10:06 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Immigration| Justice| Labor| Politics
5 May 2009
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued a decision that could change how undocumented immigrants are treated under the law, specifically in reference to the use of social security numbers.
Today, almost a year since it was used to deport nearly 400 Latino immigrants after the ICE raid in Postville, the Supreme Court issued its decision on Flores-Figueroa vs. United States. Justice Breyer authored the opinion which explained that for aggravated identity theft, the defendant must have known they were misappropriating an actual person’s identity…Ignacio Flores-Figueroa was a Mexican immigrant working in an Illinois steel facility. Unbeknownst to him, the papers he had procured bore the name and number of an actual person. When he was caught, Ignacio pled guilty to the immigration charges but refused to accept the aggravating sentence of identity theft. While the 8th Circuit upheld the conviction, the Supreme Court’s decision today means that Ignacio will serve less time before he is deported.
Flores is still being deported. The ruling doesn’t change that or the deportation orders of others, not to mention the hundreds of other working immigrants who were deported after they plead guilty so that they would avoid long prison sentences. Remember Postville?
Via / Smartborders, Feet in 2 Worlds
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by 2 Mujeres Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse and influential Latino and Latina community in the U.S.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
4 Responses to Supreme Court Decision Helps The Future Somewhat, Doesn’t Change the Past
brynnapple
May 5th, 2009 at 9:58 pm
how does this help the future?
brynnapple
May 5th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
my bad, I understand now
Sam DePecan
May 7th, 2009 at 9:54 am
You are telling me that if I have the Mona Lisa hanging in my garage, then the poslice can only take it away from me since it’s stolen art; but I am not guilty because I would plea, “I didn’t know that it was stolen”? ? ? ? Way to go U. S. Supreme Court! Keep it up for the sake of the upcomming American Revolution. We need that.
Maegan La Mala
May 7th, 2009 at 10:11 am
This comparison is so full of fail in so many ways, not to mention the fear factor you choose to insert.