Advertisement

Archive for 2009

New Years Resolutions

8:21 pm By la Macha · holidays · 1 Comment

31 Dec 2009

It seems a new year is about to begin. And with that comes all sorts of serious reflection and earnest declarations. So I guess it’s time to add my own.

I vow to take myself much more seriously throughout 2010. To do more reflection with my shirt off. And to clap more for all the Mexican boys who grow up into such men.

Happy New Year! Have a great night and don’t forget the condoms and money for the cab!

Besos from the VL team!

Post to Twitter

Rush Limbaugh: Alive

1:12 pm By la Macha · Media · 4 Comments

31 Dec 2009

Last night I got a steady stream of tweets and facebook updates promising one of the most astounding things I had read in a long time. Rush Limbaugh was dead. Supposedly, he had gone into a Hawai’ian hospital with chest pains and the Good Lord called Rush home.

Turns out that the only parts that were true were the chest pains and hospital.

For now, Rush Limbaugh is very much alive.

I am neither disappointed nor happy the man is still alive. My feelings for him are neutral. Which is surprising, given his feelings about me.

What has been very interesting to me is reading what other bloggers, tweeters and facebookers have had to say about Limbaugh–and what they’ve had to say about what others have had to say about Limbaugh!

From Womanist Musings:

There is not much that is redeemable about Limbaugh. In fact, the issue really shouldn’t be about whether he lives or dies but what values we choose to uphold. It is hypocrisy to claim that we have respect for life and agency and then wish for the death of another. How is this different from being upset that Limbaugh wished the failure of Obama?

For the most part, on a moral level, I agree with Renee. But I had to admit to seeing the political side of the people who posted what they did about Limbaugh being dead. When disenfranchised people glory in the death of an oppressive force–is that really the same thing as the oppressive force glorying in the death of the disenfranchised? Or, in other words–maybe the comparison here should not be so much between two groups of people where the assumption is that both groups are equal. Maybe the comparison should be between people glorying in Limbaugh’s supposed death, and say, Palestinians supposedly glorying in the death of U.S. citizens during 9-11.

Does anybody have the right to tell a violently oppressed group how to react to their violator’s death?

I am not even going to pretend that everybody who had something to say was from a group targeted by Limbaugh. And I am SO not trying to compare a bunch of relatively privileged U.S. citizens to survivors of colonial violence.

I’m more trying to question the belief that the oppressed group must always maintain a “morally superior” agenda. Why? Why is moral superiority so essential to leftist type of organizing? It has been around since at least the 1960′s with the church based Civil Rights movement. We shall not strike back when we are hit. We shall forgive our brothers than violently oppress us. We shall strive to distance ourselves from the filth and squalor used by white supremacy to deny us agency.

Do we really have to be morally superior to deserve “freedom” (whatever we may feel that freedom may be)? I am not arguing that Renee is arguing that we *need* to be. In fact I think Renee would probably agree with me that it doesn’t matter who or what you are or what you’ve done–there are just human rights that every human is entitled to no matter what.

But I do feel like the “morally superior” argument should find a quick death because it is so easily used against truly violated populations like Palestinians, “illegal aliens,” single mothers, prostitutes and others. With the consequences being that “good” drug users (as an example) deserve help (for example, Rush Limbaugh)–and “bad” drug users who are homeless and maybe beat their partners should just be locked up and forgotten about.

But I know the morally superior argument has essentially been a long standing battle in communities of color (think: MLK versus Malcom X). What do you think? Is it ever ok to glory in the death of others?

Post to Twitter

Happy New Year!

12:05 pm By Maegan La Mala · holidays · Comments Off

31 Dec 2009

I’m working on a year end round up post, which is more time consuming than I thought (especially with two kids running around). In the meantime, on behalf of the entire VivirLatino sisterhood, here’s wishing all of our readers a happy and healthy new year filled with hope y justicia.

See you all in 2010!

Post to Twitter

here’s a musical gift/wish to end the year. All good things to all VL readers/supporters and even the haters. We couldn’t have done it without you.

Post to Twitter

There has been much attention paid to the President Obama’s foreign policy with the Middle East and parts of Asia which makes sense given that the U.S. in involved in two wars there. Pero, I think that the mainstream media has been sleeping on what is going on in Latin America. The focus on Latin America in the media has been usually limited to the immigration issue (which regular readers know is an extremely important issue to me). What is being ignored is the continuance of Bush policies when it comes to Colombia and Venezuela.

It should be no secret that Colombia’s President Alvaro Uribe is a friend of the U.S while Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez is considered crazy at best and dangerous at worse. Plan Colombia has allowed the U.S nearly unfettered access in Colombia all in the name of the war on drugs and now the war on terror.

Two weeks ago, President Chavez reported on his weekly radio and television show that unmanned U.S. aircrafts, drones, illegally entered Venezuela’s airspace. Not surprisingly, these entries occurred in parts of the country that border with Colombia.

Simple accident?
Read more…

Post to Twitter

"Puerto Rican Political Prisoners" Puerto Rican Political Prisoner Avelino Gonzalez Claudo is being denied medical treatment. Since his incarceration, he has developed a neurological condition. In November 2008, Avelino requested, several times, medical attention receiving only a “I do not know”, “I will read some books” answer from the Doctor assigned to his facility. Avelino has been mvoed to a new prison, so the campaign has a new target: Peter J. Murphy, the Warden of Avelino’s new prison, MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution.
Read more…

Post to Twitter

And unless you think I am not serious about the level of humor Michiganders were able to drum up in reaction to the terrorist attack, please check out this post from Blogging For Michigan about our lovely representative, Pete Hoekstra. Pete is famous for having his ass handed to him by Rachel Maddow and being all all around extreme Christian Conservative.

And of course, as somebody who is not from this side of the state, much less Detroit, as somebody who has never once stood for Detroit (or this side of the state), as somebody who has supported racist “support ‘rural Michiganders’ instead of urban areas” (aka freeloading black folks are stealing from hardworking white people) agendas of various politicians in the state–Pete feels totally comfortable playing the attempted attack up to suit his own agenda.

…that didn’t stop Pete from spending part of Christmas and the entire day of the 26th like some warped modern version of Paul Revere, running to every available form of mass media that he could to remind you that it wasn’t a terrible day, but if you just use your imagination, you can and should turn it into one! Here he is in the Detroit News, “Hoekstra: Attack not aimed at Detroit”, the Detroit Free Press, “Hoekstra: Air terror try hints at a larger plot” (followed by the inevitable, Napolitano: No sign of larger terror plot), the Associated Foreign Press, “Pete Hoekstra: Detroit terror suspect Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab may be connected to Fort Hood shooter”, WOOD TV in Grand Rapids, “Hoekstra: attack attempt cutting edge”, and there were probably other appearances that we didn’t see because we were too busy checking our basements to make damn sure there were no terrorists down there. Whew.

Ah…Pete. If you weren’t such a total asshole, Michigan might claim you just for the humor you make available to us.

Post to Twitter

Detroit Under Attack

12:36 pm By la Macha · Detriot · 1 Comment

29 Dec 2009

As la Mala pointed out, Michigan was just the target of a terrorist attack. Thank god the attempt failed. But it’s weird, because all hell has broken loose since the attempt. Joe Lieberman wants to attack Yemen. Republicans are sure it is all Obama’s fault. A white man is selling his heroic photos. And my eyes have been subjected to the ripped up underwear of the man who attempted to blow up the plain.

But let me tell you something. As a Michigander and as a Detroiter–let me just say. I promise you–the politics that are swirling around this attempted attack are much more horrific to Michiganders than the actual attempt was.

A little history about Michigan. We are the state with the worst unemployment rate in the U.S. People are leaving Michigan right and left. In many areas of the state (including Detroit, Flint, Saginaw and countless rural areas), unemployment is over 50%. Yes, you read that correctly–50% of the population in many cities throughout the state are simply out of work.

And things only seem to be getting worse. Our state government can’t get its shit together. We have a governor who knows what she’s doing but is constantly hindered by a legislature caught up in grandstanding and buy offs (on both sides). Pundits are saying it’s time to let “Detroit die” even as they refuse to invest in alternative economic structures that would transition millions of people out of dependency on the auto industry.

Everybody is out of work, and those who aren’t are holding on for dear life. Which means that Michigan conservatives and libertarians are in the odd position of being “under attack” but advocating for things they aren’t used to. That is, instead of screaming about “increase police” and “attack attack” etc–there has been a tremendous amount of worry about the government becoming too involved. The government increasing regulations and rules will more than likely have a deleterious effect on the Detroit airline industry.

And nobody knows if Michigan can survive one more industry collapsing. Attacking Yemen doesn’t seem so logical, practical or exciting when you may be out of a job soon.

But the impossibility of increased government interventions on the economy of Michigan has led to an alarming advocacy for profiling. If government control is going to destroy us, we might as well put particular bodies out to be destroyed first. Focus on the brown bodies so that the white ones are left alone. And it’s doubly convenient that the brown folk we’re all watching so closely now are some of the hardest hit by the economic recession, and as such, can’t leave Michigan!

Outside of the increased profiling, my biggest problem is that I just can’t keep up with the people who are putting out all these ‘solutions.’ Within a couple of hours of the news breaking, pundits, activists on the right (from outside of Michigan) and others were already filling the airwaves with militaristic and violent “solutions” that largely center on the control and/or annihilation of brown bodies.

The rest of us (including the conservatives in Michigan) were spending that time reflecting on the glory of being alive and making bad coping jokes about Team Terrorism.

I really don’t know how people who actually lived through a successful attack handled it all. I understand Suheir in way I never have before–can I just have a minute? Just a minute?

I have no answers on what would be the more appropriate response to this attempt. Except the really big solutions like: get out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and stop threatening Yemen, Iran, North Korea, etc. Fix all the areas we’ve blown up. Help those who were bombed recover some sort of life and livelihood.

And then maybe head to Detroit and do the same for us.

I guess I’ll just keep making bad Team Terrorism jokes for now, though, because I don’t see any of that happening any time soon–and if you don’t have an alternative outside of “just stop” to racial profiling, nobody really wants to hear from you.

God Bless the U.S.A.

Post to Twitter

<br />
Alex Freyre, izquierda y José Maria Di Bello, quienes se casaron en Ushuaia, en el extremo sur de Argentina. Foto: EFEYesterday Alex Freyre y José María Di Bello became the first gay couple to wed in a civil ceremony in Latin America (Ushuaia, Argentina to be specific).

Too sweet. Felicidades.

Via / El Diario La Prensa

Post to Twitter

Martes Musica : Soy el Mar, Los Pericos

10:47 am By Maegan La Mala · Argentina|Music · Comments Off

29 Dec 2009

The cold here in NYC and dumb comments is making me wish I was on a beach in South America. I guess I’ll have to settle for Los Pericos.

Post to Twitter


Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you
  • Karen: Have you see the census figures for 2010? Latinos are not all that diverse. Most" Latinos" are Mexic [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: Hi Karen, I agree but only in part. I think that people do get up in cults of personality but th [...]
  • Maegan La Mala: I haven't heard anything about a rally being held Jose Luis. i know Presente.org is organizing a pet [...]
  • Karen: Also, Al Sharpton, now a host on MSNBC, brought attention to the Trayvon Martin case because he knew [...]
  • jose luis: when the rally is going to be held in SAn Diego..if there is on??? [...]

Get our RSS Feed!