11:56 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Celebrities|Music|Politics|Venezuela · Comments Off
14 Nov 2006
Grammy award-winning Calle 13 is looking to sue Hugo Chavez’s rival for the presidency of Venezuela, Manuel Rosales. According to the reggaeton stars, Rosales used their song “Atrévete-te” without their permission during his campaign events:
“The use [of the song] may lead to serious legal consequences for whomever is using it,” the group’s attorney Juan Dalmau told Puerto Rican daily “El Nuevo Día” in today’s issue.“Calle 13′s position is clear: cease and desist,” said the attorney, who also sent a message to the Venezuelan consulate in Puerto Ricos stating the position of the group and its representatives.
Meanwhile, Rosales’ PR guy is biting back, saying that the song was “inspired” by the Calle 13 hit but isn’t the same, and adds that the song was performed by Venezuelan musicians.
Via / OidosSucios
10:00 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Controversia|Cuba|Florida|GLBT · Comments Off
14 Nov 2006
Mel Martinez, the Florida senator of Cuban background, was tapped to be the Republican National Committee general chairman yesterday. Now you’d think that after the major loss of power in the Congress a week ago, the GOP would move more towards the center and try to fit as many people as they can into that party tent but by choosing Martinez, the party is making a major move further right.
Martinez has been on the record opposing Republican senator John McCain’s states’ rights stance on the marriage issue, saying, “It isn’t good enough to say, ‘Leave it up to the states. If we leave it up to the states, we will see the erosion of marriage that we’ve seen by activist courts, which we otherwise will not see if we protect the institution of marriage at the federal level.”- He attacked his 2004 Republican primary opponent for supporting hate-crimes legislation, accusing him of catering to the “radical homosexual lobby.”
Via / The Advocate
Image Via / Immigration Reform Now
8:00 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Controversia|history|Immigration · 2 Comments
14 Nov 2006
While the pundits, politicians, and even our own VivirLatino readers are quick to point out the difference between so-called illegal vs. legal immigration, a blog, Ally Work, looks at the history of immigration in the United States and when those labels began to be put into place.
Until 1918, the United States did not require passports; the term “illegal immigrant” had no meaning. New arrivals were required only to prove their identity and find a relative or friend who could vouch for them.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter