5:45 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration|March for America|Obama|Politics|Washington DC
24 Mar 2010
March for America from VivirLatino on Vimeo.
Some video clips from the March 21, 2010 March for America in Washington D.C.
I’ve decided to break my analysis of this past weekend’s March for America into three parts, each focusing on a different aspect of my experience and perceptions.
The first part is messaging. What was the purpose of this march and was the reason why anywhere between 200,000 to 500,000 people went the same as the organizers? How did expectations and promises compare with the reality of what was said and what was experienced?
The official tag lines of the march were : “Immigration reform for new American families. Economic Justice for all American families”. This pushes the idea that immigration reform will bring a better economy to all. Who is this message for? The immigrant community or those who aren’t convinced that people deserve to live without fear? Not to mention that this argument is based on capitalism, the same capitalism that has brought neo-liberal economic polices to countries around the world, forcing migration, the same capitalism linked to colonialism that was responsible for my own family’s immigration story. But before the tea baggers start calling me a socialist…
How is familia defined? There were many many faith organizations represented including churches. I saw many signs saying: ” I am Christian and I support immigration reform” and “I am conservative and I support immigration reform”. Now I understand that many Latinos are Christians and people of faith, pero why did I only see one sign, held up by a white woman mind you, saying “immigration is a queer issue”? Are the orgs going to keep pushing for an immigration reform package that leaves out families that “offend” part of their base?
Walking in my ‘hood the day before the march, the day I traveled down to the DC, I noticed that there weren’t any posters, fliers or signs announcing the march and I live in one of the most immigrant neighborhoods in NYC. Local immigrants, both documented and undocumented, that I spoke to in the days prior to the march, asked me out loud, what was the point? Would this march raise the hopes of the millions of undocumented but bring no reform?
“They are playing with people’s emotions”, one told me.
I was also concerned that the March for America would turn into a march in favor of the Schumer/Graham blueprint that was announced right before the rally. This blueprint, which is a far cry from the plan that advocates had asked for, calls for a biometric id card as well as for the undocumented to admit that their being in the U.S without papers is a crime. In other words, hand over your identities on a platter and admit that you were a criminal all along. And some of the orgs sponsoring the march, including America’s Voice and The National Council of la Raza said that this blueprint is a good start.
Forget si se puede or as Roberto Lovato likes to say, si se pedo. This is si se pudrió, as in a rotten ass deal.
The morning of the march, while taking the Metro, I found a copy of the Washington Hispanic, which was printed in Spanish despite it’s English language title. Inside, along with a half page ad for the March was a little box with tips for would be participants. Included was: to wear white, bring U.S flags, and that the purpose of the march was to show “Americans” that immigrants are just like “them” and that immigrants want to integrate themselves into the country.
White for peace/passivity?
White for surrender?
White for um…white?
The U.S flag over other flags because assimilation means immigrants must never have pride in their home country or if they do, it must be hidden?
Now, to be fair, these were not messages that I heard from any of speakers. Who were the speakers? They included the usual suspects of heads of orgs and politicians including Ali Noorani, Janet Murguia, Congressman Gutierrez, and Angelica Salas. There was even a taped message from President Obama
. Piolin’s entourage and fans almost ran me over. Pero you know who wasn’t there? The familia of Marcelo Lucero. The familia of Luis Ramirez. The familia of Jose Sucuzhañay. The familia of Brisenia Flores. If there were peeps who need half a million arms of love and support around them, it is the families of those killed for being immigrants/Latinos. I may have missed it, but were their names even mentioned or in a flurry to push for reform have organizers forgotten that without reform, people are being killed for being?
In conversations I had before ad after the march, I waxed nostalgic and sounded a little like a vieja remembering the day when marches went somewhere and were part of a wider strategy of direct and indirect action. For example, talking to amiga bfp about the health care vote that was being debated and that willfully left out the undocumented. bfp asked, why the fuck were there not half a million people storming the congress? Or even half that amount? Or a quarter? The one time I heard health care reform mentioned at the march it was in the context of it not being enough and that is why we need comprehensive immigration reform. Pero, will that be enough?
Other people who were there…were your expectations met? Did you see yourself and your needs as part of immigrant communities represented? Did you hear what you expected to hear?
Next up….March for America Part II : Media
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
12 Responses to March for America Part I : Messaging
Bryan J.
March 24th, 2010 at 11:55 am
Hey La Mala,
the absence of whites at the rally, who would identify with being pro-imm. reform, was disconcerting. In other words, people like to talk a lot of shit, but when it comes down to the wire, they won’t act. I mean, how many universities–production centers for cookie-cutter liberals– are around D.C. and where were all those students? It’s like the U.S. populous has fallen into an inextricable morass of apathy.
Secondly, I found LIwins at one point in the rally and Joselo Lucero was there, listening to Geraldo Rivera speak of his brother, Marcelo. Did you mean why did actual people that are affected by immigration–as opposed to talking heads who are quite removed from any of its effects–get to speak?
Maegan La Mala
March 24th, 2010 at 12:05 pm
I saw white people at the rally but the fact that they were outnumbered by Latinos and other people of color didn’t bother me. In fact I was talking with a colleague of mine about how nice it was for a change to see so many Latinos together. The rally brought together those directly impacted by immigration and it bothers me profoundly that Joselo wasn’t invited to speak.
Bryan J.
March 24th, 2010 at 12:12 pm
Yeah, it was nice; i felt like I entered a portal back to my days in Mexico.
Reflections on the The March for America: a Movement Matures :: racismreview.com
March 24th, 2010 at 5:07 pm
[...] and José, slowly walked in, clearly fatigued after the pre-march rally, immigrant rights march, four-hour rally and long hike to the stadium where hundreds of buses were parked. As they stumbled in José [...]
Sra. López
March 25th, 2010 at 7:36 am
I thought the energy of the crowd in general was great, even though a lot of the activity on stage was less than stirring. I would describe the crowd as hopeful, ready, … but incredibly frustrated and slightly restless.
It’s been a few days since the march, and I am feeling, angry, I think. Frustration has turned to something harder. Why aren’t we doing anything? Why is the media ignoring us? Where are the leaders of this movement?
Sometimes, in my more pessimistic moments, I feel like the only thing this did was draw more attention from racists, (unifying THEM), against the undocumented population.
I’m tired of signing petitions, blogging, donating, debating, writing to congress people and news stations. I want to DO SOMETHING… But what?
Maegan La Mala
March 25th, 2010 at 8:59 am
I don’t think that’s pessimistic. I think that’s real. Drawing more attention from them, isn’t a bad thing pero there isn’t enough unity in our communities. That’s where where we have to do the work. What’s going on in your hood?
Sra. López
March 25th, 2010 at 9:22 am
My “hood” is a suburban neighborhood full of mostly white Republicans, so what’s going on here is pretty much nothing… well, I did hear a lawn mower the other day.
I found my local contact from the Reform Immigration for America website, and the E-mail I sent her was returned undeliverable.
The Latino population where I live is not that big. Most everyone knows everyone else through the local Catholic church, but lately there has been a lack of unity, with the Mexicans insisting the misa be done their way, and everyone else complaining. Our only Spanish speaking nun, (originally from Colombia), got so tired of the bickering that she transferred to Texas.
Yes – there is a lack of unity, for sure.
Maegan La Mala
March 25th, 2010 at 3:00 pm
Yeah well maybe we can chat offline via email to find some good local stuff beyond RI4A. Email us!!! info@vivirlatino.com
Sra. López
March 25th, 2010 at 3:17 pm
I’ll go do that right after I submit this comment. Talk to you soon.
Sabina Gonzalez
March 26th, 2010 at 7:18 pm
I couldn’t go to DC, but it sounds like the speakers list was not helpful. But then again I never went to any march where the stage was better than the field.
But I wouldn’t say there’s no unity. I live in a city with huge immigrant communitites and almost everyone I know marched, some for the first time, in 06 against HR4437. No one had ever seen any event with that many people here, let alone Latinos. It was self defense though, and I think we saw the action as a last resort. That was the role of those marches, to remind os that we’re alive and we still have survival instincts. But beyond that, seeems like many immigrant people took 2006 as a learning experience. Maybe we’re seeing how little we can really rely on the top of the political system (Congress, the president, courts, labor unions, NCLR, MALDEF, etc). It doesn’t eman we can’t support that stuff, but maybe we just know that’s not the shit that builds lasting change.
I think real change takes something less sexy than running campaigns, headlining at MALDEF or the ACLU, running the most radical organization, practicing immigration law en el barrio, or working like slaves for some organization that has no respect for our time, families or our mental health. I see real change happening in my city. undocumented gente are taking over school committees, starting their own businesses, tenants groups, radio shows, community gardens, and doing it step by difficult step. And more importantly, outnumbering the people who hate us, and probably outliving them. Raising smart, HUMBLE children that really want to build, not just rally. Estilo juntas de buen gobierno. Yo creo que nadie sabe mas que su pueblo. AS a group, we have to go through these lessons, and we have a lot to learn from those who have the least access.
just a thought from someone who was burned out one too many times before learning to stop and listen.
Republicans Love Immigrants …er Maybe Not | VivirLatino
April 2nd, 2010 at 2:17 pm
[...] pre and post the March 21st March for America , there has been a series of meetings between immigration “reform” advocates and [...]
Are People Still Buying the “But Some of my Friends Are…” Line? | VivirLatino
April 5th, 2010 at 7:51 pm
[...] case people haven’t been paying attention, because you’re waiting for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, filling out your census, or like me, taking care of the off from school Spring Break children, in [...]