10:55 am By Maegan La Mala · Activism|Immigration|Justice|New York City|race · Comments Off
27 Mar 2011
On the night of March 29, 1991, Manny Mayi, an 19 year-old Dominican college student was chased and beaten to death by upon crossing over to the Italian-American section of Corona, Queens.
Following his murder, the Queen’s District Attorney’s Office [DA] struggled to produce an effective case against the alleged defendants as the Italian-American community became reclusive and shielded by police investigators. A young Italian-American woman admitted to police investigators that she heard one of the defendants confess to the crime. Nevertheless, her family relocated her to Italy one week prior to the start of the trial in 1993. She was never subpoenaed, thus her testimony was never heard.
The trial jury was selected from a pool of residents from Northern Queens and yielded a sole person of color. And while the crime was committed on a populous street during a warm spring evening, the DA’s office and the NYPD produced only two material witnesses. Compounded by the absence of hate crime legislation at the State or Federal levels, the criminal proceedings resulted in the swift acquittal of a lone defendant.
For years, rumors and accusations of police negligence lingered over the verdict. Most recently an investigation by the NYPD Cold Case Squad, —the results of which have not been shared with the family nor, to their knowledge, the Queens DA—have yielded no movement in the case.
It has been 20 years and this family continues to call for justice for the brutal murder of Manny Mayi. Join them to demand justice.
COME OUT TO THIS EVENT AS YOUR PRESENCE IS NEEDED AND SHARE THE INFO WITH OTHERS!
Today, Sunday March 27
1 pm to 4 pm
One Police Plaza (NYPD Headquarters)
Park Row (entrance is near the corner of Chambers and Centre Street)
New York City
8:47 am By la Macha · AgJOBS|Immigration|Media|Politics|race · 4 Comments
1 Oct 2010Some amazingly smart writer wrote an amazingly smart essay about Stephen Colbert, his testimony in Congress and a character on his show, Ching Chong Ding Dong. Here’s a clip!
Migrant workers (and de facto, often immigrants) are so often little more than causes–even in progressive circles. In the best case scenario, we are an “issue” to be rallied around, in the worst case, a “problem” that needs to be fixed through compromise with radical right politicians that have consistently exhibited hateful actions/votes against migrant workers and immigrant populations.
In this more serious passage, Colbert is operating from a pure place, a place of compassion and interconnectedness. He is saying, in the public sphere, migrant workers are human beings with bodies that are doing ungodly work and have little power to change the conditions they work under. He is saying that there is a moral and ethical obligation for those who have power to help how they can.
An unprecedented message in such a mainstream sphere.
I am taking the time to tell you about what Stephen Colbert means to me because I actually want to critique him. I want to talk about Colbert’s character, Ching Chong Ding Dong.
Aren’t I smart?
7:26 am By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|Los Angeles|Movies|race|Violence · 5 Comments
10 Sep 2010
When Bianca Laureano posted her review of Robert Rodriguez’s Machete here on VivirLatino, one Facebook fan/friend asked if we had heard about the “race riots” that some were claiming the film was going to cause. I admit I laughed aloud because, no I hadn’t heard about the riots (maybe my invite got lost in the mail) and because it was a ridiculous notion that because Latinos went to see a film that suddenly we would all take to the streets with machetes and start slicing and dicing. I won’t even touch how stereotypical and racist the idea is. As if there weren’t REAL reasons for Latino communities across the country to get pissed and take to the streets (which isn’t the same as rioting).
And lo and behold….nativist organizations, hate organizations and yes anti-immigrant and anti-Latino organizations are taking the protests of community members in Los Angeles, protests that legitimately question the police killing of an indigenous Guatemalan man, Manuel Jamines, and calling those protests the L.A. Machete Riots.
6:00 am By Maegan La Mala · Justice|New York City|race|Violence · 2 Comments
27 Aug 2010I cannot even begin to fathom the pain of a parent who loses a child to state sponsored violence and then finding the strength to struggle for justice in the name of that child, day after day. In this video testimony, the parents of Sean Bell, killed by the NYPD in 2006, speak out on what justice looks like to them.
Video gracias a the Justice Committee
4:27 pm By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|New York City|race|Violence · 3 Comments
18 Aug 2010
With gracious permission from the folks at City Limits magazine, we are reposting an article written by Michael Cohen regarding the possible reasons behind the wave of attacks on Mexicans in Staten Island, NYC.
As a national debate erupted over Arizona’s controversial immigration law this summer, a simmering anti-Mexican sentiment appeared to explode in Staten Island’s Mexican enclave, Port Richmond.
Ten of the 21 Staten Island cases investigated as hate crimes this year involve attacks on Mexicans in the neighborhood. Most victims report being robbed, beaten and peppered with ethnic slurs.
Diversity among the assailants involved in those assaults and an economic motive as consistent as the victims’ ethnicities, however, further complicate the already murky definition of a hate crime.
Victims have reported white, Hispanic and black male attackers. A South Asian woman was arrested in connection with two attacks. The latest arrest was a 17-year-old Liberian immigrant, Derrian Williams, who once burglarized the African Refuge Center in Park Hill, according to the center’s director.
“I don’t think there’s racism behind it,” said Ed Josey, president of Staten Island’s NAACP branch. “But those who are doing the beatings are not speaking about it. It’s not like they’re telling anyone why they do it.”
Victim and police accounts do indicate, however, a majority of black perpetrators, in this neighborhood where reports show—and residents confirm—a history of tension between blacks and Mexicans.
Josey said that the diminishment of jobs and recreational facilities play just as much a role as baseless hate towards another ethnic group.
Rev. Terry Troia, executive director of Project Hospitality, and a long time community leader here, suggested a psychological element.
“There’s a negative pulse in the community,” she said. “The people committing these crimes hear this negative verbiage, like ‘Oh, these damn Mexicans are taking all the jobs,’ and they act impulsively off that buzz.”
The buzz of bigotry on Staten Island caught the eye of federal officials in November 2008, when on Election Night four young men sought “revenge,” for President Obama’s victory by randomly beating African-Americans.
Soon after, the U.S. Department of Justice assigned Matthew Lattimer, an agent with department’s Community Relations Service to ease Staten Island’s racial tensions. Established under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, CRS functions behind the scenes to quell community conflicts, while cloaked in the secretive spirit imposed by the racial climate of the 1960s.
Given the history of sporadic assaults on Mexicans and the current flurry of attacks, Lattimer has become a fixture in Port Richmond, holding monthly meetings at El Centro, an immigration advocacy center on Castleton Avenue.
“He does a good job getting the dialog going,” said Ron Misels, a North Shore activist who has attended some meetings at El Centro and met Lattimer two years ago at an anti-bias summit. “But it’s clear we need more than dialog. These young people need parks and facilities and more things to do.”
For CRS agents, making information public can result in a misdemeanor conviction punishable by a maximum $1,000 fine or up to one year in prison. So Lattimer doesn’t allow reporters to attend meetings at El Centro.
Residents appreciate that federal authorities finally recognize the borough’s racial tension—a review of CRS annual reports from 1997 to 2006 contained not one reference to Staten Island—but after almost two years the violence has increased and their neighborhood is flooded with city cops.
“Supposedly my block has been under surveillance for years,” said Ednita Lorenzo, a 22-year-old Mexican living in Port Richmond. “There’s one of those NYPD signs up on the corner.”
Lorenzo recalled feeling tension between blacks and Mexicans as far back as elementary school but doesn’t attribute hate as the prime motivator in the recent attacks.
She said that thieves target Mexicans because cash-carrying day laborers might hesitate reporting an attack to the police because of their own immigration status.
That’s why John Messiha, one of Lorenzo’s childhood friends, accidentally killed her father’s cousin, Ricardo Salinas, four years ago, in one of the many but less frequent attacks that foreshadowed this summer’s violence.
Messiha, an Egyptian American, then 17, testified against his two black codefendants and admitted that they wanted to “rob a Mexican.”
“It hurt when I saw that quote in the paper,” Lorenzo said. “But I knew it was more about him being defenseless than him being Mexican.”
12:24 pm By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|New York|race|Violence · 4 Comments
2 Aug 2010This past weekend, the 10th anti-Mexican attack in about four months happened in Port Richmond, Staten Island.
In this latest attack, a 17 year old coming home from work in the early morning hours was beaten, robbed of 10 dollars and called anti-Mexican slurs. NY1 News television is reporting that a suspect is in custody. That suspect a 15 year old African American teenager.
6:43 am By Maegan La Mala · race|Violence · 2 Comments
27 Jul 2010I’m going through some videos that I took during the mock ICE checkpoint at Netroots and at the same time I’m catching up on what is up in my home city and while I helped to play Latina reverse ICE agent, while I watched Latino men in my same sphere get threatened with arrest, asked for their papers and described as “shady”, while fierce ass young woman in touch with how all their facets still form one whole life are dismissed and ultimately threatened by white men with “hell to pay”, while panelists on immigration asked for “task forces”, more Latinos can’t walk outside without fear. There were two reported attacks on Mexican immigrants in Port Richmond, Staten Island.
10:45 am By la Macha · Immigration|race · 15 Comments
24 Jul 2010The following is going viral in a big way on the facebook/twitter rounds. Activists at Net Roots (where our own Mamita Mala is!) conducted ICE checkpoints to check for “illegal European immigrants” throughout the conference as a way to demonstrate how the immigration debate is a specifically race based one, how ICE is used to terrify specifically racialized communities, how you could be *doing nothing wrong* and still considered suspect.
I don’t know, I think it’s a good idea–but I also think that I saw too many white people smiling, thinking isn’t this so funny/cute! Here! Here’s my ID! Haha!
It’s a lot different being asked by activists trying to prove a point for your ID than it is being asked by official government agents with their machine guns drawn for your ID. It sorta makes me think of Coco Fusco and Guillermo Gomez Pena’s series of museum tours where they imprisoned themselves in a cage and posed as “exotic Indians” from a fake country. Some people got it, other people thought it was cute. I wonder how many Native peoples or Latin@s are laughing and smirking their way through ICE checkpoints?
When there is no power in the work to terrify–you are relying as “artists” on irony to make your point, and some people will get irony others won’t. Hopefully in the whitened halls of Netroots, more people got it than didn’t.
What do you think?
8:44 am By Maegan La Mala · race · 4 Comments
19 Jul 2010In the late 1990′s, when racial profiling, especially framed in terms like “driving while black”, was in the headlines, Congressmen like John Conyers spoke out about the possibility of legislation aimed at stopping racial profiling. Now, ten or so years later, House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers Jr. and Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitution,
Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties Chairman Jerrold Nadler introduced H.R. 5748, End Racial Profiling Act of 2010 (ERPA).
This bill is being introduced in the context of the rising use of police tactics like stop and frisk in NYC and of course laws like Arizona’s SB1070 which make it suspicious to be alive while brown.
From the official press release announcing the legislation late last week:
“The debate over racial profiling has become a central element in a much larger history of adversarial relationships between the police and communities of color,” Conyers said. “Over the past two decades, the tensions between police and minority
communities have grown as allegations of racial profiling by law enforcement agents, sometimes supported by data collection
efforts, have increased in number and frequency. The recent passage of Arizonaʼs new immigration law has crystallized the terms
of the profiling debate and demonstrates that the combination of racial discrimination and law enforcement represents a volatile
mix across all strata of the minority community. In 2001, we achieved a bipartisan consensus with the Bush administration in
support of profiling legislation and hope that we can rebuild that momentum in support of this long overdue federal action.”
1:36 pm By la Macha · race|TV · 13 Comments
13 Jul 2010I don’t really watch cable news much–I get most of my news from the internet–so I wasn’t really aware that there is a brewing story going on around the Obama administration’s handling of the New Black Panther case. Basically, what seems to have happened was that a leader of the New Black Panther Party, King Samir Shabazz, showed up at an election site in Pennsylvania and proceeded to intimidate and frighten voters. Later on, he was caught on video advocating the murder of white children.
The problem came when, having successfully pressed charges against Shabazz (i.e. Shabazz was found guilty) the Obama administration declined to press further charges against him. Because, you know, he was already convicted and sitting in jail.
So of course the right media decides that this is an excellent opportunity to assume that the Obama admin didn’t pursue charges because of “racial” reasons.
From Media matters we get the news that CNN correspondent Erick Erickson thinks this situation should be the new “Willie Horton”:
Had Horton been white, the Republicans still would have used the ad. But Horton was black and the ad was powerfully effective — so effective that it and Dukakis’s stupid answer about opposing the death penalty even if his wife were murdered destroyed the Democrats in 1988 — the Democrats screamed racism at the top of their lungs and their accomplices in the media have forever agreed. Willie Horton = racism.
Nonsense. The ad worked. It was powerful. It was the truth. That’s why the Democrats screamed racism so loud. It was the only way to stop the GOP from going this direction again. They know the GOP lives in perpetual quixotic quest for the day it gets a significant share of the black vote.
Now we have King Samir Shabazz. He showed up at a polling location in Pennsylvania and intimidated voters going into the polls. The Justice Department pursued the case and, having received a verdict it the government’s favor, Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder stopped pursuing the New Black Panthers.
Video has subsequently come out of King Samir Shabazz encouraging the murder of white children.
Republican candidates nationwide should seize on this issue. The Democrats are giving a pass to radicals who advocate killing white kids in the name of racial justice and who try to block voters from the polls.
The Democrats will scream racism. Let them. Republicans are not going to pick up significant black support anyway. But here’s the thing: everyone but the Democrats will understand this is not racism. This isn’t even about race. This is about the judgment of an administration that would rather prosecute Arizona for doing what the feds won’t do than prosecuting violent thugs who would deny you and me the right to vote while killing our kids.
Never mind the fact that the administration DID pursue a successful prosecution against Shabazz or that it was the *Bush* administration that chose not to press charges. And the especially interesting thing is that the Bush administration refused to press similar charges against the Minute Men in Arizona:
DOJ did not pursue allegations that Minutemen intimidated Hispanic voters with a gun in 2006. Perez testified that in 2006, the Justice Department “declined to bring any action for alleged voter intimidation” “when three well-known anti-immigrant advocates affiliated with the Minutemen, one of whom was carrying a gun, allegedly intimidated Latino voters at a polling place by approaching several persons, filming them, and advocating and printing voting materials in Spanish.” [U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 5/14/10]
Anti-immigrant activist in 2006 case reportedly had “9mm Glock strapped to his side” at polling place. A November 8, 2006, Austin American-Statesman article reported (from the Nexis database): “In Arizona, Roy Warden, an anti-immigration activist with the Minutemen, and a handful of supporters staked out a Tucson precinct and questioned Hispanic voters at the polls to determine whether they spoke English.” The article continued:
Armed with a 9mm Glock automatic strapped to his side, Warden said he planned to photograph Hispanic voters entering polls in an effort to identify illegal immigrants and felons.
I believe what this all boils down to is a black man with a stick is frightening. Not pursuing charges against black men with sticks is showing racial bias. A white man with a gun, on the other hand, is doing the government a *favor*, see. Helping to monitor and control the situation. Why on earth would one pursue charges against this white man?
I understand it–why don’t you?
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter