12:59 pm By la Macha · Activism|Controversia|race
31 Mar 2010I’m usually the first one in line when it comes to challenging the iconic God-like status so many of the “leaders” of people of color movements have had. I admire MLK, but he was a womanizing bastard. I identify with the personal and political travels of Malcom X, but he was a patronizing bastard on many levels. I dig the AIM movement and the brown power movement of the 60′s, but did brothas have to be such sexist assholes?
It’s not that I am looking to destroy the legacies of leaders of various leaders–but rather, in creating many legacies, the voices of the people I love, namely (queer) women, are written out, written over, and even destroyed (see Ana Mae Aquash)–and many times details of the men’s lives that are not shameful in the least, are written out to hide the very real intolerance of a community fighting for freedom.
In short, there are important stories to tell about the dark and hidden corners that we try to ignore so hard. Important stories that could help us today to make more complicated, interesting–and more liberating choices for our communities.
In the case of Cesear Chavez–we get an amazing man who dreamed when so many in our communidad simply couldn’t. He organized and inspired and created actual change that affected real human beings.
But he was also a man. Which means he undoubtedly made very human and real mistakes, just as other leaders of the 60s did.
This article touches on some of the existing critiques of Cesar Chavez. But…as I read the article I had a really hard time taking any of the critiques the author mentions seriously. For example, it is mentioned that many organizers today which they had stood up to Chavez for unions rather than going along with him on the dream of a poor people’s movement:
Chief among the lessons we should take from his life is that heroes are human, with real flaws. You follow them blindly at your own risk. The biggest regret that many who worked closely with Chavez now express is that they did not speak up for what they believed in when it might have mattered. They failed to fight to keep building a labor union when Chavez veered determinedly toward his vision of a communal movement for poor people, based on an ideology of sacrifice.
This reeks to me of arm chair game playing. Of the “*WE* didn’t want that, we were only following directions!!” hiding from accountability that runs rampant throughout so much of Latin@ centered organizing. There’s been plenty of time in the past decade or so to restructure and move towards something different. But instead, Latin@ organizers, especially in the UFW community, have been dealing with inner squabbling and rumors of corruption.
Another critique the author mentions is that Chavez was a control freak–to the detriment of his community:
His insistence on absolute control demonstrates a third lesson: When you empower people, they may not choose to wield their power toward the goals you believe they should. Chavez was a risk-taker, and he taught others to take risks. But trusting workers to run their own union was one risk he adamantly refused to take. That cost farmworkers the best chance they ever had at building an effective and lasting union.
The insistence on a centralized charismatic leader is not a new idea or something isolated to the Chicano community of the 60s. The Civil Rights movement also faced similar battles on the place of MLK in the movement–to the point that SNCC leader, Ella Baker, wound up leaving the MLK led faction of the movement. She felt that the “leaders’ of the movement should be the people.
But while the reasons that the black movement disagreed over the place of charismatic leaders in the movement has been discussed and analyzed and adjusted for by historians and organizers alike–the Chicano community in particular has been frozen by a refusal to self-reflect. A lot of this has to do with the very real threats we all still exist under–it is a stated mission of many nativists, for example, to “destroy” the legacy of Chavez (just as racists have tried to do to MLK’s legacy) and thereby destroy any legitimacy that Chicano organizers and activists have within our communities and with white liberals who love a good inspirational figure to latch onto to better demonstrate their “diversity creds.”
But I also think a large part of it is that there simply is no clear “Chicano movement.” It hints towards what several of our discussions here at VL talk about–where is solidarity in the Latino community? Is there solidarity? Is there unity? What is a Latino? What is a Chicano? Do we care about immigration or Labor–or something else all together? What do we do with all the borders that are all over our bodies, our citizenship, our organizing? How do we organize a Chicano identity based movement when so many of our fellow workers are Guatemalans, Cambodians and black?
The politics of our organizing are so complicated–so layered and in many places, completely unanswerable even after all this time–that it’s often times just easier to defend a hero–a name we all know.
I want to know Chavez on a more intimate level. Not as a villain, not as a hero–but as a man who had dreams. But even more importantly, I want his history to be used as a starting point to discuss how on earth we can organize a more focused, necessary and fundamental movement. What didn’t work for Chavez? What did? Why don’t we want to know about a particular fault of Chavez’s? What does this reflect on our movement making possibilities today (for example, do we want to keep queers out because they disrupt our notion of familia? etc)? In embracing a more real and complicated Chavez–we’d be embracing a more real and complicated us.
And what could be wrong with that?
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
12 Responses to Happy Cesar Chavez Day!
chicano future tense
March 31st, 2010 at 4:32 pm
Thank you for remembering Cesar on his birthday!
Cesar Chavez should be remember for his positive contributions and for his advancement of farm workers and the Chicano people…La Causa..
Cesar was the first Chicano leader to rise to national prominence and bring about a wider higher level of awareness and debate about farm workers and Chicanos,labor,social and economic justice.
He became a symbol of a people beaten down,oppressed suffocated and exploite.He became a symbol of a people rising up and fighting back organized and unified against injustice and oppression.He electrified and inspired Chicanos to build a movement that would be defiant and resist injustice,racism and exploitation.He helped inspire a new breed of warrior who would refuse the old paradigm of being dominated by the jack boots of racism and fascism on constantly on their peoples throats strangling their hopes,dreams and future.They would vow to fight back and throw off those jack boots.
Since the zenith of the farmworkers and Chicano movements things have changed a lot for Chicanos.Now Chicanos find themselves in an extremely dark place with the road leading into their future appearing foreboding.Chicanos are a people with extremely serious problems that are just getting worse.Unemployment,teen pregancies,sky high dropout rate,the curse of gang crime and terror in their communities,astounding apathy and ignorance in the younger generation.The future doesn’t look good for Chicanos if things continue the way they are going.
My vision of the Chicano future is a dark one..Chicans are at a crossroads that will either lead them to unity and organization- defend,protect and advance their interests for a better life..jobs,education.opportunity,etc etc..
The defining issue for generations to come is undoubtedly immigration..immigration is the one issue that that is laden with layers upon layers of implications and meaning..spanning the spectrum from mild reform to a nationalist movement for self-determination and autonomy away from the dominant white controlled system.Frustration,anger,resentment with racism and being ignored and constantly pushed aside will fuel the nationalist sentiment.
Now Chicanos are searching for answers and defining those same questions..if Chicanos are denied a future,oppressed and
thrown down to the lowest level of a permanent underclass..
what will they do? what will they do to realize their needs for a decent life?
thee are just some of the burning questions in play that Chicanos have to deal with these days.
uberVU - social comments
March 31st, 2010 at 6:43 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by LatinoMovement: RT @VivirLatino: New on VivirLatino: Happy #CesarChavez Day! http://vivirlatino.com/2010/03/31/happy-cesar-chavez-day.php #latism #p2…
Viva Chavez and Community Organizing | People Of Color Organize!
March 31st, 2010 at 11:13 pm
[...] VivirLatino: I’m usually the first one in line when it comes to challenging the iconic God-like status so [...]
Maegan La Mala
April 1st, 2010 at 6:12 am
Some really important points Macha. When I was a baby organizer, the example I was taught to follow was the example of male leaders across various movements, and like you said, they are complex and problematic leaders pero with things to teach us, especially in relation to where the mujeres were and continue to be.
No se, I think too many “movements” are repeating the mistakes of the past, scrambling for media attention and/or from attention from the wrong peeps.
I think we need to go back to the basics of talking to one another in our communities
Bubbles
April 1st, 2010 at 4:57 pm
Re: “But I also think a large part of it is that there simply is no clear “Chicano movement.” It hints towards what several of our discussions here at VL talk about–where is solidarity in the Latino community? Is there solidarity? Is there unity? What is a Latino? What is a Chicano?”
See, this is part of the problem. The Latino category is so broad now that it becomes very difficult to organize. We don’t all share the same issues, or the same history. It’s a fake category. I feel that as Mexican-Americans/Chicanos, this category does not help us. When there are too many cooks in the kitchen, nothing gets done. Maybe you don’t know what a Chicano is, but we know. Nixon came up with the Latino category to shut down the Chicano Movement.
I feel a similar problem affects feminism. First and Second wave feminism were very successful, but what has Third wave feminism ever accomplished? Outside of academia, has anyone ever heard of it? Third wave feminisn defines every social ill affecting women as “sexism.” Prison reform, racial issues, etc. That’s why it’s never accomplished anything.
Bubbles
April 1st, 2010 at 5:04 pm
Re: “..if Chicanos are denied a future,oppressed and
thrown down to the lowest level of a permanent underclass..”
The root of the immigration problem is 1) NAFTA, and 2) private, for profit federal immigrant detention centers. Obama is rounding up immigrants not to deport them, but to feed them to for-proft detention centers. The centers get money for every person they house. (The companies are Geo Group and CCA.)
Sadly, many people in the Hispanic causcus take money from these corporations. Nobody who takes money from them will vote for immigration reform. These prisons are against reform because it cuts into their profits.
Voting for Obama was a huge mistake.
Maegan La Mala
April 1st, 2010 at 7:47 pm
Bubbles, I think I would argue about how much first and second wave feminism did for women of color communities pero that said, I don’t think that claiming Latina has to negate or make invisible other identities. I cannot speak as a Chicana pero I can speak as a Nuyorican. I claim the very specific history and issues of the Nuyorican – Puerto Rican Diaspora pero I have no problem calling myself a Latina either. I think we do need to organize in our own community pero there are issues that impact the Chicana and the Rican alike and when we are attacked they don’t ask which “other” we are.
That said, I don’t think anyone on the Editorial team is an Obama apologist or would argue about how the Prison Industrial Complex is tied to Immigration Reform. Both detentions and deportations are up under Obama.
Do you you think it would have been different under any other president in the party system currently in place?
Bubbles
April 1st, 2010 at 8:34 pm
I’d like to think that Hillary would not have used undocumented immigrants as chattel for the private detention industry, but who knows. With Hillary, though, it is easier to critcize her and to appeal to her. Obama runs a very top down organization that has an attitude that you have nowhere else to go. Is there anything he hasn’t sold out on?
Obama has had little or no contact with Mexican-Americans in his life, and he cares nothing about our rights. He could have shut down Joe Arapaio long ago, but he refuses. If he won’t even shut down a small town Sheriff in total violation of the law, he won’t do anything about the larger problems of immigration and NAFTA. I will not vote for him again, and I hope he’s one term.
As for the organizing, I didn’t mean to make it seem as though I don’t care about issues that don’t specifically pertain to Mexicans. I care about all human rights issues. My point is that we would probably be more effective working together as many groups. When everyone is lumped together, the issue becomes, “What is a Latino” and that weakens everyone. Considering how many of us there are here, we should be stronger.
Maegan La Mala
April 1st, 2010 at 8:42 pm
I had a feeling that you were a Hillary supporter, so in that way I guess my previous comment was a little bit of a set up. That said, I know from personal experience that at least when Hillary was running for Senate here in NYS and then once she became Senator, the ability to appeal to her is limited and I think she may have the tendency to use women of color to gain support and then once in power be willing to ignore or worse throw them under the bus.
I think we do need to organize as many groups. Coalition work is where it’s at and where it has always been at from my experience. Pero we need to meet the community where they are at and for some, especially the younger generations, the wider identity is often an entry point.
The problem is when we let others define what is Latino. I’m clear on my definition and how the smaller parts of that fit in.
How would/do you measure strength?
Bubbles
April 1st, 2010 at 10:17 pm
I know she fired Patty Solis Doyle, but other than that, I can’t remember her being specifically bad on the rights of women of color. I don’t think Hillary wouild have bargained away abortion coverage or birth control coverage. That being said, her base during the primary was Latinos and working class whites, two groups that are at odds because of immigration, so it’s possible that she would have betrayed Latinos. Who knows. But I think she would have been smart enough to negotiate a solution, rather than let the problem fester. Obama is just kicking the can down the road, and the problem is getting worse.
I agree with you about coalition work. That’s what liberal groups did during the 60s, and they made huge gains.
Maegan La Mala
April 2nd, 2010 at 6:31 am
Well it’s out of her jursidiction/work now pero if I ever had a sit down with her I would remind her of the promises she made to the mother of Manny Mayi Jr.
RIP Dr. Dorothy Height | VivirLatino
April 23rd, 2010 at 8:41 am
[...] in Latinos thinking the dialogue does not include us. The VL familia has addressed Civil Rights in various forms and hopefully you find this a space to interrogate and learn about how we DO and ARE a part of [...]