Advertisement

Archive for April 6th, 2009

Salma’s husband bossnapped

1:48 pm By la Macha · salma · 1 Comment

6 Apr 2009

salma-hayek-cleavage-3000x0400x532When the news gets too depressing for me, I always feel like I can cruise stories about my Salmita to feel better.

Sigh.

Turns out Salma’s life is pretty darn depressing as well.

Mexican actress Salma Hayek’s billionaire husband Francois-Henri Pinault was held hostage in his car Wednesday by his staff who were angered over 1,200 job cuts at two of his stores.

Mirror online reports, Pinault, 46, the boss of retail empire PPR which owns Gucci shops, was held for an hour by 50 staff members after a meeting in Paris until freed by riot police.

Pinault, who married Hayek, 42, six weeks ago, was the fifth “boss-napping” victim in a month. The union said: “We wanted talks to save jobs.”

Now, as a firm lover of the unions, I have to say, I’m sorta snickering at this. And it, honestly, sorta cheered me up.

As a Salma lover, however, I know that this probably frightened her, and as such, I must tell the unions to cool it.

Union solidarity rocks, just don’t get in the way of my fantasizing.

Post to Twitter

Just got the news today through CNN that the military has finally started to allow the media to be present when fallen soldiers arrive back in the U.S. t1homeiraqcoffin09gi

His name was Phillip A. Myers. A staff sergeant in the U.S. Air Force, he was killed in a roadside bombing in Afghanistan on Saturday.The return of his body to the United States aboard a charter aircraft Sunday marked a solemn moment that has been repeated more than 5,000 times at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware since the start of the war in Afghanistan in late 2001.

This night, however, was not like the other nights. Watching all of this were about 40 journalists allowed to cover the return of Myers’ remains. It was the first time in almost 20 years the return of a fallen U.S. service member was able to be recorded by the media.

I feel sort of mixed by this. It looks like the proceedings really keep the needs of the family in mind–reporters have rules they have to follow (like not speaking, not making “undo movements” etc), and it appears that the family has the final say over whether or not the media will be allowed. Which is all good.

But at the same time, it did make me a little uncomfortable to see that the military asked the wife of Myers if she wanted the press there–seems to me that in a world where the government is more than aware of the power of a picture–families can be “asked” in mighty forceful/pressuring ways.

Of course on a grander scale, I am *always* pleased to know that the government is trying to be transparent with the realities of what it gets us citizens into. And it think it’s *vitally* important for citizens to know what military families must deal with.

But I think, in the end, I am capable of imagining what military families and the reality of war is like without turning the families of dead soldiers into propaganda either. I think the needs of the families must come first.

What do you think?

Post to Twitter

Chris Brown may be getting support from some camps, but from others he’s getting dissed for being a domestic abuser. A hip-hop group called Jump Smokers is serving up some musical justice on Brown in the form of a song called “My Flow So Tight Anti-Breezy (Chris Brown should get his ass kicked)”. The lyrics are scarce, but have a distinct message:

“Boy hits girl/Boy should be taken down/No matter who’s around…All the money in the world but that’s no excuse/Career suicide, yo, here’s the noose.”

EOnline reports that Jump Smokers has vowed that “a portion of the proceeds from the single will go to various organizations for battered women.”

Check out the song above and let us know what you think. Is this just a way to capitalize on a tragic incident or an important message for listeners?

Via / Yahoo Entertainment

Post to Twitter

2830612461_5924b6eba9Last week we told you about an initiative among several U.S. Senators to lift the ban on U.S. tourism to Cuba. While some — both on the Cuban side and the U.S. side — might see this as a good thing for the island, Spain’s El País reports (and editorializes) that the Cuban government is proceeding with caution:

Authorities in Havana are looking anxiously at the possibility that the U.S. might lift the travel ban that impedes American tourists from visiting Cuba “too soon”. On the one hand this is desired and seen as a salvation in these times of crisis, but on the other, the end of the banning of U.S. tourism is perceived as a challenge, with a high potential for destabilizing the political and idealogical landscape, according to observers and diplomats.

To provide perspective on what this major change in U.S.-Cuba relations could mean to prolongation of Cuba as we know it today, El País points to statements made by Cuban politician Armando Hart, who warned against the effects of a lifting of the embargo on Cuban society:

If he [Obama] keeps his promise [of lifting the embargo], a new age of idealogical combat between the Cuban revolution and imperialism will be born. Within it, the design of a new theoretical and propagandistic concept around our ideas and their origin will be needed…a broad migration towards distinct objectives could come upon us and we need to culturally prepare ourselves for that.”

I think this pretty much sums up the overall point: this isn’t just about welcoming dollars into the Cuban economy via American tourism, but rather what that will actually mean to Cuba: an influx of everything the revolution has been trying to combat all these years. American tourism is a demonstration of rampant consumerism which is capitalism at its maximum expression, and that flies in the face of the Cuban way of life. Sure, it’s been filtering through for years now via European tourism, but this sudden aperture is bound to push communist leaders on the island to reconsider the way the reconcile the ideals they wish their people to live by and the fact that the enemy is coming in and leaving a piece of their culture of consumption on the island.

What do you think? Will U.S. tourism to Cuba radically change Cuban society? How will leaders deal with this? What will Cuba look like after, say, 20 years of U.S. tourism to the island? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Via / El País

Post to Twitter

barack-obama-for-presidentI caught heat for criticizing President Obama’s appearance on Premio Lo Nuestro. I proposed that Obama’s use of Spanish in a way that didn’t address any real issues was pandering. Others thought I missed the point completely since after all Premio lo Nuestro is a social/entertainment event not a political one.

I still would argue that Obama’s video injected politics into an event that usually just injected with lots of silicone. A new poll shows that I may not be alone.

Recently, President Obama has been speaking in Spanish and appearing on
Spanish-language networks. AOL Latino just conducted a poll in which a
majority (54%) voted that the move was a strategic/political move, while
34% voted that he¹s just getting closer to his electorate.

Ok so the source is AOL Latino, which indicates that the poll may not be the most scientific, pero interesting none the less.

What do you all think?

Post to Twitter

Mover el Culito on a Monday Morning

6:50 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · Music · Comments Off

6 Apr 2009

Good Morning VL familia! Before we get to a full day of posting lo que pasa en el mundo, let’s shake off our Monday blues with a little Spanish Hustle, even if I hate when people call me “Spanish”.

Post to Twitter


Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Get our RSS Feed!