7:34 pm By la Macha · Women|Word en la calle|youth
16 Mar 2010Many people have asked why we need a Women’s History Month. Or a Latino history month. Or a Black history month. And why don’t white men get their own month?
Usually I blow these questions off. If people are too stupid or privileged to see that every single month, day, hour of the year is white male history time (how many Chicano leaders are school kids forced to memorize, ala the Presidents of the United States?), then I really don’t feel too much of a need to explain it.
But then I saw the news that Texas has taken the drastic step of almost completely rewriting history in their high schools. Not just the normal stuff–like the Pilgrims were awesome and the Native peoples welcomed them–but things like free market capitalism is not actually all that bad! And “when you’re suicidal, you should take heed that it is a personal choice!”
Or, as the New York Times tells us:
The conservative members maintain that they are trying to correct what they see as a liberal bias among the teachers who proposed the curriculum. To that end, they made dozens of minor changes aimed at calling into question, among other things, concepts like the separation of church and state and the secular nature of the American Revolution.
“I reject the notion by the left of a constitutional separation of church and state,” said David Bradley, a conservative from Beaumont who works in real estate. “I have $1,000 for the charity of your choice if you can find it in the Constitution.”
They also included a plank to ensure that students learn about “the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, including Phyllis Schlafly, the Contract With America, the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority and the National Rifle Association.”
Dr. McLeroy, a dentist by training, pushed through a change to the teaching of the civil rights movement to ensure that students study the violent philosophy of the Black Panthers in addition to the nonviolent approach of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He also made sure that textbooks would mention the votes in Congress on civil rights legislation, which Republicans supported.
“Republicans need a little credit for that,” he said. “I think it’s going to surprise some students.”
Mr. Bradley won approval for an amendment saying students should study “the unintended consequences” of the Great Society legislation, affirmative action and Title IX legislation. He also won approval for an amendment stressing that Germans and Italians as well as Japanese were interned in the United States during World War II, to counter the idea that the internment of Japanese was motivated by racism.
Other changes seem aimed at tamping down criticism of the right. Conservatives passed one amendment, for instance, requiring that the history of McCarthyism include “how the later release of the Venona papers confirmed suspicions of communist infiltration in U.S. government.” The Venona papers were transcripts of some 3,000 communications between the Soviet Union and its agents in the United States.
Mavis B. Knight, a Democrat from Dallas, introduced an amendment requiring that students study the reasons “the founding fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring the government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion above all others.”
It was defeated on a party-line vote.
After the vote, Ms. Knight said, “The social conservatives have perverted accurate history to fulfill their own agenda.”In economics, the revisions add Milton Friedman and Friedrich von Hayek, two champions of free-market economic theory, among the usual list of economists to be studied, like Adam Smith, Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes. They also replaced the word “capitalism” throughout their texts with the “free-enterprise system.”
“Let’s face it, capitalism does have a negative connotation,” said one conservative member, Terri Leo. “You know, ‘capitalist pig!’ ”
In the field of sociology, another conservative member, Barbara Cargill, won passage of an amendment requiring the teaching of “the importance of personal responsibility for life choices” in a section on teenage suicide, dating violence, sexuality, drug use and eating disorders.
“The topic of sociology tends to blame society for everything,” Ms. Cargill said.
I read all this and my jaw dropped, and stayed in that position for a few hours. THIS is why the various history months are so desperately needed. It points to the fundamental question about history–who gets to “remember” history about a certain group of people? Do a bunch of white folks on a school board get to define the Black Panthers as violent? Do a bunch of adults *really* get to tell teens that they need to stop “blaming” society when they are suicidal or dealing with any other mental health issue? Do a bunch of white folks really get to tell Latinos that they had no influence on the state of Texas politics, culture or society?
Contrary to what I am sure most of my libertarian friends are thinking right now, I am not of the belief that we need to go in the other direction either–that is, I do not think that we should blast the kids with a bunch of liberal crap either. Rather instead, I think that we should be teaching all of the students who go through public schools *how to question, critique and challenge* evidence sitting in front of them. That is: there should be some critical theory taught about how to interpret evidence–and kids should required to interpret the evidence on their own. For example: Fred Hampton was one of those “violent” Black Panthers. Kids should be given specific original source material (FBI files, Hampton’s speeches, interviews with co-organizers, etc), and asked to write up a paper on it supporting their own opinions on the evidence.
The opinion being secondary to the ability to creatively, concretely and academically *support* their opinion–or: to show that they know *how* to use the skills generations of historians have used to interpret and represent documents that they find.
But of course–we deem giving our kids thinking tools like critiques and theories as dangerous and wrong. So, that’s not going to happen any time soon, at least not in public schools. So until then, I will have to make do with the various history months. Where the community that the history is about gets to control the production of their own history. Gets to create their own commentary and theory about their history.
It may not be any more accurate or self-reflective than what the Texas school board is doing to history right now–but at least there is a reason for that. And that reason has nothing to do with racism, sexism or any other type of hateration.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
39 Responses to Texas + History=Revisionist
Jake Gomez
March 16th, 2010 at 7:39 pm
Wow, I can’t believe you just take the liberal talking points and spew them out like factual information. They are actually going back to the original way history was taught in this nation. They are not “revising’ history, they are correcting the liberal twist to the Christian-Judeo principles this nation was founded upon.
Get real. Racism is what you are spewing.
Jake Gomez
March 16th, 2010 at 7:41 pm
Sorry about the “racism” remark… after I read my post I felt that was too strong.
bryan j.
March 16th, 2010 at 11:11 pm
The preposterous decision made by the Texas Board of Education could, in part, be due to statements like:
“If people are too stupid or privileged to see that every single month, day, hour of the year is white male history time (how many Chicano leaders are school kids forced to memorize, ala the Presidents of the United States?), then I really don’t feel too much of a need to explain it.”
If you have not noticed(which you surely do by the expected response from a comment like this), Humans, regardless of whatever they are, do not respond to this sort of condescension. Change will not occur unless reason, as opposed to stagnated ideology, is used.
Sabina Gonzalez
March 17th, 2010 at 12:18 am
Well, they already teach these “corrections” at many public schools, but I guess now Texans want to make their missinformation official, so that future generations will know beyond any doubt how little we cared about truth or evidence. SO while Jake celebrates the “corrections” to our “liberal” history, I’ll call my good firend and tell her that when she was abused repeatedly as a child and became suicidal as a teen, she should have just lightened up.
Thanks for posting this, it reminds me why I invest so much time in personally educating my son and the kids around me when they’re not in school. I consider it a long term investment in our future.
Sabina Gonzalez
March 17th, 2010 at 12:27 am
@ Bryan- do yo really think reason alone will make change, or even change the minds of folks who are too angry to listen? It’s an honest question, I’m not being sarcastic. Let’s ask Obama if “reason” helped him pass a public option. I always thought it took action and organizing. Go figure.
Jake Gomez
March 17th, 2010 at 12:27 am
Sabina, I too had to educate my kids from the liberal junk they brought home. Thank God for strong believers who understand that history may not be pretty at times but we are still the greatest nation that gives people like you and I an grand opportunity to breathe and live free. You need to appreciate that and not bang on this wonderful country from which you benefit from.
Sabina Gonzalez
March 17th, 2010 at 1:16 am
Jake- I won’t pretend I know who you are, and in return don’t pretend you know who I am, what freedoms I have, or what this wonderful country has given me. I am glad to see you have access to all that you need, you are among very few. But since that’s not the case for me no matter how hard I work, you will have to get used to my “banging” cuz it will only get louder. Many of us have given much more through our labor than what we have been given in return. We have a right to defend the history of the people who fought and died for us to have what we do have. No matter how it makes you feel. Since I don’t know you, I won’t tell you what you “need to do” as you told me. All I can say is you are very very very lucky that you posted this online and did not say it to my face.
noemi
March 17th, 2010 at 3:42 am
the rewriting and whitening of history in texas school books affect other states who use the same publishers.
Maegan La Mala
March 17th, 2010 at 7:38 am
I was wondering about that Noemi. Since Texas is such a big state, peeps who use the same publishers will get the same books.
Maegan La Mala
March 17th, 2010 at 7:41 am
Sabrina,
You make a really good point about the need of parents, especially Latino parents to educate our children outside the school system that we rely on. I cannot tell you how many times I had to go to my older daughter’s former school to clear things up about Latino and Indigenous history. The administration hated me, but not the other parents.
Maegan La Mala
March 17th, 2010 at 7:44 am
Reason ain’t got shit to do with it bryan. When Latinos and all POC really raise issues about the very lives of our children we are told to watch our tone which is just coded language for, we will not acknowledge our own prejudices, especially when coming from the mouths of those in power.
Maegan La Mala
March 17th, 2010 at 7:45 am
glad you took it back because, I was gonna call you out on the racism comment.
Maegan La Mala
March 17th, 2010 at 7:55 am
And here’s the real scary thing about the state of education in general, most public schools have stopped teaching critical thinking skills in favor of test taking skills since No Child Left behind. I see students knowing less and less basic grammar and math and forget social studies and science. This is another part of that on a scarier level.
la Macha
March 17th, 2010 at 8:24 am
exactly mala–we are not teaching our children critical teaching skills–and yet that’s supposedly what we value when they are older and going to college or university. teaching first year writing has shown me the same things you’re seeing–kids who have never written a whole paper (the number of kids who have only ever written a paragraph by the time they get to university is *astounding*) but have taken so many tests they get sick just at the mention of them. To me, the real problem here is not so much even that kids will be learning a highly biased education, as most of us know that’s what we’ve all gotten from the time we were in kindergarden and colored our first picture of the fat indians and fat pilgrims eating together. but exactly what maegan, sabina and noemi are pointing to–our kids are not being taught how to think critically–and it’s going to be spreading around the entire country–it’s not just one group of kids (like that would make it any better)–and we’re all *ok* with that.
Jake Gomez
March 17th, 2010 at 9:47 am
Not only critical thinking skills but the fundamentals and framework of this country’s founding should be taught accurately, and that’s what the Texas school board is trying to do. Some of you who have been accustomed to learning the “revisionism” of history don’t understand it and that’s why you’re bashing. We tend to destroy what we don’t know.
What do you think “progressives” are? (Another name for liberals), who want to change the fundamental structure of this country “little by little”.
Great blog and responses.
Jake Gomez
March 17th, 2010 at 9:58 am
By the way, I’m one of those fundatmental Christians who understand the importance of reflecting and not “minimizing” or “forgetting” about our founders, even though they were white, Christian males, unlike me (the white part of course).
In Christianity, all racial and sexual barriers are removed. We look at each other as people made in God’s image:
You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:26-28)
Yes, I’m one of those fundamental Christians who want to make things right, including history. Do don’t “bang” on Christians! Yeah Baby!
Jake Gomez
March 17th, 2010 at 10:14 am
Quick note to Sabrina:
Sabrina, I just read your “in the face comment.” I encourage you to live above the victim mentality and the “poor me” syndrome. It wont’ do you or anyone else any good to live in anger and take it out on this country. Not all “white” people have done evil to others. Let’s not cluster only white people in the racism pool, every race is guilty of racism. As Latinos let’s not get in the habit of pointing the finger at others and not take a second look at ourselves; there are enough problems among our own kind that we need to rally around and solve first. Let’s start there, okay!
Jake Gomez
March 17th, 2010 at 10:33 am
Let’s get out of “group think” here folks.
la macha
March 17th, 2010 at 10:58 am
@jake–I would strongly *strongly* suggest reading Mark A. Noll’s “American Evangelical Christianity: An Introduction. It is written by a Christian and offers a very compelling argument about why the current historical trends among Christians to insist that the US was X “in the beginning” are actually deleterious to Christianity and Christians in the US. It’s a Very Good Book–and suggests that there are reasons that groups like the Texas Board of Education (etc) are attempting to write the US in a certain way (i.e. Christian based, no separation of Church and State, etc). It also questions why, if this is a Christian nation, there only seems to be a *certain* Christianity that is allowed to be understood as Christian–in other words, why isn’t the Christianity of slaves understood as our Christian based roots? Or the CHristianity of MLK? Why, for example, do we have to highlight the “Violence” of the black panthers–rather than the solid Christian roots that MLK came from?
It also questions whether Christians really *want* Christianity dictated to them from the nation/state–shouldn’t it be coming from GOd?
Anyway–I *know* that Sabina was NOT “feeling sorry for herself.” And I think it would be good to stay away from those sorts of arguments. As she stated, she does not know you and is staying away from making definitive statements about you–so lets give her the same credit.
Maybe instead of arguing over who is feeling what emotionally–we could discuss like–what are those problems that we need to rally around and solve? And if I, a radical, and you, a conservative, can’t agree on what history to teach our kids, can we agree on other things like teaching our kids critical thinking skills? Can we teach them that there is no one singular interpretation of history–and it’s their jobs as critical thinkers, to expose multiple views of history and support their opinions on those views with evidence and compelling arguments?
la Macha
March 17th, 2010 at 11:13 am
Also–many would say that “group think” is dangerous and something to be avoided because change comes from groups of people getting together and thinking about something. Many would argue that the texas school board acted out “group think” on a structural power based level.
Individual thinking and solitary action is nice–but only very rarely gets the sort of change that the texas school board did–so I tend to think that it’s time for those who disagree with the texas school board to act in a similar group think sort of way….
Maegan La Mala
March 17th, 2010 at 11:47 am
Jake,
I don’t classify myself as a progressive or liberal even but rather radical and that is the guiding background of this site, by the way.
Bryan J.
March 17th, 2010 at 11:51 am
@ Sabina: you asked:
“do yo really think reason alone will make change, or even change the minds of folks who are too angry to listen?”
For those that are too angry to listen, reason will do nothing. But there are many heretofore untouched minds out there who are apathetic for whatever the reason. As a human(who happens to be white and male; it’s my identity i had and still have no control over it), the constant, “I am amongst those perpetuating an oppressive power structure”, coming from various blogs on the internet, is discouraging to me, an admitted partisan for Imm. reform and thoroughly against this elitist, non-helpful Texas board decision. (BTW, I think the state of our education system in the k-12 is patently horrific; we should cut down on all of the vacation).
Succinctly, Sabina, to get things done you cannot whitewash(no pun intended) a whole group of people, who happen to be the majority in numbers, and expect anything but the status quo or worse to prevail.
@ Maegan,
If reason has nothing to do with it, then–outside of an armed resurrection–stagnation results.
Maegan La Mala
March 17th, 2010 at 11:54 am
Then don’t read those blogs anymore Bryan. Respect the fact that they are run by writers, media makers and activists who have been doing this for years, not as part of a career but because our lives depend on it.
Christopher Carr
March 17th, 2010 at 11:57 am
One could argue that politicization of education is an inevitable consequence of public schools with electable school boards; but school board members can and should both show restraint in acting on their own biases and defer to experts when formulating curricula. In this case, the Texas school board did neither. It is not the job of public schools to teach morality, but rather reading, writing, and arithmetic. Personal responsibility for one’s actions shouldn’t be taught at school; it is something that parents must teach at home, or that should be taught at church.
Bryan J.
March 17th, 2010 at 12:47 pm
It’s still entertaining and thought provoking. Thus, I continue.
noemi
March 17th, 2010 at 1:58 pm
http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/dont_mess_with_textbooks/
“And because of the state’s enormous purchasing power for textbooks, Texas’s standards will ultimately affect textbooks nationwide. The board spent more than $200 million on K-12 textbooks last year—buying more high school science books than any other state. “Publishers typically write their textbooks to Texas standards and then sell those books to smaller states,” explains Kathy Miller of the civil liberties watchdog Texas Freedom Network. If the board rejects a textbook, it can destroy a publisher. “
la Macha
March 17th, 2010 at 3:08 pm
@noemi-thank you SO much for the link–that is beyond fuckedupdisturbing. You can’t tell me that the School Board wasn’t perfectly aware of that–and it makes me wonder who is in each of the board member’s back pockets, if you catch my drift. As somebody who works in public education, I know that public education has been the underside of the right wing movement for decades–simple things like “learning how to write” have faced tremendously state legistlature show downs in my state–and of course, at universities, the English dept.s are stereotyped as “liberal”–and have seen the most invasive and intensive of all funding cuts….I really really need to know who all the board members are connected to. I wish rachel maddow would get on this, she’s really good at finding where the money starts…
Bryan J.
March 17th, 2010 at 3:48 pm
I bet I could do some connecting of the dots…
Sabina Gonzalez
March 17th, 2010 at 6:20 pm
YES! I like the idea of teaching kids critical thinking skills, they might come up with even better ideas than we do. I’m amazed each time I talk to my high school aged cousins. That way when a teacher tells them something they won’t have to just buy it, or even worse ditch school altogether becasue it has no connection to their reality.
@Jake- I didn’t mention race or anyone’s whiteness in my post, so not sure if you really read it. Maybe you’re confusing me for another Latina. Why does one even bother.. Oh, and please JAKE, I spelled your name right, at least return that favor if you can’t talk to me like a real person. It’s S-A-B-I-N-A as in Maria Sabina, a namesake I could never live up to.
Jake Gomez
March 17th, 2010 at 9:20 pm
@Christopher, personal responsibility should be taught and reinforced at many levels, that kind of thinking has this culture going down the tubes.
Bubbles
March 17th, 2010 at 10:05 pm
Re: ” I’m one of those fundatmental Christians who understand the importance of reflecting and not “minimizing” or “forgetting” about our founders, even though they were white, Christian males, unlike me (the white part of course).”
The Founding Fathers were not Christian. They were Deists. Have you ever read “The Age of Reason” by Thomas Paine? He thought the whole story of the resurrection was a scam.
Quotes from Thomas Paine:
“I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.”
And notice how he uses parallel sentence contruction to demonstrate an equivalence betwen all the faiths. Chritianity is no better or worse than any other faith.
This is what he says about the resurrection of Jesus:
“The story, so far as it relates to the supernatural part, has every mark of fraud and imposition stamped upon it.”
Here is what he says about revelation:
“Revelation, when applied to religion, means something communicated immediately from God to man. No one will deny or dispute that power of the Almighty to make such a communication if he pleases. But admitting, for the sake of a case, that something has been revealed to a certain person, and not revealed to any other person, it is revelation to that person only. When he tells it to a second person, a second to a third, a third to a fourth, and so on, it ceases to be a revelation to all those persons. It is revelation to the first person only and HEARSAY to every other; and consequently, they are not obliged to believe it.”
You can believe whayever you want, but don’t say that the Founding Fathers were Christians who wanted America to be a Christian theocracy because it’s a lie.
Why have liberals allowed the right ring wackos to co-opt the Founding Fathers? They give their groups names like “Tea Party,” and “Minutemen, ” when in reality they have more in common with the Confederates.
Sabina Gonzalez
March 17th, 2010 at 11:19 pm
didn;t know that last pasrt about tomasito pain. Good to know thanks for posting
Maegan La Mala
March 18th, 2010 at 6:45 am
Bubbles,
You have hit the nail on the head when it comes to linking the Tea Party peeps to confederates, however it would even be more accurate to link them to disgruntled confederates during reconstruction, who tried their hardest to make sure that slavery and segregation continue. That’s why in my video con Cuentame, I say that the Tea Party peeps aren’t representing a new movement, just taking advantage of demographic shifts
Katie
March 18th, 2010 at 7:43 am
Bryan,
It seems like you answered why you weren’t going to take La Macha’s 1st suggestion. But if you’re going to stick around for the reasons you noted, I think that makes it all the more important to acknowledge/take her 2nd suggestion–to respect that they write the way they do. She even explained the reasons they write like that.
Maybe you’re going to already…I just thought I’d address it since you didn’t.
Peace out,
Katie
Katie
March 18th, 2010 at 7:50 am
That sounds really great.
Katie
March 18th, 2010 at 8:02 am
La Macha: Thanks for the book suggestion (“American Evangelical Christianity: An Introduction”). I loved the way you summarized it, and if it’s easy for me to get, that’s totally gonna be my next book! I’ve been craving a new book.
Bryan J.
March 18th, 2010 at 3:33 pm
UPDATE:
currently conducting research on this: 8 out of the 15 members of the Tex. State Board have never taught a class in their life.
Bryan J.
March 18th, 2010 at 5:54 pm
Some Apologies are called for:
In writing this post:
http://bryanjohnsonblog.com/2010/03/18/texas-education-by-mob-rule/
I’m pretty sure the radical(there is no other word for it) conservative board would do what they do regardless of what anyone says.
I smell a constitutional challenge to the elective nature of state education boards in general.
Katie
March 20th, 2010 at 9:54 pm
Hey Macha,
Don’t know if you’ll read this, but I checked out the book you mentioned from the library. I’m intrigued by how much trouble I’m having getting into it. I’m pretty sure the source of that trouble is how strongly I disagree with a lot of the ideas that the author describes as shared among evangelical Christians.
(The idea that there’s no “wrong” information in the Bible, for example.)
I mean, not only do I not identify w/ believing several of these ideas, but I was raised by people who actively talked about why they thought they were incorrect.
What’s funny is that I agree w/ some other ideas a certain sub-set hold strongly. (“Strongly agree that defense spending should be cut,” for example.)
But the ones they all pretty much share…not much in there that I’ve seen yet that I strongly, strongly agree w/. I think I’ve gotten so used to reading books & blogs nowadays where I agree w/ the stuff they have in common w/ similar books/blogs–or that have writing on a topic I was JUST wanting to hear some affirming opinion about–that this is really a challenge for me.