7:27 am By Maegan La Mala · Activism|chicago|New York City|Prisons|Puerto Rico · No Comments
17 May 2012Many activist organizations on both the international and national level point out the problem of political prisoners. When it comes to looking at Latin American and Latinos and people incarcerated for their political beliefs, such as self-determination or challenging the way the government works, most people will point to Cuba and/or Venezuela. What they won’t often acknowledge the existence of prisoners of conscious in the United States. Puerto Rican activists from both the island and the U.S. are trying to change that.
Puerto Rican activist Alberto De Jesus, known as Tito Kayak, announced earlier this week intention to kayak from Venezuela to Puerto Rico. The maritine voyage, to begin on June 5th weather permiting, will row from Venezuela, island by island thoughout the Antilles following the tragectory taken by the indiginous Arawak people who originaly populated the Antillies. This effort will be carried out to honor and bring world attention to the case of the longest held Puerto Rican, U.S. political prisoner Oscar Lopez Rivera.
7:47 am By Maegan La Mala · Casa Blanca Camino 2012|DREAM Act|Immigration|Politics · No Comments
24 Apr 2012It’s time to woo the Latinos! It’s time to woo the Latinos!
According to Michael Scherer in TIME:
“When we consider the impact of Latinos in 2012, we are looking at a swing between about a 20% vote share for Republicans and a 45% vote share. The question that follows is how much of an impact this swing will have on the final electoral college results. The polls that really matter are state-by-state surveys, not national ones. Latinos are expected to make up about one in ten voters this year, but many of those votes, in big states like Texas, California and New York, will have no impact on the electoral college, since those states are not in play for Romney. But Latinos can have a big impact on the outcomes in Colorado, Arizona, Nevada and Florida, and a marginal impact in states like North Carolina and Ohio, all of which both parties will contest.”.
In other words game on. While the immigration issue may not be the most important to all Latinos, it is one that many care about for ourselves, our families, and our loved ones. It’s a political litmus test of racial politics beyond black and white. The call has gone out and both parties are upping their game by reviving dead immigration horses and even hitching their hopes to new ones.
Republicans love to remind Latinos that we’re just like them, based on stereotypical assumptions on issues like LGBTQ rights and abortion. Moving away from morality a bit this election season, the GOP is sing the promise of a potential brown vice-president, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who made the rounds on the Sunday morning political pundit television shows and the novel approach of challenging Democratic inaction on immigration reform by pushing various pared down versions of the DREAM Act.
The Democrats are approaching the Latino vote in three ways. One, by pouring money and energy into massive voter registration and get out the vote campaigns. Two, by repeating the promise of immigration reform and three, by pointing out how bad Republicans have been and will continue to be for the Latino community.
Last week Latinos for Obama officially relaunched, complete with a newish tag line : Estamos Unidos. There is nothing novel in the outreach which focuses on Latinos as the backbone of the alleged economic recovery. Of course there is mention of fixing the broken immigration system and taking a swipe at GOP versions of the DREAM Act, a mention of offering a pathway to citizenship to those who came into the U.S. as children.
Recently in an interview with Univision (of course- this a promise not to be made in English), President Obama promised, again, that if he were reelected he really would push for comprehensive immigration reform in the first year of his second term. Problem with the promise, besides that he made the same exact promise back in 2008 and didn’t keep it, is that Obama has already excused eventual failure. In that same Univision interview, Obama said that while he would push for comprehensive immigration reform in his second term, the Republicans (cue evil music) would kill it, especially Republicans like his likely opponent, Mitt Romney.
With Mitt Romney emerging as the likely GOP presidential nominee, liberal think tanks, non-profits, and advocacy orgs have joined with the Democratic Party in attacking what the Republican ticket would look like with junior Florida Senator Marco Rubio as it’s Vice-presidential pick. The Center for American Progress Action Fund recently released an issue brief ominously titled, “Nightmare Ahead: What a Romney-Rubio Presidency Would Mean for Immigration.”. One thing that immigration advocates and activists should be concerned about, according to CAP, is that both Romney and Rubio seem to love E-Verify, a flawed internet-based work-authorization system and that both would push for mandatory nation-wide use. While CAP accurately points out the problems with E-Verify, including error rates that misidentify workers authorized to work as not and vice versa, what isn’t mentioned is how the current Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano voted to make E-Verify mandatory in Arizona.
Also under attack from the Democrats and their supporters is the GOP DREAM Act. While no actual piece of legislation has been drafted, what Senator Rubio has proposed in statements is a DREAM Act like bill that would allow young undocumented people brought into the United States by their parents some sort of legal status but no path to citizenship. This proposal has rankled many within the immigration advocacy world who took up the DREAM Act as their pet cause after it became clear that President Obama was not going to keep his campaign promise of comprehensive immigration reform. Democrats and allied orgs are quick to point out that Republican senators overwhelmingly voted against the DREAM Act coming to the floor back in 2010. What many undocumented young people have countered with is how some Democrats also voted against the DREAM Act in that procedural vote and that since then the Obama administration has offered nothing save an increase in detentions and deportations. In other words, something is better than nothing and it certainly is better than living in fear of being arrested and deported. Likely GOP presidential candidate Romney has cubically spoken out against the original DREAM Act but He did say that he would support a military only version, like Republican David Rivera’s ARMS Act and has indicated that he is not opposed to a something like what Rubio is suggesting. Not all immigrants wants to be citizens and certainly that’s not a path that anyone should be forced to go on, but critics worry about the creation of second class non-citizens who are able to live and work in the United States but not vote. And because it is election time, it’s all about the vote, voters, and would be voters.
The proof however goes beyond words. We need to see what an actual GOP DREAM Act would contain and see if the Obama administration makes any real attempts at slowing down the detentions and deportations.
7:50 am By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Immigration|Justice|Politics · 4 Comments
23 Apr 2012
Arizona’s S.B. 1070 has been pushed back against since it’s creation. There have been marches, rallies, acts of civil disobedience, boycotts, petitions, and lawsuits. This week attention turns to the Supreme Court who on Wednesday will hear if parts of the law, in effect since April of 2010, can be enforced by the state or if the law infringes upon a federal power, immigration enforcement. So far, four parts of the law have been blocked from being enforced because they, according to courts, clearly tread on what the federal government should be doing. These are the four parts that will be considered by the court. The court can strike down all four provisions, some, or none. The parts being considered are:
1. The requirement that all residents of the state, regardless of immigration status, be able to show proof of their legal status if a law enforcement agent stops them with a “reasonable suspicion” to
believe that they are undocumented.
2. The provision making it a state crime if a person cannot produce the proof of their immigration status.
3. The provision making it a state crime for a person to be looking for work or be working if they don’t have legal papers.
4. The provision authorizing law enforcement to arrest an individual without a warrant if the officer believes they have committed any offense that would make them deportable.
This is not a case about if the anti-immigrant law denies equal protection under the law for immigrants. This is not a case about the civil or human rights of immigrants. People should be clear that while yes, if the Supreme Court decides that S.B. 1070 indeed goes above and beyond what a state should be doing, it has the potential of stopping other copycat laws from moving forward in other states like in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina and Utah. But that same court decision against S.B. 1070 will affirm the existence and enforcement of federal policies and practices that predated S.B. 1070, namely programs like Secure Communities. It is the federal government who will be arguing against S.B. 1070. So while a Supreme Court decision against S.B. 1070 could have a domino effect in terms of other state anti-immigrant legislation, it will not erase the climate of fear for the undocumented in the United States. That would take a real effort by the federal government to actually practice discretion when it comes to immigration enforcement priorities, something that honestly cannot happen while policies like S-Comm are pushed as part of immigration policy.
On Wednesday, there are events scheduled in Arizona and all over the country against S.B. 1070 and similar laws.
For a great resource on the Supreme Court S.B. 1070 case, visit the Immigration Policy Center.
7:20 am By Maegan La Mala · Activism|Chile|Justice|Music · Comments Off
21 Mar 2012I haven’t posted anything since last week, since before Romney won the Puerto Rican primary, as if that means anything. I’m planning my next big show happening next week so y head is in that and not in political analysis. But I did want to share this video by French Chilena Ana Tijoux which seems especially fitting given the recent reboot Occupy Wall Street has gotten (with the same problems that originally kept me away), the push for the NY State DREAM Act, Undocumented Coming Out actions across the country, the killing of
Trayvon Martin and this statement from Decolonize Oakland.
As I prepare for my participation on the next stop of the make/shift recLAmation tour, I am reflecting on reclaiming, the words of the Communiqué from Decolonize Oakland are resonating with me. The “occupations” we are seeing are not like the tomas that have been happening in Chilean schools for decades. I think the part about people of color autonomy and self-determination is critical and we can’t have that in spaces where it’s ok for white mean to don Native headdress as ironic statements (as I saw recently at OWS).
The shock is not at the fact that people are stepping up and speaking out, the shock is that people are only now starting to notice the resistance that has been happening for over 500 years.
Special Thanks to Nacional Records
12:59 pm By Maegan La Mala · Casa Blanca Camino 2012|Con la Vista al Voto|Immigration|Politics|Puerto Rico · Comments Off
16 Mar 2012There seems to be much confusion out there about who Puerto Ricans are politically speaking, what their immigration status is in the United States, and what language they speak. It’s very easy to blame Republican hate speech and ignorance and fail to look at the bigger picture of the big c word most people don’t want to mention when talking about la isla del encanto : colonialism.
So as a Rican, not claiming to speak for all of Ricankind, I wanted to clarify a few points.
Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens
Members of the Southern Mississippi University band chanted, “Where’s your green card?” at a Puerto Rican Kansas State player during their NCAA Tournament game against Kansas State University (source)
Puerto Ricans are citizens of the United States no matter if they are born within the 50 states or on the island of Puerto Rico. In 1917 the Jones–Shafroth Act collectively made Puerto Ricans citizens as well as giving us a very useful (sarcasm) Resident Commissioner who is a non-voting member of the U.S. House of Representatives. We do not need green cards. We have social security numbers and US passports. If we live within the 50 states we can vote for president. If we live in Puerto Rico we cannot. This make our immigrant experience unique in a number if ways, but it clearly does not protect us from racism or xenophobia. My own grandparents’ apartment in New York was raided by la migra in search of papers and our community has been impacted by the criminalization of Latino immigrants as demonstrated by the deportation of a Puerto Rican in 2008.
(Most) Puerto Ricans Speak English
As the GOP presidential candidates campaign in Puerto Rico, where residents can vote in primaries but not in the general election, recently Rick Santorum made a statement regarding the island’s political future.
Now put aside for a moment the English only nativist subtext and acknowledge that Puerto Ricans on the island are taught English. Do most Puerto Ricans on the island speak Spanish? Yes and they are well within their right to do so. As of 2007, the American Community Survey states that 95.1% of island residents speak Spanish and 81.5% of Puerto Ricans speak English less than “very well”. 4.7% of people on the island speak English only. It should be noted that there has been previous backlash in Puerto Rico against the idea of an English language requirement for statehood or an English language requirement in general. Puerto Ricans are extremely proud of their culture including their unique version of Spanish just as a NYRican I am very proud of my official language of Spanglish.
While it has been wonderful to see people in the media correcting the misconceptions about Puerto Ricans. I have yet to see anyone put these misconceptions within a colonial context. It needs to be acknowledged that the reason so many candidates stump on the island is not out of interest in changing the political status of the island, a commonwealth aka colony and recognized as such globally including by the United Nations, but rather as a way to earn Puerto Rican voters inside of the United States. Many are pointing to the upcoming plebiscite or non-binding vote on the island’s status that will occur while the U.S. presidential elections are happening. It’s hard not to choke on the irony of the exercise of democracy, however flawed, inside the 50 states while a farcical glorified opinion poll happens inside a country occupied by the U.S. for over 100 years.
I understand the confusion. When Puerto Rico is taught about in U.S. schools, it is not called a colony and it is not explained how the relationship between the U.S. and the island actually works in terms of political representation, voting rights, taxes, language, and culture. It isn’t explained how Puerto Rican migration happens nor how Rican bodies served as guinea pigs for the birth control so many women in the US are fighting to maintain access to.
One cannot look at the high unemployment numbers inside Puerto Rico, the poverty, the drug trade, police brutality and corruption without looking at how the local economy was decimated during Operation Bootstrap to give U.S. companies tax breaks on the backs of Rican men and woman, many who were forced to migrate to the United States. That is how my family arrived in NY.
But let’s keep ignoring the fact that the US has a colony and let’s engage in the joke of the GOP campaign, egged on by Tea Party island Governor Luis Fortuño. That’s a punchline that requires no papers and no translation.
12:39 pm By Maegan La Mala · Immigration|Justice|Politics · Comments Off
14 Mar 2012Last week a number of immigration advocacy organizations in Washington D.C. filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security seeking information regarding their Criminal Alien Program (CAP).
According to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the CAP program provides ICE-wide direction and support in the identification and arrest of those immigrants who are incarcerated within federal, state and local prisons and jails, as well as at-large immigrants with criminal records. This is done through ICE presence in jails and prisons and initiating deportation proceedings against people convicted of criminal offenses. It’s important to note that CAP does not just look at undocumented immigrants but also green-card holders, short-term temporary workers and visitors with proper authorization,
The lawsuit filed by the American Immigration Council (AIC) and the Connecticut chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) alleges that ICE also sweeps up individuals who have been arrested but never convicted of any crime, a violation of due process.
Specifically the two organizations are seeking responsive, non-exempt records regarding CAP under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
While the federal government continues to expand another deportation program, Secure Communities, over the past five years alone, CAP has led to the arrest of more than a million people, and the program was implicated in approximately half of all removal proceedings in FY 2009.
From a press release announcing the lawsuit:
“Although CAP supposedly targets the worst criminal offenders, the limited information we have shows that this is not always the case,” according to Melissa Crow, Director of AIC’s Legal Action Center. “Like Secure Communities, this insidious program seems to target individuals with little or no criminal history for deportation and to incentivize pretextual stops and racial profiling.”
ICE claims that the CAP program saves money and resources but from fiscal years 2005 to 2009 the largest as well as the fastest growing segment of appropriated dollars went to ICE’s Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) office whose budget more than doubled (increasing 104%). While ICE has stated that the focus of the program is high risk violent offenders it wouldn’t be surprising to learn that this investment in criminalizing immigrant communities has increased under Obama as deportation numbers have increased across the board.
8:29 am By Maegan La Mala · Casa Blanca Camino 2012|Media|Politics · 4 Comments
7 Mar 2012Super Martes is over with few surprises. Mitt Romney won most of the primaries and caucuses. Rick Santorum managed some small victories that allow him to remain a viable candidate. Newt Gingrich won one state, Georgia and rumors are that the other candidates will push him to drop out. Perpetual outsider Ron Paul didn’t win anything but remained ever optimistic.
Read my op-ed over at El Diario la Prensa NY on why the results hold little weight for the Latino electorate and share your thoughts.
8:46 pm By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Casa Blanca Camino 2012|Immigration|Politics · 2 Comments
24 Feb 2012Originally I had no intention of watching the alleged last of the GOP debates . It was held in Mesa, Arizona which meant the anti-immigrant rhetoric would be amped up to pander to the local audience which included Sheriff Joe Arpaio. I ended up watching the debate because my partner said we should watch it together (how romantic).Also, Arizona is where the next big primary will happen this coming Tuesday.
I was right about the hateful narrative used against immigrants but I also watched and listened to a group of white men who seemed to be against everything, including each other.
The whole debate, poorly moderated by CNN’s John King, had a strange air about it. The Republican hopefuls appeared on stage and introduced themselves in a manner that would have been appropriate in a bad comic book. For example, Ron Paul knighted himself the “defender of the Constitution.” Someone get that man a cape.
The rest of the very long evening consisted of the candidates talking about everything they hate like spending money. Rick Santorum responded to the first question asked, regarding the national debt, saying that the only thing he wanted to spend money on was the defense department, everything else should be cut : medicaid, medicare, food stamps, and of course Obama Care, I mean healthcare, and education.
Applause followed by Mitt Romney and Santorum going back and forth at each other for a while about who was more fiscally conservative.
Ron Paul gets in on the Santorum bashing (the candidate, not the sexual liquid) by calling him a fake and especially targeting how Santorum was once a backer of No Child Left Behind and now was against it.
Mitt Romney mentioned his experience as head of the Salt Lake Olympic Organizing Committee so many times that I proposed a bobsled race instead of primary to determine the GOP candidate for president.
The most unsurprising portions of the night involved birth control and immigration, and within those topics, race.
All of the candidates made the issue of contraceptives one of choice, access, and liberties but for religious fundamentalists, not for people with a uterus. Access to contraception was blamed for the amount of children born out of wedlock, especially among “some people”. I wonder who those people could be?
:: looks around at her two kids with no daddy in sight::.
Oh wait. They mean me.
Those same some people,like me, are really poor, usually criminals,uneducated and a burden because of all the babies they had while not being married. Therefore the answer to poverty is marriage and no birth control. Sign me and my out of wedlock daughters up! Married people who use birth control are mythical creatures who must exist only in the realm of the liberal elites.
This discussion of the evils of birth control had one brief ray of light when Ron Paul clarified that the morning after pill is not the same as the abortion pill. I said that moment was brief right because then he entered into the bash Planned Parenthood portion of the evening.
Arizona, the home of SB 1070 and banned books, seemed to waiting for the four white men to unleash the anti-immigration vitriol. Governer Jan Brewer and Sherrif Joe Arpaio sat in the audience, almost as GOP guests of honor. All of the candidates spoke in favor of fences and more boots on the ground. All of the candidates lambasted Obama and his administration for suing Arizona and not doing enough to stop immigrants who were of accused draining the economy and coming for the welfare ride. Mitt Romney especially came down hard on the administration, which makes sense campaign wise, since the Democratic Party has been putting all of it’s eggs in the Latino vote basket hoping that they can keep or win support by making Romney the most anti-immigrant of all. Alternately, Florida GOP Senator Marco Rubio’s name was mentioned, as if to prove to any Latinos who were watching, that they were capable of acknowledging a Latino who they weren’t going to paint as the scapegoat for the U.S.’s ills.
Of course none of the arguments the GOP presidential wannabes presented are based in reality. No one mentioned how Obama has actually expanded Bush immigration enforcement policies and how thanks to those expansions there were more Border Patrol boots on the ground and record breaking deportation numbers. Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio’s name was mentioned, as if to prove that they were capable of mentioning a Latino and had some credibility. Newt Gingrich, who at one point was being praised for his “common sense” approach to immigration policy, which boiled down to saying that family unification was important for “good” undocumented people and proposing a limbo status of undocumented but not deportable, reverted back to the standard nativist arguments and when asked to discribe himself in one word, Newt Gingrich cockily answered, “cheerful”.
11:48 am By Maegan La Mala · Casa Blanca Camino 2012|Con la Vista al Voto|DREAM Act|Florida|Immigration|Politics|Puerto Rico · 3 Comments
27 Jan 2012I’m feeling a little dazed from the seemingly endless stream of GOP debates and the incumbent President’s non-statement statement on immigration policy during the SOTU. With the Florida primary just days away, both political parties are targeting the Latino vote that the state allegedly represents. Both parties are playing a spin game, ready to crown an opponent as the most anti-immigrant on one hand, while claiming that the Latino electorate in Florida doesn’t really care about immigration.
In last night’s GOP debate, on again off again front runner Newt Gingrich took a page from the Democratic National Committee, targeting Mitt Romney as the most anti-immigrant. Certainly this attack is related to Romney’s statements earlier this week touting “self-deportation” as a good solution to current problems. Romney, offended by Gingrich’s characterization, demanded an apology. As I pointed out in a piece I wrote for El Diario La Prensa last month, we are heading into dangerous territory when we try to find the “worst” among bad choices. Gingrich’s allegedly kinder, softer approach to immigration amounts to what the current Obama policy is on paper, allowing “non-threatening” immigrants with family ties and a long history in the U.S. to stay in a permanent limbo status.
A new/old Latino target is being pushed by one organization. Today, Presente.org launched a campaign targeting potential GOP Vice Presidential pick, Senator Marco Rubio. The campaign wittingly named “No Somos Rubios” (We are not Rubios/We are not Blondes), hones in on Republicans using a brown face with a brown name to earn Latino votes. This right wing strategy is being called into question not just based on Rubio’s anti-immigrant positions but also because Rubio represent such a specific facet of the Latino electorate. Rubio appeals to Cuban-American anti-Castro demographic. Rubio probably will not appeal to other Latinos, especially in the South West, who according to polls, played a critical role in Obama’s getting elected in 2008.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter