Advertisement

Archive for the ‘race’ Category

One of the many things that irks me about the way that social justice movements are promoted by nonprofits through to the masses is the use of the either/or lens. I have written extensively over the years about how this has played out in the context of immigration policy and practice struggles in the United States. Whenever a bill is up for discussion, the so-called “good” side, that is the Democratic Party, pushes this good immigrant/bad immigrant binary and non-profits, in an often misguided effort to keep themselves afloat and gain a victory, take this language as their own. We see it with the push for the DREAM Act and the various state in-state tuition namesakes. We see it with the push against criminalizing deportation programs like Secure Communities. Now we see it again in the fight against H.B. 56 in Alabama.

Passed in June of last year, the Beason-Hammon Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act, or H.B. 56 is considered one of the harshest anti-immigrant laws in the United States. It requires schools to check and report the immigration status of their students and bars undocumented students from postsecondary education. It instructs police to demand proof of immigration status from anyone they suspect of being in the country without documentation, even on a routine traffic stop or roadblock. It also invalidates any contract knowingly entered into with an undocumented immigrant, including routine agreements such as a rent contract, and makes it a felony for an undocumented immigrant to enter into a contract with a government entity.

Hollywood director Chris Weitz, journalist Jose Antonio Vargas along with the Center for American Progress recently launched a campaign to repeal H.B. 56 called “Is this Alabama”. The accompanying report to the campaign, Alabama’s Immigration Disaster, focuses on the economic and civil rights impact of the law:

Overall, as Professor Samuel Addy of the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Alabama’s Culverhouse College of Commerce and Business Administration has illustrated, because of H.B. 56, Alabama could lose up to $10.8 billion (or 6.2 percent of its gross domestic product), up to 140,000 jobs in the state, $264.5 million in state tax revenue, and $93 million in local tax revenue.

These costs will all be incurred to drive out an undocumented population that is estimated to be only 2.5 percent of the state—a population that paid $130 million into the state’s tax coffers in 2010.

Alabama’s agricultural industry and foreign investment are especially affected. Chad Smith, a tomato farmer, estimates that he could lose up to $300,000 in produce because of the lack of farmworkers who are now fleeing the state. And recent embarrassing incidents such as the arrest of Mercedes-Benz and Honda executives under the provisions of the new law jeopardize the presence of foreign companies, which give the state both a significant amount of money and a significant number of jobs—percent of the state’s workforce in 2009, the most recent year for which data are available.

The campaign also features videos reflecting the personal, human impact of H.B. 56, asking people in Alabama their feelings about the law and framing the law in the context of the long struggle against racism in the state.

Check out one of the videos:

While repealing H.B. 56 is certainly something I am behind, I am concerned with framing issues of racism against blacks as something belonging to Alabama’s past – the United States’ past. Calling the struggle for equality and justice for all migrants the civil rights issue of our times implies that there is no more work to be done in terms of racism against blacks and the legacy of slavery in one state and across the country. All people have to do is look at the recently aired documentary Slavery by Another Name and look at who is being incarcerated and how to see that there is a hell of a long way to go when it comes to fighting racism. When racism is framed as either black or brown, real solidarity work is watered down. The reality is that the prison industrial complex that uses people of color bodies as raw materials is connected to the immigration criminalization complex.

So yes H.B. 56 is Alabama. It is the United States whose new budget features more money for Secure Communities. Failing to make the connections means we will continue to spread our resources too thin and be divided and conquered.

Post to Twitter

On the night of March 29, 1991, Manny Mayi, an 19 year-old Dominican college student was chased and beaten to death by upon crossing over to the Italian-American section of Corona, Queens.

Following his murder, the Queen’s District Attorney’s Office [DA] struggled to produce an effective case against the alleged defendants as the Italian-American community became reclusive and shielded by police investigators. A young Italian-American woman admitted to police investigators that she heard one of the defendants confess to the crime. Nevertheless, her family relocated her to Italy one week prior to the start of the trial in 1993. She was never subpoenaed, thus her testimony was never heard.

The trial jury was selected from a pool of residents from Northern Queens and yielded a sole person of color. And while the crime was committed on a populous street during a warm spring evening, the DA’s office and the NYPD produced only two material witnesses. Compounded by the absence of hate crime legislation at the State or Federal levels, the criminal proceedings resulted in the swift acquittal of a lone defendant.

For years, rumors and accusations of police negligence lingered over the verdict. Most recently an investigation by the NYPD Cold Case Squad, —the results of which have not been shared with the family nor, to their knowledge, the Queens DA—have yielded no movement in the case.

It has been 20 years and this family continues to call for justice for the brutal murder of Manny Mayi. Join them to demand justice.

COME OUT TO THIS EVENT AS YOUR PRESENCE IS NEEDED AND SHARE THE INFO WITH OTHERS!

Today, Sunday March 27
1 pm to 4 pm
One Police Plaza (NYPD Headquarters)
Park Row (entrance is near the corner of Chambers and Centre Street)
New York City

Post to Twitter

Some amazingly smart writer wrote an amazingly smart essay about Stephen Colbert, his testimony in Congress and a character on his show, Ching Chong Ding Dong. Here’s a clip!

Migrant workers (and de facto, often immigrants) are so often little more than causes–even in progressive circles. In the best case scenario, we are an “issue” to be rallied around, in the worst case, a “problem” that needs to be fixed through compromise with radical right politicians that have consistently exhibited hateful actions/votes against migrant workers and immigrant populations.

In this more serious passage, Colbert is operating from a pure place, a place of compassion and interconnectedness. He is saying, in the public sphere, migrant workers are human beings with bodies that are doing ungodly work and have little power to change the conditions they work under. He is saying that there is a moral and ethical obligation for those who have power to help how they can.

An unprecedented message in such a mainstream sphere.

I am taking the time to tell you about what Stephen Colbert means to me because I actually want to critique him. I want to talk about Colbert’s character, Ching Chong Ding Dong.

Aren’t I smart? :P

Go over and read the whole thing!!!

Post to Twitter

When Bianca Laureano posted her review of Robert Rodriguez’s Machete here on VivirLatino, one Facebook fan/friend asked if we had heard about the “race riots” that some were claiming the film was going to cause. I admit I laughed aloud because, no I hadn’t heard about the riots (maybe my invite got lost in the mail) and because it was a ridiculous notion that because Latinos went to see a film that suddenly we would all take to the streets with machetes and start slicing and dicing. I won’t even touch how stereotypical and racist the idea is. As if there weren’t REAL reasons for Latino communities across the country to get pissed and take to the streets (which isn’t the same as rioting).

And lo and behold….nativist organizations, hate organizations and yes anti-immigrant and anti-Latino organizations are taking the protests of community members in Los Angeles, protests that legitimately question the police killing of an indigenous Guatemalan man, Manuel Jamines, and calling those protests the L.A. Machete Riots.

Read more…

Post to Twitter

I cannot even begin to fathom the pain of a parent who loses a child to state sponsored violence and then finding the strength to struggle for justice in the name of that child, day after day. In this video testimony, the parents of Sean Bell, killed by the NYPD in 2006, speak out on what justice looks like to them.

Video gracias a the Justice Committee

Post to Twitter

With gracious permission from the folks at City Limits magazine, we are reposting an article written by Michael Cohen regarding the possible reasons behind the wave of attacks on Mexicans in Staten Island, NYC.

As a national debate erupted over Arizona’s controversial immigration law this summer, a simmering anti-Mexican sentiment appeared to explode in Staten Island’s Mexican enclave, Port Richmond.

Ten of the 21 Staten Island cases investigated as hate crimes this year involve attacks on Mexicans in the neighborhood. Most victims report being robbed, beaten and peppered with ethnic slurs.

Diversity among the assailants involved in those assaults and an economic motive as consistent as the victims’ ethnicities, however, further complicate the already murky definition of a hate crime.

Victims have reported white, Hispanic and black male attackers. A South Asian woman was arrested in connection with two attacks. The latest arrest was a 17-year-old Liberian immigrant, Derrian Williams, who once burglarized the African Refuge Center in Park Hill, according to the center’s director.

“I don’t think there’s racism behind it,” said Ed Josey, president of Staten Island’s NAACP branch. “But those who are doing the beatings are not speaking about it. It’s not like they’re telling anyone why they do it.”

Victim and police accounts do indicate, however, a majority of black perpetrators, in this neighborhood where reports show—and residents confirm—a history of tension between blacks and Mexicans.

Josey said that the diminishment of jobs and recreational facilities play just as much a role as baseless hate towards another ethnic group.

Rev. Terry Troia, executive director of Project Hospitality, and a long time community leader here, suggested a psychological element.

“There’s a negative pulse in the community,” she said. “The people committing these crimes hear this negative verbiage, like ‘Oh, these damn Mexicans are taking all the jobs,’ and they act impulsively off that buzz.”

The buzz of bigotry on Staten Island caught the eye of federal officials in November 2008, when on Election Night four young men sought “revenge,” for President Obama’s victory by randomly beating African-Americans.

Soon after, the U.S. Department of Justice assigned Matthew Lattimer, an agent with department’s Community Relations Service to ease Staten Island’s racial tensions. Established under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, CRS functions behind the scenes to quell community conflicts, while cloaked in the secretive spirit imposed by the racial climate of the 1960s.

Given the history of sporadic assaults on Mexicans and the current flurry of attacks, Lattimer has become a fixture in Port Richmond, holding monthly meetings at El Centro, an immigration advocacy center on Castleton Avenue.

“He does a good job getting the dialog going,” said Ron Misels, a North Shore activist who has attended some meetings at El Centro and met Lattimer two years ago at an anti-bias summit. “But it’s clear we need more than dialog. These young people need parks and facilities and more things to do.”

For CRS agents, making information public can result in a misdemeanor conviction punishable by a maximum $1,000 fine or up to one year in prison. So Lattimer doesn’t allow reporters to attend meetings at El Centro.

Residents appreciate that federal authorities finally recognize the borough’s racial tension—a review of CRS annual reports from 1997 to 2006 contained not one reference to Staten Island—but after almost two years the violence has increased and their neighborhood is flooded with city cops.

“Supposedly my block has been under surveillance for years,” said Ednita Lorenzo, a 22-year-old Mexican living in Port Richmond. “There’s one of those NYPD signs up on the corner.”

Lorenzo recalled feeling tension between blacks and Mexicans as far back as elementary school but doesn’t attribute hate as the prime motivator in the recent attacks.

She said that thieves target Mexicans because cash-carrying day laborers might hesitate reporting an attack to the police because of their own immigration status.

That’s why John Messiha, one of Lorenzo’s childhood friends, accidentally killed her father’s cousin, Ricardo Salinas, four years ago, in one of the many but less frequent attacks that foreshadowed this summer’s violence.

Messiha, an Egyptian American, then 17, testified against his two black codefendants and admitted that they wanted to “rob a Mexican.”

“It hurt when I saw that quote in the paper,” Lorenzo said. “But I knew it was more about him being defenseless than him being Mexican.”

Read more…

Post to Twitter

This past weekend, the 10th anti-Mexican attack in about four months happened in Port Richmond, Staten Island.

In this latest attack, a 17 year old coming home from work in the early morning hours was beaten, robbed of 10 dollars and called anti-Mexican slurs. NY1 News television is reporting that a suspect is in custody. That suspect a 15 year old African American teenager.

Read more…

Post to Twitter

I’m going through some videos that I took during the mock ICE checkpoint at Netroots and at the same time I’m catching up on what is up in my home city and while I helped to play Latina reverse ICE agent, while I watched Latino men in my same sphere get threatened with arrest, asked for their papers and described as “shady”, while fierce ass young woman in touch with how all their facets still form one whole life are dismissed and ultimately threatened by white men with “hell to pay”, while panelists on immigration asked for “task forces”, more Latinos can’t walk outside without fear. There were two reported attacks on Mexican immigrants in Port Richmond, Staten Island.

Read more…

Post to Twitter

The following is going viral in a big way on the facebook/twitter rounds. Activists at Net Roots (where our own Mamita Mala is!) conducted ICE checkpoints to check for “illegal European immigrants” throughout the conference as a way to demonstrate how the immigration debate is a specifically race based one, how ICE is used to terrify specifically racialized communities, how you could be *doing nothing wrong* and still considered suspect.

I don’t know, I think it’s a good idea–but I also think that I saw too many white people smiling, thinking isn’t this so funny/cute! Here! Here’s my ID! Haha!

It’s a lot different being asked by activists trying to prove a point for your ID than it is being asked by official government agents with their machine guns drawn for your ID. It sorta makes me think of Coco Fusco and Guillermo Gomez Pena’s series of museum tours where they imprisoned themselves in a cage and posed as “exotic Indians” from a fake country. Some people got it, other people thought it was cute. I wonder how many Native peoples or Latin@s are laughing and smirking their way through ICE checkpoints?

When there is no power in the work to terrify–you are relying as “artists” on irony to make your point, and some people will get irony others won’t. Hopefully in the whitened halls of Netroots, more people got it than didn’t.

What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Can a Law Stop Racial Profiling

8:44 am By Maegan La Mala · race · 4 Comments

19 Jul 2010

In the late 1990′s, when racial profiling, especially framed in terms like “driving while black”, was in the headlines, Congressmen like John Conyers spoke out about the possibility of legislation aimed at stopping racial profiling. Now, ten or so years later, House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers Jr. and Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitution,
Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties Chairman Jerrold Nadler introduced H.R. 5748, End Racial Profiling Act of 2010 (ERPA).

This bill is being introduced in the context of the rising use of police tactics like stop and frisk in NYC and of course laws like Arizona’s SB1070 which make it suspicious to be alive while brown.

From the official press release announcing the legislation late last week:

“The debate over racial profiling has become a central element in a much larger history of adversarial relationships between the police and communities of color,” Conyers said. “Over the past two decades, the tensions between police and minority
communities have grown as allegations of racial profiling by law enforcement agents, sometimes supported by data collection
efforts, have increased in number and frequency. The recent passage of Arizonaʼs new immigration law has crystallized the terms
of the profiling debate and demonstrates that the combination of racial discrimination and law enforcement represents a volatile
mix across all strata of the minority community. In 2001, we achieved a bipartisan consensus with the Bush administration in
support of profiling legislation and hope that we can rebuild that momentum in support of this long overdue federal action.”

Read more…

Post to Twitter


Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you
  • Karen: Have you see the census figures for 2010? Latinos are not all that diverse. Most" Latinos" are Mexic [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: Hi Karen, I agree but only in part. I think that people do get up in cults of personality but th [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: I haven't heard anything about a rally being held Jose Luis. i know Presente.org is organizing a pet [...]
  • Karen: Also, Al Sharpton, now a host on MSNBC, brought attention to the Trayvon Martin case because he knew [...]
  • jose luis: when the rally is going to be held in SAn Diego..if there is on??? [...]

Get our RSS Feed!