Last week we told you about an initiative among several U.S. Senators to lift the ban on U.S. tourism to Cuba. While some — both on the Cuban side and the U.S. side — might see this as a good thing for the island, Spain’s El País reports (and editorializes) that the Cuban government is proceeding with caution:
Authorities in Havana are looking anxiously at the possibility that the U.S. might lift the travel ban that impedes American tourists from visiting Cuba “too soon”. On the one hand this is desired and seen as a salvation in these times of crisis, but on the other, the end of the banning of U.S. tourism is perceived as a challenge, with a high potential for destabilizing the political and idealogical landscape, according to observers and diplomats.
To provide perspective on what this major change in U.S.-Cuba relations could mean to prolongation of Cuba as we know it today, El País points to statements made by Cuban politician Armando Hart, who warned against the effects of a lifting of the embargo on Cuban society:
If he [Obama] keeps his promise [of lifting the embargo], a new age of idealogical combat between the Cuban revolution and imperialism will be born. Within it, the design of a new theoretical and propagandistic concept around our ideas and their origin will be needed…a broad migration towards distinct objectives could come upon us and we need to culturally prepare ourselves for that.”
I think this pretty much sums up the overall point: this isn’t just about welcoming dollars into the Cuban economy via American tourism, but rather what that will actually mean to Cuba: an influx of everything the revolution has been trying to combat all these years. American tourism is a demonstration of rampant consumerism which is capitalism at its maximum expression, and that flies in the face of the Cuban way of life. Sure, it’s been filtering through for years now via European tourism, but this sudden aperture is bound to push communist leaders on the island to reconsider the way the reconcile the ideals they wish their people to live by and the fact that the enemy is coming in and leaving a piece of their culture of consumption on the island.
What do you think? Will U.S. tourism to Cuba radically change Cuban society? How will leaders deal with this? What will Cuba look like after, say, 20 years of U.S. tourism to the island? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Via / El País
5 Responses to Cuba Wary of Possibility of American Visitors
John McAuliff
April 6th, 2009 at 11:55 am
Cuba will adapt just as Vietnam (where the US is the second largest source of visitors after neighbor China) adapted.
Hart reflects old thinking in Havana, not so different from the old thinking in Miami.
Americans should worry about regaining their own freedom and tell the President to end all restrictions on non-tourist travel and the Congress to end restrictions on all travel.
This is analogous to the specious argument that Cuba’s leadership really wants to keep the embargo because it keeps them in power. In that case, those who promote such fictions should be the biggest advocates for an end to the travel and trade embargo.
Henry Gomez
April 6th, 2009 at 1:32 pm
Jennifer,
The problem with your analysis is that it seems that you are unaware that 2.2 million tourists visit Cuba every year, right now. Cuba already trades with the U.S. (we’re Cuba’s 4th largest trading partner) and with countless other countries. Adding the U.S. fully to that list does not change the calculus on the ground in Cuba.
American tourism is a demonstration of rampant consumerism which is capitalism at its maximum expression, and that flies in the face of the Cuban way of life.
Do you really think that U.S. trade tourism is THAT different from Canadian and British trade and tourism?
The regime has proven quite adept at capturing tourist dollars while keeping tourists largely segregated from the civilian population. It’s not like the regime is going to be opening McDonald’s franchises or even allowing them to be opened. The rules for conducting business in Cuba are very strict and restrictive.
No, the answer is that a dropping of the embargo will mean more of the same with the regime making more money in the process.
Nice try though.
Jennifer Woodard Maderazo
April 6th, 2009 at 4:12 pm
Actually, I wasn’t projecting what is going to happen, I was breaking down El País’ analysis of the Cuban government’s stance and Hart’s point. If you have a look at the previous post I made on the topic, I mention that that Cuba is already overwrought with international tourism and that my personal opinion is that a lifting of the travel ban can’t change all that much.
That said, regardless of how you feel about the regime, would you disagree with Hart’s point that more U.S. influence flowing into the island — in whatever form — might force the current government to adapt new ways to counter the effects of that influence?
He’s Still Alive : Fidel Castro Meets with U.S. Lawmakers | VivirLatino
April 8th, 2009 at 11:17 am
[...] the issues discussed were lifting the travel ban and ending the U.S. embargo on [...]
Kt D
April 8th, 2009 at 5:08 pm
This is very interesting. Certainly, there is some minimal trade/tourism going on in Cuba currently. But even if Britain and Canada are equivalents to the U.S. in the capitalist department, there can be no disagreement that (with the U.S. touring/spending in Cuba as well) it will largely increase the scale of that trade. Now, if only that trade embargo could be lifted…it looks quite possible at this point. I watched an interesting video on all of this at newsy.com today. It contains a few different viewpoints and is worth watching:
http://www.newsy.com/videos/u_s_cuba_removing_the_wall/