2:34 pm By Maegan La Mala · Entertainment|Media|Music · 3 Comments
12 Feb 2012I covered the Latin Grammy Awards twice for VivirLatino. Once when they were in New York City and I was beside myself for being given official credentials (and honor I am no longer impressed by), and once when they were in Las Vegas where I went to every free event because I made myself broke just getting there. These were the Latin Grammy Awards, the equivalent of Latino History Month, a segregated space completely controlled by the major music labels and the Spanish language media. Media like me were essentially locked into a media room, watching the event on television, interrupted constantly by a parade of winners and hosts we could yell questions at but not video tape (in Vegas at one point a Univision employee actually stepped in front of my camera to block my taping). I’ll admit that at first I was star struck. As an up and coming blogger I liked seeing Shakira, Ricky Martin, and Calle 13 up close and personal. I am particularly struck by the memory of Gustavo Cerati, long before he became ill.
But again those were the Latin Grammy Awards not the main event Grammy Awards being held tonight in Los Angeles and yet there is much talk and protest about the role of artists of color and exclusion.
With the sudden, untimely, and unexpected death of Whitney Houston, there is remembrance but also reflection on how the music industry, fed by the talents of many people of color, but manipulated mostly by white run music moguls, only allowed so many women of color success stories at a time and within a very specific imagined framework. Whitney was every woman, but as soon as pressure and the temptations that come with it unleashed their demons upon her, the industry’s support waned in favor of the next, more wholesome, marketable black woman. Whitney Houston was presented as a caricature, much in the same way that Michael Jackson was. The focus became her weaknesses, her failures and this at a time when media shifted from print and video music channels to the every vigilant internet. While the cause of Whitney Houston’s tragic passing are still unknown, we do know the road that brought us here. As media consumers, so many of us hungrily watched her fall but did we offer her a hand to get back up?
5:04 pm By la Macha · Entertainment|GLBT|TV|youth · 3 Comments
21 Apr 2010Colorlines has a good write up about the demise of my favorite show, Ugly Betty. It’s last show was last Thursday night–it will live on in Netflix for me, but I was really heartbroken to find out it was cancelled. Not only did it have the amazing Salma scenes, but it featured complex and powerful women of color as the lead characters AND queered things up beautifully. Which brings me to my favorite scene ever on any TV anywhere.
No. 1—It was real. Networks are increasingly targeting Latino viewers, but “Ugly Betty” was the first primetime show to address real issues Latinos in the U.S. face—like immigration laws and trying to assimilate to U.S. culture. Lisa Navarrete, a vice president for the National Council of La Raza says “the plot line illustrated the complexity of the lives of many undocumented immigrants who are otherwise integrated into American life.”
No. 2—Betty Suarez was no Jennifer Lopez. And she was the first TV Latina who lived in “both” worlds—the white professional Manhattan world and a Mexican working class home in Queens, NY.
No. 3—It was queer. Betty’s family accepted her brother Justin’s love for musicals and fashion from a very young age and never discouraged him from following his interests—which included Austin, his boyfriend. The show also provided a compelling and human portrait of Alex Meade, who transformed into Alexis.
No. 4—It opened other closets, too. Ignacio Suarez’s undocumented immigration status had its own storyline. That’s a coming out tale for 2010.
No. 5—And still, it was a family affair. “Ugly Betty” did all of this while still bridging the generational divide. Tias and Ninas alike were glued to Betty La Fea.
9:27 pm By la Macha · Entertainment · Comments Off
12 Mar 2010Contrary to Jon’s opinion, I actually know of scads of women and men in wheel chairs charging buildings. But the rest of it is enough to help me chillax after a long week!
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Health Care: The Ultimate Last Final Push | ||||
|
||||
9:08 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Argentina|Entertainment|Movies · 1 Comment
7 Mar 2010Tonight is the 82nd Academy Awards aka The Oscars. Bianca already posted about one of the Latin American films up for an award in the Best Foreign Film Category : La Teta Asustada.
The other Latin American film up for the same award comes from Argentina, El Secreto de sus Ojos.
11:54 am By la Macha · Entertainment|Family|holidays · Comments Off
7 Jan 2010
I have a new post up at Feminist Review! In it, I review the video, Christmas Classics: The Yule Log Edition (featuring Johnny Cash). A clip from the post:
I never thought that Johnny Cash could ever become kitsch. After all, he is the Man in Black, the patron saint of the disenfranchised and hurting and the bad ass country boy jamming an angry middle finger at the camera. I grew up listening to Cash singing to cheering prisoners and sullen guards, and then later turning a classic industrial rock song on its head. How on earth could this icon of morality—this Original EMO master—possibly be turned into sweet fluff?
11:50 am By la Macha · Arts|Careers|Celebrities|children|Chismes|Controversia|crime|Drugs|Entertainment|Violence · 9 Comments
1 Oct 2009
Roman Polanski is a child rapist, right? He gave drugs and alcohol to a 13-year-old girl, and then molested and raped her vaginally and anally (trigger warning, transcript of court hearings at link).
And yet, even as he raped a little girl, Polanski can’t seem to get enough support from stars everywhere–including a whole slew of the top rung of Hollywood Latin@s. A petition of support of Polanski has been making the rounds the past few days:
On September 16th, 2009, Mr. Charles Rivkin, the US Ambassador to France, received French artists and intellectuals at the embassy. He presented to them the new Minister Counselor for Public Affairs at the embassy, Ms Judith Baroody. In perfect French she lauded the Franco-American friendship and recommended the development of cultural relations between our two countries.
If only in the name of this friendship between our two countries, we demand the immediate release of Roman Polanski.
And everyday, more Latin@s are signing on, including:
Pedro Almodovar (Spanish),
Penelope Cruz (Spanish),
Guillermo del Toro,
Gael Garcia Bernal,
Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu
Richard Pena (who is the director of the NY film festival, which VL has promoted)
Harold Alvarado Tenorio
Now, technically, the point *could* be made that the petition is calling for international film festivals to be “neutral” sites that exist outside of legal jurisdictions:
Filmmakers in France, in Europe, in the United States and around the world are dismayed by this decision. It seems inadmissible to them that an international cultural event, paying homage to one of the greatest contemporary filmmakers, is used by the police to apprehend him.
By their extraterritorial nature, film festivals the world over have always permitted works to be shown and for filmmakers to present them freely and safely, even when certain States opposed this.
The arrest of Roman Polanski in a neutral country, where he assumed he could travel without hindrance, undermines this tradition: it opens the way for actions of which no-one can know the effects.
But there are two things that keep me from buying that:
This section:
His arrest follows an American arrest warrant dating from 1978 against the filmmaker, in a case of morals.
and this:
Filmmakers, actors, producers and technicians – everyone involved in international filmmaking – want him to know that he has their support and friendship.
Is drugging and raping a 13-year-old child really a case of morals? Does it show the best morals in the world to support and give friendship to a man who drugs and rapes a child? To advocate for that man’s freedom? Is a rapist’s freedom really more important than recognizing the crime of rape? Is friendship with a rapist really more important than standing in solidarity with women and girls (and men and boys) worldwide that are raped, have been raped and/or will be raped?
Do these “stars” have no responsibility at all to the young girls that watch their films?
On a different note, the girl that Polanski raped was also a worker–she was raped by him while on a shoot. Her career was finished the moment she told what happened–why is it more wrong to be arrested for a crime you admitted to committing while at a work party, than it is to be raped by your boss while at work? Why does Polanski have more right to a career than that girl did? Why do the careers of women seem predicated on their ability to keep their mouths shut about the violence and power male colleagues and bosses exert over them?
Do no workers owe their solidarity to a fellow worker who was assaulted and then blacklisted?
What is most disappointing about the list of Latin@ stars is that Gael Garcia Bernal is on it. Coming from a background of radical activism, and having appeared in several movies with leftist politics, I expected more of him.
But when has a belief in radical politics ever made men more inclined to stand against gender based violence?
Violence against women and girls, and sexual violence against children is endemic throughout the world. It is not progressive, radical or liberatory to stand in support of a rapist–it is the norm. It is saying it is ok for child rape to be a normal part of the world.
Latina women and children deserve more, and expect more.
The survivor of Roman Polanski’s assault deserves more.
These “stars” should be ashamed of themselves.
8:17 pm By la Macha · Arts|Entertainment|Health|race · 1 Comment
24 Aug 2009
In truly sad news, it is looking like Michael Jackson’s death didn’t have to happen. The L.A. corner has released preliminary findings which say the cause of death was an overdose of overdose of propofol, a powerful sedative Jackson was using to sleep.
The 32-page warrant said Dr. Conrad Murray, Jackson’s personal physician, told a detective that he had been treating Jackson for insomnia for six weeks. Murray said each night he gave Jackson 50 mg of propofol, also known as Diprivan, diluted with the anesthetic lidocaine via an intravenous drip.
Worried that Jackson may have been becoming addicted to the drug, the Houston cardiologist said he attempted to wean him from it, putting together combinations of other drugs that succeeded in helping Jackson sleep during the two nights prior to his death.
But on June 25, other drugs failed to do the job, as he recounted to detectives in an hour-by-hour account that was detailed by detective Orlando Martinez of the Los Angeles Police Department:
This is just so sad. The irony in the fact that Jackson “made it” after starting off in desperate poverty–and he still wound up meeting the fate so many of us in the ghetto do–a drug related death. His drugs may have cost more than anything you or I have ever gotten, but they’re still drugs. And presumably, Jackson was taking those drugs for the same reason so many of us are: over work, isolation, depression, and past abuse.
Jackson’s death either shows that you can’t outrun your past–or that racism is a lot more pervasive than we think. And that it is our *culture* and *physical surroundings* that are as sick as we are. That we are living in an unsustainable world.
Or maybe it’s a little of all of it.
4:33 pm By la Macha · Entertainment · Comments Off
7 Jul 2009I’m sure I’m not the only mujer out there that spent the early 90′s with this duo cranked up on the boom box (and eyeballing Mariah’s marvelous tetas).
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Feeling melancholy right now.
4:26 pm By la Macha · Entertainment · 1 Comment
7 Jul 2009I’ve had a lot of conflicting emotions about the death of Michael Jackson. I think he totally acted improperly (at the very least) with young children. I think he was beaten (viciously) by his father. I think he had some really complicated problems with being black. I think he also identified strongly as black. He made music that brought communities together (we are the world, anybody?) and he made it ok for little kids of color to be proud of who they were (for real, the number of times I’ve seen little Latino kids dressed up as Michael Jackson impersonators??? Countless).
Here’s MSNBC’s entire coverage of the memorial:
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
But even with all these complicated issues I have with the man–I found myself teary eyed watching the memorial. So many of my life memories are connected to his songs.
It’s good to see Michael’s family can have some peace and dignity and love at this time. No matter what their son/brother means to me or any of the rest of the public, to them–he is a son, a father, a brother. And for their sakes, I wouldn’t want him remembered in any other way.
9:28 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Books|Entertainment|Events|Gifts|Los Angeles|Marketing|Miami|New York · 12 Comments
6 Jul 2009
We Latinos know a little something about mixed blood and the trouble that brings. Perhaps a little magical training would help?
VivirLatino is lucky enough to offer some of our readers the chance to see special screenings in New York, Miami,
and Los Angeles of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.We also have 2 Harry Potter Mini Posters to give away.
Want to win? Click after the jump to find out how.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter