1:37 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Immigration
18 Aug 2008In the ongoing confusion of whether or not we should like ‘the illegals’ or not, several themes keep popping up. One theme is how fat, lazy and unhealthy Mexicans are. The other theme centers on the perpetual debate of “Are the Illegals an Economically Sound Investment?” The debate sounds something like this:
Speaker One: The illegals drain our economy and suck up all our resources!
Speaker Two: Undocumented workers pay millions of dollars into the system but rarely get much of anything out of it.
Here’s nice summery of such a discussion all done up neatly in letter format.
My question: Since this debate pretty much reduces undocumented workers to the equivalent of the beat up car out front that is next in line to be towed away (should you let it be towed or pay the fines to keep it?), I really have to wonder what the purpose of the debate is and why immigration rights advocates keep engaging in it.
Is there a different way to consider the benefits of immigration?
What do you think?
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by 2 Mujeres Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse and influential Latino and Latina community in the U.S.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
1 Response to Which is worse, taking their money or kicking them out?
Julia
August 22nd, 2008 at 2:44 pm
I think addressing the “economic impact” can be one way of addressing people’s fears, irrational as they might be. Does it work? Not sure, but I tend to think questions demand answers, or something else rushes in (misinformation & instinct).
But I hate to see the justifying of EVERYTHING from a $$ perspective; not everything “has to be run like a business” and most of us don’t make all our personal decisions on economic benefit alone. But this idea (of everything running like a business) seems to be the dominant ideology of our age, no?