Advertisement

Archive for February 4th, 2010

Worksite raid today in Annapolis

4:42 pm By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration · Comments Off

4 Feb 2010

Via Casa de Maryland:

WHAT: Protest Outside Baltimore Federal Building to Demand Constitutional Rights

WHEN: Thursday, February 4, 2010; 3:45 pm

WHERE: Federal Building, 31 Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore, MD 21201-2825

(Baltimore, MD) – Federal officials raided an Anne Arundel County restaurant today and have brought the restaurant workers to processing. Despite their internal policies, they have refused advocates requests to interview the workers prior to processing. People will protest outside ICE this afternoon to demand that the federal government comply with the law and allow the detainees to speak with attorneys.

Obviously this is an ongoing development. More information as it becomes available.

Update at 5:27 pm EST: According to sources on the ground, 7 people are being detained. All are from Honduras and one is a minor.

RESTAURANT RAIDED BY IMMIGRATION: DOZENS GATHER OUTSIDE FEDERAL BUILDING TO DEMAND THAT DETAINEES BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK WITH ATTORNEYS

Post to Twitter

The question about why the US government would intervene in Latin American politics has come up repeatedly in comments over time. Namely, there seems to be a disbelief that the US would ever intervene in a region where there seems to be no resources that the US can mobilize (i.e. Iraq has oil, Afghanistan gives the US several bases in a hostile region where they otherwise could not have bases.). The following article addresses that disbelief in a really compelling way.

Why do they care so much about who runs these poor countries? As any good chess player knows, pawns matter. The loss of a couple of pawns at the beginning of the game can often make a difference between a win or a loss. They are looking at these countries mostly in straight power terms. Governments that are in agreement with maximizing U.S. power in the world, they like. Those who have other goals — not necessarily antagonistic to the United States — they don’t like.

Not surprisingly, the Obama Administration’s closest allies in the hemisphere are right-wing governments such as Colombia or Panama, even though President Obama himself is not a right-wing politician. This highlights the continuity of the politics of control. The victory of the Right in Chile last week, the first time that it has won an election in half a century, was a significant victory for the U.S. government. If Lula de Silva’s Workers’ Party were to lose the presidential election in Brazil this fall, that would really be a huge win for the State Department. While U.S. officials under both Bush and Obama have maintained a friendly posture toward Brazil, it is obvious that they deeply resent the changes in Brazilian foreign policy that have allied it with other social democratic governments in the hemisphere, and its independent foreign policy stances with regard to the Middle East, Iran, and elsewhere.

It should be noted, Latin@s and Latin Americans already know the reasons listed in the article. But it’s still good to have evidence and proof when dealing with a skeptical and uninformed public.

Post to Twitter

In many ways, I really feel for Jessica Alba. I mean–really feel for her. She’s said some fucked up shit about being Mexican (remember the “spreading their seed” comment?). But–I think at the root of a lot of her fucked up comments is an extreme insecurity and anxiety about being Latina and being Mexican that I understand completely.

I don’t know about other Latin@ cultures–but as a Chicana (or Mexican-American, Hispanic, etc), I’ve found living life as somebody with immigrant Mexican roots can be incredibly difficult. All the markers the Mexican community uses to “identify” you as “one of us” are so unstable. In a settled community, you can be tall and light skinned and even unable to speak Spanish and still be considered a part of the community. In a more transient community with more first generation Mexicans–speaking Spanish often stands as the “test.” If you can’t do it, you’ve assimilated and have no claims or rights to the community no matter what your experiences are.

So–in a way, I really get what Alba’s getting at when she says, “I’m considered Latina and, thus, I consider myself Latina as well. I grew up eating enchiladas… I identify with Mexicans. It’s in my blood whether or not I speak Spanish.”

Not exactly the most elegant thing to say in the world. As Feminist Texican notes: Head. Meet Desk.

But at the same time, I still feel for Alba. I mean, it took me going to university and doing tons of reading of Chicana feminist texts to be able to 1. comfortably claim a Chicana identity and 2. use the appropriate words to talk about how unstable and anxiety provoking a Chicana identity often is.

It doesn’t sound like Alba has been to college or that her family really spends a lot of time speaking about and negotiating a Mexican-American identity in a non-assimilationist way. We aren’t just born with the knowledge of how to “be” politicized and fierce Chicanas, right? And most of us don’t have to struggle through our politics–or the politics that play out on our bodies (what does your dark hair mean? Your olive skin tone? Your unaccented tongue? etc)–on a public stage.

I know Alba is political in other ways (namely, she’s an animal rights activist). Which makes me think that she is capable of “hearing” a more radical politic when she wants to. And I know how difficult it is to actually find Chicana theory–you have to know what a Chicana is first (again, something I didn’t know until university)–how do you google something you don’t even know? So I volunteer as the most appropriate macha to talk to Ms. Alba. I will pass her a book by Gloria Anzaldua. And then sit and talk with her for a while.

I’ll make a radical Chicana out of her yet. :-)

Post to Twitter

If it really is all about the economy (stupid) when it comes to legislative priorities, to get a sense of where Comprehensive Immigration Reform falls on that list we should look at the The Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 budget request for the Department of Homeland Security.

The two immigration-enforcement components of DHS—Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—consume 30% of the department’s total budget, while the immigration-services component, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, is allotted a mere 5%.

Hmm doesn’t seem like DHS is prepping itself for a pathway to citizenship.

It is notable that there are significant increases in the budget for Asylum and Refugee Services/Military Naturalizations and Immigrant Integration and Citizenship. However, given how DHS has treated many Asylum seekers (by putting them in detention), it would be nice to know a little more specifically where this money is going. And Immigrant integration? Can I assume that means English classes?

Via / Immigration Impact : A Project of the Immigrant Policy Center

Post to Twitter


Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you
  • Maegan La Mala: Thank you Julio! To be honest I was a little nervous. [...]
  • Ana L. Flores: I was very excited when you decided to join us. I really wanted your voice there as it would add dep [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: Hola Juliana and thanks for commenting. There is a dearth in activist/critical thinking Latino blogg [...]
  • Julio Ricardo Varela: Good for you for asking. I got goose bumps just reading this and yes, yes, yes, to it all. Thank you [...]
  • julianabritto: The sense that I get is that you might feel a little frustrated at the dearth in activist bloggers? [...]

Get our RSS Feed!