Debuting Thursday, September 28 at 8:00EST, is America’s first response to the moneymaking, country-captivating and saucy Spanish-language novela. Known for keeping your mother, your grandmother, your sisters and your girlfriends glued to the television (sometimes your father, too) if you’re Latino, you learn what a novela is at an early age. (I still remember what Thalia looked like in Marimar and I still remember that Chayanne’s speedo in the opening credits of Volver a Empezar was yellow. I’m not the only one who does. Am I?)
Anyhow, novelas are a very important part of our culture. Whether we watch them or not, novelas are due a great deal of respect for their ability to captivate an entire people. Sure people have their favorite novela-producing countries, i.e. Mexico and Colombia: but Latinos are really concerned with the best cast and the best story. Period. ABC’s Ugly Betty borrowed from the most successful novela ever, Yo Soy Betty La Fea is long overdue.
A 22-year-old, yet mature and outspoken America Ferrera, who you might remember from HBO’s Real Women Have Curves and from WB’s Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants takes on the lead role as the “ugly” but talented girl who gets a job working in an upscale Fashion magazine. (Yes, did Lauren Weisenberg steal this idea somehow for her trillion-dollar producing “Devil Wears Prada”? The world will never know…) If you don’t know what happens after that… use your imagination. (Really, it’s not that hard.) Is America Ferrera ready for this role?
I don’t know.
I haven’t seen anything but the trailer. From the looks of it, it looks like she is. Produced by Salma Hayek, who purchased the rights for “Yo Soy Betty La Fea” in 2004, the show looks like “Good TV.” (Now, I’m saying “Good TV” because well, everyone should know that TV, is inherently bad and to see something that does not portray New York City as cardboard, see Jennie Garth in “What I Like About You”, or make NYC look like a place where 98% of the population is white-American and earns over $250,000 a year, a-la “Friends” and “Seinfeld” is “good TV.”) NYC is a wonderful place filled with everything from the very rich to the very poor, the best of stories, the saddest of stories, luck, misfortune: it is every single color of the rainbow and in fact, goes as far as inventing colors on a daily basis. (If Crayola were located in NYC it’d go out of business.) That is what NY is to everyone who lives here. We love it; we hate it; we are it. “Ugly Betty” which takes place in NYC–and I hope Queens—is welcome in my book. It is insulting when Hollywood tries to imitate NY on a set in CA. NY is never CA. (But I’m going off topic.)
“Ugly Betty” will do well. A large percentage of Latinos, the Spanglish ones as termed by Ed Morales in his book Living in Spanglish will watch this show. (Recalling fondly the loveable Betty.) Really, it’s a great story. It’s Cinderella without the obvious gender roles women should play strewn throughout. My only question is: how will Americans take to a story that has an obvious, predictable and predetermined happy ending? (I’m assuming Salma doesn’t want to make this a ten-year run, right?) I think culturally, one of the aspects of novelas that appeal to Latinos is this notion of “knowing” what’s going to happen. It’s directly tied to our, sometimes uncontrollable, desire for chisme. (Disagree with me as much as you want. I know I’m right.) Can the American handle it? American TV culture dictates: comedies must last five+ years to become “dear to our hearts”; and the hour-long drama must be anything but predictable.
Stay tuned.
For a glance at what America will look like at the end of the show,click here.
Image Via / American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by 2 Mujeres Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse and influential Latino and Latina community in the U.S.
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
11 Responses to Ugly (and because somehow in English “fea” means fat, too) Betty
monica
September 7th, 2006 at 12:57 pm
i’m confused by the title of this article. where was “fat” brought up?
fab
September 7th, 2006 at 1:17 pm
Marimar; Thalia’s (cinturita de abispa) tiny waist… of course is ingrained in our memories…
This entry made me laugh. Two weeks ago, I saw a bus ad showcasing the time and channel of Ugly Betty’s future programming and I thought it was eerie cause I made the premature assumption that it would NOT sell in English.
We’ll see if the English version captivates the hearts of viewers as much as Beti La Fea has.
Personally, as a Spanglish speaking person that hates TV this show is the last on my list to watch. Similarly anything that portrays more of a reality in pop culture I’m all for, like not all New Yorkers are the crisp, affluent ready in any second to pose for a New York Magazine set, thank you very much. Not only is it ingenuine it is misleading portrayals, at one point even I non TV viewer was fooled by the messages and have to remind myself not everyone lives like Samantha in Sex in the City en NY, hello!
Marco
September 8th, 2006 at 12:45 pm
The comment on her being fat was part of the American interpretation–or acculturation of Latin American, TV–of the original “Betty la Fea.” Where in Colombia, she was, “ugly” she never had to be concerned with being overweight or anything. As evidenced by her size 0, or 2, figure. In ABC’s “Ugly Betty” well, they not only made her “ugly” they also made her fat. Which, for all intents and purposes, is important to note.
Maegan la Mala
September 8th, 2006 at 12:56 pm
Well of course that depends on your definition of fat.
monica
September 11th, 2006 at 2:11 pm
is it something that is said in the reviews for the show, is she called that in the previews? you say it in the title but you don’t mention it in the article. so i’m wondering if that’s part of her character description or you noticing that america ferrera isn’t a size 2 like ana maria orozco. in all the press & previews i’ve seen for the show, her weight was never mentioned or an issue, which only made me want to watch it more.
not trying to be defensive or start an argument but the title of the article caught me off guard. and as a latina who isn’t the same size as the chicks in the novelas, i may be a little sensitive.
Maegan la Mala
September 11th, 2006 at 3:58 pm
Nope , not sensitive at all. It was a fat phobic title
Marco
September 13th, 2006 at 12:46 pm
Contrary to what Maegan writes, it was not a “fatphobic” title. I think it is interesting to note that the producers of “Ugly Betty” interpreted ugly by making her not only “ugly” but also “fat.” Now, working within the contexts of those two words, which are subject to personal opinion, the producers created a character that is both “ugly” and “fat.” Furthermore, they plan on capitalizing on that. Fact of the matter, in the trailer, they show her running in gray sweats (trying to lose weight) and wearing tight clothing (making her look overweight as well). Whether the main focus, or any focus, will be her weight, that is yet to be seen.
Armando
September 30th, 2006 at 6:53 pm
When Betty walked into work with that poncho,
I laughed so hard. Then she walked into the glass wall and I laughed more. Funny novela conversion like Cinderella or something. No, I, don’t watch novelas but my mom watched the original.
AA
Melina
October 5th, 2006 at 9:09 pm
Ugly Betty is nothing like Betty La Fea…this is my second time watching it and all I can see is caricature and sterotypes. It is so much worse than I imagined it could be. I predict that the ratings will go down drastically…its just missing everything we loved about Betty La Fea. Ugly Betty should go off air ASAP.
Anthony
October 10th, 2006 at 5:01 am
What part of Queens is Ugly Betty suppose to take place in?
Marco
October 10th, 2006 at 12:06 pm
I would “guess” that Ugly Betty is supposed to be from Woodside or Sunnyside. The view of the train in background did not look like the 7 train in Corona, Jackson Heights or Elmhurst.