12:20 pm By Maegan La Mala · Con la Vista al Voto|Immigration|Midterm Elections 2010
3 Nov 2010Yesterday’s midterm elections saw the addition of some Latino surnames to the political rosters including Tea Party Latino poster bebe Marco Rubio who won the Senate race in Florida.
But is having more Latinos in elected positions more important than having the right Latinos in office? Have some Latino voters gotten caught up in representational fever based on ethnicity and not on who will best represents our interests?
MicEvHill.Com points out some of the Latino losses and gains and what they mean specifically for the issues around immigration:
Congressional Hispanic Caucus Losses in the House. Two members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) lost their bids for reelection to Republican challengers: Representative Ciro Rodriguez (D-TX) and Representative John Salazar (D-CO). Three other CHC Members were locked in tight races at the time of this writing and could well lose their seats: Representative Jim Costa (D-CA), Representatiive Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) and Representative Solomon Ortiz (D-TX). This is an important development, not just because of the symoloss of these staunchly pro-immigrant Members. But it also is important because it may well have provided immigration restrictionists with a model for winning seats in CHC districts in the furture: recruit conservative Hispanic Republicans to run against CHC Members and then flood the district with massive amounts of television ads and money that CHC Members cannot compete with.
Election of Immigration Restrictionist-Oriented Hispanic Republicans. Six Hispanic Republicans were elected to either the House or the Senate on anti-immigrant platforms. This includes Senator-Elect Marco Rubio (R-FL) who was elected to the Senate. It also includes Representatives-Elect Quico Canseco (R-TX), Bill Flores (R-TX), Jaime Herrera (R-WA), Raul Labrador (R-ID), and David Rivera (R-FL). This is an important devlopment, in that it could enable immigration restricionists in Congress to make some of these new anti-immigrant Republican Hispanics the face of some of their restrictionist legislative efforts, thereby dulling any charges that pro-immigrant Hispanics might make that their immigration restrictionist legislation is anti-Latino or anti-Hispanic. Additionally, two Hispanic Republicans who ran largely on immigration restrictionisit platforms were elected governors of New Mexico and Nevada. There already is talk in Washington of Senator-Elect Marco Rubio or Governor-Elect Susana Martinez (R-NM) being possible Vice Presidential running mates for whoever winds up winning the 2012 Republican Presidential nomination, an eventuality that could have a profound impact on that election.
Immigration certainly isn’t the only issue of interest to the Latino community but it is tied into to ALL other issues from the economy and unemployment to national security and education. Many if not all of the candidates above may be more likely to play divide and conquer good immigrant Latino vs bad immigrant Latino as they move their careers forward.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
18 Responses to Con la Vista Al Voto : Is Any Latino in Office a Good Latino?
Tweets that mention Con la Vista Al Voto : Is Any Latino in Office a Good Latino? | VivirLatino -- Topsy.com
November 3rd, 2010 at 1:37 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Cecilia PAN, Chela. Chela said: RT @vivirlatino Con la Vista Al Voto : Is Any Latino in Office a Good Latino? | VivirLatino http://bit.ly/9zn0N5 [...]
Karen
November 3rd, 2010 at 3:26 pm
More work needs to be done organizing Latinos on the ground, and not just through unions and immigration reform. People need to understand that “internal enforcement” will put anybody with brown skin and a Spanish surname at risk of detention/arrest even if you are a US citizen.
Martinez took money from the private prison industry, so expect incarceration rates in New Mexico to increase.
Neither party has any intention of closing the border or of passing immigration reform. There is too much money to be made by keeping the system as it is.
Our rights are now at risk. At some point these immigrants are going to have to fix their own countries.
J
November 3rd, 2010 at 5:42 pm
You nailed it on the head. That is the strategy. The people who support illegal immigrants always scream racism when a Republican wants to enforce our laws, which is bogus. If it was racist to deport “undocumented” people, then 100% of latinos would be democrats. But they aren’t. There is right and wrong, and it isn’t divided up based on race.
Maegan La Mala
November 4th, 2010 at 7:38 am
Karen, you and I have debated this before but are you advocating that everyone go back to “their” country? Where would your country be (unless you are Native American)?
Karen
November 4th, 2010 at 1:58 pm
I’m an American citizen and my family was in Texas before it was a state. I know that nobody is going home, but as I said in another post, my fear is that having so many people here without any rights will endanger the rights of everybody with brown skin and a Spanish surname.
I still stand by the comment that at some point, they will need to fix their own countries. I don’t know why the governments in their home countries are never an issue in the immigration debate. Mexico is not a poor country, and there is no reason their government could not pursue a plan of economic development. Imagine if millions of Mexicans who have now been exposed to democracy went home and worked for change in that country. They could fix it, and not have to live here doing menial labor and fearing arrest.
Maegan La Mala
November 4th, 2010 at 6:41 pm
Karen it sees to me like you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth.
You say that you are worried about the undocumented and their lack of rights but in the context that “they” threaten “your” rights and others like you, Citizen Latinos.
I would disagree that the issues of Latin American Countries are not an issue in the immigration debate. I think they are especially in the context of colonialism and imperialism. I also think that Latin America has plenty of string social justice movements that are doing work there.
Karen
November 4th, 2010 at 7:04 pm
I don’t think I’m speaking out of both sides of my mouth by acknowledging the very real threat to all of our rights. I feel sorry for the plight of undocumented/illegal workers, but I should not have to lose my rights over them. That is what is slowly happening. Again, I do not see immigration reform on the horizon. So now what?
As it is, the only political issue ever discussed in the context of Latinos is immigration. There is no longer any discussion of education, the economy, etc. It’s all immigration, all the time. All of our political capital is used on that one issue.
What about the rest of us?
Maegan La Mala
November 4th, 2010 at 9:02 pm
So you are buying into the divide and conquer argument then. Us vs them.
I understand now.
Sad
Karen
November 5th, 2010 at 1:38 pm
It’s divide and conquer if I don’t take a backseat to illegal immigrants and all of their issues? They don’t have any rights, so the rest of us shouldn’t have any rights either? Unbelievable.
Frankly, you really didn’t answer my question. CIR isn’t going to pass, or even be brought up for a vote. The Dream Act might but only because of its military component. Meanwhile Secure Communities is going national, and US citizens might be deported.
Are you going to vote for Obama in 2012? I’m not. I voted strraight Democrat in the midterm election, but only because Obama wasn’t on the ballot.
Maegan La Mala
November 5th, 2010 at 3:00 pm
I am not obligated to disclose who I will vote for.
Also, I don’t play oppression olympics. All Latinos regardless of status deserve their human rights and dignity. If any Latinos’ rights are being disrespected I will fight for them. True justice leaves no one behind. That’s freedom not putting one over the other.
Done
la Macha
November 6th, 2010 at 3:07 pm
Karen–how about, what they will do to the least of us, they will do to all of us. If they will fuck with workers becaues they don’t have papers–then they will fuck with ALL workers. And that has been a consistent truth throughout US history. The US had such a huge problem with people like Emma Goldman (etc) because those people were immigrants who knew how to organize the masses. And god forbid, a capitalist system has workers who are organized and unionized and know their rights.
is it a possible that we want to keep people out of the US because they will share information and educate us?
Karen
November 6th, 2010 at 6:16 pm
You can organize illegal immigrant workers, but because they are here illegally, they can de deported and/or detained. Game over.
The only way I can see myself in the same boat as they are, is if this immigration problem remains unchecked, and all of our rights are
taken away under the pretext of immigration enforcement. I wonder if that’s why Susana Martinez and Brian Sandoval won. Maybe people think that putting all of our eggs in the Democratic basket is not such a good idea. I really don’t see either of those Hispanic Governors, no matter how conservative they claim to be, passing an SB 1070 type of law.
I support immigration reform/amnesty and the Dream Act, but I really don’t see any of that being passed because unemployment is so high. If Obama wouldn’t raise the issue when he had a majority, he sure isn’t going to raise it now. And even if he did, the GOP House would never go along with it.
These illegal immigrants are now being exploited not only by unscrupulous employers, but also by the for-profit detention industry, and to some extent by both political parties. If they’re not going to go home, then they should at least press for change in their home countries by witholding remittances. That money gives them a voice.
Also, we have heard much about the Hispanic vote in the West, but I would be curious to know what Hispanic turnout was like in the blue dog districts that the Democrats lost. Are those the areas where there have been raids? I wonder if Hispanic voters there stayed home.
Bryan j
November 7th, 2010 at 11:40 am
In all of this, reality must be acknowledged.
Even assuming CIR has no chance of passing, the undocumented are here. They will continue to be here. Thus, by urging them to “go back” because they are endangering legal resident/citizens’ rights is unrealistic and can only empower the unchecked enforcement ire of ICE, dragging more and more into its web, regardless of status.
Maegan La Mala
November 7th, 2010 at 8:22 pm
Well I think part of the problem, that I have addressed over and over is the expectation that a law or a change in the law is in and of itself going to change anything. It is not. Community organizing will and that means different things to different people.
Karen
November 7th, 2010 at 10:45 pm
What is the point of community organizing if not to change the law?
Maegan La Mala
November 8th, 2010 at 6:53 am
Ah Karen very good question. I would answer with another question in return (even though I am pretty certain I have little interest in sparring with you anymore). Has the existence of laws against hate crimes lessened the amount of hate crimes especially against Latinos and LGBTQ people and their intersections? Has the increased criminalization of violence against women stopped domestic violence?
Laws do little to change a culture, a history of violence and misogyny. Only communities building self-reliance and self determination can.
See how community organizing has been co-opted so that all we think about are laws.
M.A.
November 8th, 2010 at 1:09 pm
I agree that we can stick up for each other in our communities and do our best to help each other. I am going to try and do that. Republicans speak so much about personal responsibility and that it’s not the gvmt’s job to fix the problem. Maybe this will force those of us who believe in equality to find our own way of making it happen.
I am still pissed off because I am actually hearing people in my (PUBLICALLY FUNDED) university, and also people who work for the state of Florida, who voted for Rick Scott, our governor-elect here in FL. When I say “why are you voting for somoene who doesn’t support public education, or who wants to get rid of your job”…they say they aren’t sure that is the states job. One of my classmates is doing his internship at Department of Children and Families who said “I home schooled my three kids, I pay for my tuition here out of my own pocket, I don’t ask anyone else to pay for it…” I want to say “what about those kids at DCF…who’s going to homeschool them huh?” I did say “Oh sure you built this school brick by brick and all of these gvmt grants the school got were actually all from your pocket…” And when I said that his kids were lucky that they could have a good education because of their dad’s lifestyle…travelling, going to doctors, the people his dad knew, I said “there are many people besides you who contributed to your kids education..they were exposed to a lot, not everyone gets that without a good school…”…he said “sorry it doesn’t take a village to raise a child…”…whatever. I am sick of people who don’t seem to get it but I hope I am fighting the good fight because I think what I said could go with the immigration argument too. So many people take for granted the role immigrants, whatever their documentation status, play in our society, and I feel like I could say “yes, you were able to buy that house so cheap that you think you worked so hard for because somoene else worked just as hard building it…no shame in that, but then give them their rights, too, y’know?” I feel like I am trying to show what the power of fair laws can do. They can do a lot.
But it’s not the only thing, and I think that could actually be a positive affect of this election is to be forced to look at those other ways to take action.
Maegan La Mala
November 8th, 2010 at 1:59 pm
Hola M.A y gracias. I think you hit it on the head when it comes to really taking alot of the Republican buzz words and showing how so much of what they (and the Dems as well) say is not really in line with their policy and at the same time visualizing something different, outside of the traditional spheres of influence