2:30 pm By la Macha · Immigration · 3 Comments
9 Nov 2009We’ve heard a lot post-Obama about how Nazism just gained a foothold in the U.S.. Nary a tea-bag protest can occur without a least a few hundred pictures of Obama with the famous Hilter mustache, and every time the health care debate comes up, non-teabaggers all have to sit through long rants about how “government controlled health care” is really secretly Nazi Germany all over again.
I’ve rolled my eyes to most of this stuff. It’s infuriating, yes, but everybody has their rhetoric.
Until I saw the following video about how Neo-Nazi parties are holding their own protests–only this time the protests are against immigrants:
As if these protests weren’t bad enough–word has it that the leader of the Nazi organization is getting support from various media organizations–and even more specifically, a media organization that many in the Republican party find respectable enough to contribute to:
Otherwise, they need to own the fact that a sitting Republican congresswoman is a contributor to a website that promoted a neo-Nazi hate rally, promotion that included sharing Sam Johnson’s email address with those looking to get involved.
When politicians aren’t calling in to major media sites that endorse neo-Nazism and demanding that their essay’s be removed from the sites and promising that all future campaigning/essay writing has ended–it is little more than tacit approval of the message on the site’s message.
Considering how easily the Minutemen Project was accepted into the mainstream (due to the embracing of the organization by corporate news sources like Lou Dobbs and Pat Buchanan on MSNBC), this is a truly frightening development. The Minutemen have always been a violence based group, but actually attempted to distance itself from it’s own violence once the mainstream began to embrace it (causing several major splinters in the org). At the time, the organization knew that to be linked to open violence against immigrants would be to spell its doom.
Things have changed in the U.S., huh? When have the neo-Nazi’s *ever* been anything but a hate group? An openly violent hate group that has embraced violence as a core tenet since its inception? It’s worth noting as well, that original Nazism also began because of mainstream acceptance of what would’ve normally been recognized as nativist and extremest organizations.
And finally, the resurgence of neo-Nazism was predicted by those who work on anti-immigrant violence as late back as 2006.
12:36 pm By Maegan la Mamita Mala · crime|Justice|Linking Latinos|Politics|youth · Comments Off
9 Nov 2009Today the Supreme Court is hearing two cases that could hopefully change how the (in)justice system sentences juveniles. The cases specifically deal with sentencing youth to life without parole and if that is unconstitutional. The cases being used are that of Terrance Jamar Graham and Joe Sullivan, who were 16 and 13, respectively, when they committed their crimes. Not surprisingly, considering how in all phases of the criminal (in)justice system people of color are profiled and targeted, the Supreme Court’s ruling could impact the case of Latino Efrén Paredes, Jr., who at age 15 and wrongly convicted in 1989 for a murder and armed robbery he did not commit; a crime to which others have admitted guilt.
This week’s News With Nezua discusses what the Supreme Court is up to and what’s at stake.
11:28 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · GLBT|Immigration|Politics|Women · 4 Comments
9 Nov 2009Some are celebrating the weekend passage of a health insurance bill in the House of Representatives. Pero those unhappy and critical aren’t just tea-baggers and others crying over a red scare. From jump, I was angered that health care reform was excluding and scapegoating some of the communities I feel strongly about, immigrants and women.
The Affordable Health Care for America Act, aka HR3962, passed 220-215 but the act contains provisions that bar access to services for women.
The Stupak Amendment (does that rhyme with stupid) bans coverage for abortion under any plans that use federal monies. This amendment apparently was a response to threats from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops who threatened to dis the bill at masses across the country if abortion was covered. I went to church this Sunday specifically to see if the health care reform bill would be mentioned instead the priest talked about the World Series. Hmm.
Additionally the amendment requires that those participating in the “health exchange”, individuals and employers, buy riders for covering abortion services. The only exceptions are for pregnancies that are the result of rape/incest or when the life of the pregnant woman is in danger (her life, not her health). Additionally employer sponsored and private plans that don’t take government money are exempt. This means that women who participate in the public option of health care exchanges couldn’t even use their own money to access abortions.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter