Advertisement

Proposed cuts in California would end assistance to legal residents

8:48 pm By la Macha · Immigration

2 Mar 2010

How many times have we who work with immigrant populations heard that line–the “We don’t mind *legal* immigrants! Ones who come here according to the rules and assimilate and speak English…I *love* those immigrants!” line?

Well, in spite of how much everybody luuuurvs that honest legal eagle immigrant, we are still doing what we can to punish the shit out of him/her. From California comes the news that in an effort to deal with the hard economic times the state is collapsing under, it is proposing an end to assistance programs for legal citizens.

From the LA Times:

“How are we going to live?” asked 70-year-old Yong Hak Cho, who emigrated from Korea four years ago and is raising two grandchildren in Los Angeles. “Immigrants pay taxes like anybody else. So why do they want to eliminate programs for us? It is unfair and it is un-American.”

State officials say the cuts are painful but necessary, and there was no attempt to single out any population group in the proposed budget.

“The fact that we have to close a $20-billion budget gap, on the heels of a $60-billion gap last year, means that we have had to make the difficult decision to propose curtailing or eliminating many state-only programs, and these fall into that category,” said H.D. Palmer, a spokesman for the Finance Department.

When families petition to bring relatives to the U.S., they are required to sign affidavits agreeing to support them financially for up to 10 years. But many of these families have fallen on hard times. Affidavits are not required for people entering the country under various other programs.

Federal benefits have been restored to some recent arrivals, but most are not eligible for supplemental security income, food stamps, transitional assistance for needy families or Medi-Cal until they have lived legally in the U.S. for five years. Exceptions are made for refugees and a few other categories.

You know–there comes a time in an activist’s life where she just has to admit: the other side is not arguing with her in good faith. I think this is that moment for me.

Post to Twitter

32 Responses to Proposed cuts in California would end assistance to legal residents

Avatar

Bryan J.

March 3rd, 2010 at 12:13 pm

It’s not clear who the other side is, here.

But the infuriating part about this is that legal residents are being punished for the sins of others–corrupt government/businesses/whoever contributed to the economic crisis.

It’s astounding to figure out how California, as well as New York, have been so incompetent as to create such mammoth budget deficits.

And corrupt–here’s a clue: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/nyregion/01cars.html

Avatar

Milo

March 3rd, 2010 at 6:11 pm

It’s time to pay the piper. Individual States and the Country cannot go on providing unfunded entitlements.

California is broke, more states to follow.

This woman in the article has been in the US for 4 years and she expects a full Government Pension?

Avatar

Milo

March 3rd, 2010 at 6:13 pm

and I should add that an element of the Tea Party is also against the corruption in Government and Business.

Maybe if you got together with them and concentrated on the positive changes that both groups have in common, something could be accomplished.

Avatar

la Macha

March 3rd, 2010 at 6:33 pm

Milo–the US does not have anything like a “full government pension.” we have a welfare system, social security and a health care system that some people are eligible for. Most people can not live on welfare or social security (which is also disability). Most people have to take in income some other way and/or get help through spouses/fam. So it’s misleading to say the least that there is any such thing as a “full govt. pension.”

What benefits are–is usually a few hundred dollars a month to help with the cost of food.

Avatar

la Macha

March 3rd, 2010 at 6:34 pm

also–lets try having the politicians–the ones who got us into this mess to begin with–pay the piper. lets try h aving wall street pay the piper. Lets try administrations pay the piper. Fix this shit from the top down rather than the bottom up.

Avatar

Milo

March 3rd, 2010 at 6:51 pm

La Macha, SS is underfunded by how many Trillions? Baby boomers start retiring next year. Some have paid into it for decades.

There is no possible way to pay for all these entitlements, as California is finding out.

Even if the Government was to confiscate all wealth in the US (personal and Corporate), it would still not meet the obligations of the liabilities.

Avatar

la Macha

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:04 pm

Milo–a few hundred dollars to keep children and old people from starving is not an “entitlement” it’s a human right. As most people outside of the US recognize.

Avatar

Sabina Gonzalez

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:06 pm

Oh damn, just wasted 5 minutes responding to Milo in another post, but now i see it’s a waste of time since he hasn’t even done his basic homework. well, here’s another wasted minute…
@Milo- HONEY, your’e talking about “legal residents” here. I am a legal resident and last I checked, I pay a shitload of income taxes, So, exaclty how is it fair to take away whatever benefits i paid for with thos etaxes over the years?

Avatar

Milo

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:11 pm

la Macha, is that what you took from my post?

spending has to be reduced. I would suggest that California worry less about the minnows that will cost so many jobs and cost so much to protect and spend more on Human rights.

Those on the left can’t have it both ways, there is just not enough money to go around.

Avatar

Milo

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:18 pm

Sabine, a 70 year old woman that has been in the US for 4 years has paid little to any tax. Why would you consider her eligible to the ssame amount of benefits that you have spent so many years paying for.

Only 50% of wage earners pay tax. You could tax them 100% and the Country would still run deficits.

It used to be charity that would take care of these types of situations. But now the Government taxes, wastes, steals and citizens do not have enough left over to be charitable.

Where has the money gone that should have been banked all these years for programs like SS, etc?

Avatar

la Macha

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:27 pm

Milo–there is plenty of money to go around. but there needs to be a radical restructuring of the US economic system that privileges wars over human lives, CEO’s pay checks over the workers, etc. The US is currently paying over one trillion dollars a WEEK to the wars in Afghanistan and IRaq. I say that’s plenty of money to pay a few old people a couple hundred bucks a month to keep from starving.

Re: the “she’s only been here four years” argument. There are plenty of stay at home mothers who have not paid into the system at all or only paid a few years before they retired from the system to care for their kids. By your logic, those women don’t deserve any benefits either, or limited benefits.

And the same could be said for children, for disabled workers, for part time workers, unemployed workers, etc.

All that you are saying here is that the most marginalized populations i.e. THE ONES WHO NEED THAT CHECK THE MOST, are easily denied benefits so that corporate greed and nation/state violence can be funded. I don’t buy that and don’t think that I should have to pay taxes so that we can kill more people when what I really want to do is make sure old people don’t starve.

If those on the left can decide their money won’t go towards paying for abortion, I would like to decide the same thing.

Avatar

Sabina Gonzalez

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:32 pm

Well, if that 70 year old woman had spent her life toiling in a maquiladora, or picking fruit in 110 degree weather, or doing any other shit job that helped maintain my level of lifetyle and others like me, then yes, she should get those benefits because as far as I’m concerned, she worked just as hard as I did and constributed no less.
Just out of curiosity, where are your descendants from and did they bring an invitation when they arrived in this country?

Avatar

Sabina Gonzalez

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:34 pm

And Milo, it’s SabinA. As in Sabina GONZALEZ, child of Mexican immigrants.

Avatar

Sabina Gonzalez

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:37 pm

And Milo, my name is SabinA. As in Sabina Gonzalez, child of two Mexican immigrants.

Avatar

Milo

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:46 pm

la Macha, check your figures. $1 T/week is incorrect. The DOD budget is $708 Billion for the entire year.

and all military spending is not a negative for Human Rights. The end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union offered the Baltic States, Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Eastern Asia to gain their freedom from an tyrannical regime.

Sabina, sorry for messing up on your name.

We might all feel the same as you about the 70 year old, but that still does not change the fact that the safety net is not structured that way.

That’s where the charity comes in. I give over $20,000 a year to Charities.

Avatar

la Macha

March 3rd, 2010 at 7:58 pm

jezz–sorry–i meant one BILLION a week. and the wars have already cost us trillions. and the DOD budget is not the only place they get money–the discretionary spending is a huge site of funding–and it is renewed constantly and does not require accountability for where or how it is being spent. I think even one trillion dollars would be plenty to prop up social security.

Avatar

Milo

March 3rd, 2010 at 8:22 pm

la macha, 1 Trillion would not even come close to the unfunded liability of SS.

unfunded liabilities

SS $14.1 Trillion
Prescription Drug $18.7 Trillion
Medicare $ $74.9 Trillion
Total of $107.7 Trillion or $348, 678/citizen

Assets per citizen is $244,912 ( this includes Household, Corporate and small business assets)

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Avatar

Sabina Gonzalez

March 3rd, 2010 at 8:35 pm

@ Milo- Well I give every year too, although I chose organizing campaigns instead of charities. But I still think our focus should be on changing the safety net structure where it doesn’t work, not just accept it as fact. We challenge so may other things in life, late payments at the bank, overcharges at the grocery store… well this is the same thing, but much bigger.

Avatar

Milo

March 3rd, 2010 at 9:19 pm

Sabina, the restructuring process has already begun. But it is going to mean some tough choices. I agree that the structure needs to change, but that does not change the fact that there is only so much money.

The SS structure, when set up, was based on a retirement age of 65, and avg. lifespan of 61. They were counting on only having to pay out to a certain % of the contributors. It’s not hard to see the problem with this. And then they went and spent the money that should have been invested as an aggregate amount on other things.

Avatar

la Macha

March 3rd, 2010 at 9:41 pm

Milo–I suggest that you check out what “censorship” really means.

Avatar

la Macha

March 3rd, 2010 at 9:43 pm

Finally–I’ve been moderating comments all day now–and have been working two jobs and being a mami all at the same time. I am calling it quits for the night. Please play nicely while I am gone. Comment moderation is on, and any posts that we miss in the meantime that go against our commenting policy will be deleted.

Avatar

la Macha

March 3rd, 2010 at 9:44 pm

and Sabina–I checked comment moderation and didn’t see anything? I’ll check again, just to make sure–you said it’s showing up on the recent comments, but not in the thread itself?

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

March 3rd, 2010 at 9:45 pm

Thanks Macha. I may have to close comments on this thread completely.

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

March 3rd, 2010 at 9:47 pm

Yup he’s about to get banned. You’ve been warned.

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

March 3rd, 2010 at 9:52 pm

Sabina, I just restored one comment that was in limbo but it looks like it was from much earlier in the day.

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

March 3rd, 2010 at 9:54 pm

Thanks for holding down the fort mujer. With the craziness in casa mala, I fell behind. :)

Avatar

Milo

March 3rd, 2010 at 10:00 pm

banned for what? Please let a guy know how he is offending you, before you punish him for it.

Avatar

la Macha

March 3rd, 2010 at 10:07 pm

I just let you know how you’re offending me, Milo. You’ve had every single comment except one posted. And that one had a bullshit link to it with references to “the illegals.” I’ve admitted in several places where I may be wrong and have been wrong–and you are still here snarking about how unfairly you’ve been treated. I’ve addressed you repeatedly, with one exception, in civil tones. There are exactly three regulars that have been posting here–every single other comment today–and there have been over two hundred, have been from far right nativists that are only interested in starting fights.

Lecturing me and now mala about how you want to be treated when you’ve accused me of calling you a racist, deleting your comments, censorship, etc etc is not the greatest way to “learn.” FYI.

Avatar

Sabina Gonzalez

March 3rd, 2010 at 10:55 pm

Thanks for checking on my comments, they appeared after a while. And also I’m glad to ehar youre not afraid to shut it down if it gets too ridiculous. SO hard to find a blog that’s not full of looney toons these days..

Avatar

Bryan J.

March 3rd, 2010 at 11:16 pm

Dayum, quite a busy day at VL. The comment deluge actually prevented me from finishing a post at my own blog.

@ La Mala.

Generalmente, no me importa si una persona me dice gracias por algo. Pero en este contexto, cuando dijiste “Thanks for holding down the fort mujer” a Sabina me parecia poquito extrano, como el unico razon que me ignoras es que no me caes bien. Estoy equivocado, o no?

Avatar

Maegan La Mala

March 3rd, 2010 at 11:25 pm

my thanks was actually directed at la macha who is an editor here.

Avatar

Bryan J.

March 3rd, 2010 at 11:28 pm

Ah, well, my mistake.

Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Get our RSS Feed!