Today is the 37th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade being decided in the US. In recognizing this day, many organizations have events and special features, one such space is RH Reality Check, “an online community and publication serving individuals and organizations committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights.” RH Reality Check has a series of writing by various people in the reproductive and sexual health field writing under the feature: What does choice mean to you.
You’ll find writing by several Latinas including:
*Aimée Thorne-Thomsen Executive Director of The Pro-Choice Public Education Project writes about growing up with Roe and how that has impacted her life to do the work she does today in Growing Up With Roe.
*Silvia Henriquez the Executive Director of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health shares her desire to see an expansion of seeing a “holistic vision for reproductive freedom” in her piece Securing Real Choices Means Going Beyond “Choice”.
*Bianca M. Velez, Program Assistant for The Pro-Choice Public Education Project writes about being a young woman of Color in NYC and her examination into the terminology of choice and reproductive justice in Will I Ever Have A Choice?
*And yours truly reflects on the sacrifices of Rosie Jimenez, the first victim of the Hyde Amendment and how I see choice as survival and self-determination. Read my contribution The Hyde Amendment Killed Rosie Jimenez…Because of Roe and Rosie, I Exist.
Additional articles I’d like to highlight (there are 17 in total) focus on international work around reproductive justice and access to care, how “choice” also means choices in birth options, a 37-year retrospect on Roe v. Wade, and one man shares why choice is important to him.
What does choice mean to you?
9:42 am By la Macha · Uncategorized · 8 Comments
22 Jan 2010The bad news just keeps coming and coming. In a fairly predictable but shocking nonetheless, decision, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that corporations were allowed unrestricted spending and donations for political campaigns. The reasoning? If spending was restricted, corporations (that’s right, *corporations*) free speech would be infringed upon.
What this ruling means is that for the 2010 election, at least, corporations will rule. Most analysts agree that we can’t forecast the entirety of what elections will look like–but most are agreeing that there will be an unprecedented amount of money spent, the commercials and other media outreach will be overwhelming, and there will be no way at all for citizens to make their voices heard, except through their membership to organizations like Unions.
Now, of course, I am really happy that Unions are suddenly relevant again. But the idea that a corporation that is owned by shareholders (who are NOT all U.S. citizens) will have this unprecedented ability to influence elections is stunning to me.
After we all go to such extremes to insure that “Teh Illegalz” not have any influence at all in the U.S.–we’re just going to hand over our basic fundamental rights so easily? Without a fight even? With clapping and cheering from big portions of the U.S. citizenry?
Here is a group attempting to organize against this ruling. Now is the time to truly consider what the constitution means to us. And what “U.S. Citizen” means to us. Do we intend to cut off our nose to spite our face?
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter