5:07 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · New Orleans
29 Sep 2008VL reported here last week about Louisiana State Representative John LaBruzzo’s efforts to create legislation that would pay poor women $1000 to have their tubes tide. At the time, a commenter noticed that many women of color and poor women may actually want the sterilization, to which I replied that it is frustrating that “help” for poor people always comes in the form of sterilization rather than challenges to economic structures (such as $1000 scholarships for school, more jobs, raising the minimum wage, etc).
Women’s Health & Justice Initiative and the New Orleans Women’s Health Clinic (both located in Louisiana) put out talking points to address LaBruzzo’s plans. The address the issue of “consent” in a very important way:
According to LaBruzzo, the solution to ending poverty in our society is to control and regulate the fertility and sexuality of black women – not the creation of comprehensive programs to improve health care access, our education system, housing affordability, and employment opportunities in the state. His plan pathologizes the reproductive capabilities of Black and poor women by proposing legislation to exploit the economic vulnerability of those who are socially stereotyped as burdens on the state.
Even if sterilization is voluntary, POVERTY IS NOT! Poverty, economic insecurity, and lack of sustainable livelihood can cause a woman to consider this aggressive sterilization incentive a viable option.
LaBruzzo talks about poverty as though it were an infectious disease—a though poor people will eventually make everyone poor—rather than a condition people are condemned to by Louisiana’s lack of investment in education, employment, affordable housing, and quality health care programs, services, and resources.
LaBruzzo uses a myth of scarcity to argue that if economic resources are shared with everyone, no one will have enough. The reality is that if the lion’s share of our economic resources stopped being used for unnecessary military spending and corporate welfare, such as the Wall Street bailout, then all our communities would have access to the resources and opportunities they need to survive and thrive!
…
The low-income women of color LaBruzzo feels so comfortable scapegoating for Louisiana’s economic conditions are those who support Louisiana’s economy by doing its low-wage work. When LaBruzzo goes to his office, these women clean it; when he goes to a restaurant, they wash the dishes; and when he stays at a hotel, they turn down his sheets. Rather than this mean-spirited attack, he should call for an increase in the minimum wage that would make it feasible for poor women to survive economically.
BFP (who is posting at Elle PhD these days) has the entire document.
Will there ever come a day when corporations are required to take responsibility for the state of economic mess that we are in rather than poor people? Will we ever stop believing that poor women and women of color *deserve* to be sterilized–that it’s there own fault for ‘being poor’?
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
6 Responses to Follow up on John LaBruzzo’s Plans to Sterilize Poor Women
HispanicPundit
September 30th, 2008 at 1:47 am
I’m curious – do you get as worked up when the issue is providing abortions to poor woman? Or is it just with sterilization that it bothers you?
La Macha
September 30th, 2008 at 10:42 am
I wonder, do you consider this effort to be ‘providing’ sterilization services?
J Glenn
September 30th, 2008 at 11:43 am
Abortions aren’t permanent; sterilizations are.
Denise H.
September 30th, 2008 at 4:54 pm
J Glenn, the baby finds its death pretty permanent
La Macha
September 30th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
well, for the baby to find it’s death pretty permanent, it’d have to be consciously aware of what life and death actually are, wouldn’t it?
Abortion and Sterilization are not interchangeable procedures. But just for the record, I do believe that if a politician “offers” low income women 1000$ to abort a pregnancy, I would find that just as morally reprehensible as this. Economic policies should not be decided or in any way connected to the reproductive capabilities of any women, rich or poor, white or of color, heterosexual or queer etc etc. You do not improve the economy by bribing women with little resources into permanently ending their ability to reproduce. You improve the economy by ending 700 billion dollar corporate bail outs. You end the billion dollar a week worthless wars in Iraq/Afghanistan. You make it more economically possible for the workforce to educate itself and become more advanced (and thus more hirable) in higher paying jobs.
It’s not that hard really–but it does call for a restructuring of priorities. Making the lives of workers and citizens more important that corporate pockets.
Is anybody in the u.s. willing to do that?
HispanicPundit
October 1st, 2008 at 11:35 pm
But just for the record, I do believe that if a politician “offers” low income women 1000$ to abort a pregnancy, I would find that just as morally reprehensible as this.
Fair enough. Thanks for the response.