Advertisement

Another Che film

10:05 am By Maegan La Mala · Movies

23 Nov 2005

che2k5.jpg From rock concerts, to soccer games, to college dorm rooms, Che Guevara’s image can be found everywhere and is one of the most recognizable icons in the world.

The revolutionary’s image has been co-opted lately though. From Mike Tyson and Diego Maradona sporting tattoos of him to the rapper Jay-Z wearing t-shirts and saying things like “I’m Che with bling on.” Absurd I say. Che must be rolling in his grave.

To make matters worse, Hollywood is taking another shot at the life of Che (I must admit, the Motorcycle Diaries was a great film) with Benecio del Toro playing the part of the Argentine revolutionary. I’m still not quite sure if another Che movie is a good thing. Will this spread “the revolution” or simply water it down? At least the actor that will play Che in this new film is doing his homework.

Benecio del Toro visited Argentina to learn more of the life of the guerrilla leader “Che” Guevara and meet with Carlos “Calica” Ferrer, a childhood friend of Che.

Via / La Opinión

Post to Twitter

15 Responses to Another Che film

Avatar

Jennifer Woodard Maderazo

November 23rd, 2005 at 3:53 pm

Unfortunately, most people with Che t-shirts and posters who go around pumping their fists and yelling revolucion have no clue as to who he was really. Any Hollywood film made about his life will manipulate history just like all historical films do. You sacrifice the ugly or the boring for the romantic.

Avatar

Maegan la Mala

November 23rd, 2005 at 4:44 pm

I prouly wear my Che shirt (from Cuba ) pero I know the history and understand what he did. Whenever I see someone with a Che shirt I wanna ask them if they know wassup because like you said, el pobre Che is probably rolling in his grave. Even the revolution and ideas behind it are for sale these days though.

Avatar

HispanicPundit

November 23rd, 2005 at 7:04 pm

Slate Magazine writes about the Che Guevara people should know,

But Che was a mainstay of the hardline pro-Soviet faction, and his faction won. Che presided over the Cuban Revolution’s first firing squads. He founded Cuba’s “labor camp” system—the system that was eventually employed to incarcerate gays, dissidents, and AIDS victims. To get himself killed, and to get a lot of other people killed, was central to Che’s imagination.

Alvaro Vargas Llosa (son of Mario Vargas Llosa) has a more detailed account of, “The Killing Machine: Che Guevara, from Communist Firebrand to Capitalist Brand

I’ve often thought of making a T-shirt that had Che Guevara on the left side, underneath the title ‘Leftist Totalitarian’, and Augusto Pinochet on the right side underneath the title ‘Rightist Dictator”, and at the bottom of both write, “Atleast Rightist Dictators leave you with a better economy”.

The love of Che by the left is a perfect example of their moral bankruptcy and their disconnect with reality.

Avatar

Maegan la Mala

November 23rd, 2005 at 8:49 pm

I actually did read that article. The thing is that both sides will paint history the way they want. I’m not saying that Che didn’t advocate violence. I’m also not saying I’m a pacifist .

Avatar

Gustavo

November 23rd, 2005 at 9:14 pm

“Atleast Rightist Dictators leave you with a better economy”

Oh my gosh, I know you just didn’t lend support to that bastard Agusto Pinochet. It’s too bad all those Chileans murdered under the Pinochet regime did not live to enjoy the good economy.

Avatar

HispanicPundit

November 23rd, 2005 at 9:42 pm

I didn’t defend Pinochet, I made a comparison, after all, the same can be said of Che, “It’s too bad all those Cubans murdered under the Che regime did not live to enjoy the BAD economy”.

Avatar

Hank

November 24th, 2005 at 5:49 am

Che was a Marxist murderer. For an accurate view of this sociopath’s crimes against humanity see this article by Humberto Fontova:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19823

Avatar

Gustavo

November 24th, 2005 at 4:46 pm

Che was a “Marxist murderer?” Give me a break. If someone had their foot on your throat are you going to take it or are you going to stand up for yourself?
Cuba under Fulgencio Batista was no paradise that’s for sure (unless you were an American visiting Cuba for the casinos and the prostitution, or a member of the Cuban elite). Batista was just another Latin American dictator that catered to U.S. interests.
Furthermore, according to your line of reasoning Zapata is also sociopath. The American revolution was probably also full of sociopaths for “murdering” all those English troops.
Interestingly you’re using the same rhetoric as some on the left with the phrase “crimes against humanity” (in regards to George W. Bush).

Avatar

HispanicPundit

November 24th, 2005 at 9:15 pm

Gustavo,
Che was a “Marxist murderer?” Give me a break.

Che wasn’t just a Marxist dictator, he was the worse kind of Marxist dictators, as Slate writes, “Che was a totalitarian. He achieved nothing but disaster. Many of the early leaders of the Cuban Revolution favored a democratic or democratic-socialist direction for the new Cuba. But Che was a mainstay of the hardline pro-Soviet faction, and his faction won.”

Cuba under Fulgencio Batista was no paradise that’s for sure

It certainly was no paradise, but compared to how Che left Cuba afterwards, it can be considered a paradise. Here are some stats about Cuba before and after Che and Castro,

Before Castro, Cuba was as rich as Italy, and richer than Spain. Cuba has not merely lagged behind, it has actually grown poorer, and is now more than five times poorer than these countries. It used to be among the richest in Latin America, now it’s among the poorest.

Cubans had better access to food than all other Latin American countries, except Argentina, before Castro, but now they have worse access than almost all the others. Cubans are the only people in Latin America who have seen their intake of calories decrease since then. It is now better than in the 90s, but more than every tenth Cuban is chronically undernourished.

Cuba had lower infant mortality than all other Latin American countries before Castro, and lower than France, Italy and Japan. It is the only area where progress has continued since then, but it has been much slower than in other similar countries.

(Source: Manuel Sánchez Herrero och Arnaldo Ramos Lauzurique: Los llamados logros.)

But hasn’t anyone benefited from the revolution? Sure, Castro has amassed a fortune equal to ten percent of Cuba’s GDP. This is one dictator who does not wear his uniform because he can’t afford a suit.

And, oh, did I mention that Castro has murdered more than 70 000 of his own citizens for political reasons? That’s about seven times more than Pinochet, who is hated by all leftists who love Castro. Apparently murder and brutality is not what they object to in Pinochet.

Reminds me of this quote,

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism[communism] is the equal sharing of miseries.” – Sir Winston Leonard Spenser Churchill

Avatar

HispanicPundit

November 25th, 2005 at 2:59 am

Btw, not that it matters much, I meant to write ‘Marxist murderer’ above, instead of ‘Marxist dictator’.

Also, Happy Thanksgiving everyone!!!

Avatar

Gustavo

November 25th, 2005 at 10:22 am

HP, so I take it you’re not going to watch the upcoming Che movie when it comes out? Come on man, it’s on me.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Avatar

HispanicPundit

November 25th, 2005 at 4:24 pm

I probably will end up watching it, I have some friends who are die hard Che fans and they always try and get me to watch Che films.

But you can bet I’ll be booing, and yawning throughout the movie. ;-)

Avatar

oso

November 28th, 2005 at 5:37 pm

I think del Toro is a great actor. Did anyone see the movie “Fidel” in which pretty boy Gael also played Che? Sadly, it forced otherwise talented Latin American actors to sputter out cheesy lines in English, but it also had a much more balanced look at the revolution and Che than The Motorcycle Diaries.

HP is not the only nutty Pinochet apologist out there.

Avatar

Jennifer Woodard Maderazo

November 28th, 2005 at 9:04 pm

Whoa…those “other apologists” are actually scary.

Avatar

HispanicPundit

November 29th, 2005 at 1:06 am

Hey, I am no Pinochet apologist, I was making a comparison.

But on the other hand, I’d rather be called a ‘Pinochet apologist’ than a ‘Che apologist’, that’s for sure.

Btw, thanks for the subtle compliment JWM, glad to know I’m not ‘actually scary’. ;-)

Hola!

VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse Latin@ diaspora.

About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter

VivirLatino on Facebook


blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Get our RSS Feed!