2:56 pm By la Macha · Immigration · 7 Comments
15 Jun 2010There are currently a whole slew of comments in trash right now that are really dependent on the “yeah, you complain about the US, but look at what Mexico is/does!” thought process. In other words, people in the US have no right to complain about immigration policy because if they lived in Mexico, things would be way worse.
We at VL get these comments all the time. Usually in relation to the border (i.e. I vote America starts treating illegals like Mexico does, shoot them!) but lately we’ve been getting them in relation to the border shooting of Sergio Adrian Hernandez-Huereca.
This is a meme used by everybody from the liberals to the far right conservatives. But the thing is, as a meme, this logic simply doesn’t cut it.
First of all, there is no pro-immigration advocate of any sort (that I’ve heard of) who has ever said that their problem with immigration in the US is that we are “not like other countries.” That we want to be like other countries. That we should model ourselves on other countries immigration policies. The reason? 99% of other countries’ immigration policies suck just as bad or worse than the US’s–and that includes more “civilized” European countries. I’ve posted how in Canada, women living at shelters have been hunted down by immigration police, for example.
If you are a part of the immigration debate for any amount of time, you know that “looking towards other countries” for indication on how to create understandable and human immigration policy simply isn’t a viable method for creating policy here in the US. As such, only very very rarely will you find a legitimate pro-immigration advocate/organization calling for the implementation of another countries’ policies. Thus, if it isn’t an argument, it can’t be used as a *counter* argument. Simple rules of debate. If somebody doesn’t bring it up in the original argument, you can’t make a counter argument introducting new idea.
Also, 99% of of the “But Mexico sux worse!” arguments center *Mexico* as a site of “bad immigration policy.” As if 99% of immigrants in the US come from Mexico. But what does Mexico’s horrible immigration policy mean for the Irish immigrant in the US illegally? Or the Britians or the Indians etc? In other words, all immigrants in the US are from pretty much every country in the world, and it solves next to nothing to assume that if we just close the border, immigration problems will end. Immigration is a global problem that every country in the world is struggling to deal with–to be so US centric in the face of a global international problem is to be narrow minded at best and self-defeating at worst.
Which brings us to another point: many many many times, other countries have horrible immigration policies *specifically* because of US interference/interventions. For example–look at the Phillipines. It is a country similar to Mexico, in that vast money comes into the country from immigrants living outside of it. It has a colonial history, like Mexico and until recently, was living under a dictator, like far too many countries in South America.
And yet, by virtue of land/water geographies, most who come *into* the US are documented (but they may not stay that way–most undocumented workers become undocumented *after* they get here). So we have us a good legal population of workers that we all love because they are like, totes legal, right?
Only…what is the US government doing to help reduce the level of immigration–of *necessary* economic immigration–from the Philippines? Except, oh, congratulating the Philippines for being the “first democractic nation” in Asia as the regime controlling the country murders labor unionizers and thinks 1 out of every 4 workers being unemployed is not so bad?
In other words, the tired “But X country sucks worse than the US” does next to nothing to address the actual reasons why people are forced to immigrate, and erases US culpability in creating the *need* to immigrate to begin with. That is, the problem with immigration is NOT enforcement or “protection” or “defense” etc. The problem is vastly horrifically bigger. It is a problem that exists on a world-wide scale and has everything to do with the World Bank, capitalism, free trade agreements and corporate power. And just because we are able to document some immigrants living under horrific circumstances we created does not erase the fact that those immigrants, like immigrants from countries that we *aren’t* able to majority document–don’t want to immigrate. Who in the hell wants to leave home?
Fighting for hours and hours in blogland about who is worse, Mexico or the US, does next to nothing to interrogate the real issues wrapped around immigration: Who is entitled to a homeland? Who is entitled to protections by a nation/state from corporations? Are corporations human beings? Why is immigration/migration so necessary under current global economic structures? How do The People hold corporations accountable and responsible across borders when The People are not allowed to migrate those same borders? When are we going to make the lives of human beings more important than the life of a Corporation? Which laws are we going to listen to, community laws made by the community for the community, nation/state laws that are increasingly privileging corporations, or corporate laws? And why are the immigration problems in almost every single first world country almost exactly like they are here in the US (i.e. unfixable and unending)? Are Mexicans really the problem? Or is it a system that depends on the movement of labor and capital to exist?
I am the first to say that Mexico as a nation/state sucks. I have no loyalty to Mexico and have many problems with Chicano nationalism/organizing because Chicanos base so much of their organizing on the 1848 Treaty of Hildago thereby assuming that *Mexico* had a legitimate right to contested borderland (I would argue that no nation/state has the right to indigenous land.).
But there is a reason that this is the first time I have ever posted this critique of Chicano Mexico centered organizing at VL in the three plus years I’ve been writing here. Who is better or worse is not the problem for me, and it has almost never been the problem for any immigrant or immigrant rights advocate that I’ve ever known. And I promise you, it is absolutely NOT what any nation/state or corporation is worried about either.
If all of us who are interested in immigration–and yes, that includes you, hateful right wingers–could start talking about the problems that those in government and corporations are talking about, I think we’d actually find some answers worth implementing.
Until then, however, please be forwarned–there’s a reason 99% of the “Mexico Sux Worse Than US” comments are deleted.
Thanks.
1:03 pm By la Macha · U.S.-Mexico Border|Violence|youth · 3 Comments
15 Jun 2010
I’m still waiting for the day when all the “obey every single law at any cost” people demand that the as yet unnamed agent be handed over to the Mexican police so that he may receive his just punishment. It doesn’t matter how angry it makes him that he can’t shoot people on the other side of the border (even if they are drug smugglers!) it is the law. And he apparently broke it.
An official story soon came out. The Border Patrol claimed that reports of the incident indicated U.S. officers on bicycle patrol “were assaulted with rocks by an unknown number of people.” Border Patrol and other government officials claimed that their agent was surrounded by a rock-throwing mob and that the agent was attacked and stoned before he fired his weapon.
A video taken with a cell phone proved this account to be full of lies. CNN reported on its web-site that “a video obtained by CNN casts doubt on the Border Patrol agent’s claim that he was surrounded by rock-throwing suspected illegal immigrants when he fatally shot the boy on the border at Ciudad Juarez. … The video contradicts [FBI spokeswoman Andrea] Simmons’ account. She had said: ‘This agent, who had the second subject detained on the ground, gave verbal commands to the remaining subjects to stop and retreat. However, the subjects surrounded the agent and continued to throw rocks at him. The agent then fired his service weapon several times, striking one subject who later died.’”
The video clearly shows that no one is “surrounding” the cop. He is clearly seen pointing his weapon at a group of people who are on the Mexican side of the river, which at this time of year in Juarez/El Paso is mainly dry, and 10 feet wide. Three cracks from his gun are heard.
Several vendors on a bridge overlooking the carnage also disputed the official story. Estelle Gonzalez, who sells hats on the Paso del Norte Bridge, said, “The kid wasn’t throwing rocks. He was only watching.” Another vendor, Luis Rodriguez, said, “The kid wasn’t throwing anything. Then he [the Border Patrol agent] started shooting like crazy. He fired three shots.”
All laws enforced all the time folks. Right? This man broke the law. He should be in jail awaiting justice.
I’m fairly certain that I am the only Rican in NYC who on the day of the National Puerto Rican Day parade opted to dance to Chilean Cumbia.
On Sunday, June 13, 2010, Chico Trujillo held a party at the Oveja Negra in Astoria, Queens to celebrate the release of their latest album Chico de Oro on Barbès Records.
When I first heard the album, I knew little about Chilean cumbia save what I had heard from my Chilean familia and alot of that was based in a class analysis of the music, that this was the music that the lower classes listened to. Mexican and Colombian cumbia were more familiar to me. Pero put Chico de Oro on and you have an instant dance party, complete with familiar cumbia covers and original songs with lyrics that tease. See Chico Trujillo live and you have a dance parade.
6:55 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration|Phoenix|Politics · 1 Comment
15 Jun 2010The United States Conference of Mayors closes it’s annual gathering in Oklahoma City today. The conference, which includes Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Phoenix, AZ Mayor Phil Gordon, passed a resolution opposing Arizona’s SB1070 and copycat legislation and supporting legal challenges to the law, while calling for bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform legislation.
It should be noted that their the Conference’s call for CIR is qualified by five principles, passed in 1999, that they feel reform must contain. The first principle is increased border security and enforcement.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter