Advertisement

Mon23Oct2006

Is money wiring destroying families?

15:25 H | Topics: Children - Family - Labor - Latin America - Money

capt.b2a91d645afabe619a7496605d63593a.jpgIs Western Union-ing some money back to your familia in Mexico destroying the family structure in Latin America? That's what some experts are saying. While the economies of Latin American countries are bolstered by the remittances made from the U.S. by immigrants to their families (some sources say 20 billion dollars per year in Mexico alone), this practice is also having very negative effects, reports The Miami Herald's Andres Oppenheimer:

...at the meeting of mayors in Miami last week, United Nations and Colombian national police consultant Hugo Acero Velasquez said not everything about the remittances is positive: The massive migration of Latin American men is leaving behind fatherless children, who often grow up raised by grandparents who tend to be too permissive.

As a result, millions of children are growing up on the streets. In countries with high youth unemployment rates, they often end up doing criminal jobs for drug-trafficking or other organized-crime gangs, other experts said. According to the latest World Health Organization figures, Latin America is the most violent region in the world after Africa. It has an annual average of 19 violent killings per 100,000 inhabitants, more than twice the world average.

Others say that the income received -- which can be relatively small amounts to us but are hefty sums in Latin America -- can contribute to laziness in those back home:

"Getting $50 a month can turn you into a bum," says Raul Benitez, a Mexican visiting scholar at American University in Washington. "In El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, you often see a complete destruction of the family structure. Women or grandparents are in charge of raising the children, and there is a total absence of the father figure."
What other choice is there, though? People emigrate out of necessity, and not being able to support your family in your home country leaves one to take that difficult step because one has to. Is it better to stay back and be the "father figure" and have your family starve?

Thoughts?

Via / The OC Register

Related

Feedback (2) » Share your opinion

1. Maegan la Mala ~ Tuesday, Oct 24 2006 | 10:59H:

That's one of the the most backwards arguments I've heard , not to mention the fact that it plays on the lazy Latin American stereotype. Instead of looking at how the negative parts if globalization like NAFTA have done more harm than good, blame the workers.

2. Neruda ~ Saturday, Oct 28 2006 | 14:01H:

I agree that one of the consequences of NAFTA and decades of collusion between the wealthy in Latin American and American Corporate interests is to destroy the family structure by making it necessary for so many men to go find work in the US. And Maegan is right. That needs to become the core of the conversation.

Conversation





Remember Me?

Write a comment (You can link: <a href="http://...">text</a>)

Comment Policy: Any and all outright racist, supremacist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, fatphobic, classist, xenophobic, anti-semetic and abelist language is prohibited. Any poster using such language within a comment will be warned and the comment will be deleted. If the poster continues to use such language after being warned, they will be banned from further posting.