end the boycotts and work toward immigration reform. Based on the official press release announcing the calling off of the boycott, it’s all about the money honey. Both the Arizona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and the Greater Phoenix Convention and Visitors Bureau are quoted in the official release, talking about the importance of “getting back to business”.
I know I am not the only one confused by this decision. Certainly the boycott in and of itself is controversial. There is debate as to the effectiveness of such an action, just like there is debate as to the effectiveness of civil disobedience. What both boycotts and cd’s share in common is that on their own, they are useless. On a small scale, people not buying a Stone Cold Creamery ice cream cone or blocking a highway are meaningless unless they are connected in a real way to work on the ground for a long time. The work of protest is not supposed to be easy. That is why it is called struggle. And to clarify, work on the ground does not just mean funded policy promoting as is currently happening with across the board in the immigrant rights advocacy world. The immigrant “movement” at the moment has been completely co-opted by non-profit orgs and their funders. There is no direction while on our blocks deportations rise.
And then we wonder why we are unable to find a Latino “leader”.
And then we wonder why Latinos are criticized for being unable to create sustained actions.
I’ve gone from confusion to cynical anger at the state of “movement building”.
Does NCLR’s backing off the boycott mean their national convention will be in Phoenix next year?
9:21 am By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Immigration|Politics · 1 Comment
12 Apr 2011Yesterday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to lift an injunction on the most controversial aspects of SB 1070, including the provision that required police to verify the immigration status of anyone they suspected of being undocumented, the show me your papers portion of the notorious law. The injunction is expected to stay in place until the Department of Justice lawsuit against SB-1070 is decided.
Salvador Reza of the Puente Movement responded, “SB 1070 and the on-going court battles could be avoided if the Obama administration simply ended its ICE Access contracts with Arizona. A simple stroke of the President’s pen could resolve much of the human rights crisis in Arizona. ”
And may I add, across the country. It’s important to remember that the federal lawsuit against SB1070 is based more on the idea that it is the job of the federal government to enforce immigration laws, than on the idea of racial profiling being a disgusting way to feed the prison system. And enforce the federal government has done (i.e Secure Communities).
The continuance of the injunction hopefully will also serve as a warning to states, like Georgia, that are pushing laws like SB1070, that these laws will be challenged by the legal system, but perhaps more importantly and less talked about, by our communities.
12:55 pm By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Immigration|Justice · 1 Comment
21 Feb 2011VivirLatino is a proud endorser of the statement below.
The guilty verdict in the case against Shawna Forde is not justice, as it doesn’t bring little Brisenia Flores or her father, Raul, back from the dead. The verdict will not stop hate crimes, it will not stop the waves of anti-Latino and anti-immigrant laws being presented across the country. But yes we are watching, we are taking note and taking action(s).
From Presente.org
Thursday, February 17th, 2011, Tucson, Arizona – As Latinos and immigrant rights advocates from all over the United States applaud the guilty verdict in the trial of Shawna Forde – a leader of the hate-group Minuteman American Defense (MAD) convicted of murdering 9 year-old Brisenia Flores and her father Raul Flores – a strong message resonates throughout the nation: We Are Watching. We are watching those who provide a platform to promote hate-crimes and call on the media to be socially responsible by reporting the linkages between Forde’s proven extremism and that of extremist groups she represents.On May 2009, Forde and two accomplices – MAD Operations Director Jason Bush and local MAD member Albert Gaxiola – broke into the Flores’ home in the border town of Arivaca, Arizona. Without compunction, they shot Raul Flores, his wife Gina Gonzalez and their daughter Brisenia who screamed, “Please don’t shoot me!” before being shot twice in the head; Gonzalez survived the incident.Brisenia’s murder has galvanized the entire Latino community. This gruesome act reflects in the starkest terms the anti-immigrant, anti-Latino hatred promoted by extremist groups. Latinos – the fastest-growing and largest ethnic minority group in the U.S. – understand and experience the hatred gripping the United States. In response, Latinos and immigrant advocates are closely watching media outlets that provide a platform for hatred promoted by extremist groups like MAD and the Federation for American Immigration Reform – a group Forde represented on a PBS show, for instance.
The details revealed in the murder trial have touched us all in a deep and unique way; indeed, no one will forget Brisenia. These important details-the organized hatred, the dehumanization of Latinos, the utter disregard of a child’s innocence- reflect the deepening and mainstreaming of the most noxious and dangerous strands of hatred in the United States. The growth and expansion of this hatred moves us to continue efforts to make sure there are no more hate-crimes and to take action condemning those media outlets that help disseminate hatred.
We call on the all media to be socially responsible by, for example, reporting the intimate link between Forde’s proven extremism and that of extremist groups she represents, so that the intellectual authors of the anti-Latino, anti-immigrant industry that has been growing in the nation -and the violence they perpetrate- may be known, discussed and confronted with greater urgency.
Endorsed by:
America Para Todos, Houston, TX
America’s Voice Educational Fund, Washington, DC
American Association of Jews from the Former USSR, National
Brazilian Total Assistance, Inc., Massachusetts
CARECEN, Los Angeles, CA
CASA de Maryland, Maryland
Center for Media Justice, Nationwide
Central American Resource Center (CRECEN), Houston, TX
Chicano Consortium de Sacramento, Sacramento, CA
Coalición de Derechos Humanos, Tucson AZ
Cuentame, Nationwide
El Centro del Inmigrante, New York
FIEL Houston, Inc, Houston, TX
Florida Immigration Coalition, Miami, FL
Fresno Unit of the Brown Beret National Organization (FresnoBBNO), Fresno, CA
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, Atlanta, GA
Latino Leadership, Inc, Orlando, FL
LatinoPolitico.net, Nationwide
MinKwon Center for Community Action, New York
New Immigrant Community Empowerment, New York
New Mexico Media Literacy Project, Albuquerque, NM
New York Immigration Coalition, New York
OurNewAnahuac.net, Houston, TX
Ohio Action Circle, Ohio
Presente.org, Nationwide
Rockland County Immigration Coalition, New York
Salvadoran American National Network SANN, Nationwide
The Hispanic Community Dialogue of Virginia, Virginia
Virginia Coalition of Latino Organizations, Virginia
Vivir Latino, Nationwide
Voces de la Frontera, Milwaukee, WI
Westchester Hispanic Coalition, New York
William C. Velasquez Institute, Nationwide
2:51 pm By Maegan La Mala · arizona|DREAM Act|Immigration · 1 Comment
18 Jan 2011Two days ago I wrote about Pedro, the 22 year old living in Arizona who was brought here as a young child from Mexico and was facing deportation today.
Today there is a little bit of good news. Pedro was granted a 30 day window by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ‘s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency office in Phoenix, AZ to remain in the country while his case is being further reviewed.
“I now realize that the only way for me to be able to stay in Arizona, my home, is for President Obama to allow for me to stay. It is his choice whether I am deported to a country I do not know or if I am allowed to stay in Arizona and give back to my community. I ask President Obama to please let me serve this nation,” says Pedro.
In the absence of the DREAM Act, which would have allowed Pedro an opportunity to stay in the U.S., Pedro’s attorney is seeking for Pedro to be allowed to stay in the U.S. via deferred action based on the fact that he wants to enlist in the U.S. Marines.
10:05 am By Maegan La Mala · arizona|DREAM Act|Immigration · 3 Comments
16 Jan 2011
22 year old Pedro was brought to the United States from Mexico when he was 7 years old by his grandmother, who raised him. The young man, who lives in Arizona and has no living relatives on either side of the border, has been told that he has until Tuesday to report to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, who could deport him.
1:19 pm By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Education · 6 Comments
4 Jan 2011Just like part of the push back against Arizona’s SB1070 includes legal wrangling, so does the fight against HB2281, which bans Ethnic Studies in the state.
Arizona State Attorney General, Tom Horne, started the year by claiming that the Tucson Unified School District is out of compliance with HB2281 because of a Mexican-American study course, If found out of compliance and do not cut the course within a 60 day period, TUSD could lose 10 percent in state funding, an estimated $15 million.
TUSD has some options. The first is a hearing to prove that they are in compliance with HB2281. Additionally 11 teachers are filing a lawsuit claiming HB2281 violates the first and fourteenth amendments.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter