12:56 pm By la Macha · Celebrities · 5 Comments
4 Feb 2010In many ways, I really feel for Jessica Alba. I mean–really feel for her. She’s said some fucked up shit about being Mexican (remember the “spreading their seed” comment?). But–I think at the root of a lot of her fucked up comments is an extreme insecurity and anxiety about being Latina and being Mexican that I understand completely.
I don’t know about other Latin@ cultures–but as a Chicana (or Mexican-American, Hispanic, etc), I’ve found living life as somebody with immigrant Mexican roots can be incredibly difficult. All the markers the Mexican community uses to “identify” you as “one of us” are so unstable. In a settled community, you can be tall and light skinned and even unable to speak Spanish and still be considered a part of the community. In a more transient community with more first generation Mexicans–speaking Spanish often stands as the “test.” If you can’t do it, you’ve assimilated and have no claims or rights to the community no matter what your experiences are.
So–in a way, I really get what Alba’s getting at when she says, “I’m considered Latina and, thus, I consider myself Latina as well. I grew up eating enchiladas… I identify with Mexicans. It’s in my blood whether or not I speak Spanish.”
Not exactly the most elegant thing to say in the world. As Feminist Texican notes: Head. Meet Desk.
But at the same time, I still feel for Alba. I mean, it took me going to university and doing tons of reading of Chicana feminist texts to be able to 1. comfortably claim a Chicana identity and 2. use the appropriate words to talk about how unstable and anxiety provoking a Chicana identity often is.
It doesn’t sound like Alba has been to college or that her family really spends a lot of time speaking about and negotiating a Mexican-American identity in a non-assimilationist way. We aren’t just born with the knowledge of how to “be” politicized and fierce Chicanas, right? And most of us don’t have to struggle through our politics–or the politics that play out on our bodies (what does your dark hair mean? Your olive skin tone? Your unaccented tongue? etc)–on a public stage.
I know Alba is political in other ways (namely, she’s an animal rights activist). Which makes me think that she is capable of “hearing” a more radical politic when she wants to. And I know how difficult it is to actually find Chicana theory–you have to know what a Chicana is first (again, something I didn’t know until university)–how do you google something you don’t even know? So I volunteer as the most appropriate macha to talk to Ms. Alba. I will pass her a book by Gloria Anzaldua. And then sit and talk with her for a while.
I’ll make a radical Chicana out of her yet.
10:18 pm By BiancaLaureano · Celebrities| GLBT| Immigration| Puerto Rico · 2 Comments
20 Dec 2009Ricky Martin has issued a statement speaking out against homophobia. Author and activist Larry La Fountain-Stokes, author of Queer Ricans, posted this story in English and Spanish. Martin writes:
Well, when we believe in peace, there is simply no room for complacency. The murders of James Byrd, Matthew Shepard, Jorge Steven Lopez, Marcelo Lucero, Luis Ramirez and countless others who were victims of violent “hate crimes” should be completely unacceptable to every human being; because we’re all human beings. It’s up to us to change the paradigm. I hear the world “tolerance” thrown around in the media when it comes to cases like the ones I mentioned above. One of the meanings of tolerance is “the capacity to endure pain or hardship.” Another is “the act of allowing something.” To me, those don’t seem to encompass acceptance, by any definition. So how about this? Instead of saying “we need to tolerate diversity” why not say, “we need to accept diversity.”
6:11 pm By la Macha · Celebrities| TV| Violence| Women · 10 Comments
5 Nov 2009This just broke my heart. Broke my heart.
From Huffington Post, a preview on the Rihanna interview:
I think that it is really generous and loving of Rihanna to think about girls at a time in her life when she is hurting and confused and devastated and even humiliated. But that section quoted above–that part where she says, “her selfish decision to love”….Oh, how my heart breaks.
It is not Rihanna’s job to stop violence against women. It’s not any woman or girl’s job to stop violence against women and girls. Even if she stayed with Chris Brown forever–it would never be her fault that women are being killed by men. It is manipulative and even violent to say it is. It is not selfish for a woman or girl to love. Dear god, no.
It is selfish to beat a woman. It is selfish to scare and intimidate her. It is selfish to take her love and use it against her, it is selfish to beat a woman who loves you because you know you can.
It is Chris Brown’s job to stop violating women. It is men’s job to stop violating women. It is men’s job to stop twisting and FUCKING with love so freely and generously given. It is the job of men to grow the fuck up and get into some kind of healing/therapy so that they can teach *little boys* how to not beat the holy fuck out of a person who loves them.
And it’s media’s job to stop putting the lives of little girls onto the shoulders of survivors. They have enough shit to worry about. It’s time to start putting responsibility where it belongs. On the fists of men who make the choice to use them whenever they feel like it.
11:50 am By la Macha · Arts| Careers| Celebrities| Chismes| Controversia| Drugs| Entertainment| Violence| children| crime · 9 Comments
1 Oct 2009
Roman Polanski is a child rapist, right? He gave drugs and alcohol to a 13-year-old girl, and then molested and raped her vaginally and anally (trigger warning, transcript of court hearings at link).
And yet, even as he raped a little girl, Polanski can’t seem to get enough support from stars everywhere–including a whole slew of the top rung of Hollywood Latin@s. A petition of support of Polanski has been making the rounds the past few days:
On September 16th, 2009, Mr. Charles Rivkin, the US Ambassador to France, received French artists and intellectuals at the embassy. He presented to them the new Minister Counselor for Public Affairs at the embassy, Ms Judith Baroody. In perfect French she lauded the Franco-American friendship and recommended the development of cultural relations between our two countries.
If only in the name of this friendship between our two countries, we demand the immediate release of Roman Polanski.
And everyday, more Latin@s are signing on, including:
Pedro Almodovar (Spanish),
Penelope Cruz (Spanish),
Guillermo del Toro,
Gael Garcia Bernal,
Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu
Richard Pena (who is the director of the NY film festival, which VL has promoted)
Harold Alvarado Tenorio
Now, technically, the point *could* be made that the petition is calling for international film festivals to be “neutral” sites that exist outside of legal jurisdictions:
Filmmakers in France, in Europe, in the United States and around the world are dismayed by this decision. It seems inadmissible to them that an international cultural event, paying homage to one of the greatest contemporary filmmakers, is used by the police to apprehend him.
By their extraterritorial nature, film festivals the world over have always permitted works to be shown and for filmmakers to present them freely and safely, even when certain States opposed this.
The arrest of Roman Polanski in a neutral country, where he assumed he could travel without hindrance, undermines this tradition: it opens the way for actions of which no-one can know the effects.
But there are two things that keep me from buying that:
This section:
His arrest follows an American arrest warrant dating from 1978 against the filmmaker, in a case of morals.
and this:
Filmmakers, actors, producers and technicians – everyone involved in international filmmaking – want him to know that he has their support and friendship.
Is drugging and raping a 13-year-old child really a case of morals? Does it show the best morals in the world to support and give friendship to a man who drugs and rapes a child? To advocate for that man’s freedom? Is a rapist’s freedom really more important than recognizing the crime of rape? Is friendship with a rapist really more important than standing in solidarity with women and girls (and men and boys) worldwide that are raped, have been raped and/or will be raped?
Do these “stars” have no responsibility at all to the young girls that watch their films?
On a different note, the girl that Polanski raped was also a worker–she was raped by him while on a shoot. Her career was finished the moment she told what happened–why is it more wrong to be arrested for a crime you admitted to committing while at a work party, than it is to be raped by your boss while at work? Why does Polanski have more right to a career than that girl did? Why do the careers of women seem predicated on their ability to keep their mouths shut about the violence and power male colleagues and bosses exert over them?
Do no workers owe their solidarity to a fellow worker who was assaulted and then blacklisted?
What is most disappointing about the list of Latin@ stars is that Gael Garcia Bernal is on it. Coming from a background of radical activism, and having appeared in several movies with leftist politics, I expected more of him.
But when has a belief in radical politics ever made men more inclined to stand against gender based violence?
Violence against women and girls, and sexual violence against children is endemic throughout the world. It is not progressive, radical or liberatory to stand in support of a rapist–it is the norm. It is saying it is ok for child rape to be a normal part of the world.
Latina women and children deserve more, and expect more.
The survivor of Roman Polanski’s assault deserves more.
These “stars” should be ashamed of themselves.
1:26 pm By la Macha · Celebrities| Immigration| children| race| society · 3 Comments
29 Sep 2009
Anybody who follows the immigration debate knows the tired old explanation as to why undocumented immigrants are really “illegals” or “aliens.” They committed a crime! They are here illegally! They deserve the label!
Well, as I am sure many of you have heard, director Roman Polanski is currently in the news because 30 years after committing the crime of raping a 13-year-old girl, he was arrested in Switzerland and is awaiting extradition to the U.S. He has continued his life since his arrest and admission of guilt in a pretty unadulterated way. He works. He lives in multiple houses. He won a prestigious award. He has friends and supporters. And he lives (and has lived) quite openly as a man who likes to fuck young girls.
In short, if the U.S. really wanted him, the U.S. could’ve gotten him. And yet…it didn’t. And as I mentioned, after committing a crime, Polanski received no small level of support from others, up to and including “liberal” presses like NPR calling his crime “sex with a thirteen-year-old” rather than “rape.”
So, you have the case of families coming to the U.S. to get a job and help support families here and in other countries–and those people are no longer people. They are illegals. They are aliens. They deserve what they get.
You have the case of a man who *admits* to drugging and raping a thirteen-year-old child, and you have a “troubled genius” who, well, maybe isn’t that bad. I mean, not a rapist rapist. Just a regular rapist. A not bad rapist.
What is up with this difference? Why isn’t Glen Beck going after this scumbag? Why isn’t Lou Dobbs? Why isn’t the U.S. mobilizing an entire department to go after all the rapists? The illegal rapists? Why don’t we have an entire system of detention centers set up exclusively for all the rapists and their families to sit in until we can figure out what to do with them? If the rapists didn’t want their children locked up, they shouldn’t have raped, right?
I am not the only one who notices the differences in standards here. What I am wondering is will any of the “they are illegals” troupe be brave enough to account for the differences? And lest men think they are not the problem here, will any men be brave enough to account for why crimes against women and girls are so easy to forgive?
12:25 pm By la Macha · Bizarro| Celebrities| Controversia| children| society · Comments Off
8 Sep 2009I admit, I have occasionally watched Jon and Kate plus 8. The show is not that engrossing–your basic family of 10 experiencing the day. But it’s something safe to watch with the kids, and somewhat interesting just to see “how the hell does one stay organized with 10 people in the family?”
But now, the kids are back at school, and I’m too tired to trudge through depressing stories of parents fainting over Obamadoctrination and poor people saying they don’t want free health care. Because then…we’d all be pinkos. Or something.
So, instead, I am turning to the gossip columns. And boy, was I rewarded. Turns out Jon and Kate are not the organized put together couple we all thought they were.
Accusations of abuse don’t surprise me here. Rumors of Kate’s aggression have run rampant for a while (including accusations of child abuse). I have to wonder though, at how much of the reaction to Jon’s statements is colored in the fact that he is a man.
Everybody knows that Kate has acted questionably. And yet, when Jon *says* he was abused, suddenly everybody is all concerned about how the kids are going to react to this news–and *cautioning* Jon about “tit for tat” antics. He doesn’t want to make the kids hate him, right?
But..what happens if the kids are getting the sharp end of Kate’s “tat,” too? And what happens if in 20 years, one of them tries to say, “yes, my mother hurt me,” and *can’t* because everybody believes the t.v. illusion?
Why do we believe that Jon is being bullied by his wife…until he calls it abuse? And then we think it’s just “messy” divorce?
Is it because we think that being “pussy whipped” is funny? Because we think that Jon has the male god given right not *not* be abused if he really wanted it? So he must secretly like it?
And what does any of this reaction have to do with the fact that he is Asian and Kate is white? (And before any men’s rights folks come here moaning about how unfair life is, let me just point to how Kate has been treated in all of this. And how it’s mighty easy to get caught hitting your kids when you are the primary caregiver.)
Ai, maybe ‘escaping’ in celebrity gossip isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be?
9:53 am By la Macha · Celebrities| Controversia · Comments Off
4 Aug 2009Keith Olberman can often be over the top to me, although he is regularly amusing. For example, his constant airing of the Palin turkey video was really amusing even as I had a hard time considering it news and was, frankly, rather grossed out and horrified by the whole thing.
But having said that, I think he hit one out of the ballpark with last night’s special comment.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
To see a partial transcript, click here.
Of course, with Olberman comes problems. His use of the innocent white woman to tug at our heart strings and his casual references to the evils of prostitution are par for the course with Olberman. But…his overall point? That corporations run this country? Right on.
Maybe he’ll become a good old flaming red socialist soon, and join la Macha out on the protest line soon.
9:02 pm By la Macha · Celebrities · 2 Comments
3 Aug 2009I was so happy to hear the news that Michael Jackson’s children will not become fodder for the celebrity mags–at least not yet. Jackson’s mother (Kathryn Jackson) and his ex-wife (Debbie Rowe) have settled (largely out of court) visitation and custody issues with the kids.
The battle for his estate will not be going so smoothly. And it makes me wonder, if Jackson had left all his money to his kids, would the custody battle have gone so smoothly?
Maybe Michael was a lot smarter than any of us ever figured.
12:46 pm By la Macha · Celebrities · 5 Comments
29 Jul 2009Seems to be a really slow news cycle these past few days. I’ve been surfing around all the major news sites and all I can find is grisly stories about babies being cut out of dead women and bus riding cats. Oh, and stories about Madonnas biceps. Apparently, Madonna has been spending a lot of time working out.

I don’t know ya’ll. On the one hand, I won’t deny having an immediate reaction to those pictures (ay, dios mio, Madonna, what are you doing to yourself girl?), but on the other hand, in light of the stark picture of how horribly and dehumanizing Michael Jackson was treated throughout his life time only to find out that the man was suffering from serious skin conditions, drug abuse, loneliness and god knows what else brought on by the evils of fame–I kinda feel like these pictures are exploitative. They reduce Madonna to her biceps.
And sure, Madonna is one of the biggest Latinophiles out there–but whatever may or may not be wrong with her, does she deserve to have her entire humanity reduced to the state of her arms? Does she deserve to be turned into another “wacko” so that the public can feel better about itself?
5:17 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Celebrities| Controversia| Violence| Women| society · 1 Comment
21 Jul 2009Embattled R&B star and woman beater Chris Brown has something to say: he’s sorry.
Damn right he’s sorry. One sorry excuse for a human being. But that’s just my opinion.
What do you think? Are you convinced by Brown’s apology? Should the world just let him get on with his life as Rihanna has? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
Via / YouTube
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by 2 Mujeres Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse and influential Latino and Latina community in the U.S.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter