The latest horrifying video of animal cruelty in the factory farm system has just been released by the animal rights group, Mercy for Animals. The video is below–but for those of you who can’t watch–a description is as follows:
An undercover video shot by an animal rights group at an Iowa egg hatchery shows workers discarding unwanted chicks by sending them alive into a grinder, and other chicks falling through a sorting machine to die on the factory floor.
Chicago-based Mercy for Animals said it shot the video at Hy-Line North America’s hatchery in Spencer, Iowa, over a two-week period in May and June. The video was obtained Monday by The Associated Press.
I support this groups recommended action against this practice: 1. Go vegan, and 2. Require the egg industry to include labels on their eggs that say, “Warning: Male chicks are ground-up alive by the egg industry,” even though I don’t see either action inspiring mass action in the “average” citizen. I just know too many people who look at animal rights groups and see them as a group of people that are not connected to reality. In other words, animal rights groups are not meeting communities where they are at. So I support their call for action, but wish that they would start with something less radical (in the minds of “average citizen”), like leading investigations then protests against the system of factory farming in the U.S.
Or…they could do something even simpler, like talking to the workers. As somebody who has several family and community members who have or do work in the chicken industry–I would listen immediately if one (or all!!!) of them came to me and said, listen, it’s time to boycott this place.
Workers and animals are connected together in some really violent and complicated ways. Workers are literally killing animals. And speaking from experience with friends and family–the conditions animals live under often literally make workers physically and mentally ill. Workers may need to kill animals so that they can bring a paycheck home–but almost every worker I ever came across hates their jobs, hates killing animals, and can’t be anywhere around the animals that they’re working to kill once they’re off the clock. The stories I’ve heard about egg collecting in particular–Chicana academic Gloria Anzaldua has written about how the sight of eggs made her physically ill after she worked at an egg factory.
There is violence for animals at these factories–and trauma for the workers. And it seems to me that rather than ignoring workers and heading straight to the consumer in these campaigns to protect animals, animal rights advocates would do better and get more productive results by going to the workers first and working with workers to be leaders in a movement away from factory farming violence and toward a more just and sustainable food structure.
So the question becomes, why haven’t they?
Is it because they would have to learn Spanish first?
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by 2 Mujeres Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse and influential Latino and Latina community in the U.S.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
13 Responses to Male Chicks being Ground Alive: Where are the workers?
Nathan Runkle
September 3rd, 2009 at 10:52 am
The egg industry admits that throwing live animals into a grinder is “standard practice.” This is not a matter of reporting abuse to other workers, this is a matter of standard and accepted methods of killing unwanted male chicks. This facility alone kills over 150,000 male chicks in this manner each and every day. The system is set-up to kill animals in this way. Read the hatchery’s response to the footage, they say grinding up baby animals is a very acceptable way to kill them. I think you missed the point with this investigation. This isn’t a matter of a few bad employees, but rather an entire system and industry that treats these animals as inanimate objects, rather than the sentient creatures they are.
Tracy
September 3rd, 2009 at 11:16 am
I don’t understand what talking to the workers would accomplish. I’ve read “Slaughterhouse.” I agree with you that workers also suffer and are exploited in these places.
But how would talking to the workers end the suffering and cruelty toward animals?
la Macha
September 3rd, 2009 at 11:33 am
Well, Tracy, I’m not sure, quite honestly. As far as I know, there have not been any alliances made between animal rights groups and workers/migrant groups. So I really don’t know. But I would *guess* that a creative alliance between each group would probably provide a way to do more grass roots stuff that would seem more relevant to mainstream people who think that veganism is too radical. So, in other words, if the workers organized with animal rights groups–those workers would start talking to their families (who are probably just “normal” people, not invested in all in “radical” stuff like veganism, etc), and would get their families on board with any protest. And maybe a protest wouldn’t necessarily lead to veganism, but instead might lead to…say, the abolition of factory farms. Or maybe more humane conditions for the animals AND workers as a first step toward dismantling current food structures and rebuilding a food structure based on justice.
it just seems to me that when there is a situation where there is a “space” (i.e. a factory farm) where everybody in the space is being violated–the first thing to do when organizing against the violence in that space is to reach out to others who are experiencing or a part of that violence. Who better to explain the way factory farms harm animals than a worker, right? WHo esle could better explain the health implications of both consumption and work environment?
but again, I don’t really know tracy. I’ve not been a part of or seen organizing between animal rights folks and workers–so I don’t know what has happened if anything–only that something *should* happen between the two groups.
la Macha
September 3rd, 2009 at 11:45 am
actually, nathan, i think you missed the entire point of my post. I never said this was a matter of a few bad employees and would actually *never* say such a thing, as I’ve critiqued the “few bad apples” approach to fixing structural issues pretty much my entire life.
My point was–who is this video appealing to? Consumers. It is operating under the assumption that if a consumer just realized what the fuck was going on in factory farms, they’d stop buying eggs. And I am saying–actually, why don’t animal rights groups ever reach out to workers in the same way that they reach out to consumers? WHy don’t they ever assume that consumers and workers may be the same people? That maybe the point should not be “don’t buy eggs!!!” but instead should be, let’s dismantle an unjust and violent economic based food structure? Because going vegan has its own problems–not eating butter increases demand for oil–and that demand is contributing to deforestation and loss of animal habitat. When the economic based food *structure* is so pervasive and intertwined with globalization, is a singular approach like “watch what you eat” really going to dismantle that structure alone?
Influencing consumer choice has never changed anything. Sustained boycotts that are grounded in community needs has. And I’m basically asking–how can you mobilize a sustained boycott when you won’t even talk (or *can’t* even talk) to the people most inclined to be your allies?
Nathan Runkle
September 3rd, 2009 at 12:13 pm
As the egg industry says, they have no use for these male chicks. This is an inherent problem in commercial egg production. Animal advocacy groups have talked to, and continue to have conversations with, meat, dairy, and egg producers, as well as their trade organizations and the companies that purchase and sell the products. But at the end of the day, there are still going to be 200 million “useless” male chicks to the egg industry. Grinding up live animals is considered the “best option” by the egg industry – they say the veterinarian and science community supports it.
There comes a time when we have to start looking at addressing these issues at it’s core – which is consumer demand for these products. The egg industry will never have a use for these chicks. The practice of grinding them up alive is well known and long discussed within the industry. At the very least, consumers deserve to know about this sad side to the egg industry. Perhaps then, people can make informed food choices. And I must respectfully disagree with the statement that “Influencing consumer choice has never changed anything.” In fact, it’s the only thing that has or will every change these industries. These industries are built on consumer demand for their products.
whatsername
September 3rd, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Nice work La Macha. It seems a couple people missed the point, but I liked the connections you’re making here.
la Macha
September 3rd, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Nathan–male chickens are not the only animals that are being slaughtered by factory farming. I agree with you–consumers DO need to know this. I am not saying that there is NO use in videos like this. And like I said, I support the proposed actions.
You keep using *industry* here–and I am asking you to look at what the word *industry* implies. It is something that is bigger than consumer choice. it is pervasive–and with globalization–it is something that can just pick up and move to a whole new group of consumers.
Perhaps the point is not to change the industries–but to *dismantle* the industries. addressing animal cruetly at it’s core will require all of us to dig much deeper than than “consumer choice”–it’s going to require the dismantling of a structure that is based on the basic belief that anything, including animals, can be consumed. It’s going to require the rebuilding of a new, just structure that is sustainable and prioritizes the needs of all animals, including workers.
I think that exposing the industry for what it is is a powerful and important and necessary step. but can we dream something bigger and more just than “don’t buy that?”
Also–there is a difference between “influencing consumer choice” and “targeted boycotts”–a really important distinction. influencing consumer choice has never changed anything. Period. Targeted boycotts has. I think the problem here is that animal rights groups often think they are doing targeted boycotts, when in all reality, what they are doing is influencing consumer choice. you can guilt and horrify many people into not buying meat products–but it won’t work to get even *most* people, IMO. because what you wind up getting is an egg selection that includes twenty different types of eggs–cage free eggs, organic eggs, etc. people think all they have to do is buy a different kind of egg.
Maegan la Mala
September 3rd, 2009 at 3:48 pm
I think the point that is being made, and missed by many, is that in these factory farm operations, you have communities of workers, many whom are migrants, who are also being abused, and participate because it is wjat they have to do to feed their own families. There was just a report released on how Latino workers are abused in various industries. We also have seen how these factory farm operations have been targets of immigration raids. What is being demanded is a bigger connection. Claro that consumer demand plays a role and that needs to be a target of attack pero what often animal rights’ orgs do is go right over the heads and experiences of those on the front lines of these operations and ignore their issues as well. They are connected.
Is that right Macha?
Bea Elliott
September 4th, 2009 at 8:20 am
I agree that the whole industry (system) exploits the vunerable. From the land, consumers, workers and murdered victims.
But I also know that there have been many extensive reports and individual blogs posted about worker mistreatment as well. Most vegan advocates do try the sell “the whole package” of wrongs – which always includes trauma to employees – both physically and emotionally.
Yet, as an observation – in most interviews with workers I’ve seen only a few which had comments about how the killing of animals affected them on a spiritual level. It’s mostly been about the hours, the repetition of tasks, and working conditions in general. Really… very little about the physiological issues…
And I don’t think it’s “extreme” to expect people to go vegan… It’s not at all as difficult as some would make it seem. In fact, given all the reasons – it’s almost difficult not to.
la Macha
September 4th, 2009 at 8:48 am
hey bea–i put “extreme” in quotes–recognizing that “radical” and “extreme” are simply a matter of perspective. I personally don’t think it’s radical or extreme–but I also live in rust belt working class U.S.–and yes, for the most part, most people I know who are not a part of radical organizing circles i am a part of, veganism, even vegetarianism, is considered radical and extreme.
also, why are workers being interviewed? Are they being asked about the physiological issues? And maybe this is something where actually getting to know workers and be a part of their communities would be beneficial–because I can’t think of one worker I’ve ever known who hasn’t expressed (in their own way) total disgust and horror at the job. Like I said, Many prominent workers have talked about how just the sight of eggs make them physically ill. This is not an unknown discussion in our communities–it’s actually a very common one. The most prominent chicano activist, Ceasar Chavez, was a vegetarian and spoke often about why it was an act of solidarity with animals (which I consider a much more political statement than “go vegan”–and it is using words that people in the migrant worker community understand). So, I don’t doubt that interviewers are not asking the right questions–because they simply don’t know, or they assume too much about the workers (as in, workers don’t know the “right words” the way active vegans do, and thus they can’t possibly have their own critiques can they?).
but even if workers don’t have their own critique and they have no opinion or even enjoy slaughtering animals–why on earth do animal rights activists think that isn’t a problem worth giving time and attention to? How on earth are animal rights activists ever going to change a horribly violent and destructive structure if they can’t wake people up to the spiritual violence assembly line murder commits against them?
Does it make a difference that so many animal rights activists in communities of color count workers as the fathers and mothers and loved ones and are unwilling to casually dismiss them, wheras mainstream largely white animals rights workers look at workers as “the enemy?”
rick
September 4th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
I would put money on it that those who are oposed to this kind of treatment are “pro choice”! Go figure.
la Macha
September 4th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
oooh, rick–you just played a PERFECT move in an awesome game of **GOTCHA**.
Good on you, mate!
Maegan La Mala
September 4th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
because chicks are so much cuter than fetuses Rick! ::eye roll::