Advertisement

Where the March for America and the Anniversary of the Iraq Invasion Intersect

6:48 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration|Iraq War|March for America|Politics

19 Mar 2010

I will be at the March for America on Sunday, but the 7th Anniversary of the United States invasion of Iraq is on Saturday and that is something that I have marched against. There are a flurry of protests and remembrances planned across the country and a march on Saturday in DC against the ongoing 7 year war in Iraq.

Pero why is neither side talking about where the two issues, immigration and war, intersect? Is this one of the glaring failures of “reform” movements that are single issue and don’t talk about how different policies inside the United States feed each other?

What am I talking about?

While the face of wartime motherhood in the media was Cindy Sheehan but it could have been the mother of Jose E. Ulloa, or the mother of Jesus Alberto Suarez del Solar, or the mother of a young Latino soldier whose funeral bells I could hear from my apartment, Sgt. Alex R. Jimenez. This is not an attempt to disrespect or diminish the work of Cindy Sheehan or the death of her son Casey but rather to point out, that as support for the war waned, efforts to recruit soldiers from low-income communities of color were stepped up. Recruiters targeted schools and subway stations and they still do, promising money in a tough economy and promising legal status in the midst of a broken immigration system.

Overwhelmingly, however, what many young men of color have gotten from their service in the Iraq War, is death. In 2007, El Tiempo reported that Latinos represented less than nine percent of those enlisted in the army, but made up 11 percent of deaths in the Iraq War. Sometimes it is only after death that these immigrant soldiers are granted legal status, like what happened to Jose Gutierrez. There is now a widow benefit, but the wife of Alex Jimenez had to fight deportation after her husband when her husband first went missing. But is their a parental survival benefit or have the parents of U.S. Army Private Armando Soriano, also killed in Iraq, been deported to Mexico?

The recruitment efforts marketing the U.S. military to Latino immigrants is only a piece of the bigger picture. The seven year long war has created millions of refugees from Iraq. A recent report says that about a third of those are living “as squatters in slum areas”. Iraqi refugees who have been placed in the United States face poverty and racism as their faces and lives still are painted as “terrorist” in order to support the war. Is this the freedom and democracy Iraq was promised?

While D.D. (Detain and Deport) Napolitano has cut funding for the fence along the U.S. – Mexico border, one of the excuses, er justifications for heightened security at the borders has been the threat of terrorism which can be directly linked to the Iraq war. So whether you are participating in anti-war events or in the March for America on Sunday, remember how the lives of immigrants are tied to the U.S.’s bloodthirsty desire to show it’s supremacy over Mexico and Mahmoudiyah.

Post to Twitter

4 Responses to Where the March for America and the Anniversary of the Iraq Invasion Intersect

Avatar

CHICANO-future tense

March 19th, 2010 at 8:20 am

I’ll tell you why in two words- DNC/OBAMA.

Now that their team is in power they have effectively coopted and duped significant gullible segments of the anti-war movement by cleverly appealing through rhetoric and deceit to a type of liberalism which is stealthily pro corporate.pro war.
Most people are aware of NEO-CONservatism thanks to GW and Cheney.But very few if any are aware that the DNC/Obama represent a different doctrinal school of political rule called NEO-LIBeralism which has exactly the same goal as it’s rival-maintaining domestic and global control for the ruling elite by any means necessary..war or fascism whatever the situation calls for.
Whether it be the anti-war,immigration or health care issues..we see some things taking form .. a pattern..
that is that dnc/obama have effectively hijacked and taken control of them by pressuring,threatening and dominating weak Latino politicians and anti-war leaders who have turned out to be no more than gutless unprincipled cowards who folded like cheap suits..
sadly obama will just keep yanking the chain of Latino politicians and political leaders..yanking their chain as if they were harmless,mindless puppy dogs begging for a treat ..
I am thoroughly disgusted at the pathetic quality of our nations Latino political representatives..what a bunch of bumbling fools gutless rank amateurs ..Honestly,I feel ashamed of them..
I thoroughly support the march for america as well as the antiwar march..but frankly I feel they are moistly symbolic in nature..
obama and his fell neo-libs are desperate to avoid any politcal backlash and disaffection from the vast majority of american voters..white voters to be more specific..
they will sacrifice immigration and they will expand the wars in afghanistan and pakistan….

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

March 19th, 2010 at 8:33 am

Gracias for weighing in and I do not disagree with you at all. I think from immigration reform to the war in Iraq many people were/are too willing to listen and accept what has been business as usual from the Obama administration. It really is a glaring failure of the two party system here in the U.S, when the two parties look so similar.

I think one can be a supporter of marches, such as the ones happening this weekend and be critical of their actual effectiveness. I do not see that as being contradictory.

Avatar

uberVU - social comments

March 20th, 2010 at 2:55 pm

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by VivirLatino: New on VivirLatino: Where the March for America and the Anniversary of the Iraq Invasion Intersect http://bit.ly/dm1mEE...

Avatar

Captain H Frith,II

March 21st, 2010 at 5:17 pm

There are about 57 Democrat Blue Dogs in Congress. From a total of 247 democrats subtract 57 and you are left with only 190 liberals. In order to pass immigration reform you will then need 3 or 4 Blue Dogs to vote liberal. Now you have 194. To pass a bill in the House of reps you need 216. Therefore, to get an immigration reform bill pass you will need 22 Republicans. Which Republicans will vote pro-immigrant? Provide me with your list. I don’t see the votes!

Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Get our RSS Feed!