Advertisement

Archive for the ‘March for America’ Category

March for America from VivirLatino on Vimeo.

Some video clips from the March 21, 2010 March for America in Washington D.C.

I’ve decided to break my analysis of this past weekend’s March for America into three parts, each focusing on a different aspect of my experience and perceptions.

The first part is messaging. What was the purpose of this march and was the reason why anywhere between 200,000 to 500,000 people went the same as the organizers? How did expectations and promises compare with the reality of what was said and what was experienced?

Read more…

Post to Twitter

I’ve been really interested to read Mala’s critique of the March for America (can we pause for just a minute and really think about what that means? Marching for America?) as she and I have talked offline a bit about how the march was largely symbolic–carrying very little meaning for most US citizens and doing not-so-much for those who desperately need action, protection, and help–undocumented peoples. That the march was a mixed bag; symbolism can be really good and necessary–but it can’t be all that there is (these are largely my critiques, you’ll have to wait for mala to post her own critiques!).

Then I read the following:

The Shelter | Sanctuary | Status Campaign invites shelter workers, residents, managers, counselors and anti-violence against women advocates and activists to attend an urgent community meeting on March 8th.

It has come to our attention, that the Canada Border Services Agency invaded a shelter for women – on February 27, looking to track down Jane, a single mom and survivor of violence from Ghana.

“It’s so scary,” Jane says, who wishes to keep her real name anonymous but is willing to speak to the media. “I thought the shelter was supposed to be a safe space for me and my baby. I’m scared not just for myself, but for non-status women in shelters everywhere who are facing the same fear,” she continued.

“We have heard of the CBSA waiting outside of shelters, looking to apprehend women without status, but I have never heard of officers actually walking into a shelter to look for women,” says Eileen Morrow, Coordinator of the Ontario Association for Interval and Transition Homes, the largest shelter association in Canada. “This is an unprecedented attack on women in our communities and we demand it end immediately!”

“The women in our shelters are survivors of violence. They are healing from trauma. The last thing we need is the bullies from CBSA barging in her to re-traumatize them,” says Bernadette Dondo, a counsellor at Nellies.

“The women’s movement fought long and hard for access to shelter and safety. This is a fundamental right for all women, regardless of immigration status. The CBSA violated this right and the women’s movement is going to hold them accountable,” asserts Fariah Chowdhury, an organizer with the Shelter | Sanctuary | Status Campaign.

Shelter workers, residents and anti-violence against women advocates will be joined by women from Toronto Rape Crisis Centre, Sistering, METRAC –Metropolitan Action Committee Against Violence Against Women and Children and many other women’s organizations demand that Canada Borders Service Agency immediately stop visiting or waiting outside shelters or organizations that provide services to women; that women fleeing domestic abuse and violence be given status immediately and a full and inclusive regularization program be implemented.

For more info phone: 647.836.8781
or email shelter.sanctuary.status@gmail.com

Organized by the Shelter|Sanctuary|Status Coalition, a growing movement of over 120 anti-Violence Against Women organizations that are working to create safe spaces for all women, regardless of immigration status – http://toronto.nooneisillegal.org/sss

The follow up to this post is here.

Outside of the fact that these actions of the Canadian Patrol are extraordinarily frightening and misogynistic (I’ve written before about how women are often controlled by abusive spouses through the theft of their green cards or even outright refusal to renew papers), I think that the response to the Canadian Patrol by women’s groups in Canada points an especially bright light on what the pro-immigration groups in the US are not achieving: a national response to gross abuse and negligence against immigrants by the government.

What I mean specifically: the major pro-immigration organizations in the US are so policy driven–so reform minded and “get new legislation enacted” centered–that they forget that the fight over immigration starts first and foremost, in the streets. In our hood, among our friends, with our familia. It starts with having no place to go, nothing to eat, no friends. And being reached out to by the local women’s shelter. Or the local church. The various Border Patrols throughout the world are not looking for undocumented people in Congress or Legislature. They are looking for them at bars, at churches, at shelters.

The government, too, knows where the fight is.

So what does it mean then, that immigrants, their families, their communities, and the Border Patrol know exactly where the fight is–but all those who are supposedly standing up for immigrant rights are sitting a world away advocating for something that may or may not have any sort of effect on the battle going on in the community?

In short: what in the hell do we do about this major disconnect between most pro-immigration organizations and the lived experiences of immigrants? How do we get to the point that there is a organization or coalition that will be strong enough and hold enough clout to put out a succinct analysis and forceful response about local issues on a national level?

I know that there are several problems in the US that Canada and other nations do not have to deal with–for starters, the corporate owned media that has a central interest in maintaining immigrant (women) as the “other.”

But from where I’m sitting, the pro-immigration community in the US can’t even agree that “family” is a highly contested concept to organize around–specifically because of incidences of abuse and violence that go unreported and undealt with in an effort to maintain the “we’re good people who love our families” immigrant narrative intact.

The US only likes Good Immigrants, right?

Are we ever going to be brave enough to have the tough conversations?

Post to Twitter

Depending on who you ask, between a quarter of a million people to half a million people, overwhelmingly Latinos, went to the National Mall this past Sunday in support of immigration reform in what was called the March for America.

I was there repping VivirLatino with my official media cred, pero do not expect this to be a post about who said what, because I promise you that nothing new was said. That is not a criticism of the organizers, Reform Immigration for America, who were in part responsible for my being there, but rather a larger criticism of this wing of the “movement”. I was more interested in seeing who were the people who were attending the march and why. What were their messages? Were those messages in line with what the organizers and speakers were saying? Y when all is said and done, que? Does everyone pack their signs and “si se puede” and wait for another meaningless deadline to pass?

Pero first fotos to be followed by three separate posts analyzing the events of the day from three perspectives.


Created with Admarket’s flickrSLiDR.

Mil gracias to the RI4A campaign, America’s Voice, y NCLR whose hardworking team support even though they know their orgs will get called to task by me. We each have our roles to play in the wider struggles. Respect. I especially want to thank Rachel LaBruyere, Jackie Mahendra, and Paco Fabian. Special shout out to the post event margaritas.

Post to Twitter

I will be at the March for America on Sunday, but the 7th Anniversary of the United States invasion of Iraq is on Saturday and that is something that I have marched against. There are a flurry of protests and remembrances planned across the country and a march on Saturday in DC against the ongoing 7 year war in Iraq.

Pero why is neither side talking about where the two issues, immigration and war, intersect? Is this one of the glaring failures of “reform” movements that are single issue and don’t talk about how different policies inside the United States feed each other?

What am I talking about?

While the face of wartime motherhood in the media was Cindy Sheehan but it could have been the mother of Jose E. Ulloa, or the mother of Jesus Alberto Suarez del Solar, or the mother of a young Latino soldier whose funeral bells I could hear from my apartment, Sgt. Alex R. Jimenez. This is not an attempt to disrespect or diminish the work of Cindy Sheehan or the death of her son Casey but rather to point out, that as support for the war waned, efforts to recruit soldiers from low-income communities of color were stepped up. Recruiters targeted schools and subway stations and they still do, promising money in a tough economy and promising legal status in the midst of a broken immigration system.
Read more…

Post to Twitter

In just a few days the March for America will jump off and thousands of gente from comunidades across the country will arrive in D.C.. Each person will have their own individual story and reason for being there and some of the messages will even conflict pero the unifying message is justicia for migrantes and their familias.

I will be highlighting over several posts some reasons why people are heading to D.C., including why I am going, and even some issues I have with the rally itself.

One reason to attend the March for America is to demand that immigrants not be ignored when it comes to health care reform.
In recent posts here at VivirLatino, La Macha has been pointing out how the current immigration and health care system fail immigrants, especially mujeres. Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), who was poised as the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Champion, has been taking heat for saying that he won’t support the current health care reform proposal on the Senate floor because it prevents undocumented immigrants from using their own money to buy into the health care exchanges.

Wait, aren’t Republicans supposed to be against telling peeps what to do with their money?
When you’re an immigrant, I guess the rules are different.

PS. I never do this, pero please click on the March for America ad on the sidebar and the NCLR banner on the top to show them that you support them supporting independent Latino media like us, even when we disagree with them :)

Post to Twitter

Regardless of what people think of the effectiveness of the March for America, happening next Sunday, March 21st in Washington D.C., it will be a big event.

VivirLatino is happy to report that we will be on the scene covering the rally. You can read updates here on the site and get up to the minute coverage via our twitter account.

Post to Twitter


Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Get our RSS Feed!