Advertisement

Quick Link: The Gender Problem of Deportation

12:26 pm By la Macha · Immigration|Violence|Women

2 Nov 2010

From Cara at the Curvature comes the news of the latest deportation situation:

Last year, a woman named Maria Bolanos called the police during a domestic dispute with her partner, hoping that they would protect her. Now, as a result of that phone call and the subsequent interaction with police, because she is an immigrant who is undocumented, it is probable that she will be deported soon.

Last Christmas Eve, Maria Bolanos made a decision she would later regret: During a fight with her partner, she called the Prince George’s County police and sought their protection.

The call for help had disastrous consequences for Bolanos, a 28-year-old undocumented immigrant from El Salvador. Within months, she found herself ensnared in an increasingly controversial immigration enforcement program designed to deport undocumented criminals.

Bolanos now faces deportation and possible separation from her 21-month-old daughter, who was born here and is a U.S. citizen

.

It’s the never ending heartbreaking situation that so many women who are facing deportation are enduring. Arrested for being “illegal” instead of getting the protection they deserve. Deported instead of being helped. Blamed for the violence they neither created nor supported.

When will this ever end?

Post to Twitter

16 Responses to Quick Link: The Gender Problem of Deportation

Avatar

Karen

November 2nd, 2010 at 6:30 pm

It will end when they stand up for themselves and fix their own countries.

Avatar

Tweets that mention Quick Link: The Gender Problem of Deportation | VivirLatino -- Topsy.com

November 3rd, 2010 at 9:51 am

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Aimee Thorne-Thomsen, Vivir Latino. Vivir Latino said: Quick Link: The Gender Problem of Deportation | VivirLatino http://bit.ly/cpQK1l [...]

Avatar

Bryan j

November 3rd, 2010 at 10:23 am

Karen, that’s the most unsubstantiated generalization out there. Yes, this 28 year old woman is going to reverse centuries of history by being poor in El Salvador.

It ends when our politicians stop using ICE on the local level i.e. repeal 287(g) and secure communities.

Avatar

la Macha

November 3rd, 2010 at 11:16 am

Are you serious Karen? Really? That’s the solution to gendered violence is for women to stand up for themselves and “fix their own countries”? I notice women standing up for themselves and “fixing their own country” here in the US–and that hasn’t done much to end violence against women here–against citizens or non-citizens.

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

November 3rd, 2010 at 11:29 am

I wouldn’t pay much mind to the haters. Karen has managed to ignore the central issue of violence against women and the various ways in which that works, coming from within the familia and then from the State, and instead repeat talking points with no substance.

Avatar

Karen

November 3rd, 2010 at 3:43 pm

I’m not a hater. Yes, I know that this woman isn’t going to single handedly change El Salvador, but I don’t see immigration law changing anytime soon.

The country is firmly opposed to immigration reform because of the bad economy and because of racism. The private prison industry sees illegal immigrants as their next “market,” and ICE essentially works for them by rounding people up for detention. And with the Citizens United case, the private prison industry can now spend billions to get their candidates elected, candidates such as Susana Martinez.

Jan Brewer is appealing SB 1070, but what if it goes all the way to the conservative Supreme Court? How do you think they will rule? We already have situations where US citizens have been wrongly detained and/or deported because police suspected them of being here illegally, and neither party cares.

Should ALL of our rights now be at risk? I don’t want to live in Latin America, but the hardcore oppression that exists there is coming here.
Some people are successful no matter where they go, and some people are oppressed/exploited no matter where they go.

I feel sorry for undocumented immigrants but they need to go home and fight for their freedom in their own countries just like people have had to do since the beginning of time.

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

November 4th, 2010 at 7:41 am

Karen, could you please explain what you mean when you talk about the hardcore oppression fro Latin America being brought to the U.S.? Are you speaking of political oppression (which by the way was helped by U.S. intervention over and over again in Latin America) or are you speaking culturally?

You do know Karen that advocating for Latin Americans to fight for their freedom would mean fighting the U.S. as it remains a strong colonial power in Latin America?

Avatar

Bryan j

November 4th, 2010 at 9:48 am

Oppression is not some contagion that can be transferred from one nation to the next–it is in us all. It’s a hallmark human history.

SB1070, at least the portion that creates unlawful presence as a state crime, will likely not be upheld in the Supreme Court. There is too much of a clear-cut due process concern i.e. unlawful detention.

Avatar

Karen

November 4th, 2010 at 12:29 pm

Meagan, I understand the US role in Latin America. Instead of immigration reform, whuich won’t fix the long term problem, I wish that people would work to repeal NAFTA, CAFTA and the War on Drugs. Many of the South American countries have managed to break free, and the same needs to happen for Mexico and Central America.

When I say hardcore opression, I mean not having any rights or due process. I mean being detained or deported or disappeared for being “illegal” even if you’re a US citizen. That’s has already happened to some people. They also want to repeal the 14th Amendent, which would create a class of stateless people. If someone is born here, but not a US citizen, it doesn’t automatically mean that the person would be a citizen of his or her parents’ country. That person and his or her offspring would most likely not be citizens of any country at all.

Bryan, I do think that the Supreme Cout could uphold those portions of SB 1070 because there is a huge profit motive involved. This is the Court that gave us the Citizens United ruling. They don’t care about democracy. I also think that this society is looking for a new divide to replace the old racial one. They want the new divide to be citizen, non-citizen.

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

November 4th, 2010 at 12:34 pm

Funny Karen there are some things that I agree with you. I am confused with you stating that the woman at the center of the original story should fix the problems of her country.

Avatar

Bryan j

November 4th, 2010 at 1:45 pm

As to the Citizens United decision, there is some good counter-point analysis of it from the Cato Institute, stating that the campaign finance reform prior to citizens united was in essence not to root out corruption but to keep incumbents in power.

Either way, democracy is one thing–due process another.

Avatar

Karen

November 4th, 2010 at 2:16 pm

Maegan, I meant that the oppression won’t stop until people fix the problems in their own country. Living here illegally or undocumented is just causing the same kind of problems for them that they were trying to escape.

I don’t think that Obama has any intention of touching immigration reform, and of course he never did. He has already signaled that he will compromise with the Republicans, so expect things to get worse as Obama runs through hoops seeking the approval of people who can’t stand him. He is so trifling.

Bryan, democracy is one thing, due process is another? I don’t understad what you mean by that.

Avatar

Bryan j

November 4th, 2010 at 2:43 pm

Citizens United not necessarily indicative of future decisions that have to do with what SB1070 endangers, namely lack of due process.

Avatar

Karen

November 4th, 2010 at 2:49 pm

My point in bringing up Citizens United was to show that this Supreme Court does not care about democracy. If they were willing to corrupt our elections to keep corporations and the top 1% from paying their fair share of taxes, then why woudn’t they eliminate due process for people suspected of being here illegally, if due process interferes with the profit motive of private prisons?

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

November 4th, 2010 at 6:45 pm

Karen, pray tell, what does the oppression in Mexico or anywhere in Latin America have to do with the white supremacy of the United States?

Avatar

Karen

November 4th, 2010 at 8:05 pm

It’s the same thing–500 years of European oppression. But they have no legal standing here at all, while they at least have some rights in their home countries.

Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you
  • Maegan La Mala: Thank you Julio! To be honest I was a little nervous. [...]
  • Ana L. Flores: I was very excited when you decided to join us. I really wanted your voice there as it would add dep [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: Hola Juliana and thanks for commenting. There is a dearth in activist/critical thinking Latino blogg [...]
  • Julio Ricardo Varela: Good for you for asking. I got goose bumps just reading this and yes, yes, yes, to it all. Thank you [...]
  • julianabritto: The sense that I get is that you might feel a little frustrated at the dearth in activist bloggers? [...]

Get our RSS Feed!