9:33 pm By Maegan La Mala · Environment| Food| Latin America · 5 Comments
27 Sep 2006
Because not all of us care about Paulina…
Everyone should know that the human body can only function for a few days without water. That the human body is blah-% water. In other words, water is life. Water is important. However, frozen water is probably even more important.
Glaciers are huge sheets of ice. Similar to the iceberg that we all saw in Titanic, except glaciers reside on land and slowly cut a path through the land they rest upon. They’re remnants of the last ice age, water trapped on land, isolated from the bodies of water they came from. The bodies of water they’d like to return to… Why are they so important?
Currently, most of the glaciers in South America, tropical glaciers, are steadily declining in mass. (As are most of the tropical glaciers around the word.) They’re getting smaller. Which shouldn’t be a big deal, right? After all, they’re just ice, right?
The thing is, that for the people who live near these glaciers, i.e. everyone who doesn’t live in the huge already over-populated big cities of South America, the slow melt of glaciers provides the only source of fresh water. Water used for drinking and for sustaining agriculture. Glaciers have been sustaining life in the valleys of the Andes Mountains for thousands of years, melting in the summers, irrigating the fertile land, and regaining their mass during the winter months. A perfect system.
However, as the Guardian Unlimited reports:
Andean glaciers are melting so fast that some are expected to disappear within 15-25 years, denying major cities water supplies and putting populations and food supplies at risk in Colombia, Peru, Chile, Venezuela, Ecuador, Argentina and Bolivia.
The culprit is a rise in temperature. Global warming.
The end result: this melt will not only effect the Andean populations in South America, but also the large coastal cities such as Lima and Santiago de Chile. Less water, coupled with the daily contamination of Andes from mining, such as this gold mining project taking place on the Chilean/Argentine border–a project that involves the removal of three glaciers–could lead to an extinction of our Andean peoples, and even denser populations in the big cities. The latter which would result in even poorer living conditions in our big cities. (As if the slums could get any worse.)
It’s up to us to do something about this. Less electricity. Less air conditioning. Walk some more. Plant those trees. Plant wheatgrass on your windowsill. Write to your congresspeople, your president. Buy less gold. The valleys of the Andes Mountains are worth it.
Image via / Lee Chai ©2004 (Siula Glacier / Perú)
News via / BBC News and The Guardian Unlimited and The International Press Service News Agency
2:55 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Argentina| Education| Internet| society · 1 Comment
27 Sep 2006
I am not sure whether to applaud this or ask the question: “why internet cafes and not places for them to live?”:
The government of the Argentine capital inaugurated the first “cybercafe” for children and adolescents who live on the street, the first of five of these facilities expected to open in the city.More than a simple cafe with internet access or just a place where one can play games online, the new facility is a “learning and recreation” space to help better the living conditions of “these children that have lost almost everything,” said Jorge Telerman, Mayor of Buenos Aires, during the opening of the cafe.
According to Spain’s 20 Minutos, these cafes will offer, on top of internet access, recreational and educational activities, and light meals.
The idea for this project was supposedly born from data that showed that homeless children in Argentina spent 60% of the money they receive panhandling on cybercafes.
While on the surface it seems like a great idea — providing internet access, and therefore access to information, education, and the world in general to these children — my mind can’t help but wonder why more basic needs aren’t covered first, like a home, foster parents, meals and education.
What do you think? Is this a good idea or does it overlook these children’s well-being?
Via / 20 Minutos
Image via 26Noticias.com.ar
12:26 pm By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Celebrities| Chismes · Comments Off
27 Sep 2006
I’ve been hearing all over that Paulina Rubio has changed her name to P. Blonde. WTF?
I first heard it in the background on some Telemundo show, so I Googled it and a lo and behold:
En los agradecimientos que Pau firma se autonombra P. Blonde —”muy chic”— al estilo JLo.
Maybe I just hate these celebrity nicknames — JLo, P Diddy, Big Daddy — but what was wrong with Paulina Rubio? It’s a nice enough name. And the gangsta-ness of the “P” gets a bit diluted by the adjective “blonde”, which conjures up images of Anna Nicole Smith or Marilyn Monroe. Real badass.
Meanwhile, in Mexico everyone is hating on Pau for having recently developed a fake Spanish accent. Her CD is number one is Spain now (selling 80,000 copies in just one week), so perhaps adopting the local lexicon helped that along.
On another random note, and I know I’m probably late to the game, did you guys know that Pau was also doing Pro-Active Solution commercials a la Jessica Simpson?
10:48 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Controversia| Immigration| mexico · 1 Comment
27 Sep 2006
The “official” Mexican President-elect, Felipe Calderon, weighed in yesterday on plans to add additional fencing/walls along the border between Mexico and the United States.
We are worried … about the actions that the United States is discussing concerning building a border wall and tightening restrictions on migrants.
Calderon made the statement afer a meeting with his country’s foreign secretary. Calderon is not convinced that the placement of additional physical barriers will lessen the amount of traffic through the border. United States Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist set up a possible vote late this week on a proposal to erect fencing along a third of the U.S.-Mexican border.
Sounds like more band aids instead of real aid.
Via / Yahoo! News
8:23 am By Jennifer Woodard Maderazo · Cities| Puerto Rico| States| society · Comments Off
27 Sep 2006
One of the largest growing sectors of the Latino population in the United States isn’t coming in from Mexico as Pat Buchanan and friends would like you to believe, but rather are U.S. citizens. According to a public policy study by the Center for Puerto Rican Studies at Hunter College (CENTRO) released yesterday, the U.S. Puerto Rican population grew nearly three times as fast as the overall population.
Puerto Rican population growth was fastest in states that have not been locations of traditional settlement. Fast Puerto Rican growth took place in states such as Nevada, Rhode Island, Florida, Georgia, Arizona, Tennessee, New Hampshire, North Carolina and Virginia. Puerto Ricans grew in these mostly Sunbelt states at rates that fluctuated between 300 percent and 400 percent between 1980 and 2000. The ten fastest growing counties in the survey were located in Florida (eight) and Pennsylvania (two). Puerto Rican growth was slowest in states of traditional settlement, such as New York , New Jersey , Illinois or Hawaii . The slowest growth counties were also located largely in these states.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by 2 Mujeres Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse and influential Latino and Latina community in the U.S.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter