Absolut Ad Takes Us Back to 1848
09:54 H | Topics: Immigration - Marketing - Mexico
Does this Absolut Vodka ad -- which first appeared in Quién, a Mexican magazine -- offend you?
When I first saw the ad, I was amused. My first thought was that the map in the ad looked like a less detailed version of the map used to negotiate the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. Any Chicana/o Studies student knows that map quite well. Second, I figured the Minutemen types and reconquista fear mongers would have a field day with the ad.
Carmen at All About Race notes the ad's problematic nature this side of the border.
Although the ad appeals in a daydreaming, head cocked to the side, eyes toward the sky “if only…” kind of way it is divisive given our overheated idealogical wars about immigration in this country. Mostly, I think the Reconquista ad was a dumb move on Absolut’s part for a simple non-political reason. You want to associate a liquor brand with feeling good, happy. And now, my once a year Absolut Mandarin and cranberry feels tainted. 24 hours ago I thought Absolut and I thought of cool print ads, backlit bars, too loud music, and laughter. Now, I think Absolut and all that’s going through my mind are the contentious threads [and here] I’ve been reading in response to this ad.
Personally, I find Absolut's Maya ad much more offensive than this.
Update: Absolut apologizes after the reaction on right-wing blogs:
"In no way was it meant to offend or disparage, nor does it advocate an altering of borders, nor does it lend support to any anti-American sentiment, nor does it reflect immigration issues," Absolut said in a statement left on its consumer inquiry phone line.
Via / All About Race
Feedback (13) » Share your opinion
1. Maegan la Mala Ortiz ~ Monday, Apr 07 2008 | 10:18H:
After seeing the Absolute Maya ad and reading your post over at the Unapologetic Mexican, these ads also are making me think about the commodification of Latino culture/history in general in order to make money for non-Latino companies
2. Sammy ~ Monday, Apr 07 2008 | 10:20H:
"I figured the Minutemen types and reconquista fear mongers would have a field day with the ad."
I'm not a fear monger. I'm a native a Texas. It's a offensive to me since Texans (Texians and Tejanos) fought a war of independence from Mexico. But, I don't expect you to understand that being from NY.
3. Maegan la Mala Ortiz ~ Monday, Apr 07 2008 | 11:13H:
Um the poster of this article isn't from NY.
5. cindylu ~ Monday, Apr 07 2008 | 15:29H:
Sammy,
I'm from California, a state which was Alta California as part of Mexico. I do understand these issues, but I don't think it matters if you're from New York, Texas or California.
6. Christopher ~ Monday, Apr 07 2008 | 23:54H:
I think it is important to note that this ad was meant for the Mexican market. As a Chicano from LA I personally love this!... I do feel uneasy about the continued appropriation of Mexican history/culture by foreign companies, however, I feel that this Absolut ad has an inherent sense of levity while at the same time recognizing the often disregarded history of the Southwest.
Granted it may not have been the best thing for Absolut to have this ad leaked to a US audience, nonetheless next time I'm dancing to some cumbia at the club I'll let out a grito as I down a shot of absolut (then straight back to the tequila no?!).
7. Maegan la Mala Ortiz ~ Tuesday, Apr 08 2008 | 07:57H:
Oh yeah Christopher, Imagine if the ad had been run in the US? Well first, who would run it?!!
Sammy- FYI, We are based in NY and San Francisco and the blogger who wrote the post is a Chicana based in LA.
8. Tom from Texas ~ Tuesday, Apr 08 2008 | 11:18H:
So it would be okay if they ran a "US only" ad that shows a map of the USA with a 20 foot fence from the south-eastern tip of Texas to the south-western tip of California? It would imply that the company supports such an idea. That's why so many in the US (and especially Texas which fought for it's own independence from Mexico to become a sovereign nation) are upset with Absolut.
9. Maegan la Mala Ortiz ~ Tuesday, Apr 08 2008 | 12:49H:
Except that the US media is full of those images already, all one has to do is watch/listen to lou dobbs!!
10. mark ~ Tuesday, Apr 08 2008 | 13:17H:
Well...I dont have much problem with the ad except that the map is wrong in the first place........if its supposed to represent a "pre-1848" version of the United States, Texas was not part of Mexico OR the United States! Texas had already declared its independence from Mexico on March 2, 1836, then two and a half months later (April 21, 1836) at the Battle of San Jacinto we kicked the Mexican Army's arse and captured the Supreme General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna and only released him only after he signed a peace treaty which then allowed the formation of the Republic of Texas, our own Country! We didn't join the United States until December 29, 1845. Which may I add that in the annexation of Texas there were the stipulations that the Texas State flag is one of the only flags that can be flown at the same hieght of the united States flag and that we are the only State that can legally still secede from the Union!!!!
11. Tom from Texas ~ Tuesday, Apr 08 2008 | 22:40H:
Lou Dobbs is a politcal commentator, Absolut Vodka (V&S Group) is not, until now.
12. sammy ~ Wednesday, Apr 09 2008 | 15:24H:
"5. cindylu ~ Monday, Apr 07 2008 | 15:29H:
Sammy,
I'm from California, a state which was Alta California as part of Mexico. I do understand these issues, but I don't think it matters if you're from New York, Texas or California."
No comrade it doesn't matter to me because that was not my main point of the post. San Fransico, eh? 'nuff said
13. Sammy ~ Wednesday, Apr 09 2008 | 15:55H:
"10. mark ~ Tuesday, Apr 08 2008 | 13:17H:
Well...I dont have much problem with the ad except that the map is wrong in the first place........if its supposed to represent a "pre-1848" version of the United States, Texas was not part of Mexico OR the United States! Texas had already declared its independence from Mexico on March 2, 1836,"
Don't try to confuse people with facts



