12:03 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Celebrities|Controversia|Politics|Sports|Venezuela · Comments Off
19 Mar 2009
Being a Chavez supporter can have its ups and downs. It really depends on the crowd you’re with, and in the case of Detroit Tigers All-Star player Magglio Ordoñez, the crowd is the fans and the reaction to Ordoñez’s support of Huguito has been anything but positive. NPR reports that Ordoñez has had to face all sorts of criticism from fans, most recently at the World Baseball Classic:
After every at-bat boos rain down on Ordonez from his team’s own supporters, and cheers erupt from Venezuelans in the stands when Ordonez strikes out. At issue is Ordonez’s vocal support of Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan president known for his commitment to socialism and the glee he takes in criticizing the United States. Other famous Venezuelan players past and present have voiced support for President Chavez, and the fans have cut them a break.Venezuelan baseball expert Leonte Landino says in the cases of Melvin Mora, Ozzie Guillen, Dave Concepcion and Francisco Rodriguez, fans acknowledge “you can think different from me, but still you’re a baseball player and you’re representing Venezuela.”
But Ordonez is in another category, says Landino, who was working as a producer for ESPN Deportes during the World Baseball Classic games. Ordonez actively campaigned with Chavez, even appearing at softball events held to promote a vote to change the Venezuelan Constitution and eliminate term limits. That effort succeeded, allowing Chavez to run for re-election again in 2012.
This has earned Ordoñez the wrath of some Venezuelans and Venezuelan Americans. Chavez himself has called Ordoñez a “patriot” and the fans’ reaction “shameful”.
This makes me wonder: if it’s acceptable to mix sports with politics, why don’t we boo all the baseball players who supported Bush?
Via / NPR
9:14 am By Maegan la Mamita Mala · crime|Justice|New Mexico · Comments Off
19 Mar 2009
New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson may not be president or be in the Obama cabinet, pero he’s not letting that get him down and made a really positive move for all people in the United States. Yesterday he signed a law that abolishes the death penalty in New Mexico.
Regardless of my personal opinion about the death penalty, I do not have confidence in the criminal justice system as it currently operates to be the final arbiter when it comes to who lives and who dies for their crime”…
“Faced with the reality that our system for imposing the death penalty can never be perfect, my conscience compels me to replace the death penalty with a solution that keeps society safe.”
Studies have shown that the death penalty does not deter crimes and ends up costing tax-payers more.
The New Mexico ban goes into effect on July 1st and is not retroactive, meaning that it will only apply to crimes committed after that date. This part is problematic to me. Why not commute the death sentences to life imprisonment? I am not an legal expert pero perhaps there is a legal reason for not making the law retroactive? Currently there are two men on New Mexico’s death row.
New Mexico becomes the 15th state to nix the death penalty.
Via / The Latin Americanist
5:29 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · California|Immigration · 20 Comments
19 Mar 2009President Obama was in Costa Mesa, California, yesterday to hold a “town hall” meeting and he finally brought up the hot-button topic of immigration, and more specifically, immigration reform. The speech was vague and lacking content, as was to be expected, but here’s the most salient part:
“You’ve got to say to the undocumented workers… ‘Look, you’ve broken the law. You didn’t come here the way you were supposed to. So this is not going to be a free ride … What’s going to happen is you’re going to pay a significant fine.’
“‘You are going to learn english. You are going to… go to the back of the line so you don’t get ahead of somebody who was in Mexico City applying legally.’”
“‘But after you’ve done these things over a certain period of time, you can earn your citizenship. So that it’s not — it’s not something that is guaranteed or automatic. You’ve got to earn it.’ But over time, you get people an opportunity.”
How do you interpret this? How will this rhetoric translate into real policy?
Via / SGGP
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter