Advertisement

Wed11Jul2007

Bill Richardson : Not Such a Latino/Gay Friendly Candidate

16:30 H | Topics: GLBT - MBAPBSAllAmericaDem - Politics

richardsononimus.jpgWould you vote for a candidate who used the gay slur, the "f" word? It certainly didn't help the career of Grey's Anatomy actor Isaiah Washington. What if the slur were in a different language, say Spanish? Well Democratic presidential hopeful Bill Richardson used the word maricón in an exchange over a year ago with shock jock (and racist) Don Imus and now Richardson is scrambling to apologize.

The New Mexico governor used the term as part of a joke instigated by talk show host Don Imus during a March 29, 2006, segment of his “Imus in the Morning” syndicated radio program, simulcast on MSNBC. “Bernard on the staff here has been claiming you’re not really Hispanic so-- that you're just claiming that for some sort of advantage or something,” Imus said to Richardson, tongue clearly in cheek. “You can just answer this yes or no and this will answer that question. Would you agree that Bernard is a maricón?”
Without missing a beat, Richardson replied in Spanish, “Yo creo que Bernardo, sí — es un maricón si él piensa que yo no soy hispano. [General laughter] Was that good enough or what? [General laughter]”
“That’s good enough for me,” Imus replied.

Richardson has loudly been proclaiming himself as THE Latino Presidential candidate but with language like that does he represent all Latinos? And why did it take over a year for this to make media waves? Did he think he could get away with it because he was speaking Spanish? Did he think that he could rely on the machismo and homophobia oh so present in the Latino community that the Spanish speakers wouldn't care? Had I known about this comment I most certainly would have confronted Richardson at the Democratic debate a few weeks ago (not that I expect him to have given me a real answer-that's how unimpressed with him I was).

What's even of more concern is how gay rights organizations in Richardson's home state helped bury this issue.

Alexis Blizman, executive director of Equality New Mexico (EQNM), acknowledged that she asked GLAAD not to “go after” Richardson because of his strong gay rights record, but said the domestic partnership bill was not under consideration at the time. Blizman said that Richardson called her shortly after the Imus interview to apologize for using the word.

And yes while the question was clearly a set up, a politician with Richardson's experience could have and should have deflected it. What if it had been the "n" word. Wouldn't he have been attacked at last month's debate?

Richardson has claimed that he thought the word meant effeminate, not the "f" word, which in my opinion is a load of bs that I'm not shoveling.

“In the Spanish I grew up speaking, the term means simply ‘gay,’ not positive or negative. It has been brought to my attention that the word also has a hurtful or derogatory connotation, which was never my intent. If I offended anybody, I’m sorry.”
So while I may have declared Richardson "gay friendly" before, now I wonder if he's friendly to gays, Latinos, and obviously gay Latinos.


Via / Gay News Watch

Related

Feedback (5) » Share your opinion

1. Stephen Cassidy ~ Thursday, Jul 12 2007 | 03:24H:

It was a lapse in judgment by Richardson. He apologized now and last year after it occurred. I think he was set up by Imus but he shouldn't gone down that path.

In the end, I judge candidates on their records. In Congress, Richardson voted against the Pentagon's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, and will reverse it when President. In New Mexico, a state evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans, Richardson

* expanded anti-discrimination laws to include sexual orientation and gender identity.
* provided state health insurance for domestic partnerships,
* signed into law the state's first hate crimes legislation for crimes based on sexual orientation and gender identity,
* transformed health services in the state for AIDS patients.

And if the few state senators hadn't block it, the state would have now a Domestic Partner Rights Act. Richardson fought hard for the legislation. Have any of the other Presidential candidates called on their state legislatures and governors to enact Domestic Partners statutes?

Recently, the Bay Area Reporter, the leading LGBT paper for the San Francisco Bay Area, profiled Richardson:

B.A.R. publisher Thomas E. Horn, who was born and raised in New Mexico and whose family has been involved in the state's politics – an uncle served as a state legislator and then the state's Democratic Party chair in the 1950s and 1960s – first met Richardson when he served as a congressman.

"I really think he is the most qualified Democrat in the race for president," Horn wrote in an e-mail. "His track record is exceptional. He's done a fine job as governor ... and was re-elected with around 70 percent of the vote."

Horn, who said he expects to make an endorsement in the primary but has yet to back a candidate, said winning the southwest will be key to the Democrats taking back the White House. Not only does he see Richardson having an advantage in the West, but Horn also praised his gay rights track record.

"If a Democrat carries New Mexico, Colorado, and Nevada, we don't need Ohio or Florida to win. Richardson is very popular throughout the southwest and stands the best chance of being able to do that," wrote Horn. "His record of LGBT issues has always been stellar."

Richardson has also been the only candidate that I'm aware of who has criticized Bush on his threat to veto Washington, DC appropriations bill because of the domestic partner registry. Richardson stated:

"I was disappointed to hear about the President's threat to veto the Washington, DC appropriations bill because of the Domestic Partner Registry. Let's be clear: this threatened veto is a veto of human rights and basic civil protections.

"The President says that he is the "decider." With this veto threat, he has once again decided to support the forces of intolerance. This bill is not radical and should not be controversial. It simply extends basic rights that most Americans already enjoy -- like hospital visitation, medical decision, and inheritance rights -- to committed domestic partnerships.

"It is particularly sad that the President would choose to issue this threat during Pride Month, which should be a celebration of GLBT Americans' contributions to our nation, as well as a celebration of the strides our nation has made towards full equality.

Finally, let me tell you one story I know from a friend who dealt directly with Richardson's campaign. Richardson likes staying at the homes of supporters on his trips - it helps him gain a much better understanding of the views of people across the nation than he would obtain if he checked into hotels. Plus, I think Richardson is a very social person and enjoys meeting new people.

In a visit either to San Francisco earlier this year, the supporter (my friend) who Richardson was going to stay with is gay, and lives in the Castro District of SF with his partner and children. Richardson didn't know in advance the supporter was gay. My friend didn't want to surprise Richardson and checked with the campaign as to whether Richardson would have any problem spending the night as his house. Richardson's response was absolutely not.

As it turned out Richardson's plans got shifted, he came into San Francisco the morning of the fundraiser - not the night before so he didn't need lodging. But the point is Richardson in his personal life is comfortable and welcoming of gays and does not practice discrimination.

2. Tfunk ~ Thursday, Jul 12 2007 | 13:00H:

"So while I may have declared Richardson "gay friendly" before, now I wonder if he's friendly to gays, Latinos, and obviously gay Latinos. "

How, in your mind, does all of his work for the LGBT community in NM get erased so simply by a minor political blunder on a shock radio program? Are your perceptions of candidates molded and altered so easily? because THAT would be pretty unimpressive.

3. Maegan la Mala ~ Thursday, Jul 12 2007 | 14:05H:

I've written about many of the positive steps that Richardson has done for the GLBT community but I don't consider what happened minor. As I wrote I think had Richardson used F---t or even the N word people wouldn't be so quick to defend him. So I think the perception of race/ethnicity and homophobia in the Latino community have alot to do with the how what happened is being analyzed.

4. Yolanda Carrington ~ Friday, Jul 13 2007 | 07:14H:

It most surely does matter that Richardson used a homophobic slur, on the Imus show no less. I mean, does he think there are no LBGT folk in the Chicano/Latino community?

And his defense of his remarks was weak---I knew what the m-word meant when I was a fourteen, long before I knew any Spanish. Misogynist and homophobic Spanish slurs are staples in many of the gangsta films that US kids grow up watching. And hell---even if it DID merely mean "gay," does it make it okay somehow? What is he saying?

5. Mike Kitts ~ Saturday, Jul 14 2007 | 12:34H:

Hey, this was a slip of the tongue, and possibly a famous, Don Imus setup for Bill. We who live under Bill's watch as governor have seen this state progress more than in most all of the other previous administrations this state has had. Certainly the governor before Bill did little, if anything, to forward the social progress for the people of this state. Bill has made this state a place to be glad you live here. While not perfect,
and knowing that a lot more has to be done, we have seen a tremendous growth in this state's economy, we are cleaning up our part of the environment, as best as we can, and in spite of being in the desert, we are becoming one of the greenest states in the country. I know Bill is gay friendly, he has to be, he lives in Santa Fe! He is truly the governor of ALL of the citizens of New Mexico, gay, straight, transgender, celibate
and anyone else that is in the gene pool in New
Mexico.

Conversation





Remember Me?

Write a comment (You can link: <a href="http://...">text</a>)

Comment Policy: Any and all outright racist, supremacist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, fatphobic, classist, xenophobic, anti-semetic and abelist language is prohibited. Any poster using such language within a comment will be warned and the comment will be deleted. If the poster continues to use such language after being warned, they will be banned from further posting.