Advertisement

Anti-Mining Activists Murdered in El Salvador

11:52 am By la Macha · El Salvador

1 Jan 2010

For all those people in comments recently who just couldn’t possibly see the Hugo Chavez’s accusations of drone fly over to be true–because why on *earth* would the U.S. do something like that??–I highly recommend watching the following segment.

Pacific Rim applied for mining permits, and they were denied on the basis of their environmental impact study that didn’t pass muster in El Salvador. And that was in 2005, 2006. But just this past year, Pacific Rim filed a lawsuit through CAFTA, the US Central American Free Trade Agreement, suing the Salvadoran government for, at the minimum, $77 million, claiming that this is money that they have lost in their investment or money, potential profits, that they could have made, had they been granted the permits.

And they are going through CAFTA, which was the—is the US Central America Free Trade Agreement, and the only way that they are able to do this, because Pacific Rim is located in Vancouver, is that they acquired a subsidiary in Nevada in 2007. And through that US subsidiary, they are taking advantage of the very generous and expansive corporate rights that are built into CAFTA.

CAFTA has a Chapter 11, which is—Chapter 10, which is very similar to NAFTA’s Chapter 11, around, quote-unquote, “investment rights,” which really is a chapter that gives transnational corporations tremendous legal access to the natural resources of the countries in Central America and in Mexico and defines investors with more rights, literally, to land and to water than even local or national governments have.

And so, the basis of Pacific Rim’s lawsuit is that they didn’t get these permits, even though the Salvadoran government has every right to give or not give mining permits based on what the impact will be—and in this case, you know, because Pacific Rim is going to use, or proposing to use, cyanide extraction, presents a tremendous health and environmental danger to the community. So the really central issue here is about sovereignty. Does El Salvador, do the other countries in Central America, have the right to enforce their own environmental laws, or do transnational corporations get to rule?

Post to Twitter

7 Responses to Anti-Mining Activists Murdered in El Salvador

Avatar

Rob

January 1st, 2010 at 1:07 pm

Interesting news segment; unfortunately, there is no nexus between “U.S. drones,” a Canadian mining company in El Salvador, and murdered mining protestors.

Avatar

la Macha

January 1st, 2010 at 2:09 pm

how about a nexus between resources and U.S. national interest that plays out in the form of military interventions throughout an entire hemisphere?

Avatar

Rob

January 1st, 2010 at 6:44 pm

Show the proof.

Avatar

Bubbles

January 1st, 2010 at 7:00 pm

This is awful. NAFTA, CAFTA and all of these other anti-democratic trade agreements need to be repealed.

Avatar

la Macha

January 1st, 2010 at 7:06 pm

Rob. You show ME the proof.

Avatar

Bryan J.

January 1st, 2010 at 7:41 pm

La Macha,

If you recall from the “drone” post, I did not rule out that what Chavez said could be true; I even mentioned that if there were to be drones, it would probably be to counter traffickers/rebels in Venezuela territory. It is possible. Nonetheless, no one can conclusively say whether the drones were there based solely on the words of Mr. Chavez, or on the words of any politician anywhere in the world for that matter.

Speaking of Mining companies and transnational companies running rampant over local populations rights, Hugo Chavez I give him credit for following through nationalizing foreign companies’ assets. The following is a list of pending arbitration cases with the International Centre for Investment and Settlement disputes(ICSID).

http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=GenCaseDtlsRH&actionVal=ListPending

Oil companies, a mining company, and Cemex. Should be interesting to see what, if any, awards are given to these companies.

Avatar

Bubbles

January 2nd, 2010 at 3:51 pm

Salon just released a list of people and organizations that have donated to Bill Clinton’s Charitable Foundation, and listed was a Canadian mining tycoon. Considering the interests Canadian mining companies have in Latin America, I would call this a conflict of interest for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The attitude seems to be that merely releasing the names of the donors is enough to quiet accusations of impropriety, but I disagree with that. I wonder if this man, Frank Giustra, has business interests in Honduras and what, if any, effect it had on Hillary’s support of the coup.

http://www.salon.com/news/bill_clinton/index.html?story=/news/2010/01/01/us_clinton_foundation_donors

“Canadian mining tycoon and Radcliffe Foundation chief executive Frank Giustra…”

Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you
  • Maegan La Mala: Thank you Julio! To be honest I was a little nervous. [...]
  • Ana L. Flores: I was very excited when you decided to join us. I really wanted your voice there as it would add dep [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: Hola Juliana and thanks for commenting. There is a dearth in activist/critical thinking Latino blogg [...]
  • Julio Ricardo Varela: Good for you for asking. I got goose bumps just reading this and yes, yes, yes, to it all. Thank you [...]
  • julianabritto: The sense that I get is that you might feel a little frustrated at the dearth in activist bloggers? [...]

Get our RSS Feed!