Advertisement

Thu09Nov2006

Could a Latino be our next President?

10:49 H | Topics: New Mexico - Politics

billrichardson.jpgNew Mexico Governor Bill Richardson was overwhelmingly re-elected this week with a whopping 68% of votes cast in his favor. Richardson (born in Mexico City born in Pasadena, raised in Mexico City, son of an American father and a Mexican mother), is the only Latino governor in the United States and las malas lenguas say he's going to try to run for President in 2008. With the recent shift in public support toward the Democrats, could Richardson pull off on a national level what he pulled off in his own state?

Hefty majorities of men and women, Anglos and Hispanics, all age and income groups backed Richardson, according to the exit poll.

The governor also won the political middle ground. Majorities of moderates and independents favored Richardson. Those groups are considered key swing voters in New Mexico elections. About a third of conservatives defected from Dendahl and backed Richardson, according to the survey of voters as they left polling places across the state.

In spite of a relatively liberal philosophy on immigration (he's reviled by anti-immigrant organizations) and other hot button issues, Richardson seems to have pulled from all walks of life and political affiliations to get this win, which is the kind of appeal that could make him a great candidate for the White House.

Would the Democratic party get behind a Latino candidate for President? And is this country ready for a Latino president? Tell us what you think.

Via / El Paso Times

Related

Feedback (7) » Share your opinion

1. monica ~ Thursday, Nov 09 2006 | 15:39H:

i say "bring it"!!!

2. xoloitzquintle ~ Thursday, Nov 09 2006 | 18:04H:

I think we are close, but not quite there yet. Richardson will not be the "breakthough" Latino.

His popularity in NM is tied to the fact that NM politics doesn't like change (note the two Senators - they have been there forever).

I can see him as Secretary of State in the next administration, though (because the Dems will win, of course).

3. Georgina ~ Thursday, Nov 09 2006 | 19:07H:

It would be cool, but isn't being born in the U.S. a prerequisite for the presidency?

4. cindylu ~ Thursday, Nov 09 2006 | 19:51H:

Is he still eligible to run for president if he was born outside of the US?

5. Jennifer Woodard Maderazo ~ Friday, Nov 10 2006 | 11:45H:

I'm not sure but I'm guessing he is since he's already laying the groundwork for a campaign. Maybe because his dad was American?

6. xoloitzquintle ~ Saturday, Nov 11 2006 | 11:45H:

He was not born in Mexico City, rather in Pasadena, CA. He then moved to Mexico City.

You do need to be born in the US to be eligible to be President, which why you will never see Presidente Xoloitzquintle.

7. Jennifer Woodard Maderazo ~ Saturday, Nov 11 2006 | 14:43H:

Thanks for the correction, Xoloitzquintle. Teaches me to stop believing all that I read on the internet.

Conversation





Remember Me?

Write a comment (You can link: <a href="http://...">text</a>)

Comment Policy: Any and all outright racist, supremacist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, fatphobic, classist, xenophobic, anti-semetic and abelist language is prohibited. Any poster using such language within a comment will be warned and the comment will be deleted. If the poster continues to use such language after being warned, they will be banned from further posting.