Advertisement

Wed16Jul2008

A More Apt Comparison

12:25 H | Topics: Controversia - Magazines - Race - US Presidential Race 2008

In a follow up to the New Yorker's "ironic" cartoon, the Washington Post published the following:
wapocartoon.jpg

via Anxious Black Woman


As I asked in comments here, the interesting thing to consider is what could the New Yorker artist have done differently in his comic such that he truly represented irony? What's different between the WaPo comic, which seems to represent it's message very clearly, and the New Yorker comic, where the audience must be told how to interpret it?

Related

Feedback (1) » Share your opinion

1. Julia ~ Saturday, Jul 19 2008 | 11:29H:

Bingo. FRAMING. And love the snide dig at the New Yorker's elitist "our readers know better" attitude (eg, we're above NEEDING to care if we offend & do harm, coz we're SMART=entitled).

Conversation





Remember Me?

Write a comment (You can link: <a href="http://...">text</a>)

Comment Policy: Any and all outright racist, supremacist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, fatphobic, classist, xenophobic, anti-semetic and abelist language is prohibited. Any poster using such language within a comment will be warned and the comment will be deleted. If the poster continues to use such language after being warned, they will be banned from further posting.